Discover more from Lies are Unbekoming
A letter to my two adult kids: Vaccines and the free Spike Protein
20 June 2021
To family and friends
I wrote this to our 23 year old daughter and 22 year old son.
I apologise for the length of this, it started out as an email, and then I just kept going and here we are.
As many of you know, our son studied para-medicine and is in the early days of his career, so I expect the question of vaccination will be put to him soon.
For what its worth, I have had all the usual vaccines and have taken the occasional flu vaccine, so has my wife and my kids are all up to date. So, clearly, I don’t have a problem with vaccines. Now that I got that out of the way.
I have agonised about this for quite some time and felt I didn’t have enough information to write earlier. That has changed, there is enough coming out now to say with a good degree of confidence that the spike protein the vaccines are designed to generate in the body, do not stay locally in the arm (as intended or thought), but float around the body and can cause damage all over the place.
I encourage you to put the time in to first read this document, watch the main videos I point you to, and read the other attached document in the email. You will then be as informed as any lay person can be at this point in time, and you can make your decisions accordingly.
We are at the tip of the spear, and this is a developing story that will bubble up to the surface eventually, despite the suppression and censorship. In the meantime, we need to look after ourselves and our loved one.
Everything that has happened since March of 2020 has now led us to this single question:
Should I get vaccinated?
You, or members of your family may have already been vaccinated. Hopefully, there has been no adverse reaction. You could choose to ignore this document and not worry yourself, or you might read it and be alert to any future symptoms.
But, prior to vaccination, this will help you make a more informed decision for yourself and others.
My personal decision
I will start off by giving you my personal answer: I will not be vaccinated.
I have many reasons for this that reach far beyond what I am going to cover here, but on medical grounds alone I am not going to do it. If the price I pay is inability to travel overseas, or go to some events etc, then so be it. Luckily for me I don’t have an employment element to my consideration.
My guess is that at some point within the next 12 months, much of what I am writing to you about will appear in the public domain and the mandatory/coercive roll-out of these vaccines will stop. Also, there are other vaccines coming down the pipe that seem to have far lower risk profiles. But I will study them when the time is right.
I also believe that they (Pharma/Gov) are unlikely to get to the critical mass required to run society along vaccinated and unvaccinated lines. There will simply be too many unvaccinated for society and business to function without them.
Information, Misinformation, Disinformation, and other forms of Distortion
There is almost nothing in the mainstream public domain that is Functionally True.
As I have said to my wife many times over the last year: “COVID19 headlines are almost always true in letter, but hardly ever true in spirit.”
Every one of the main narrative points is untrue, no exceptions.
I am talking about Government, Media, and Business, which is why my counsel has always been to not consume MSM (mainstream media), because the sum of all the small/large distortions knocks you off centre and is the very basis for “brainwashing” where you disassociate from reality.
Or said another way, your MAP of reality does not represent the TERRITORY anymore, and you become lost. The risks of the territory are not being shown on the map that has been given to everybody.
The parable of the blind men and an elephant is apt. Everything they described was “true” but not Functionally of Contextually True…they never saw the Elephant.
A group of blind men heard that a strange animal, called an elephant, had been brought to the town, but none of them were aware of its shape and form. Out of curiosity, they said: "We must inspect and know it by touch, of which we are capable". So, they sought it out, and when they found it, they groped about it. The first person, whose hand landed on the trunk, said, "This being is like a thick snake". For another one whose hand reached its ear, it seemed like a kind of fan. As for another person, whose hand was upon its leg, said, the elephant is a pillar like a tree-trunk. The blind man who placed his hand upon its side said the elephant, "is a wall". Another who felt its tail, described it as a rope. The last felt its tusk, stating the elephant is that which is hard, smooth and like a spear.
I have worked extremely hard since March 20 to see the Elephant, and I believe I have one of the most accurate observations of it among anyone I know. My reason for doing this, even though I am powerless to change what is happening around the globe, is that I have the power to help family and friends and the people I care about and help them through it in the best way possible.
I am wired to try to understand what is true, even if I don’t like what I see, and even if I cannot do anything about it besides my immediate circle.
