Five Walls

An Essay

A Note Before Reading

This essay is long. The subject demands it. What follows is an attempt to map an entire system of extraction — five interlocking deceptions that have operated for over a century to redirect attention from the actual causes of illness toward profitable interventions. That architecture cannot be sketched in a thousand words.

This is also an advanced discussion. If you have not yet questioned vaccination — if the phrase “safe and effective” still sounds like science rather than marketing — this essay will move too fast. Start with the first wall. Read the evidence. Let it settle. The map will be here when you need it.

The intended reader is someone who has already broken through one or two walls. You refused the shots, or you stopped suppressing every symptom, or you recognised that bacteria are not the enemy. But something still holds you. You sense there are more layers. You are right. This essay is the meta-map: a view of the entire prison for those who have begun to see that they are in one. It shows you where the remaining walls stand and why the wall you have not yet questioned is the wall that still contains you.

There is no partial escape. Each wall you leave intact is a wall that keeps you inside the extraction system. The journey moves from the inside out — from the innermost circle where you were captured at birth, through each successive barrier, until you finally confront the outermost wall: the one disguised as your own identity.

What follows is that map.

---

Support Independent Research

This work remains free because paid subscribers make it possible. If you find value here, consider joining them.

What paid subscribers get: Access to the Deep Dive Audio Library — 180+ in-depth discussions (30-50 min each) exploring the books behind these essays. New discussions added weekly. That’s 100+ hours of content for less than the price of a single audiobook.

[Upgrade to Paid – $5/month or $50/year]

Get in touch Essay ideas, stories, or expertise to share: unbekoming@outlook.com

---

There are four causes of disease: toxic exposure, nutritional deficiency, electromagnetic radiation, and chronic stress. There are over 70,000 ICD diagnostic codes. The gap between these numbers is where the money is.

More than 350,000 synthetic chemicals saturate modern life. Glyphosate laces the food supply. Heavy metals accumulate in tissues. Endocrine disruptors line food containers, saturate thermal receipt paper, infuse drinking water. Vaccines inject aluminium, mercury, formaldehyde, and foreign proteins directly into the bloodstream beginning within hours of birth. Industrial agriculture strips minerals from soil while processing strips nutrients from what grows in it. Artificial electromagnetic fields blanket the planet at intensities unimaginable a century ago. And the chronic stress of modern existence — compounded by emotional patterns encoded in childhood — depletes the body’s adaptive capacity faster than it can be restored.

The body responds to these insults with symptoms.

Inflammation brings repair resources to damaged tissue. Fever accelerates metabolic clearing. Mucus encapsulates and removes irritants. Fatigue enforces rest so energy can be redirected to healing. Diarrhoea rapidly clears toxins from the digestive tract. Skin eruptions push poisons outward rather than letting them circulate internally. Pain signals that something requires attention. These are not malfunctions. They are the body’s intelligence at work — a system refined over millions of years doing exactly what it was designed to do.

The modern medical system takes these intelligent responses and inverts them. Healing gets labelled as disease. The label generates a billing code. The code justifies a prescription. The prescription suppresses the symptom — which is to say, it chemically interrupts the body’s repair process. The underlying cause continues. New symptoms emerge. These receive new labels, new codes, new prescriptions. The child who walked into the clinic with his body intelligently responding to toxic insult walks out as a patient, a customer, whose lifetime value to the pharmaceutical industry runs to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

A child eats processed food saturated with glyphosate, artificial colours, and preservatives for years. His body, doing exactly what it evolved to do, initiates a detoxification response. Mucus production increases to flush irritants. Inflammation rises to repair damaged tissue. A fever develops to accelerate metabolic clearing. His mother, frightened by the symptoms, takes him to the doctor. The doctor delivers a diagnosis: respiratory infection, or allergic rhinitis, or asthma — depending on which symptoms present most prominently and which billing code applies. The diagnosis triggers a prescription. The prescription — an antibiotic, an antihistamine, a steroid, or all three — suppresses the symptoms. The child feels better, which is to say: his body’s repair mechanisms have been chemically interrupted.

The toxins that provoked the response remain. The underlying damage continues. Weeks or months later, new symptoms emerge. The antibiotics have disrupted his gut microbiome, producing what will be diagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome. The steroids have weakened his immune regulation, producing what will be diagnosed as recurrent infections. The antihistamines have masked an escalating sensitivity that will eventually be diagnosed as severe allergy requiring an EpiPen prescription and lifelong vigilance. Each diagnosis generates treatment. Each treatment generates consequences. Each consequence generates further diagnosis. The child who walked into the clinic with his body intelligently responding to toxic insult walks out as a patient, a customer, whose lifetime value to the pharmaceutical industry runs to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Florence Nightingale understood this over a century ago: “The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions.”

The symptoms are real. The suffering is real. What is artificial is the conversion of symptoms into seventy thousand named entities — entities that justify intervention, generate revenue, and ensure the patient remains within the system. A cured patient is a lost customer. A managed patient is an annuity. The language of modern medicine reveals the business model: diabetes is managed, hypertension is managed, depression is managed, arthritis is managed. Never cured. Never resolved. Managed. Billed. Renewed.

This is extraction dressed as healthcare — the systematic transfer of wealth from those experiencing the body’s healing responses to those who have learned to interrupt and exploit them. In the United States alone, healthcare spending exceeds four trillion dollars annually, nearly twenty percent of GDP. Seventy-six percent of American adults are now chronically ill. These two figures are not a paradox. They are cause and effect. The spending does not produce health. It produces customers.

But the extraction requires more than simple profit motive. It requires a population that cannot see what is happening to it. It requires explanatory frameworks that redirect attention from the four actual causes of illness toward explanations that demand medical intervention while protecting industrial interests. It requires walls.

