You said at the beginning, "whatever was out there (released not "leaked")". Can you expand on that? It sounds like you think the virus was released. If so, how do you think thst happened and by whom?
This warrants its own article, but I'll try to outline some of the bouncing balls here.
There was either an infectious agent or not. I'm on the Yes side.
It was either a virus or something else. I'm on the something else side.
Which brings us to infectious clones, as per what I have written about Couey before. Search for Couey in my stack.
Which leave us with a manufactured clone.
Which brings us to leaked or released. I'm on the released side. Too much has happened to think this was some silly accident.
Leaked would simply fizzle out, because of natural immunity, it couldn't spread across the world.
So, you land on released.
Where?
Many places, Wuhan, Iran, Italy...and in my view Australia, parts of the US, and any number of other places.
You can aerosolize these things and spray them.
Then you are left with the question of what made the PCRs ping?
And why were there so many "asymptomatic" pings?
If you have 20 years to plan something like this, and there is plenty of evidence for that, then one way to do it is to create a very weak infectious clone, something that if scrutinized will show us as "novel" but that is virtually indistinguishable from a cold and flu and slowly release it around the world over a number of years and make it "endemic". Because nobody is testing for it, you wouldn't know it's there.
Once it's endemic you are ready to light the fire whenever you want or need to (the need question is its own discussion).
But when you are ready, you do a big release in several locations, which will create some disease and death but plenty of fear and propaganda. Then you roll out your special PCRs and they start pinging all over the world.
And you build a story around the dangers of "asymptomatic" spread which the Diamond Princess helped with.
So, in short, it's a giant magic trick that definitely looks like the woman has been cut in half, but in fact there is plenty of elaborate planning and tech that means she isn't.
Fascinating, though not sure anything additional needs to have been released. Looking for something which you think is new but actually was already endemic with a test which cross reacts, especially at insane Ct and in environments with insane levels of cross contamination, can explain things adequately.
What’s your theory on the mysteriously disappearing flu?
The flu question is the right one I think, and I don't know how to answer it, or even how to think about it properly.
It's my understanding that most if not all notifications and deaths are lab confirmed.
I have come to accept "viral interference" as my working model that explains it, but my gut tells me that might be a part of the story, but not the story.
I am open to different ideas on this one. I havent heard any of the dissident doctors give me a solid explanation on this...I have a feeling they dont know either.
The starting point to appreciate is that the number of ILIs - "influenza-like illnesses" - is entirely based on modeling. Routine PCR testing for flu has never been "a thing".
Yes, flu monitoring in various countries does indeed test those with symptoms for the presence of influenza virus
But I cannot be the only one who harbours deep suspicions about PCR testing. So much appears unknown and unreported. For one thing, the Ct levels are basically a state secret. Then there are the primers. Where do these come from? Who certifies them and gainst what standards? How centralized is this process? Whose control might it be under?
On "viral interference" the notion that everybody's upper respiratory tracts combine worldwide to form one ecosystem in which one virus with very similar lethality and symptoms totally replaced another for 2 years - and started to do so upon the declaration of an emergency by the WHO - seems rather fanciful.
AFAIK there is no empirical evidence of this viral phenomenon actually taking place or even research showing how it might occur.
Is all this another example of prior assumptions, via poorly understood mechanisms, resulting in what is assumed to be the case then being found?
Or...All you need are a few CCP-devoted "volunteers" to travel throughout the world unimpeded (as they did before the travel ban from China was instituted far too late) and spread or release whatever it was that would be 'detected' by fake PCR tests.
As important or fascinaing as the origin story may be, it is the RESPONSE that was, and continues to be DEADLY.
At this point of trusting nothing and no one, I have a question about the Diamond Princess: the testing. Do we trust the PCR tests used to distinguish infection in passengers? Why? Fruit tested positive, and Magufuli died; Mullis preceded him in death.
Those 7 deaths out of 712 infected... were the 712 infected with a novel coronavirus, or did they just have stray coronavirus particles in their system to be amplified by PCR until we called it SARS-Cov-2?
Some people say there was no new virus at all. Did the 7 die because approximately that many old comorbid people succumb to respiratory illness on every winter Princess cruise? Who was that gentleman from Hong Kong? Is he as anonymous as the gentleman who brought it from China to Seattle: our Patient Zero, from whom experts extracted a sample of a bodily fluid and found SARS-Cov-2? Did they?
Was the Diamond Princess a controlled experiment from the jump? 🙃
If there was never a virus (as in there was nothing), then the PCR tests pinging on the ship and elsewhere have to be explained in another way. The illness and death too. I don't believe the facts in their totality map over the "there was nothing" thesis, that it was all psychological.