Brainwashing and Cults
You probably don’t know that I lived in and with a Cult for several years (long story). I know how that framework works.
Put simply, a Cult is a “closed system”, it is most effective and most durable when it controls the flow of information to its members. The less information that comes in from the outside the less likely it is to have internal friction and/or member loss.
The control of information is a means to creating an environment where the information on the INSIDE is different to the information on the OUTSIDE. Think North Korea and The Truman Show.
This Inside/Outside dynamic is the Distortion. If you are on the Inside for long periods of time, you are gradually “de-centred”, you lose your balance and you lose touch with what is True…you lose touch with REALITY. That is what brainwashing is: Brainwashing | Britannica
Brainwashing, also called Coercive Persuasion, systematic effort to persuade nonbelievers to accept a certain allegiance, command, or doctrine. A colloquial term, it is more generally applied to any technique designed to manipulate human thought or action against the desire, will, or knowledge of the individual. By controlling the physical and social environment, an attempt is made to destroy loyalties to any unfavourable groups or individuals, to demonstrate to the individual that his attitudes and patterns of thinking are incorrect and must be changed, and to develop loyalty and unquestioning obedience to the ruling party.
This is probably one of my all-time favourite quotes:
"We accept the reality of the world with which we're presented. It's as simple as that." The Truman Show
It is technically accurate to say that society has been brainwashed. The centralisation of the flow of information has made it possible. It is hard to believe that it could have happened at such a scale…but it is true, it has happened.
I am optimistic that people will eventually wake up, but it is a slow process. Society falls into a mass delusion “wholesale” but wakes up “retail”.
Let’s start off with this short 10-minute interview with Dr. Byram Bridle from 28 May.
It’s a simple explanation of the problem and the flaw in the product design.
There will be more on Byram Bridle later.
Now, let’s go to Brett Weinstein.
You probably don’t know who he is, but if you look him up there is a lot about him. I have known and followed him for many years, long before COVID, but the important thing to know is that he is a Nobel prize level scientist (evolutionary scientist), and he just missed out on a Nobel Prize (but that’s another story entirely). Bottom line, the man knows a thing or two about science.
Anyway, he and his wife, started the DarkHorse Podcast and recently had Steve Kirsch and Robert Malone (inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology, no less). Start off by watching the interview, its only 15 minutes.
Here it is on YouTube
Here on BitChute (in case YouTube removes it)
The full 3-hour interview was on YouTube and got removed yesterday
Here it is in 3 parts on BitChute
If you don’t watch the full 3 hours, at least watch the 15-minute video…this whole paper I have written is built on these interviews.
Because of the censorship Bret is moving his podcast and videos over to Odysee.
Steve Kirsch has written a “living article” that is updated regularly, here is the link. PLEASE read the whole thing, or at the very least the Summary of the key points.
Steve also has done an excellent 1.5-hour video that breaks down the data. It is both true and HORRIFYING.
The free Spike Protein
The problem is the spike protein freely floating around in your body…that is the bottom line. All the vaccines use differing technologies to produce and deliver the spike protein into the system, and that is the problem.
The Spike Protein is cytotoxic (they are damaging/poisonous to cells). Because these therapies were rushed, months instead of many years of testing, they simply did not have the time to find out.
Normal testing protocols and timelines developed over the last 100 years would have picked up this problem. Well, we are now picking it up in the human population instead of in an animal experiment or a controlled and finalised Phase 3 trial (that doesn’t complete until 2024).
Here are some highlights from the Steve Kirsch article:
· At least 25,000 deaths from the vaccine. The OpenVAERS team think it is over 20,000 due to under reporting. But we looked at the CMS database and it appears VAERS is under-reporting by 5X. And the CDC excess unexplained deaths are 25,000 as well. It matches up.
· Biodistribution data shows massive accumulation in ovaries of the LNP (Lipid Nano Particle) (which instructs cells in ovaries to sprout toxic spike protein). Whoops. That was never supposed to be leaked out. We obtained it via FOIA request. The CDC never told you about that one, did they? Of course not!