---

The Architecture

Five concentric walls surround every person born into the modern medical extraction system. The first wall — the innermost circle, encountered from the first hours of life — is vaccination: mass poisoning marketed as prevention. The second is allopathic medicine itself, the inversion that suppresses symptoms while ignoring the body’s intelligent healing responses. The third is bacteriology, the confusion of firefighters with firestarters. The fourth is virology and its twin fiction, contagion — neither yet proven despite a century of trying. The fifth wall — the outermost circle, the final barrier to freedom — is genetics: the claim that your DNA is defective, that disease is destiny, that no environmental factor is responsible for your condition and no solution exists except lifelong pharmaceutical management.

Each wall serves the same function: to redirect attention from the four assaults on human health toward explanations that generate dependence on the medical system. Each wall captures a different population. Many who escape one wall remain held by another. Some who refuse vaccines never question their prescriptions. Some who grasp the terrain paradigm still believe viruses spread through populations. Some who reject every pharmaceutical intervention accept a genetic diagnosis without hesitation.

The awakening moves from inside out. Escape the first wall and you still face four more. Escape four walls and the fifth — the outermost, the one disguised as identity — still contains you. The extraction requires only that you accept one wall, any wall, to keep you as a customer. The architecture is designed so that the wall you never question is the wall that holds you.

What follows is a tour of the prison. The key is already in your hand: four causes, not seventy thousand diseases. The body heals; it does not malfunction. Symptoms communicate; they do not attack. Hold that key and each wall becomes visible for what it is — not protection, not science, not identity, but containment.

---

The First Wall: Vaccination

The innermost wall catches people before they can think. Within hours of birth, before the blood-brain barrier has fully formed, before the immune system has developed, the first injection occurs. By age two, a child in the United States has received over twenty injections. By eighteen, over seventy doses of various vaccines are on the CDC schedule. Each one administered to a body that cannot consent and a parent operating on trust.

That trust has a specific origin. In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, granting vaccine manufacturers complete immunity from liability for injuries caused by their products. The legislation followed a series of lawsuits that threatened to bankrupt the industry. Rather than requiring safer products, the government removed all financial consequence for harm. A special “Vaccine Court” was established, funded by a tax on vaccines, in which the Department of Health and Human Services — the same agency responsible for promoting vaccines — serves as the respondent defending against injury claims.

Since 1988, that court has paid out roughly five billion dollars in compensation for vaccine injuries. That figure appears to represent a fraction of the real damage. A study conducted from 2007 to 2010 by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality found that fewer than one percent of vaccine adverse events are reported. If all injuries were reported and brought to court, the total damages could exceed five hundred billion dollars.

Aaron Siri’s forensic legal analysis delivered a finding that should have shut down the programme. Not a single routine childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule was licensed on the basis of a true inert placebo-controlled trial. The clinical trials that formed the basis for licensure used other vaccines, or vaccine adjuvants, as the “placebo” — making it impossible to identify the actual safety profile of any individual product. The entire evidence base for vaccine safety rests on comparisons between one set of reactive ingredients and another.

The ingredients themselves are a matter of public record. The CDC’s own Vaccine Excipient Summary lists formaldehyde, thimerosal (a mercury compound), aluminium salts, polysorbate 80, monosodium glutamate, bovine serum albumin, and cells derived from aborted human foetuses, among others. The NIH, in response to a Freedom of Information request from the Informed Consent Action Network, conceded that it possesses no studies assessing the safety of injecting aluminium adjuvants — despite aluminium appearing in the majority of childhood vaccines.

Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and one of the most prominent vaccine advocates in America, has confirmed that vaccines contain cells from aborted foetuses. Stanley Plotkin, considered the godfather of modern vaccines, admitted under oath to using tissue from seventy-six aborted foetuses for a single study, all three months or older and normally developed. The same deposition revealed experimentation on orphans, mentally handicapped individuals, and babies of incarcerated mothers.

The historical record extends further back than most people realise. Military vaccination records document mass casualties from the vaccines themselves. During 1917–1918, over 30,000 soldiers in one army were hospitalised by vaccination disease. In 1942, the yellow fever vaccine caused 28,505 cases of hepatitis with 62 deaths among American troops in prime condition. Shortly after the Salk polio vaccine’s introduction in 1955, the American Public Health Service announced 168 confirmed polio cases among the vaccinated with six deaths. In nine out of ten cases, paralysis occurred in the arm where the vaccine had been injected. The State Health Director of Idaho halted inoculations, stating: “We have lost confidence in the Salk Vaccine.”

The communities that opted out entirely tell the most important story. Amish populations that do not vaccinate have virtually no autism, allergies, or chronic childhood disease. Their children do not suffer from the epidemics of asthma, ADHD, chronic inflammatory conditions, and food allergies that afflict their vaccinated peers. Their existence is a controlled experiment that the medical establishment refuses to study — because the results would demolish the justification for the programme. The largest vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study to date, published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research by Joy Garner in 2024, found that unvaccinated persons are incommensurably healthier than vaccinated persons across virtually every health measure examined.

In the 1970s, autism affected approximately one in ten thousand children. In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, granting manufacturers complete immunity from liability. The number of mandated doses has since tripled. The autism rate has risen in lockstep — now affecting roughly one in thirty-six. Correlation is not causation, as the reflex response goes. But the temporal association, the dose-response relationship, the biological plausibility established by the ingredients involved, the absence of the condition in unvaccinated populations, and the systematic refusal to conduct the comprehensive vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study that would settle the question — taken together, these satisfy the Bradford Hill criteria more convincingly than most pharmaceutical products that have been accepted as causing harm.

