The climategate is a fascinating subject - it is so easy to manipulate because everyone can see as it is. “Manipulate” meaning whatever you want to tell people to believe. They will. If they don’t believe, their neighbors will force them to believe. Not that these neighbors know better, they will advocate for anything that is opposite to the views of their neighbors. The neighbor mentality, if you will.
Scattered, fragmented and modulated information gives the enormous edge to one side. The pressure of a handful of “scientists” who pushed the absurd climategate helped it gain momentum sufficient for its survival. Now it thrives. What can you do? Pay your bills, reduce gas, heat, A/C and whatever else you need to live efficiently - remember, you have to support our favorite jet travelers in their voyages across all skies in total disregard of environmental “protection”.
Ah, the sky. Watch the recent Highwire episode on climate engineering. This one is so different from everything else. I don’t know if it presents “truth” (what is it, anyway?) or an “angle”. But its 76 minutes explain practically everything you need to understand climategate. The speaker clearly is extremely well prepared and knows his stuff.
Key conclusions: 1) The real objective of the climate agenda is to melt the Arctic in order to gain easy access to new oil basins. 2) Geoengineering is being done 24/7 by all jest planes (explained nicely, no sensations, no conspiracies, pure physics). 3) Even if we stopped all spraying planes, the air will self-cleanse only after 2 years or so. 4) The contamination of the air with suspended chemicals is done 24/7 in a number of ways - with the purpose of reducing sunlight which reaches the surface of the Earth.
This last item is far worse than all covids. If they manage to do this, famine will only be mitigated by fake and artificial food (who benefits?). In the meantime, you will see the Earth desert growing daily. In the meantime all mechanical equipment will self-destroy due to accelerated oxidation (with reduced CO2 in the air). Animals and plants will die out sooner because they do not have human capabilities.
Two years ago I was half-joking with the Mad Max landscape desired by the ultra-rich useless eaters. After this interview… You will laugh at your concerns about masks, freedom of speech or vaccine mandates…
I watched this the other day and it’s great. BUT ... I do wonder who the target audience is. Those of us with spare brain cells to rub together who aren’t brainwashed and propagandised already know the bulk of the content, and the triple-boosted normies terrified of their own exhalations aren’t going to believe any of it, so who is it intended to persuade? What I would love is for the main protagonists and the producers to make a 6 episode series of ~45min episodes pulling apart the major climate lies and insane unscientific predictions, letting Happer, Lindzen, Heller et al loose to really lay out the case for cynical nihilistic mass insanity.
In an earlier post you reviewed Dane Wigington's _The Dimming_ (https://open.substack.com/pub/unbekoming/p/geoengineering?r=kck7s). In his broadcasts Dane has often mentioned rising ocean temperatures reaching critical levels, and how hot the planet is becoming. I don't recall if he talks about this in _The Dimming_.
Here, you report that "Thermometer records, when adjusted for the urban heat island effect, show only a mild warming over the past 150 years, with most of that occurring before 1940. Satellite data shows even less warming." I have also heard this from another source (https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/is-the-planet-truly-boiling-or-are?r=kck7s).
I'm just asking, for anyone who can contribute, but are these two views consistent with each other? I've wondered about this ever since learning about the "urban heat island effect". It does not change what I see going on in the skies or read in alternative and non-alternative media (excepting the worst offenders and the debunkers), but is planetary heating at a critical stage or not?
I really wish this documentary stuck to the topic of climate and what we can prove using sound science.
I'm 10 minutes in and they've taken multiple shots at people who believe the Earth is flat, talked about alleged dinosaurs, mentioned evolution as if it's a fact rather than a theory, and made statements about the temperature 500,000,000 years ago with no evidence whatsoever. These people are just as bad as the climate alarmists with their so-called "science" they are presenting.
It begins by showing you people in satanic colors and then a blood ritual, hmmmm, and then "We are not flat earthers". Hmmmm, it's a Gatekeeper's movie.
The climategate is a fascinating subject - it is so easy to manipulate because everyone can see as it is. “Manipulate” meaning whatever you want to tell people to believe. They will. If they don’t believe, their neighbors will force them to believe. Not that these neighbors know better, they will advocate for anything that is opposite to the views of their neighbors. The neighbor mentality, if you will.