· 82% miscarriage rate in first 20 weeks (10% is the normal rate). It is baffling that the CDC says the vaccine is safe for pregnant women when it is so clear that this is not the case. For example, one our family friends is a victim of this. She miscarried at 25 weeks and is having a D&C on 6/9/21. She had her first shot 7 weeks ago, and her second shot 4 weeks ago. The baby had severe bleeding of the brain and other disfigurements. Her gynaecologist had never seen anything like that before in her life. They called in a specialist who said it was probably a genetic defect (because everyone buys into the narrative that the vaccine is safe it is always ruled out as a possible cause). No VAERS report. No CDC report. Yet the doctors I’ve talked to say that it is over 99% certain it was the vaccine. The family doesn’t want an autopsy for fear that their daughter will find out it was the vaccine. This is a perfect example of how these horrible side effects just never get reported anywhere.
· 25X the possibility of myocarditis for teen boys (can lead to heart failure and death)
· Defective virus design (s1 was never supposed to be free, inclusion of PEG was unnecessary and allows LNP to be widely distributed)
o S1 = Spike Protein
o PEG = Polyethylene glycol
· In Israel, the adverse event tracking is much more accurate than the US. They found rate of myocarditis in vaccinated young adults is up to 25X the normal background rate for that age range. That’s not my calculation. That’s right from the article (“The rate reported among young men in Israel was 25 times higher”). “Israeli researchers reported this week that between one in 3,000 and one in 6,000 men between the ages of 16 and 24 had developed myocarditis, or heart muscle inflammation, after receiving both doses of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine there.” That’s 4X the rate for even the smallpox vaccine (which is 1 in 12,000).
· It is almost beside the point to calculate the exact number of deaths. In the past, the death threshold was that if 1 in 1 million Americans were killed by the vaccine, we stop it. So we stop at 168 excess deaths. There are 4,500 excess deaths right now and probably more like 25,000. So we are at 25X to 125X over the stopping threshold and we want to accelerate our rate of vaccination and give it to our kids. Why isn’t the press asking why we are doing this when there are better alternatives that result in much lower loss of life?
Dr. Robert Malone
This guy is the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology. Not much more to say on that really.
This is a good short read with highlights about the 3-hour interview he did with Bret Weinstein and Steve Kirsch.
Here are some important highlights:
· Prior to the study’s disclosure, the public was led to believe by regulators and vaccine developers that the spike protein produced by mRNA COVID vaccines stayed in the shoulder where it was injected and was not biologically active — even though regulators around the world had a copy of the study which showed otherwise.
· The biodistribution study obtained by Bridle showed lipid nanoparticles from the vaccine did not stay in the deltoid muscle where they were injected as the vaccine’s developers claimed would happen, but circulated throughout the body and accumulated in large concentrations in organs and tissues, including the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and — in “quite high concentrations” — in the ovaries.
· The mRNA — or messenger RNA — is what tells the body to manufacture the spike protein. The lipid nanoparticles are like the “boxes” the mRNA is shipped in, according to Malone. “If you find lipid nanoparticles in an organ or tissue, that tells you the drug got to that location,” Malone explained.
· Malone said there needed to be monitoring of vaccine recipients for leukemia and lymphomas as there were concentrations of lipid nanoparticles in the bone marrow and lymph nodes. But those signals often don’t show up for six months to three or nine years down the road, he said.
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick
What can I say about this man?
I came across him early, I think as early as March 2020.
Bottom line, he is a practising Scottish Dr., with a clear-thinking brain, and brave enough to stand up to “The Man”. He most definitely has Stickittodeman Neosis.
He has been right from the start on all things that mattered. You could do far worse than read all his COVID articles. He doesn’t write often but everything he has written is remarkably high quality and helps with orienting you during this medical madness.
He recently wrote this excellent piece on the Spike Protein and blood clots.
Here are some highlights:
What we now know, on the journey towards COVID19, are three important things.
If you damage the endothelial cells/glycocalyx, blood clots will form and stick to the side of blood vessels.
· Damage is often caused by immune system attack.
· Falling platelet levels are a sign of widespread blood clotting.
We know that the spike protein can stimulate blood clots all by itself.
We know that the immune system attack on ‘alien’ proteins, such as the spike protein, can cause vasculitis.