The Institute of Medicine’s 2011 report examined vaccine adverse events and, for the vast majority, could not determine whether the vaccine did or did not cause the health problems. As Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Brian Hooker observed: for almost ninety percent of the vaccine adverse events examined, the CDC has never completed sufficient studies to affirm or rule out a causal relationship. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. It is evidence that the studies are not being run. The hepatitis B vaccine’s own package insert states: “ENGERIX-B has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of male fertility in animals.” The product is injected into newborns within hours of birth.

The first wall is the entry point of extraction. Each injection represents not just immediate revenue but potential long-term customer acquisition. The vaccine that sensitises the immune system creates a patient requiring immunosuppressants for the resulting chronic inflammation. The vaccine that causes neurological damage creates a patient requiring psychiatric medication, behavioural therapy, and residential care. The injection that initiates chronic illness at two months of age creates a customer for life.

Many people now see this wall. Vaccination rates are declining despite mandates. COVID accelerated the awakening — millions who had trusted institutions watched athletes collapse, saw adverse events dismissed as coincidence, experienced censorship of their own observations. The first wall is cracking.

But escaping vaccination is necessary and insufficient. The person who refuses vaccines but runs to the doctor every time their child develops a fever remains inside the system. They have crossed one wall only to be caught by the next.

---

The Second Wall: Allopathic Medicine

The person who rejects vaccination but accepts the allopathic framework has exchanged one form of captivity for another. The second wall is the medical system itself — not its individual practitioners, many of whom entered medicine to help people, but its foundational logic. That logic is inversion: the body’s intelligent healing responses are classified as pathology requiring suppression.

Your child develops a fever. The fever is creating optimal conditions for cellular detoxification and repair — elevated temperature accelerates metabolic waste removal, breaks down damaged proteins, and enhances cellular regeneration. The body’s own healthy cells, adapted to these temperatures, thrive. The chills that accompany fever are raising core temperature to therapeutic levels. This is precision engineering, refined across evolutionary time.

The doctor prescribes paracetamol. The fever drops. The repair process is interrupted. The toxins that provoked the response remain. The parent is relieved. The body’s work is undone.

Multiply this by every symptom. Inflammation brings repair resources to damaged tissue — steroids suppress it. Mucus encapsulates and removes irritants — decongestants dry it up. Diarrhoea clears toxins from the digestive tract — anti-diarrhoeals stop it. Pain signals that something requires attention — painkillers silence it. Fatigue enforces rest — stimulants override it. In every case, the treatment interrupts the healing and leaves the cause in place.

The system profits from this at every step. The medical establishment takes the body’s responses, assigns them names from a catalogue of seventy thousand diagnostic codes, and converts each name into a billing event. Autopsy data reveals the scale of overdiagnosis: approximately half of older men have prostate cancer at autopsy, yet only three percent die from it. The New England Journal of Medicine reported that 1.3 million American women were overdiagnosed with breast cancer over thirty years — subjected to surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy for conditions that required no treatment. These women become statistical “survivors” while suffering enormous harm from unnecessary interventions.

The extraction cascade is mechanical. Diagnosis generates prescription. Prescription generates side effects. Side effects generate new diagnoses. The SSRI user develops anxiety requiring benzodiazepines that cause insomnia needing sleep aids that create dependency requiring addiction treatment. The statin patient develops muscle weakness leading to falls requiring surgery complicated by infections necessitating antibiotics that destroy gut health. Each step generates revenue. Each step binds the patient more tightly to the system.

The most dangerous moment in any illness is not the onset of symptoms but the moment someone in a white coat gives those symptoms a name. A diagnosis programmes expectations. Research on the nocebo effect demonstrates that negative expectations produce negative outcomes with measurable physiological force. Patients told they will experience side effects experience them — even when given inert placebos. Patients told they have terminal illness die on schedule — even when autopsy reveals their condition was survivable. The authority of the diagnostician creates the reality the diagnosis describes. Once you accept a diagnosis, you have agreed to play a role: the victim of a mysterious ailment that only medical intervention can address. Your swollen joints are not your body adapting to inflammation — they are “arthritis” requiring lifelong medication. Your fatigue is not your body enforcing needed rest — it is “chronic fatigue syndrome” requiring pharmaceutical management.

Mark Gober, in An End to Upside Down Medicine, identifies the two pillars of the allopathic approach: reductionism and a focus on symptoms rather than root causes. The model reduces complex conditions to single tangible causes addressable by single pharmaceutical treatments — “one disease, one cause, one miracle pill.” It ignores the possibility that disease conditions arise from a mosaic of factors. It views humans as biological robots destined for specific ailments based on their genetics. It is, in Gober’s framing, not merely incomplete but structurally incapable of producing health.

The economic logic is precise. There is no money in telling someone their symptoms represent a response to toxic exposure, and that addressing the exposure will resolve the symptoms. There is no money in correcting a nutritional deficiency with inexpensive dietary changes. There is no money in recommending reduced EMF exposure or addressing chronic stress. There are trillions in the alternative. Drug companies profit from chronic disease, not health. A system that acknowledged only four causes would have no need for thousands of specialists, millions of diagnostic tests, or the pharmaceutical industry’s trillion dollars in annual global revenue. The complexity is manufactured because complexity is profitable.

Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, admitted that perhaps half of the scientific literature is simply untrue. Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, wrote that the profession has been bought by the pharmaceutical industry. These admissions were published. Nothing changed. The journals themselves are owned by the same investment firms — BlackRock, Vanguard — that hold major stakes in pharmaceutical companies. The Lancet generates two million euros from reprints when a positive drug study is published.

The second wall holds the vast majority of the population. Even many who refuse vaccines will rush to suppress a fever, fill an antibiotic prescription, accept a diagnosis without questioning what the symptom was trying to accomplish. The inversion is so complete, so deeply embedded in cultural assumption, that questioning it sounds like advocacy for suffering. It is the opposite. It is advocacy for letting the body complete the work it started — and for addressing what caused the work to begin.

