You're like he lied about everything w his vaccines that killed, plagiarized bechamp, used potassium dichromate to cause the 'imfections' and he still gets a pass
I agree. The suffering caused by this, essentially a fraudulent enterprise, continues to stun our consciousness. But I sense a true inflection happening now. And, I'm glad you brought up banking! The 900 lb gorilla, riding atop the elephant in the room! All this time and we're still fumbling around with money tech.
Excellent summary. Thank you. As a side note, in the early 1990s a Princeton professor obtained Pasteur’s private laboratory notes from - if I recall correctly- a relative who is the last of the direct family line. Apparently Pasteur kept two diaries of his experiments, one for public and one for private consumption. The biography uses Pasteur’s private notes: "In The Private Science of Louis Pasteur, Gerald Geison has written a controversial biography that finally penetrates the secrecy that has surrounded much of this legendary scientist’s laboratory work. Geison uses Pasteur’s laboratory notebooks, made available only recently, and his published papers to present a rich and full account of some of the most famous episodes in the history of science and their darker sides—for example, Pasteur’s rush to develop the rabies vaccine and the human risks his haste entailed. The discrepancies between the public record and the “private science” of Louis Pasteur tell us as much about the man as they do about the highly competitive and political world he learned to master.
Although experimental ingenuity served Pasteur well, he also owed much of his success to the polemical virtuosity and political savvy that won him unprecedented financial support from the French state during the late nineteenth century. But a close look at his greatest achievements raises ethical issues. In the case of Pasteur’s widely publicized anthrax vaccine, Geison reveals its initial defects and how Pasteur, in order to avoid embarrassment, secretly incorporated a rival colleague’s findings to make his version of the vaccine work. Pasteur’s premature decision to apply his rabies treatment to his first animal-bite victims raises even deeper questions and must be understood not only in terms of the ethics of human experimentation and scientific method, but also in light of Pasteur’s shift from a biological theory of immunity to a chemical theory—similar to ones he had often disparaged when advanced by his competitors.
Through his vivid reconstruction of the professional rivalries as well as the national adulation that surrounded Pasteur, Geison places him in his wider cultural context. In giving Pasteur the close scrutiny his fame and achievements deserve, Geison’s book offers compelling reading for anyone interested in the social and ethical dimensions of science.
Originally published in 1995.
The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.’
You have no business telling me about what sort of milk I should consume if you cannot tell me about Bechamp's work or your direct first hand experiences with animal husbandry.
Most of these anti-raw milk and pro-raw milk clowns do not know what they're talking about.
The west crams their cows in shit stained buildings, weaken the milk (milk is a living organism), so it can become sick easily and cannot fight of pathogenic strains.
So yes, pasteurize your milk, leverage Louis' and Bechamps half and one sided work to treat your garbage food, it still doesn't make it nutritious.
You are drinking from a polluted river and all you can see is a river.
The rest of us understands how it works and our source is different.
We will consume milk from happy healthy roaming animals on the hillside, eating a wide variety of bush, whose metabolites will be passed into its meat and milk.
Why would I want to burn that up? Because of ideology you derived due to wanting to sell more milk?
Any sensible farmer will tell you 1 and a half cow per acre of land. Goats are a different breed but they still need to roam and they have a mind of their own.
Sometimes a goat will roam from the land way up into the hills to seek a specific bush.
Whatever they pick up there comes back and shared with the herd as a beneficial boost to their immune system. They call this horizontal gene transfer.
So first hand experience needs to also be backed up by shared experiences. I've talked to farmers who work in garbage cow factories telling me one sided information, but yet when I go to other farms, I hear something else?
Guys, if you run farms, invest in your farmers to do farm visits of other farms. And not to boost quantity but quality. And if you don't have a farm, go do a farm visit yourself and ask questions.
Books is a tiny fraction of the puzzle. Bechamp and Pasteur is good yes, another one is Untold Story of Milk.