Salk Institute Report
This is the first major report I know of that showed the Spike Protein damaging cells (cyto-toxic)
There seems to be a special affinity to ovaries by the Lipid Nano-Particles (the boxes) that deliver the mRNA.
We have recently found this out due to a Freedom of Information Request, even though it was known to Pharma/Gov beforehand.
This is a good 17-minute clip from the 3-hour interview on this:
Here are some highlights from Steve Kirsch’s piece:
· Here’s the third item I need you to see. This is the biodistribution graph created from the Pfizer data obtained via Byram Bridle FOIA request to help you visualize where the vaccine is going in your child’s body (FP Note: this data is from a rat bio-distribution study…we can assume it behaves the same way in the human body). This shows you the sites where it cranks out the toxic spike protein; the higher the line, the greater the production of spike protein that can cause damage to blood vessels and cause inflammation.
· NOTE: There are areas of the body that are not included here like the injection site (165), liver (24), spleen (23), and adrenals (18). These were not included so you can see more detail. The graph ends at 48 hours because that is the extent of the data provided in the original Pfizer study. The mRNA is basically mostly gone after 48 hours which is why it ends there. I did not commission this slide; it was created by PANDA.
· Biodistribution of lipid nanoparticles which carry the mRNA show that the ovaries get the highest concentration. This turns the ovaries into a very large manufacturing plant to turn out toxic spike protein. Accumulation in the bone marrow is likely not good either. What are the long term implications of that?
· Here’s what this means. This vaccine seeks out your daughter’s ovaries and instructs the cells in the ovaries to turn out a very toxic spike protein. It also goes to your child’s brain, heart, and other critical organs. This can cause deafness, blindness, inability to speak, myocarditis, pericarditis, and more at unacceptable rates. It may permanently damage your child’s reproductive system. We just don’t know. Would you like to volunteer your child for a clinical trial so we can find out? Well, if so, and if your child concurs, then get vaccinated and be part of the largest experiment ever done on the human reproductive system.
This is a recent short interview covering among other things heart inflammation in young men.
I don’t like using anecdote to make my points, much more interested in high level data and stats, but sometimes anecdote just comes along and smacks you in the face.
Like this one…4 pilots die in one week after vaccination.
Listen to the 1-minute audio clip embedded in the article.
We need to pay attention to the Fact Patterns.
How dangerous is Cov-Sars-2?
While we are on the subject, let me show you how to think about the numbers to be able to answer the question. Being comfortable with an answer to this question helps to contrast it to all the things going on in the world.
I have run these numbers every few months over the last 16 months and the final number keeps dropping, as was predicted, because the really old, frail and co-morbid have died (as they would have during a flu season for example), so you are left with less old and frail people and many more who have naturally acquired immunity.
The following numbers are as of Thursday 17-06-21.
Some last points on this:
· None of these numbers factor in the suppression of Ivermectin (and other known, cheap, and safe treatments to COVID). There has been a global suppression and censorship of any information related to alternatives to a vaccine. If you factor in these drugs, then in reality you have no statistically material deaths from COVID
· I know that this doesn’t map over what is in the news, but it remains true. If your map does not accurately reflect the terrain, you need to change your map
This is a long subject in its own right, but put simply, there are several cheap established drugs, with extremely low risk profiles, that have been used for DECADES on millions of people for other illnesses that can be repurposed to treat COVID.
Ivermectin is the poster child of these drugs, but there are many others such as Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, Fluvoxamine…and the list goes on.
There are plenty of studies now that confirm their effectiveness, yet Drs are NOT ALLOWED to use them.
Think about that…deeply.
Imagine that someone has a heart attack on an aeroplane, and there are 5 doctors on the flight, all of them as it turns out are heart specialists. They start running towards the patient to help but get crash tackled by air hostesses and onboard airline security, even the co-pilot jumps in to punch the doctors. Anyway, the patient dies and several of the doctors lose their license for trying to help. Turns out the reason is that the airline has also invested in a new heart treatment and that is the only treatment it will allow its passengers. The treatment involves heavy machinery that is at the airport, so the patient must wait until landing.
Do you think that the airline, its employees and hired help are involved in a Criminal Obstruction? I do.