Some do escape this wall. They discover functional medicine, terrain-based approaches, or simply observe that their health improves when they stop suppressing symptoms and start supporting the body’s processes. But many of these people still accept the foundational claim beneath allopathic medicine: that microbes are the enemy.

---

The Third Wall: Bacteriology

The third wall predates the pharmaceutical industry but was adopted by it because the logic was irresistible: an invisible enemy that only expensive intervention can defeat.

Germ theory, in its dominant form, proposes that specific external microorganisms invade the body and cause specific diseases. The practical implications follow directly: identify the pathogen, develop a weapon to kill it, sell that weapon to the frightened. Each identified enemy represents a market. Each market justifies a product line. The conceptual framework is indistinguishable from a business plan.

Antoine Béchamp, working alongside and often ahead of Louis Pasteur in the nineteenth century, proposed an alternative that threatened this model entirely. His terrain paradigm argued that the body’s internal environment determines whether disease develops. Microorganisms found at the site of illness were not invaders causing damage but responders cleaning it up — drawn to diseased tissue the way flies are drawn to garbage without having created the garbage. The critical variable was not which microbe was present but what condition the body was in.

Béchamp identified what he called microzymas — subcellular particles present in all living tissue that could transform into different microbial forms depending on the body’s internal state. When the terrain was healthy, these particles contributed to normal function. When the terrain was compromised through toxic exposure, nutritional deficiency, or other insults, they transformed into bacteria and fungi — not to attack the body but to decompose damaged tissue. Disease, in this framework, was an inside-out process. The microbes were the cleanup crew, not the demolition team.

This concept — pleomorphism, the ability of microorganisms to change form based on environmental conditions — directly contradicted the monomorphism that germ theory required: the claim that each bacterial species has a fixed, unchanging form. If bacteria could shift shape and function depending on the terrain, then the entire edifice of one-bug-one-drug medicine lost its foundation. Researchers like Günther Enderlein documented complex cycles through darkfield microscopy in which tiny colloids in blood could aggregate into bacteria and fungi. Royal Rife claimed to observe cancer-associated microbes shifting between five different forms. Modern science, while rejecting the more extreme claims, has confirmed the core observation: L-form bacteria — cell wall-deficient variants that can pass through filters and resist antibiotics — prove that bacteria possess far greater morphological flexibility than the fixed-form model allows. Dr. Lida Mattman cultured L-forms from patients with multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and various chronic inflammatory conditions, suggesting these forms may explain treatment-resistant infections.

Dr. Marizelle Arce, a naturopathic physician, explains that bacteria are the caretakers of our internal garden, appearing and changing form based on tissue conditions. When synthetic antibiotics force bacteria to adapt through pleomorphism, they do not die — they transform. This is why fungal overgrowth and antibiotic-resistant organisms emerge after treatment. The temporary symptom relief comes not from defeating an enemy but from the body redirecting its energy to eliminate the antibiotic poison itself.

The experimental evidence against simple germ causation was available from the start. Dr. Pettenkofer, professor at the University of Vienna, swallowed glasses containing millions of living cholera germs on multiple occasions. Nothing happened. He did not contract cholera or any other disease. His point was not reckless bravado but scientific demonstration: a healthy terrain does not produce disease regardless of microbial exposure.

What settled the debate was not evidence but money. The 1910 Flexner Report, funded by the Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations, reformed medical education to exclude schools teaching alternative approaches. Within two decades, the number of medical schools in the United States dropped from 162 to 66. Every surviving school adopted the germ theory model. Homeopathy, naturopathy, and any framework that emphasised terrain over pathogen was eliminated from the curriculum. Rockefeller money flowed to compliant institutions. The American Medical Association’s consultation clause prohibited members from associating with alternative practitioners, creating a professional monopoly enforced by economic exclusion.

John D. Rockefeller, who personally used homeopathic physicians, directed his foundations to fund only allopathic schools. The man who understood terrain well enough to choose it for his own family ensured that everyone else’s family would be locked into germ theory and the pharmaceutical products it justified. Pasteur’s simpler model aligned with emerging industrial interests perfectly. Each pathogen meant a new drug to patent and sell. Béchamp’s emphasis on nutrition, detoxification, and internal balance offered nothing to patent.

Modern science has inadvertently validated Béchamp’s core insights while refusing to credit him. The Human Microbiome Project revealed that humans harbour trillions of microbes playing crucial roles in digestion, immunity, and mental health. The same bacterial species can be beneficial or pathogenic depending on context — precisely what the terrain paradigm predicted. Dysbiosis, the disruption of microbial communities leading to disease, is now a mainstream concept. It is the terrain paradigm wearing a lab coat and pretending to be new.

The antibiotic era illustrates what terrain theorists warned about over a century ago. Decades of attempting to sterilise the internal environment have devastated the beneficial microbial communities that actually protect health — while bacteria, as living organisms do, simply adapted to the chemical assault. The problem was never the bacteria. The problem was the war. Hospitals now use probiotics to prevent complications after antibiotic treatment — restoring terrain rather than killing pathogens, exactly as Béchamp prescribed. Fecal microbiota transplants resolve conditions by reintroducing healthy microbial ecosystems. The success of these approaches is an admission, unspoken but unmistakable, that the germ theory model of disease is insufficient.

The third wall captures those who have escaped vaccination and even those who question allopathic symptom suppression, but who still believe that bacteria are enemies to be fought. The parent who refuses vaccines and avoids unnecessary prescriptions but reaches for antibiotics when their child has an ear infection remains inside the extraction system. They have broken through the innermost walls but accepted the logic that still surrounds them: that microbes attack from without and must be destroyed.