But the facts also don't make over the theory that there was a novel virus racing around the world. Pandemics as they have described them cannot happen, because of natural immunity. They always fizzle out.
So, we are left in the middle, that there was something, but it wasn't the virus described.
Which brings us to infectious clones and the Couey thesis I've written about before. That makes sense to me in a number of ways.
Something had to make the PCRs ping.
I think the clue to the whole thing is the PCRs and what makes them ping. Which also get's you into understanding all the different ways a false positive can be created. It's not just one way.
I'm going to need to gather my thoughts and write about that at some point.
RE: “Half of those that tested positive had no symptoms. Which in English means that they got the deadly virus and were HEALTHY…”
Which means they tested positive. And may or may not have got the virus.
Somewhat analogous to saying that voting is compulsory in Australia. It’s compulsory to have your name ticked off before receiving a ballot paper; after that, how you mark or don’t mark the ballot paper is up to you.
Moreover, statistically-speaking, the deaths that occurred are no different from what we could expect given the number and age profile of the passengers.
Wouldn’t “asymptomatic positives” just be another term for “false positives”? Why call them “cases” if they aren’t sick? Why include them in the total number of “infections”? It throws off all the stats.
The "case" counted was the main engine of fear, and "false" positives was the fuel of the engine. There are many ways you can get a false positives, and I'm sure I don't know all of them.
Also, asymptomatic is just a liar's way of saying healthy.
I love that artwork by Bob. Unfortunately it triggered the memory of the time that, on one anointed day at one anointed hour, we were all supposed to go outside and bang our pots and pans, in solidarity with the front line workers that were busy learning line-dancing moves. That was a dark time, and it affected me deeply. It was them pushing us to primal reaction, mass formation behavior.
The Diamond Princess story was an AHA! moment for a lot of sheeple. It certainly should be promoted again!
The line dancing at hospitals, as a psychological and propaganda strategy must have a name. I'm still looking for it. There must be a psyop book for dummies somewhere that describes the technique. It's deeply sophisticated.
This reminds me of all those dancing nurses videos in empty hospitals while we were in this “most deadly pandemic”
It’s a form of highly specialised gaslighting and mind fuckery I think, and very purposeful…I’ve struggled to put my finger on what it is exactly.
It’s something like this I think…they use “comedy” to make us “feel good” about the fact that they are using comedy to make fun of the fact that they can do whatever they want to us, and we won’t do anything about it…it’s something double and triple twisted like that, that turns an already mushy brain into soup…
Good point. I'll be interested to hear what you discover.
To me it felt like a lack of humility. I'm old school in that I prefer my doctors and nurses to be friendly but serious about their jobs. And not to engage in self-promotion or to conspire with each other to HURT THEIR PATIENTS or use them as subjects of experimentation.
Maybe only as sophisticated as the imagery of conformity. Line-dancing does not celebrate the individual, but the group, and belonging to the group was a powerful aphrodisiac to get convince people to get jabbed. Just another way to weed out the free thinkers and prop up the message 'we're all in this together'.
Gates contradicts himself in the 40-second video. Why would the world need to "go on alert" sooner if, as he admits, covid was just a bad flu? As usual, he makes no sense, despite speaking with false 'authority.'
Rocket, for all explanations psyop, visit corbettreport.com. You can get lost in all the ways the U.S is (and has been engaged in) killing its people (and others in the world as well). And when you need uplifting, go to zachbushmd.com. His enlightened view is calmative.
You said at the beginning, "whatever was out there (released not "leaked")". Can you expand on that? It sounds like you think the virus was released. If so, how do you think thst happened and by whom?
This warrants its own article, but I'll try to outline some of the bouncing balls here.
There was either an infectious agent or not. I'm on the Yes side.
It was either a virus or something else. I'm on the something else side.
Which brings us to infectious clones, as per what I have written about Couey before. Search for Couey in my stack.
Which leave us with a manufactured clone.
Which brings us to leaked or released. I'm on the released side. Too much has happened to think this was some silly accident.
Leaked would simply fizzle out, because of natural immunity, it couldn't spread across the world.
So, you land on released.
Where?
Many places, Wuhan, Iran, Italy...and in my view Australia, parts of the US, and any number of other places.
You can aerosolize these things and spray them.
Then you are left with the question of what made the PCRs ping?
And why were there so many "asymptomatic" pings?