If you need any evidence at all that there is structural, centralised malfeasance at play, look no further than Ivermectin and this subject generally.
This is a great piece on the medical corruption in Australia and how Gilead Sciences has corrupted our medical sense making processes in favour of it brand new, very expensive, questionably effective Remdesivir.
And this is a great one about a recent study on Ivermectin…there are many more.
Vaccine death = c.1 in 10,000
Historical vaccine danger level = up to c.1 in 1,000,000
Ivermectin death = c.1 in 1,000,000,000
When you see a news piece in the MSM on COVID or an announcement from a Premier/Prime Minister etc…think about what they are doing and saying through this lens.
This from the Steve Kirsch article:
How can the CDC possibly call a vaccine that kills somewhere around 1 in 10,000 people as “perfectly safe” while the FDA insists that ivermectin which kills 1 in 1,000,000,000 as “dangerous and can cause serious harm.” Are you kidding me?!?!
Probabilistic Thinking and Fact Patterns
It’s been interesting looking back at my time going down the rabbit holes of Poker and Chess.
The fundamental difference between the two games is that in one, there is little KNOWN information because you don’t KNOW what cards the other players have, and in the other, Chess, ALL the information is known. You both can see the other persons pieces and where they are on the board.
The environment we are in now is one of low information. There is much that is not true, much that we think might be true, much that is hidden, much that only time will tell.
It certainly is not Chess-like, it is much more analogous to Poker.
That means that Probabilistic Thinking is in order. If you default to certainties, which is what most people do because that is how our brains are wired, you will fail at the game of navigating through this with your critical thinking intact. And you will make decisions that are far poorer than you otherwise would have made.
Thinking probabilistically is about looking for Fact Patterns, what do we know that is True or Likely to be True. If something comes along that is MORE Likely to be True, then you recalibrate your orientation and conclusions.
Most people don’t think this way, and their natural psychological hard-wiring and normal human emotional glitches (that we all have) get in the way.
There was much less information in March 2020 than there is today. The Fact Pattern then still didn’t support locking down the world, but I can live with the idea that the framework for the Fact Pattern back then was weak…certainly MUCH weaker than it is today.
I was the guy who went and ordered the ingredients to make and distribute hand sanitiser from home. So clearly, I thought back then that there MIGHT have been something to it all.
But, as you have heard my say 1,000’s of times…The mind is like an umbrella, it only works when opened.
I kept my mind open, paid attention to the Fact Patterns, thought Probabilistically, and did the work to defend my mind from the brainwashing zeitgeist smoke everyone else is breathing in.
Natural Immunity vs Vaccine Immunity
Any notion that a vaccine confers better immunity than naturally acquired immunity is NOT true.
There are many reasons for this least of which is that a vaccine is “showing” the immune system a part of the virus at a certain point in time. To the extent that the immune system learns anything, its “learning” is limited to what it has been “shown”.
Alternatively, when someone is infected with Cov-Sars-2 (or any one of its THOUSANDS of variants…yes there are thousands as that is what viruses do!) what the immune system SEES is the WHOLE virus, and the most up to date version of the WHOLE virus. So, it learns to deal with that, not some PART of an old edition.
So, if you have already been infected, you already have immunity and its BETTER than any vaccine immunity.
If 90% of people are asymptomatic
45% of the planet already has been infected (See Table in How dangerous is Cov-Sars-2?)
How do you know you haven’t had it already?
On a balance of probabilities, you have already had it, and on a balance of probabilities you already have Natural Immunity both at an antibody level but much more importantly as a T-Cell level.
It is the closely related “cousin” of today’s virus.
This first popped up in Feb 2003, over 18 years ago. It now swirls the world in many of its “variant” forms. There are 6 corona viruses with 4 being endemic, that seasonally swirl around the world. Cov-Sars-2 has now been added to the list, the 7th on the list and the 5th endemic one.
This is important because it means MILLIONS of people around the world already have T-Cell immunity (which is the strong, long lasting immunity) to Cov-Sars-1 and viruses SIMILAR to it.
Cov-Sars-2 is 80% similar to Cov-Sars-1.