Some see through this wall. They recognise bacteria as participants in the body’s ecology, not hostile invaders. They understand that the terrain determines the outcome. But even among these, many accept a still deeper claim — that something smaller and more sinister than bacteria threatens them. Something invisible, contagious, and everywhere.

---

The Fourth Wall: Virology and Contagion

The fourth wall is the most consequential in practical terms. Virology and its twin fiction, contagion, provide the intellectual foundation for mass vaccination, lockdowns, mandates, quarantines, and the largest transfers of wealth and liberty in modern history. Without the belief that invisible particles spread from person to person causing disease, the entire apparatus of pandemic preparedness — and the trillions that flow through it — collapses.

The foundational methodology of virology was established in a 1954 paper by John Franklin Enders and Thomas Peebles, for which Enders received a Nobel Prize. Their method for “isolating” a virus involved taking fluids from a sick patient and adding them to a cell culture containing monkey kidney cells, antibiotics, and fetal bovine serum. When the cells broke down, this was declared evidence of a virus. The method became the gold standard for all subsequent virology.

The problem is that no proper control was ever run. Dr. Mark Bailey, in his comprehensive paper “A Farewell to Virology,” documents that the 1954 study did not include a parallel experiment applying the same cell-culture conditions without the patient’s fluids to determine whether the cell culture process itself caused the breakdown. When Enders and Peebles did observe cellular breakdown in an uninoculated culture of monkey kidney cells, they noted it “could not be distinguished with confidence from the viruses obtained from measles.” They observed the same result without any sick patient’s material — and continued to claim they had found a virus.

Stefan Lanka conducted the control experiment that virology has avoided for seventy years. In 2021, he subjected cell cultures to the standard virological protocol — antibiotics, nutrient starvation, the same chemical environment — without adding any material from a sick person. The cells broke down. The particles produced were indistinguishable from those claimed to be viruses. The cell-culture process itself generates the very results that virology interprets as evidence of viral presence.

Andreas Podbielski, head of the Department of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene at the University Hospital in Rostock, testified during a German court proceeding that while the existence of the measles virus could be concluded from six key papers, none of the authors had conducted controlled experiments in accordance with internationally defined rules and principles of good scientific practice. He called this lack of controls a “methodological weakness” — and noted that no other publications attempting to prove the measles virus’s existence even exist.

Christine Massey has aggregated Freedom of Information responses from over two hundred institutions in forty countries, asking for records of any virus being isolated directly from a sick patient — purified, photographed, and biochemically characterised from a clinical sample. None has provided such records. The CDC’s November 2020 response stated: “A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request.” New Zealand’s ESR responded: “ESR has not performed any experiments to scientifically prove the existence of SARS-CoV-2 virus.” In a separate request about whether the virus causes COVID-19 disease, the ESR responded identically: no experiments performed.

The HART organisation — distinguished doctors, scientists, and academics in the United Kingdom — published a critique of the no-virus position in 2023. In the course of defending virology, they explicitly acknowledged that “there has never been a pure isolate of SARS-CoV-2 virus.” Their explanation: “This could be because no-one has tried hard enough to carry out this work.” Three years into a pandemic that reshaped global society, and no one tried hard enough to isolate the agent supposedly responsible.

Contagion itself — the claim that disease transmits from person to person — lacks the experimental support that its universal acceptance would imply. Milton Rosenau conducted experiments during the Spanish Flu in 1918, detailed in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Working with the U.S. Navy and Public Health Service, he used one hundred volunteers at Gallops Island in the Boston Harbor Islands. The sequence of escalation reveals how determined the experimenters were — and how completely their expectations were confounded.

First, pure cultures of influenza bacillus were administered into volunteers’ nostrils. None got sick. Then large quantities of various strains — billions of organisms by their estimate — were sprayed into noses, eyes, and throats. None got sick. Then mucous secretions from the mouth, nose, throat, and bronchi of actively ill patients were sprayed into the volunteers. None got sick. Wondering if the four-hour delay between extraction and administration was the problem, they reduced the interval to under two hours. None got sick. Suspecting the salt solution might interfere, they transferred diseased material directly from nose to nose and throat to throat using cotton swabs. None got sick. The volunteers were watched carefully for seven days after each attempt. Not one developed influenza or any other illness.

Rosenau stated in conclusion: “Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.” Dr. McCoy, conducting a parallel series at Goat Island in San Francisco with volunteers who had no prior exposure to the outbreak, obtained identical negative results. This was supposed to be the deadliest pandemic in world history. The experimenters could not make it spread under conditions far more aggressive than any natural contact.

The polio narrative provides an instructive case study. From 1945 to 1952, as DDT use exploded across America — sprayed on beaches, in homes, on crops, directly on children and dairy cows — polio cases rose from 25,000 to 280,000. When farmers reduced DDT use in 1951–52 due to livestock deaths, polio cases plummeted by two-thirds before the Salk vaccine was deployed. Morton Biskind testified to Congress in 1950 about treating hundreds of DDT poisoning cases whose symptoms matched polio exactly. These patients recovered when DDT exposure ended. Ralph Scobey noted that polio wards never saw transmission between patients. The toxicological explanation was buried. The virus theory — and the vaccine profits it justified — prevailed.

An Antarctic base study after seventeen weeks of complete isolation found eight of twelve men developing cold symptoms simultaneously — timed not with human contact but with a sudden drop in temperature. No outside pathogen could have reached them. Their bodies responded to the same environmental stress at the same time.

The fourth wall is the load-bearing structure of the extraction system. Without contagion, there is no justification for mass vaccination. Without viruses, there is no pandemic preparedness industry. Without invisible enemies, fear cannot be manufactured at scale. The person who grasps this — who understands that no virus has been properly isolated, that contagion lacks experimental proof, that the entire virology enterprise rests on uncontrolled experiments and institutional assertion — has escaped the wall that justifies the greatest interventions.