I cannot agree with you more. There is no comparison between pasteurized (boiled) milk and fresh raw milk. I never drank milk at all until my family got access to excellent raw milk from a local farmer. It was ambrosia compared to boiled milk. Our children were raised on raw milk and were (still are as adults) remarkably healthy.
Eye opening to see anthrax at the start of the safe & effective mantra for vaccines.. fab historic framework to see how disease thinking evolved.. super post to help rethink how we think about what we know!!
"Béchamp proposed that disease originated from changes in the normal functioning of an organism's own microzymas, rather than from external invasion alone. He demonstrated that microzymas could change their function based on their environment, and that disease occurred when these changes led to abnormal bacterial development or altered cellular function. This explanation accounted for both infectious and non-infectious diseases.
His theory explained why specific diseases affected particular tissues or organs, why all exposed individuals didn't necessarily become ill, and why diseases could appear to change form. This understanding provided a more comprehensive explanation of disease than the simple germ theory, accounting for the role of the organism's internal condition in disease development."
I've found Hume referenced in most of what I have read about terrain theory in the past, which has convinced me that it is a far more comprehensive theory of health and disease, that far better reflects real world observations, than germ theory. I know at one point I went looking for her research, but probably got side tracked before I found it. I'm glad you managed to find it.
You have to LOVE a 100-year old book, where you can swap out a few words and names and essentially have a story of the COVID fraud. Clearly, the tactics being employed against us today have been part of the elite's playbook for centuries.
The 1920s and 1930s were the Golden Age of medicine in this country. It's been more downhill than uphill since then. Since then, medicine has gotten more expensive, with no real value delivered for the extra expense.
Once again, clear evidence that we should always Beware the Benevolence of Billionaires. None of them got rich looking out for someone else's interests. Their interest in us is in harvesting our wealth. It's ironic that the easiest way for them to do that is to damage our health (the real function of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation).
I suppose the "Bustling City" Analogy resonates more effectively with readers, then say, an old growth forest, or the earth as a whole. The first image that comes to my mind when confronted with the "Bustling City" Analogy is Metastatic Brain Cancer.
Amazing book summary!! Your substack is really a treasure trove of wisdom.
I think that microzymas are actually what the current dogma on virology term viruses. For instance, think on how "microzymas possess an inherent resilience and longevity, capable of withstanding harsh conditions and persisting over vast stretches of time." This is so similar to how viruses are presented as something between life and death. Makes me wonder if virology is just sn attempt to hide microzymas and avoid thinking in terms of the life cycle that they imply
How deep and pervasive does the misunderstanding extend? Being 'told' by a homeopath 'with 40 years in health' that Pasteur was not wrong was ... well ...
What else is known about microzymas? Anyone working on this theory? Have they been isolated? What is molecular weight and structure? Might they be synonymous with RNA or DNA (not then known)?
Thank you for this awesome post. A revealing plunge into the murky depths of allopathic medicine and a reminder of the ongoing inhumane experiments on animals. The Ethel Douglas Hume book looks a good one to purchase. Sad that most people I know trust and act on so-called advice from the government, doctors, teachers etc. I'm not holding my breath for peace and goodwill in 2025.
You and me both. Changed everything that I hitherto believed. Pasteur was a fraud. Just like Einstein. Another fraud standing on the shoulders of never published giants to take their inventions and call it his own. New incarnation of that thievery is Musk.
If anyone's interested, here is my write up after reading this book: https://coppervortex.substack.com/p/louis-pasteur-the-fraudster-part-51b . So many examples of fraud, what a disgrace, yet the whole world is built on this bs.
The whole world? Dude! Snap out of it. I understand the sentiment, but this is Not true!
You're like he lied about everything w his vaccines that killed, plagiarized bechamp, used potassium dichromate to cause the 'imfections' and he still gets a pass
Ok 98%. Biggest industry on earth if banking doesn't count since they don't do anything
I agree. The suffering caused by this, essentially a fraudulent enterprise, continues to stun our consciousness. But I sense a true inflection happening now. And, I'm glad you brought up banking! The 900 lb gorilla, riding atop the elephant in the room! All this time and we're still fumbling around with money tech.