Your T-Cells can recognise a virus (and its variants) up to a 30% difference. So, immunity to Cov-Sars-1 can deal with Cov-Sars-2 which is about 20% difference, even 18 years later! And immunity to Cov-Sars-2 can deal with all the “variants” they are trying to scare people with, that are only 0.3% different.
When the news talks about VARIANTS to today’s COV-Sars-2 virus, what they will not tell you is that the degree of variance is about 0.3% difference only.
So, bottom line, it is ALMOST certain that your T-Cells have already come across some version of Sar-Cov-1 or Sars-Cov-2 which means you are already immune. It is the main reason why so many people (c.90%) are asymptomatic.
Even on the exceedingly small chance that you don’t have that immunity already, the risk to you of catching Sars-Cov-2 and dying of COVID is MANY MANY times less than the risks of the Vaccines.
What is the risk of COVID to you?
This is an important question at so many levels.
The risk at a generalised society level is that of the flu, or lower.
But what is the risk to YOU personally, based on your age and health profile?
What is the maths based on the best data we have available today?
Well, here is the best calculator on the subject. It is used as a research level; I am happy to go with its numbers. Certainly, the SHAPE of the numbers is something we can work with.
You will notice how many questions in the calculator are related to other illnesses!
If someone doesn’t want to role the dice with COVID but would rather roll the dice with the vaccine…I can get that sort of thinking, but people don’t know the numbers on each side of that equation.
But I want you to know the numbers.
Here is the calculator.
I ran the numbers for me, and here are the results:
So…I have a 1 in 16,129 risk of dying from COVID and I am 51. About the same as my risk of dying from Mountain Hiking! (see chart in link below)
I can live with that.
Your risk will be somewhere between 1 in 300,000 to 1 in 1,000,000.
See what the actual number is for you.
Here are your chances to dying from other activities to give these numbers some context.
Another way to think about COVID risk is how does it compare to the general risk of living/dying.
Is the risk of dying from COVID smaller or greater than the risk of dying from all other causes…the answer is…not by a long shot.
Here is but one simple breakdown of the risks along age lines (and this is from the US where obesity has been a COVID problem):
What is a Vaccine?
Let’s start with a dictionary definition:
any preparation used as a preventive inoculation to confer immunity against a specific disease, usually employing an innocuous form of the disease agent, as killed, or weakened bacteria or viruses, to stimulate antibody production.
So, what does Immunity mean:
the state of being immune from or insusceptible to a particular disease or the like.
What does Immune mean:
protected from a disease or the like, as by inoculation.
Well…the “vaccines” do not do this.
It does not prevent you developing symptoms if you come across the virus again.
It does not prevent you from transmitting the virus to others.
It does seem to help with the reduction of symptoms, typically from mild to very mild. Something that Codral would also do.
So, bottom line, it is inaccurate to even call it a Vaccine, but that is the lingo everyone is using and its part of the brainwashing (map/territory) problem.
It is much more accurate to call it an Experimental Gene Therapy. That is accurate in both letter and spirit.
Much of what you will read online and the Fact Checkers (what a scam that is) will suggest they are Effective; it usually ends up being a case of Correlation NOT Causation: the virus path always follows some version of a Gompertz Curve. A sharp exponential rise, a short peak and then a sharp exponential fall. The sum of all the factors that underly this are complex, but the bottom line is that the shape is always the same.
Lockdowns and other NPIs (Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions) manage to nudge it sideways fractionally, but in practical terms make no difference. There is plenty of overwhelming evidence on this by now.
The correlation happens when the government says, see we rolled out the vaccine (or lockdown, or masks, or social distancing etc.) and the virus went away…in reality it was going to fall all by itself, with or without a vaccine, with or without a lockdown etc. Just check out Sweden, Texas, Florida, South Dakota and a long list of other regions.
Again, pay attention to the Fact Patterns.
What does SAFE mean?
The answer is up to c.1 in a million.
To date the standard has been that UP TO 1 death per million people administered with a vaccine was an “acceptable” cost to protect the greater good. Vaccines pretty much get pulled during Phase 3 trials if the number reaches these levels. Vaccines that have been used in the broad population have also been pulled once this level has been reached.