Scattered, fragmented and modulated information gives the enormous edge to one side. The pressure of a handful of “scientists” who pushed the absurd climategate helped it gain momentum sufficient for its survival. Now it thrives. What can you do? Pay your bills, reduce gas, heat, A/C and whatever else you need to live efficiently - remember, you have to support our favorite jet travelers in their voyages across all skies in total disregard of environmental “protection”.
Ah, the sky. Watch the recent Highwire episode on climate engineering. This one is so different from everything else. I don’t know if it presents “truth” (what is it, anyway?) or an “angle”. But its 76 minutes explain practically everything you need to understand climategate. The speaker clearly is extremely well prepared and knows his stuff.
Key conclusions: 1) The real objective of the climate agenda is to melt the Arctic in order to gain easy access to new oil basins. 2) Geoengineering is being done 24/7 by all jest planes (explained nicely, no sensations, no conspiracies, pure physics). 3) Even if we stopped all spraying planes, the air will self-cleanse only after 2 years or so. 4) The contamination of the air with suspended chemicals is done 24/7 in a number of ways - with the purpose of reducing sunlight which reaches the surface of the Earth.
This last item is far worse than all covids. If they manage to do this, famine will only be mitigated by fake and artificial food (who benefits?). In the meantime, you will see the Earth desert growing daily. In the meantime all mechanical equipment will self-destroy due to accelerated oxidation (with reduced CO2 in the air). Animals and plants will die out sooner because they do not have human capabilities.
Two years ago I was half-joking with the Mad Max landscape desired by the ultra-rich useless eaters. After this interview… You will laugh at your concerns about masks, freedom of speech or vaccine mandates…
https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/unpacking-climate-engineering-with-jim-lee/
Quick Dick McDick's response to chicken little sky is falling:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIG9ozEDPVg
(I love this clip)
I watched this the other day and it’s great. BUT ... I do wonder who the target audience is. Those of us with spare brain cells to rub together who aren’t brainwashed and propagandised already know the bulk of the content, and the triple-boosted normies terrified of their own exhalations aren’t going to believe any of it, so who is it intended to persuade? What I would love is for the main protagonists and the producers to make a 6 episode series of ~45min episodes pulling apart the major climate lies and insane unscientific predictions, letting Happer, Lindzen, Heller et al loose to really lay out the case for cynical nihilistic mass insanity.
Loved your main points...I cannot show the video to my kids but might be able to get a point t or two across....thank yiu!
Top shelf. Thanks for sharing and the notes.
The lies of lying liars.
Wow - wow - wow. Thank you all for your courage, tenacity, and integrity.
In an earlier post you reviewed Dane Wigington's _The Dimming_ (https://open.substack.com/pub/unbekoming/p/geoengineering?r=kck7s). In his broadcasts Dane has often mentioned rising ocean temperatures reaching critical levels, and how hot the planet is becoming. I don't recall if he talks about this in _The Dimming_.
Here, you report that "Thermometer records, when adjusted for the urban heat island effect, show only a mild warming over the past 150 years, with most of that occurring before 1940. Satellite data shows even less warming." I have also heard this from another source (https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/is-the-planet-truly-boiling-or-are?r=kck7s).
I'm just asking, for anyone who can contribute, but are these two views consistent with each other? I've wondered about this ever since learning about the "urban heat island effect". It does not change what I see going on in the skies or read in alternative and non-alternative media (excepting the worst offenders and the debunkers), but is planetary heating at a critical stage or not?
Thanks for sharing
Thank you for all your work!
Keep it up.
Want to force my family to watch this. As a former democrat my son calls me a flat earther now. 🤦🏻♀️
I really wish this documentary stuck to the topic of climate and what we can prove using sound science.
I'm 10 minutes in and they've taken multiple shots at people who believe the Earth is flat, talked about alleged dinosaurs, mentioned evolution as if it's a fact rather than a theory, and made statements about the temperature 500,000,000 years ago with no evidence whatsoever. These people are just as bad as the climate alarmists with their so-called "science" they are presenting.
It begins by showing you people in satanic colors and then a blood ritual, hmmmm, and then "We are not flat earthers". Hmmmm, it's a Gatekeeper's movie.