But even this person can be recaptured. The system has one more wall, and it is the most formidable of all.

---

The Fifth Wall: Genetics

Someone close to me who has struggled with liver problems for years recently received a diagnosis: alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. He was told that fifty percent of the proteins his liver produces are faulty, that his liver and lungs must work double-time to remove them. Another person close to me, a woman in her mid-30s, was told she has a genetic heart condition — and that her father and brother also have it. “It runs in the family.” Meanwhile, Good Morning Britain runs a segment urging Black people to get tested for the APOL1 gene, which supposedly puts one in ten people of Caribbean or African heritage at risk for kidney failure. A new campaign. A new population targeted. A new genetic framework for diagnosis.

The system is pivoting. And genetics is the pivot.

The Human Genome Project launched in 1990 with extraordinary promises. Francis Collins, its most prominent champion, told the world that decoding human DNA would unlock the secrets of common diseases — cancer, diabetes, heart disease, mental illness. Identify the responsible genes, develop targeted treatments, transform medicine into a precise science of genetic management. Billions of dollars flowed into the project.

The results were a catastrophe for the theory and a bonanza for the industry. Genome-wide association studies, the primary tool for finding disease genes, examined hundreds of thousands of people across hundreds of studies. Jonathan Latham and Allison Wilson of Independent Science News assessed the findings: the studies found almost nothing. The genetic variants identified explained tiny fractions of disease risk — typically less than five percent, often less than one. The “missing heritability” problem became the field’s defining embarrassment. The genes that were supposed to explain why people get sick could not be found because, in the way the theory required them to exist, they do not.

Dr. Marizelle, in her essay “Genetics is Not a Fraud, it’s Worse,” identifies a problem more fundamental than failed methodology. The gene itself is a conceptual construct, not a discovered entity. Gregor Mendel never described genes — he spoke of abstract “factors,” mathematical conveniences used to account for ratios in pea plants. Wilhelm Johannsen introduced the term “gene” in 1909, explicitly defining it as a conceptual unit, an accounting device for heredity rather than a demonstrated physical structure. No one has ever observed a gene operating inside a living organism. The entity that supposedly determines your health destiny has never been seen performing the function attributed to it.

The testing regime built on this foundation fails when subjected to basic scientific scrutiny. Genetic tests claiming 99.9 percent accuracy collapse under blinding — when clinicians do not know which results are “positive,” their diagnostic and treatment recommendations change dramatically. Prenatal genetic screening drives termination decisions based on false positive rates that would constitute malpractice in any other context. The stem cell biology of fetal development means chromosomal abnormalities detected in early samples may be confined to the placenta while the foetus develops normally. What appears permanent in amplified DNA data may be transient in biological reality. The developing child is a dynamic system with inherent repair capacity that no test measures.

The cultural framework surrounding prenatal testing connects to institutional interests in fetal tissue. Cell lines derived from elective abortions — HEK-293 and WI-38 among the most widely used — are embedded throughout vaccine development, pharmaceutical testing, and laboratory research. These supply chains require continuous sourcing. Each flagged prenatal abnormality increases the probability of termination. The screening system that presents itself as empowering parental choice channels pregnancies toward institutional outcomes.

The concept of a “PCR positive” result in genetics operates on the same principle as in virology. A positive result means that fragments were copied enough times to be detected by a machine. It does not mean a functional gene has been observed causing a disease process in a living body. Calling amplified fragments evidence of a medical condition is no more justified in genetics than it was during COVID.

Genetic determinism captures even the most awakened because it presents itself not as medicine but as identity. Your genes feel like you in a way that vaccines, prescriptions, bacteria, and viruses do not. To question a genetic diagnosis feels like questioning your own existence. You cannot change your genes. You cannot undo your ancestry. The diagnosis simultaneously assigns you complete responsibility for your condition and removes all agency to address it. You are to blame, but you are also helpless. The only path forward runs through the institutions that diagnosed you. You need their monitoring, their medications, their gene therapies, their lifetime surveillance.

This is the perfect dependent: a patient who believes their body is fundamentally defective, who accepts that decline is written in their cells, who sees the medical system as their only hope. This patient will not investigate environmental causes. This patient will not question. This patient will not refuse. The genetic framework transforms public health failures into private biological misfortunes. No corporation is liable. No regulator is negligent. No lifestyle factor is actionable. You were simply born broken.

The four assaults operate here as everywhere. Chemical exposures create the developmental disruptions that testing attributes to genetic destiny. Electromagnetic exposure affects cellular function in ways that appear as inherited abnormality. Maternal stress and malnutrition shape outcomes that get coded as chromosomal. The testing apparatus converts environmental damage into genetic diagnosis, protecting the sources of harm while enrolling frightened people in lifelong management.

The coming decades will see a genetic therapy industrial complex that dwarfs the vaccine industry. Gene editing, mRNA platforms, personalised genomic medicine — the infrastructure is being built now, justified by a scientific framework that has already collapsed under the weight of its own data.

---

The Architecture of Containment

Seen in isolation, each wall is a separate deception. Seen together, they form something more sophisticated: a self-reinforcing system in which each wall protects the others and the whole protects the four causes from examination.

Vaccination creates damage. That damage produces symptoms. Allopathic medicine labels the symptoms as diseases and prescribes treatments that generate further symptoms. When a culprit is needed, bacteriology and virology provide invisible enemies — germs and viruses — to blame. When those explanations strain credibility, genetics offers the final redirection: the damage was always in your DNA. No external cause needs to be investigated. No industry needs to be held accountable. The circle closes.