So, the word Safe actually has a number…it is 1 death per million.
So, you could ask, what is the death rate of this “Vaccine”.
The SHAPE of the answer is 1 in 10,000. You can slice and dice the numbers in many ways, and you can end up with numbers that are half that or double that…but whichever way you cut the numbers the SHAPE is right.
It certainly is NOT 1 in a million.
It is al LEAST 100x more dangerous that the highest level of “accepted danger” to date, and probably much more dangerous than that.
Which brings is to Ivermectin.
“Vaccine” Safety and Time
The word SAFE in the context of vaccines has always meant large scale Phase 3 trials over long periods of TIME that are studied before public release, with plenty of sub-groups tested. This testing protocol was designed to pick up “product-defects”.
The key ingredient though is TIME, it is the only way of coming to terms with the UNKNOWN. The human body is a complex system, maybe the most complex systems of all, you cannot tell what will happen inside the body when you bring something in from the outside…without TIME to observe and report.
These “vaccines” have not been studied over enough TIME…they have been rushed to market…their primary defect is the spike protein that is now running riot inside the body.
Pricing the UNKOWN is impossible (you can price Probability, but not the Unknown), that’s why the Unknown is so risky. Think of Russian Roulette and imagine a gun with a 20 bullet capacity. If you know there was one bullet in the barrel, well you have a 1 in 20 risk (5% probability) of blowing your brains out…the risk has been quantified and you can decide whether to play from there…. obviously if you knew there were 20 bullets in the barrel, you wouldn’t pick up the gun.
But what if you DIDN’T KNOW how many bullets there were…could be 20 and could be Zero…would you pick up the gun…I wouldn’t, and I don’t think anybody else would? Not knowing how many bullets are in the barrel is the same as knowing there are 20.
Without TIME, you don’t know how many bullets are in the vaccine barrel…it is that simple.
What is interesting is that the French suspended the use of the vaccines on these grounds. Quite simply, they were not tested properly so we cannot use them.
The analogy they used was car production:
The report draws an interesting parallel between vaccine production and automobile production. It asks whether we would imagine it feasible to start a production line for a new car and begin marketing it without completing quality studies on each of its parts and engine, including safety-related components such as its brakes and electrical systems.
Now onto the issue of sub-groups. This from the Steve Kirsch:
· Where is your Phase 3 DB-RCT (Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial) showing that kids under 20 are better off been vaccinated with these vaccines?
· Where is your Phase 3 DB-RCT showing that if you’ve had COVID, you are better off getting these vaccines or not? If there was no death or disability risk from the vaccine, I could see the argument. But that’s just not reality?
· Where is your DB-RCT showing that a 12 year old girl that is vaccinated today will be able to have kids in 6 years from now?
· People were dropped from the Phase 3 trials if they had a reaction to the first dose.
· This is not right. Free spike is dangerous. Everyone knew that. It wasn’t supposed to happen. They created anchoring so you would not get free spike. This should have been detected, but nobody did the toxicology. The FDA didn’t force the drug companies to do the required toxicology studies. They were too hurried and believed the anchoring would work.
· Vaccines are never supposed to kill people. The influenza vaccine doesn’t kill anyone. Virtually zero (there are also very rare events where people do die, but they are < 1 in a million). People are much more likely to die just coincidentally with the vaccination not from the vaccination. For example, less than 1 person in the age group 30-39 dies per year according to VAERS.
· This vaccine is much more dangerous than any vaccine in our history. There are more reactions to this vaccine than all 70 vaccines in the last 30 years combined.
· Normally, vaccination injects or generates a harmless antigen in your shoulder to generate immunity. It stays in your shoulder. These vaccines are different. The mRNA vaccines deliver instructions to cells all over your body to make a pathogenic spike protein over the next 48 hours: inside your brain, heart, ovaries, etc. The spike proteins damage your blood vessel walls and cause clotting. The spikes can break free of the cell membrane and freely circulate causing even more damage. The spike proteins can last around 30 days. The damage that has been done in the 30 days can last a lifetime.
