Hannah Arendt, Martial Arts, and Insurance Brokers
On the taxing of unthinking minds.
God knows there have been enough letters written to enough people over the last couple of years. I’ve written a few myself, but nowhere near enough.
I don’t know if they make an immediate difference, but I believe they all count and they have to be written. If not me then who?
At the very least, I want these letters and emails to tax the otherwise oblivious and unthinking mind of the reader. They might not change what they do, but I want them sleeping a bit less comfortably at night in the knowledge that they might be part of an injurious and fascist enterprise.
Martial Arts
I wrote this letter in late 2021 to the head of a martial arts group that was likely to succumb to government pressure to ban the unjabbed from the gyms. Use those parts that are useful to you.
Dear Professor X
My son and I have been XXX students for over 2.5 years, with most of that time at XXX. It has been one of the best experiences of my life.
Risk
Professionally I am responsible for assessing and managing risk for over XXX financial services businesses across Australia with approximately 30,000 clients.
I am in the business of assessing risk for a living.
I can assure you on any analysis the risk-reward scenario for anyone with other than serious high-risk comorbidities these vaccines do not equate as a sensible choice. So failed are these vaccines that if they were a toaster they would have been recalled after a week, with the global scandals emerging in Israel and many other countries showing a complete lack of efficacy. Not to mention the horrific stories emerging of serious injury, side effects and even death (with which I have close personal experience).
Vaccination
I am writing to you as the leader of XXX that will need to decide soon about the enforcement of vaccination.
You will receive some pressure from members, and you will also receive some pressure from franchisees who are scared of Covid and who believe that vaccination is the solution. You will also undoubtedly receive pressure from the government.
I urge you to stay strong. Do not tap out.
Please do not buckle to the tyranny of the government and do not buckle to the demands of the terrified. Anyone that wants to voluntarily get vaccinated understanding the risks and benefits obviously can do so. But forcing it on people by turning XXX into a vaccinated only space is a historically significant mistake.
Governments globally have waged a campaign of fear that has wildly exaggerated the risks of a real virus and a real disease. Yes, Covid is new and real, but it is not the terror that the government, media, and medical establishment claim it to be.
The reasons why, we could debate but it is clear that at least one of the reasons is to forcibly vaccinate as many people as possible.
The government is restricted in its ability to mandate vaccination so it is relying on business to do what it cannot. To force vaccination on franchisees, employees, and members of the public through the withholding of employment and/or services. Most people do not understand fascism, it’s not an easy concept, but simply put, it’s when the government and business come together against the citizen. The government needs business to do its dirty work[i].
I am asking you to stand up against the tyranny when it comes knocking and protect your gym owners and your members from a forced and not properly tested medical intervention.
I don’t want to make this letter about the medicine, but this is a medical apartheid that we are living under, so I have to mention some medical facts.
Covid
Covid is real, the virus is real, but its threat to society has been exaggerated.
About a year ago the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) globally was calculated at 0.23%[ii] and today that has dropped to 0.15%[iii]. That means for every 1,000 people that get it, one will die. In Australia the average age of a Covid death is 85 (average life expectancy is 82). The IFR of the Flu is about 0.1%, which means that last year it had a societal impact of a bad flu season and this year it is about the same impact on society as the Flu. More dangerous than the Flu for the very old and frail (70+) and much less dangerous than the Flu to the young and healthy (who are the XXX members).
The best database in the world for Covid risk is QCovid[iv] that is maintained by Oxford University and used for Covid research all over the world. You will see that the Absolute Risk (of first getting it and then dying from it) for a 20-year-old healthy male is 1 in 1,000,000. This is UK data where there is at least 5 times more virus than Australia. I recommend you play around with the calculator.
In truth, there are no numbers that justify forced medical intervention and societal segregation, but I mention it for context and a backdrop that highlights the government exaggeration.
Healthy people do not spread the virus
Many have been convinced that you can catch Covid from someone with no symptoms, in other words someone healthy. This is a part of the fear propaganda and is not true. The most important study on this was published in December 2020[v], in simple English, this was a study of studies, 54 studies in fact with 77,758 total participants. It studied households with at least one member of the family having the virus, and how many other people in that family they infected. In other words, “secondary household transmission”. The answer is 0.7%.