Excellent summary. Thank you. As a side note, in the early 1990s a Princeton professor obtained Pasteur’s private laboratory notes from - if I recall correctly- a relative who is the last of the direct family line. Apparently Pasteur kept two diaries of his experiments, one for public and one for private consumption. The biography uses Pasteur’s private notes: "In The Private Science of Louis Pasteur, Gerald Geison has written a controversial biography that finally penetrates the secrecy that has surrounded much of this legendary scientist’s laboratory work. Geison uses Pasteur’s laboratory notebooks, made available only recently, and his published papers to present a rich and full account of some of the most famous episodes in the history of science and their darker sides—for example, Pasteur’s rush to develop the rabies vaccine and the human risks his haste entailed. The discrepancies between the public record and the “private science” of Louis Pasteur tell us as much about the man as they do about the highly competitive and political world he learned to master.
Although experimental ingenuity served Pasteur well, he also owed much of his success to the polemical virtuosity and political savvy that won him unprecedented financial support from the French state during the late nineteenth century. But a close look at his greatest achievements raises ethical issues. In the case of Pasteur’s widely publicized anthrax vaccine, Geison reveals its initial defects and how Pasteur, in order to avoid embarrassment, secretly incorporated a rival colleague’s findings to make his version of the vaccine work. Pasteur’s premature decision to apply his rabies treatment to his first animal-bite victims raises even deeper questions and must be understood not only in terms of the ethics of human experimentation and scientific method, but also in light of Pasteur’s shift from a biological theory of immunity to a chemical theory—similar to ones he had often disparaged when advanced by his competitors.
Through his vivid reconstruction of the professional rivalries as well as the national adulation that surrounded Pasteur, Geison places him in his wider cultural context. In giving Pasteur the close scrutiny his fame and achievements deserve, Geison’s book offers compelling reading for anyone interested in the social and ethical dimensions of science.
Originally published in 1995.
The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.’
You have no business telling me about what sort of milk I should consume if you cannot tell me about Bechamp's work or your direct first hand experiences with animal husbandry.
Most of these anti-raw milk and pro-raw milk clowns do not know what they're talking about.
The west crams their cows in shit stained buildings, weaken the milk (milk is a living organism), so it can become sick easily and cannot fight of pathogenic strains.
So yes, pasteurize your milk, leverage Louis' and Bechamps half and one sided work to treat your garbage food, it still doesn't make it nutritious.
You are drinking from a polluted river and all you can see is a river.
The rest of us understands how it works and our source is different.
We will consume milk from happy healthy roaming animals on the hillside, eating a wide variety of bush, whose metabolites will be passed into its meat and milk.
Why would I want to burn that up? Because of ideology you derived due to wanting to sell more milk?
Any sensible farmer will tell you 1 and a half cow per acre of land. Goats are a different breed but they still need to roam and they have a mind of their own.
Sometimes a goat will roam from the land way up into the hills to seek a specific bush.
Whatever they pick up there comes back and shared with the herd as a beneficial boost to their immune system. They call this horizontal gene transfer.
So first hand experience needs to also be backed up by shared experiences. I've talked to farmers who work in garbage cow factories telling me one sided information, but yet when I go to other farms, I hear something else?
Guys, if you run farms, invest in your farmers to do farm visits of other farms. And not to boost quantity but quality. And if you don't have a farm, go do a farm visit yourself and ask questions.
Books is a tiny fraction of the puzzle. Bechamp and Pasteur is good yes, another one is Untold Story of Milk.
I have a few others on my shelf here: https://www.sovoli.com/shawn/shelves
But go talk to your farmers and ask questions.