If you have 20 years to plan something like this, and there is plenty of evidence for that, then one way to do it is to create a very weak infectious clone, something that if scrutinized will show us as "novel" but that is virtually indistinguishable from a cold and flu and slowly release it around the world over a number of years and make it "endemic". Because nobody is testing for it, you wouldn't know it's there.
Once it's endemic you are ready to light the fire whenever you want or need to (the need question is its own discussion).
But when you are ready, you do a big release in several locations, which will create some disease and death but plenty of fear and propaganda. Then you roll out your special PCRs and they start pinging all over the world.
And you build a story around the dangers of "asymptomatic" spread which the Diamond Princess helped with.
So, in short, it's a giant magic trick that definitely looks like the woman has been cut in half, but in fact there is plenty of elaborate planning and tech that means she isn't.
Folks, if you have not heard or read any of the stuff from David Martin, this is a good place to start. It addresses the leak issue in a comprehensive manner. https://rumble.com/v2dmq0e-its-much-worse-than-you-think-govt-corruption-and-the-creation-of-covid-w-d.html
Fascinating, though not sure anything additional needs to have been released. Looking for something which you think is new but actually was already endemic with a test which cross reacts, especially at insane Ct and in environments with insane levels of cross contamination, can explain things adequately.
What’s your theory on the mysteriously disappearing flu?
The flu question is the right one I think, and I don't know how to answer it, or even how to think about it properly.
It's my understanding that most if not all notifications and deaths are lab confirmed.
I have come to accept "viral interference" as my working model that explains it, but my gut tells me that might be a part of the story, but not the story.
I am open to different ideas on this one. I havent heard any of the dissident doctors give me a solid explanation on this...I have a feeling they dont know either.
The starting point to appreciate is that the number of ILIs - "influenza-like illnesses" - is entirely based on modeling. Routine PCR testing for flu has never been "a thing".
Yes, flu monitoring in various countries does indeed test those with symptoms for the presence of influenza virus
But I cannot be the only one who harbours deep suspicions about PCR testing. So much appears unknown and unreported. For one thing, the Ct levels are basically a state secret. Then there are the primers. Where do these come from? Who certifies them and gainst what standards? How centralized is this process? Whose control might it be under?
On "viral interference" the notion that everybody's upper respiratory tracts combine worldwide to form one ecosystem in which one virus with very similar lethality and symptoms totally replaced another for 2 years - and started to do so upon the declaration of an emergency by the WHO - seems rather fanciful.
AFAIK there is no empirical evidence of this viral phenomenon actually taking place or even research showing how it might occur.
Is all this another example of prior assumptions, via poorly understood mechanisms, resulting in what is assumed to be the case then being found?
Thanks Jonathan, interesting to say the least.
I'd say that feels closer to the truth than the interference idea.
You've reminded me of this guy, Saeed A Qureshi
I read this back in 2020 and am now thinking whether he could help with some of the questions you've raised.
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-19-vaccine-not-possible-for-a-virus-not-yet-identified/
Brilliant explanation.
Thank you for this explanation. It's very helpful, and makes absolute sense. What a psyop that was, a magic trick to say the least.
Why are we so susceptible to this kind of trickery?
Or...All you need are a few CCP-devoted "volunteers" to travel throughout the world unimpeded (as they did before the travel ban from China was instituted far too late) and spread or release whatever it was that would be 'detected' by fake PCR tests.
As important or fascinaing as the origin story may be, it is the RESPONSE that was, and continues to be DEADLY.
At this point of trusting nothing and no one, I have a question about the Diamond Princess: the testing. Do we trust the PCR tests used to distinguish infection in passengers? Why? Fruit tested positive, and Magufuli died; Mullis preceded him in death.
Those 7 deaths out of 712 infected... were the 712 infected with a novel coronavirus, or did they just have stray coronavirus particles in their system to be amplified by PCR until we called it SARS-Cov-2?
Some people say there was no new virus at all. Did the 7 die because approximately that many old comorbid people succumb to respiratory illness on every winter Princess cruise? Who was that gentleman from Hong Kong? Is he as anonymous as the gentleman who brought it from China to Seattle: our Patient Zero, from whom experts extracted a sample of a bodily fluid and found SARS-Cov-2? Did they?
Was the Diamond Princess a controlled experiment from the jump? 🙃
All good questions.
If there was never a virus (as in there was nothing), then the PCR tests pinging on the ship and elsewhere have to be explained in another way. The illness and death too. I don't believe the facts in their totality map over the "there was nothing" thesis, that it was all psychological.
But the facts also don't make over the theory that there was a novel virus racing around the world. Pandemics as they have described them cannot happen, because of natural immunity. They always fizzle out.