For every 100 people that have the virus without symptoms, living with their families, kissing, hugging, arguing, shouting, sexing, and sleeping together without masks, distancing, or vaccines, less than one other person caught the virus from them. Point seven to be precise. The government has purposefully exaggerated the risk. XXX should not be afraid of members that have no symptoms. Simply ask members to stay at home if they have some symptoms, and they will.
Product Defect
The vaccines used in Australia (Pfizer, AstraZeneca and now Moderna) all do the same thing, using genetic material they get your cells to produce what’s called Spike Protein in an attempt to train your immune system. It was thought that the Spike Protein would stay in your arm and that it was safe. We now know that it spreads throughout your whole body, and it is cytotoxic (damaging to cells)[vi].
Because of the rushed testing (3.4 months for AstraZeneca and 2 months for Pfizer) these problems were not properly investigated or discovered. Vaccines normally go through 7-10 years of proper testing.
The Spike Protein problems are too many to mention here but they range from dramatically increased rates of micro-clotting, pulmonary embolism, miscarriage, menstrual cycle disruption, stroke, and many other conditions. There are at least 41 conditions that have significantly increased above their normal rates. Pulmonary embolism (little clots in the lungs) for example is calculated to have risen by 473 times above normal rates (see page 18 here[vii]).
Just one of the many and recent studies shows that the vaccine is 6 times riskier to teenage boys than Covid[viii].
XXX knows that I have been studying this from the beginning and did a webinar recently on the subject that you may wish to watch here[ix]. But if you were to watch one thing and one thing only, I would ask you to put the time in to watch this recent interview with Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most published and cited doctors in the world. It is just over an hour but the best video I have come across to explain the problems with the vaccine.
Perspectives on the Pandemic with Dr. Peter McCullough
The vaccine is not safe, and it is not effective. Evidence from the United Kingdom, Israel and elsewhere demonstrates that these vaccines do not prevent infection with Covid, nor transmission of Covid, nor hospitalisation, nor death.
Given they do not serve to protect either people contracting or transmitting the virus; the entire house of cards around mandatory vaccinations falls over at the first hurdle. Those wishing to take the things (because they think there is adequate safety data available and think that somehow their symptoms will be lessened) should be free to take those risks themselves.
Liability
The risks associated with these vaccines are well documented.
Whilst some franchisees, employers and associations have noted a concern regarding “what if I get sued if a staff member gets Covid?” the exact opposite presents as a greater risk for anyone “mandating” a vaccine.
Through forced, mandated, tactic insistence - one clearly exposes themselves to significant damages claims in circumstances whereby the recipient of a vaccine can demonstrate they were coerced into receiving one and injury or worse resulted.
This is not a good government Professor XXX, and they should not be supported in any way.
Please protect your owners and members from the risks of these injections and please do not allow your wonderful organisation to be part of a two-tier medical apartheid society.
Sincerely
Unbekoming
I am quite confident that he read it, but I only received a curt reply from his receptionist. He went ahead and opened up the gyms to the jabbed only. I know that many of the small gym owners, within his franchise, would have had no option but to do that as financially they simply couldn’t afford to stay shut. I don’t begrudge him his decision as head of the group, but I wasn’t prepared for it to be a psychological freebie. My intent at the very least was to tax a likely unthinking mind.
Insurance broker
In Nov 2021, I received a lovely digital newsletter from a general insurance broker we deal with. I would get something from him on a monthly basis. I hardly ever read them, but my radar is highly sensitive to “vaccine” related issues, and so I noticed this oh so helpful article within the newsletter.
I felt my blood pressure rise.
Here was our broker sending out advice to his long list of clients, many of them employers, explaining to them that it would be “lawful and reasonable” to coerce their staff into surrendering to a genetic injection.
The NSW Government was actively encouraging employers to do its coercive dirty work. The government either didn’t want to, or couldn’t, mandate the jab across the State so they called on any and all business and association collaborators to do the direct day to day bullying of their employees.
Did I say that my blood pressure was rising?
So, I fired off the following email.
Billy
That’s disappointing that you would promote the tools of mandatory vaccination. Forcing people into a risky medical intervention so they can keep their homes and feed their kids is a poor way to fill a newsletter.
Please do better about informing yourself, otherwise I encourage you to stay silent on the subject.