The reinforcement runs in every direction. Virology justifies vaccination: without the belief in contagious viruses, there is no case for mass injection. Vaccination creates the chronic illness that allopathic medicine manages. Bacteriology provides the rationale for the antibiotics that devastate the microbiome, generating the dysbiosis that produces new diagnoses. Genetics explains away the vaccine injuries, the iatrogenic damage, the environmental poisoning — all attributed to inherited defect. And allopathic medicine’s symptom-suppression model ensures that no patient ever recovers fully enough to question the entire arrangement.

Pull any single wall out and the others wobble. If virology falls, vaccination loses its justification. If the allopathic inversion is understood, the seventy thousand billing codes collapse to four causes. If bacteriology is reframed, antibiotics lose their rationale. If genetics is exposed, vaccine injuries can no longer be blamed on DNA. The walls need each other. That is both the system’s strength and its vulnerability.

A child receives a vaccine at two months. The aluminium adjuvant triggers an inflammatory response. The inflammation is diagnosed as an immune disorder. Steroids are prescribed. The steroids suppress immune function. Recurrent infections follow, attributed to the diagnosed immune disorder rather than to the steroids or the original injection. Antibiotics are administered, devastating the gut microbiome. Digestive symptoms emerge, diagnosed as a gastrointestinal condition. If the child develops neurological symptoms, the family is told it is genetic. At no point does anyone in the chain look backward to the first injection. Each specialist sees only their segment. The system is designed so that no one holds the full picture — except the pharmaceutical shareholders who profit at every step.

Toby Rogers, the political economist who testified before the U.S. Senate in 2025, named this pattern: biological colonialism. The systematic extraction of wealth from a target population through the deliberate creation of chronic illness. The territory being colonised is not geographic but demographic — the middle class of the developed world, with enough accumulated wealth to extract but insufficient power to resist. The mechanism is not military force but medical intervention. The ideology justifying the extraction is not Christianity or civilisation but Science and Public Health.

A middle-class person has accumulated perhaps one or two million dollars over a lifetime. Initiate a cascade of chronic illness, and that wealth transfers systematically to pharmaceutical shareholders. First the acute symptoms. Then the diagnostic odyssey — specialists, tests, imaging, biopsies. Then chronic management — each specialist prescribing medications that generate new symptoms requiring new specialists. The family liquidates assets in sequence: savings first, then retirement accounts, then home equity. Insurance covers less over time. Within a decade, the accumulated wealth of a lifetime has changed hands.

The genius of the system lies in its invisibility. Traditional colonialism required visible violence, which eventually generated resistance. Biological colonialism operates through trusted authorities in white coats, backed by captured institutions, enforced through mandates presented as protection. The colonised do not resist because they believe they are being saved.

Twenty-seven billion dollars flows annually into pharmaceutical marketing — more than the entire NIH budget. Two-thirds of Congress receive pharmaceutical campaign contributions. Medical school curricula are dictated by conflicted interests — two-thirds of department chairs have financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. Forty percent of medical journal articles are ghostwritten by industry. The revolving door spins continuously: Julie Gerberding from CDC vaccine safety to president of Merck’s vaccine division. Scott Gottlieb from FDA commissioner to Pfizer’s board. The regulators protect the interests of those they will soon work for.

Every wall feeds the architecture. Every wall protects the causes. Every wall generates revenue. And every wall ensures that the person inside it — whether they are an infant receiving their first injection, a middle-aged adult managing a chronic diagnosis, or an elderly patient accepting that their genes have failed them — remains a customer of the system that is making them sick.

---

Where You Stand

You are inside these walls right now. The question is how many.

If you have refused vaccination but still reach for paracetamol when your child develops a fever, the second wall holds you. You have broken through the innermost circle but accepted the inversion at the core of allopathic medicine. Your child’s body is trying to heal. You are interrupting it.

If you distrust pharmaceutical medicine but believe your ear infection requires antibiotics because bacteria are attacking you, the third wall holds you. You have escaped the first two enclosures but accepted the foundational error of germ theory. The bacteria are responding to your terrain. Address the terrain and they will stand down.

If you understand the terrain paradigm but still believe your colleague gave you the flu, the fourth wall holds you. You have grasped that the body’s internal environment matters, but you have not followed the logic to its conclusion. Contagion has never been experimentally demonstrated. Your symptoms are your body responding to your conditions, not to particles transmitted by another person.

If you have questioned vaccines, pharmaceuticals, germ theory, and virology, but accepted a doctor’s statement that your condition is genetic, the fifth wall holds you. You have escaped four enclosures only to be captured by the one that disguises itself as identity. Your genes are not your destiny. The diagnosis is not a discovery about who you are. It is a framework that protects the four causes from investigation while enrolling you as a lifetime customer.

Each wall you have not questioned is a wall that still contains you.

The walls are not as solid as they appear. The vaccine wall is cracking — declining uptake, legal challenges, and the existence of unvaccinated communities with superior health outcomes are forcing the conversation into the open. The allopathic wall weakens every time someone supports a fever instead of suppressing it and watches their child recover faster. The bacteriology wall dissolves under the weight of microbiome science that validates the terrain paradigm while pretending to be novel. The virology wall cannot survive the simple demand: show us the isolated virus. The genetics wall collapses when seven hundred studies looking for disease genes find almost nothing.

The evidence is available. The documents are public. The FOIA responses are filed. The court testimonies are recorded. The clinical trials can be read. The ingredients are listed on package inserts that most patients never see because no doctor offers them. The data does not require credentials to interpret — it requires the willingness to look.

On the other side of all five walls lies something the extraction system cannot tolerate: a population that recognises the sources of its illness, assigns responsibility accurately, and trusts the body’s intelligence to heal when the assaults are removed. Remove the toxins. Restore the nutrients. Reduce the electromagnetic burden. Address the chronic stress — including the emotional patterns that generate physiological stress without conscious awareness. Support the body’s responses rather than suppressing them. Refuse the diagnostic identity.