And this from the CDC in the US:
· In a June 10th meeting the CDC disclosed, as of May 31,475 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis were reported to VAERS of Americans aged 30 and younger. The conditions called myocarditis and pericarditis can cause permanent heart damage.
This one is a good story. That island is a lab experiment as it has maybe the highest level of population “vaccination” in the world, yet it has another wave of surging virus through it island.
So much for the “efficacy” of the “vaccine”.
Anyway, there are literally dozens and dozens of stories that debunk any notion that these “vaccines” will do what a normal vaccine is meant to do.
Said another way: highly ineffective product, with truly little upside and a world of downside.
Shit deal if you ask me.
Some UK stories and data
There is plenty on this, here are just some highlights from a recent piece:
· His warning comes as the UK’s regulator is being urged to declare the Covid vaccines ‘unsafe for use in humans’ because of the high number of vaccine-attributed deaths (1,253) and adverse reactions (888,196, with 256,224 individual reports) over the five months to May 26. Hodkinson describes this report, by Dr Tess Lawrie, as ‘a devastating analysis of the whole mess’.
· ‘Myocarditis is a medical term for inflammation of the heart. It is never mild, as they are describing it – meaning not terribly significant. The heart cells that make up the heart muscles never regenerate. It’s not like the liver, or the kidney, that regenerates. When a heart muscle dies, it’s dead. And it’s never replaced. So muscle cells in the heart will be dying. The number is hard to determine, because the person is still alive.
· ‘On the female side there’s equal concern, because it comes out of the obscure Pfizer submission to the Japanese regulatory authority that the vaccine particles – the tiny lipid nano-particles that are part of the vaccine – locate very heavily in the ovary. This was a rat study, but it still showed, most unexpectedly, heavy localisation of these particles in the ovary. If that is in the literature, it needs to be excluded as a possible long-term complication. And you can’t do that unless you check fertility issues over a number of years.
Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy
While still in the UK, this is a recent report on the UK’s Yellow Card system (which is the equivalent of the VAERS system in the US) that reports adverse reactions. I don’t know yet what the system is called in Oz.
It is grim reading.
It is much harder to get detailed data in Australia, but we do have this.
I haven’t found a public database regarding details of each death.
To 13 June 2021, we received 303 reports of death following vaccination for COVID-19 vaccines.
This is the “reported” deaths…I have no reason to believe that the same degree of under reporting is not happening here…so 4x to 5x under reporting I believe…maybe more.
Drs in Australia are under strict instruction to follow the Government line on the narrative or risk suspension or losing their license altogether.
With your understanding of the shape of the numbers and data in the US and the UK, you can now look at the numbers here and make up your own mind.
To me, it’s a similar story here, there is nothing in these numbers that suggest we are having a different adverse reaction experience.
Responsibility to the old
One of the last Hail Mary attempts at guilting people (mostly the young) into getting the injection is to call on their “obligation” towards the old.
Let’s get this straight, you do not have an obligation to put your personal health at risk for the old. We have an obligation to treat them with the dignity and respect they deserve, and to provide the best targeted protection we can. But not to put our personal health at risk!
It is not only a silly idea, but also morally corrupt and evil…and does not stack up to any level of slow thinking or analysis.
It attempts to conflate any obligation you might have or feel towards your immediate family members, brother, sister, mum, dad, grandparents, or even a best friend, with an obligation towards greater society.
It is bullshit.
At no point would anyone go to get a flu vaccine to protect a strangers grandparent.
You do it to protect yourself and maybe the family you live with. That’s it.
A 10-year-old has NO DUTY towards the 85-year-old grandmother of a stranger. At most if they were about to visit a stranger and the kid had the flu, then maybe the kid would stay at home. They certainly wouldn’t get an experimental treatment to protect the stranger.
The idea that a 20-year-old who has 65 QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years) ahead of them put that at risk to protect the 1 (or less) QALY of the 85-year-old stranger is among the evilest ideas I have ever come across.
That is not how it works and is not how anyone should think…please do NOT fall into that trap.
If someone in your family needed a kidney, you MIGHT consider giving them a kidney…it would be a big deal, but you might decide to do it. You would never decide to hand over your kidney to a total stranger just because they needed it. That is not how personal and social obligations work.