The author, Joel Zyngier, is silent on the risk of Covid, which sits now at about 0.1% (it was 0.23% about 1 years ago), on par with the societal risk of the flu. That means that out of 1,000 that catch the bug, 1 will die in Australia with an average age of 85 (higher than life expectancy) and 76% chance that they live in high dependency aged care. He is also silent on the risk of the jab.
The stories of severe injury and death are piling up, and unreported. Please again, inform yourself about what is going on in Australia.
An Alarming Truth – Covid Vaccines (an Australian whistleblower documentary)
19 Australian "Vaccine" Injury Stories
10 More Australian “Vaccine” Casualty Stories
Anyone encouraging employers to force this injection should also be encouraging them to have an adequate risk analysis on file for when they are sued, and to also provide their employees with an indemnity against all costs related to injury from the jab they coerced them to get.
By the way, the jabs don’t prevent you catching the bug, nor developing Covid nor spreading it. In other words, they do not work as advertised.
You are welcome to circulate these links in your next newsletter to give your readers a more balanced view on the risks of the jabs.
Regards
Unbekoming
Here was his reply:
Dear Unbekoming,
Happy to hear from you although via a contentious perspective. A few notes in response to your email.
I maintain the individual’s right to make a choice of vaccination.
The government has mandated vaccination in some roles in the community.
Employers have risks associated with implementing and monitoring those roles and requirements, and also general WH&S responsibilities to the general employment workforce and also to customers that may contract this and other disease in the interaction with those businesses.
My role as a risk advisor is to assist in the raising awareness of risk and ways to mitigate this.
I hope you are well and trust you understand this perspective, as I respect the right for you to have yours.
Kind regards,
Your insurance broker who is too lazy to read up on the genetics and clearly does NOT understand Risk
I didn’t bother responding, and I never saw him promote the links I gave him about jab injuries in his newsletter. But so far, I also haven’t seen him write again about mandatory jabs.
Hannah Arendt
And lastly, Amos Elon, in his beautiful introduction to Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem, wrote:
She concluded that Eichmann's inability to speak coherently in court was connected with his incapacity to think, or to think from another person's point of view. His shallowness was by no means identical with stupidity. He personified neither hatred or madness nor an insatiable thirst for blood, but something far worse, the faceless nature of Nazi evil itself, within a closed system run by pathological gangsters, aimed at dismantling the human personality of its victims.
The Nazis had succeeded in turning the legal order on its head, making the wrong and the malevolent the foundation of a new "righteousness." In the Third Reich evil lost its distinctive characteristic by which most people had until then recognized it. The Nazis redefined it as a civil norm.
Conventional goodness became a mere temptation which most Germans were fast learning to resist. Within this upside-down world Eichmann (perhaps like Pol Pot four decades later) seemed not to have been aware of having done evil. In matters of elementary morality, Arendt warned, what had been thought of as decent instincts were no longer to be taken for granted.
In The Origins of Totalitarianism, she still held on to a Kantian notion of radical evil, the evil that, under the Nazis, corrupted the basis of moral law, exploded legal categories, and defied human judgment. In Eichmann in Jerusalem, and in the bitter controversies about it that followed, she insisted that only good had any depth. Good can be radical; evil can never be radical, it can only be extreme, for it possesses neither depth nor any demonic dimension yet-and this is its horror!-it can spread like a fungus over the surface of the earth and lay waste the entire world.
Evil comes from a failure to think. It defies thought for as soon as thought tries to engage itself with evil and examine the premises and principles from which it originates, it is frustrated because it finds nothing there. That is the banality of evil.
Yes indeed, evil comes from a failure to think. My broker, like so many others, are failing to think.
[ii] Bulletin of the World Health Organization
[iii] Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of COVID-19: An overview of systematic evaluations
[iv] Risk Calculator | QCovid™ risk calculator
[v] Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
[vi] Dr. Hoffe explains the mechanism of action of spike proteins produced after a Covid shot
[vii] Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America
[viii] STUDY: Covid Vaccine 6 Times Riskier for Teenage Boys Than Covid Itself
Great stuff. You deserve much wider readership.
Why do people immediately default to a defensive stance when their wrong-doings are pointed out to them? Those were brilliant letters you wrote, and anyone with half a brain cell or an iota of compassion would have taken them to heart.