So, we are left in the middle, that there was something, but it wasn't the virus described.
Which brings us to infectious clones and the Couey thesis I've written about before. That makes sense to me in a number of ways.
Something had to make the PCRs ping.
I think the clue to the whole thing is the PCRs and what makes them ping. Which also get's you into understanding all the different ways a false positive can be created. It's not just one way.
I'm going to need to gather my thoughts and write about that at some point.
RE: “Half of those that tested positive had no symptoms. Which in English means that they got the deadly virus and were HEALTHY…”
Which means they tested positive. And may or may not have got the virus.
Somewhat analogous to saying that voting is compulsory in Australia. It’s compulsory to have your name ticked off before receiving a ballot paper; after that, how you mark or don’t mark the ballot paper is up to you.
The Diamond Princess wasn't an outbreak.
https://twitter.com/EWoodhouse7/status/1633659235543179265?s=20
Moreover, statistically-speaking, the deaths that occurred are no different from what we could expect given the number and age profile of the passengers.
https://twitter.com/ProfessorAkston/status/1620460625586700288?s=20
Good links, thanks.
Sure thing.
Tip: Study every investigation and activity in which the CDC was involved between Jan 1, 2020 and March 31, 2020.
I think those links answer my questions very well! Thank you, Unbekoming and Jessica (and all). It was a controlled experiment in stoking panic.
Wouldn’t “asymptomatic positives” just be another term for “false positives”? Why call them “cases” if they aren’t sick? Why include them in the total number of “infections”? It throws off all the stats.
Padding the stats was always part of the theatre.
The "case" counted was the main engine of fear, and "false" positives was the fuel of the engine. There are many ways you can get a false positives, and I'm sure I don't know all of them.
Also, asymptomatic is just a liar's way of saying healthy.
If you're not sick, you're NOT SICK. :)
I am absolutely amazed that you do not appear to have registered that 5G had been the big new feature and selling point of the cruise ships.....
5G was switched on in Wuhan mid October 2019 followed by Bergamo in Italy and Tehran in Iran. Then London and New York.
The spread of Covid19 followed this same pattern......
It's not something I understand, so cannot speculate on it. Happy to read on it though...
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/turn-5g-off-or-is-that-too-simple
I love that artwork by Bob. Unfortunately it triggered the memory of the time that, on one anointed day at one anointed hour, we were all supposed to go outside and bang our pots and pans, in solidarity with the front line workers that were busy learning line-dancing moves. That was a dark time, and it affected me deeply. It was them pushing us to primal reaction, mass formation behavior.
The Diamond Princess story was an AHA! moment for a lot of sheeple. It certainly should be promoted again!
The line dancing at hospitals, as a psychological and propaganda strategy must have a name. I'm still looking for it. There must be a psyop book for dummies somewhere that describes the technique. It's deeply sophisticated.
This is the best I have come up with to describe the technique, but I dont have a name for it, I'm sure there is one.
From:
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/kyle
This reminds me of all those dancing nurses videos in empty hospitals while we were in this “most deadly pandemic”
It’s a form of highly specialised gaslighting and mind fuckery I think, and very purposeful…I’ve struggled to put my finger on what it is exactly.
It’s something like this I think…they use “comedy” to make us “feel good” about the fact that they are using comedy to make fun of the fact that they can do whatever they want to us, and we won’t do anything about it…it’s something double and triple twisted like that, that turns an already mushy brain into soup…
Good point. I'll be interested to hear what you discover.
To me it felt like a lack of humility. I'm old school in that I prefer my doctors and nurses to be friendly but serious about their jobs. And not to engage in self-promotion or to conspire with each other to HURT THEIR PATIENTS or use them as subjects of experimentation.
Maybe only as sophisticated as the imagery of conformity. Line-dancing does not celebrate the individual, but the group, and belonging to the group was a powerful aphrodisiac to get convince people to get jabbed. Just another way to weed out the free thinkers and prop up the message 'we're all in this together'.
Gates contradicts himself in the 40-second video. Why would the world need to "go on alert" sooner if, as he admits, covid was just a bad flu? As usual, he makes no sense, despite speaking with false 'authority.'
You know CFR doesn’t tell a full story...
👍
These things are ingrained...we can’t even imagine not knowing!!
Rocket, for all explanations psyop, visit corbettreport.com. You can get lost in all the ways the U.S is (and has been engaged in) killing its people (and others in the world as well). And when you need uplifting, go to zachbushmd.com. His enlightened view is calmative.
Lol it’s the pun for me ⚓️