Consider how different every health decision becomes with this understanding. Instead of taking antacids for heartburn, you investigate what foods your body is rejecting. Rather than suppressing inflammation with steroids, you support the healing process it represents while addressing what caused the tissue damage. When fatigue strikes, instead of pushing through with stimulants, you honour your body’s demand for rest and repair. When your child develops a fever, you stay hydrated, rest, and let the body complete its work. You stop shooting the messenger long enough to receive the message.

The parallel structures are already emerging. Functional medicine addresses root causes rather than managing symptoms. Traditional practices suppressed by Rockefeller medicine are being recovered. Independent researchers are conducting the studies the captured system refuses to fund. Legal challenges have forced disclosure of hidden data. The censorship that was supposed to maintain control has instead driven audiences to seek alternatives. Every parent who researches before consenting, every patient who questions a prescription, every citizen who sees through public health theatre represents a crack in the architecture.

Your body is not malfunctioning. It is responding — to the glyphosate in your food, the deficiencies in your diet, the frequencies saturating your home, the stress you carry but do not address. The fever is doing exactly what it should. So is the inflammation, and the fatigue, and every other symptom you have been taught to fear.

Seventy thousand disease names. Four causes. The gap between these numbers is the extraction zone.

Every wall you see through is a wall that no longer holds you.

---

References

Anonymous. Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth. 2019.

Arce, M. Germs Are Not Our Enemy. 2024.

Bailey, M. “A Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition).” 2022. Available at drsambailey.com.

Béchamp, A. The Blood and Its Third Element. Originally published 1912.

Collins, F. The Language of Life: DNA and the Revolution in Personalized Medicine. Harper, 2010.

Enders, J.F., and Peebles, T.C. “Propagation in Tissue Cultures of Cytopathogenic Agents from Patients with Measles.” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 86(2), 1954.

Flexner, A. Medical Education in the United States and Canada. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1910.

Garner, J. “Health versus Disorder, Disease, and Death: Unvaccinated Persons Are Incommensurably Healthier than Vaccinated.” International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 3(2), 2024.

Gober, M. An End to Upside Down Medicine: Contagion, Viruses, and Vaccines — What the Science Really Says. Waterside, 2023.

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. Electronic Support for Public Health — Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2011.

Horton, R. “Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma?” The Lancet, 385(9976), 2015.

Humphries, S., and Bystrianyk, R. Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History. CreateSpace, 2013.

Informed Consent Action Network. “NIH Concedes It Has No Studies Assessing The Safety Of Injecting Aluminum.” Available at icandecide.org.

Kennedy, R.F. Jr., and Hooker, B. Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak. Skyhorse, 2023.

Lanka, S. Control experiments on cell cultures, 2021.

Latham, J., and Wilson, A. “The Great DNA Data Deficit: Are Genes for Disease a Mirage?” Independent Science News, 2010.

Lester, D., and Parker, D. What Really Makes You Ill? Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong. 2019.

Lipton, B. The Biology of Belief. Hay House, 2005.

Marizelle, Dr. “Genetics is Not a Fraud, it’s Worse.” Undiagnosed (Substack), 2025.

Massey, C. Freedom of Information responses aggregated at fluoridefreepeel.ca.

Mattman, L. Cell Wall Deficient Forms: Stealth Pathogens. CRC Press, 2001.

McBean, E. The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccination. 1957.

Rogers, T. “Biological Colonialism.” Testimony before the U.S. Senate, 2025.

Rogers, T. “Epistemic Capture.” uTobian (Substack), 2025.

Rosenau, M. “Experiments to Determine Mode of Spread of Influenza.” Journal of the American Medical Association, 73(5), August 1919.

Siri, A. “Proof Regarding the Clinical Trials Relied Upon by the FDA to License the Childhood Vaccines on the CDC Childhood Vaccine Schedule.” Available at aaronsiri.substack.com.

West, J.P. DDT/Polio: Virology vs Toxicology. 2023.

---

Book: Medicalized Motherhood: From First Pill to Permanent Patient

Available as a free download. 123 interventions documented across six phases—from pre-conception capture through postpartum surveillance. Includes practical tools: birth plan template, provider interview questions, quick reference card, and a new chapter on interrupting the cascade. Download it, share it with someone facing their first prenatal appointment, their induction date, their cesarean recommendation. The cascade works because women don’t see it coming. This book makes it visible.

Download the free PDF here

Support Independent Research

This work remains free because paid subscribers make it possible. If you find value here, consider joining them.

What paid subscribers get: Access to the Deep Dive Audio Library — 180+ in-depth discussions (30-50 min each) exploring the books behind these essays. New discussions added weekly. That’s 100+ hours of content for less than the price of a single audiobook.

[Upgrade to Paid – $5/month or $50/year]

Get in touch Essay ideas, stories, or expertise to share: unbekoming@outlook.com

New Biology Clinic

For those of you looking for practitioners who actually understand terrain medicine and the principles we explore here, I want to share something valuable. Dr. Tom Cowan—whose books and podcasts have shaped much of my own thinking about health—has created the New Biology Clinic, a virtual practice staffed by wellness specialists who operate from the same foundational understanding. This isn’t about symptom suppression or the conventional model. It’s about personalized guidance rooted in how living systems actually work. The clinic offers individual and family memberships that include not just private consults, but group sessions covering movement, nutrition, breathwork, biofield tuning, and more. Everything is virtual, making it accessible wherever you are. If you’ve been searching for practitioners who won’t look at you blankly when you mention structured water or the importance of the extracellular matrix, this is worth exploring. Use discount code “Unbekoming” to get $100 off the member activation fee. You can learn more and sign up at newbiologyclinic.com