I cannot agree with you more. There is no comparison between pasteurized (boiled) milk and fresh raw milk. I never drank milk at all until my family got access to excellent raw milk from a local farmer. It was ambrosia compared to boiled milk. Our children were raised on raw milk and were (still are as adults) remarkably healthy.
Bravo. Sheep farmer here, fighting animal vax lies…
Eye opening to see anthrax at the start of the safe & effective mantra for vaccines.. fab historic framework to see how disease thinking evolved.. super post to help rethink how we think about what we know!!
"Béchamp proposed that disease originated from changes in the normal functioning of an organism's own microzymas, rather than from external invasion alone. He demonstrated that microzymas could change their function based on their environment, and that disease occurred when these changes led to abnormal bacterial development or altered cellular function. This explanation accounted for both infectious and non-infectious diseases.
His theory explained why specific diseases affected particular tissues or organs, why all exposed individuals didn't necessarily become ill, and why diseases could appear to change form. This understanding provided a more comprehensive explanation of disease than the simple germ theory, accounting for the role of the organism's internal condition in disease development."
You would appreciate this paper https://www.vithoulkas.com/research/scientific-papers/continuum-unified-theory-diseases/
Awesome thanks!
Bechamp for the win! Every, single, time!!!
Thanks, Unbekoming!
I've found Hume referenced in most of what I have read about terrain theory in the past, which has convinced me that it is a far more comprehensive theory of health and disease, that far better reflects real world observations, than germ theory. I know at one point I went looking for her research, but probably got side tracked before I found it. I'm glad you managed to find it.
You have to LOVE a 100-year old book, where you can swap out a few words and names and essentially have a story of the COVID fraud. Clearly, the tactics being employed against us today have been part of the elite's playbook for centuries.
The 1920s and 1930s were the Golden Age of medicine in this country. It's been more downhill than uphill since then. Since then, medicine has gotten more expensive, with no real value delivered for the extra expense.
Once again, clear evidence that we should always Beware the Benevolence of Billionaires. None of them got rich looking out for someone else's interests. Their interest in us is in harvesting our wealth. It's ironic that the easiest way for them to do that is to damage our health (the real function of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation).
I suppose the "Bustling City" Analogy resonates more effectively with readers, then say, an old growth forest, or the earth as a whole. The first image that comes to my mind when confronted with the "Bustling City" Analogy is Metastatic Brain Cancer.
Amazing book summary!! Your substack is really a treasure trove of wisdom.
I think that microzymas are actually what the current dogma on virology term viruses. For instance, think on how "microzymas possess an inherent resilience and longevity, capable of withstanding harsh conditions and persisting over vast stretches of time." This is so similar to how viruses are presented as something between life and death. Makes me wonder if virology is just sn attempt to hide microzymas and avoid thinking in terms of the life cycle that they imply
How deep and pervasive does the misunderstanding extend? Being 'told' by a homeopath 'with 40 years in health' that Pasteur was not wrong was ... well ...
I appreciate your blog, as always. Have you ever posted any considerations of the Newton v. Halley drama, or the Newton v. Leibniz ?
No, not at this stage.
What else is known about microzymas? Anyone working on this theory? Have they been isolated? What is molecular weight and structure? Might they be synonymous with RNA or DNA (not then known)?
Thank you for this awesome post. A revealing plunge into the murky depths of allopathic medicine and a reminder of the ongoing inhumane experiments on animals. The Ethel Douglas Hume book looks a good one to purchase. Sad that most people I know trust and act on so-called advice from the government, doctors, teachers etc. I'm not holding my breath for peace and goodwill in 2025.
I found a reprint copy on Amazon for $10. It is a good one to purchase.
Thank you for taking the trouble to reply - I'll look on Amazon for the copy. Best wishes, Frances
I read this years ago. It was very instrumental in beginning my journey of discernment.
You and me both. Changed everything that I hitherto believed. Pasteur was a fraud. Just like Einstein. Another fraud standing on the shoulders of never published giants to take their inventions and call it his own. New incarnation of that thievery is Musk.