These "narratives" of historical events end up telling the truth when they may not have intended too. The Olympian Jesse Owens, on his death bed, told the truth of his time in Nazi Germany. It was his deathbed revelation that made me realize that everything we've been told about the Holocaust is wrong: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-holocaust-examined
Yep, the fear factor, keep the populace scared Sh-less that vaporisation can happen at any instant by the press of a big red button. Duck and cover, duck and cover.....
There's a brilliant 19-part series of essays on Miles Mathis' site by an English guy called "Lestrade" about how pretty much the entire "Pacific Theater" war between the United States and Japan was mostly fake. This guy rose even further in my esteem when he mentioned he was the same guy who has the Unpopular Opinion Bitchute channel with the excellent 7 part series of videos Fake Atomics exposing the nukes hoax.
Brilliant forensic work here. The striped kimono detail is haunting becuase it suggests fabric-mediated chemical burns rather than thermal flash. I remember simialr burn patterns from clinical work where agents penetrated clothing. If close-range survival in wooden structures contradicts radiation dosage models, maybe we gotta rethink the whole mechanism.
Really Unbekoming, you had to interview Parker when you just had to ask me? I told you there were no nuclear weapons ages ago. Oppenheimer was full of shit. Nonetheless, glad you caught up, very interesting article. Now look at the ramifications of that truth today. All leaders, generals, military, scientists, news medias singing from the same hymn book, scaring all of humanity about who will use nuclear weapons first. Dag, they're good, aren't they?
It wasn’t nuclear; it was atomic bombs according to what I was told by the graduate student who led the review for the final exam at UCLA for the American history class that I enrolled in back in 1984. See http://www.truedemocracy.net/w01/10.html by scrolling down until you see Did You Know?
I'm not denying the fires, just don't think that nuclear was used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I have also become aware that those two cities were predominantly where Christians lived.
That w01 means that it was my first edition of top secret history that I learned over a 10 year timespan, and edition that only exists because of the biggest cover up of the 20th century which betrayed every decent human being around the world, and enabled me to understand the mentality of those who deceive people. I highly recommend that you read it.
Hi Arlene - I've looked into this, and maybe also come across Palmer's work, but I put "nukes" in the same category as "viruses" -- we're told that these things exist, but when we examine them, they serve more as a scare tactic than something plausible. I know you mentioned it was atomic bombs vs nuclear weapons, but I'd like to present some of my articles that show that the reason for Nagasaki/Hiroshima is more of a fear tactic than reality:
The offical photographies taken from airplanes 'failed'. I believe the US wanted to escape culpability for having used nuclear weapons and didnt want leave evidence of a mushroom cloud. US authorities censored info about radioactivity from Cs 137 and Sr90 and proof of Neutron activation causing nails and steel to be temporarily radioactive
During the occupation of Japan, photographs, medical reports, and samples showing radiation damage were confiscated. The US authorities formed the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC) to study the victims, but at the same time forbade them from providing medical care, as this was considered an admission of guilt for an "illegal" weapon.
That story cannot be confirmed. To pick up one detail " - ‘Atomic Bomb Dome’—is presented in both accounts as notable rather than anomalous. Palmer argues such survival is inexplicable under the nuclear narrative but consistent with firebombing." No, that is not true.
The survival of the 'Atomic Bomb Dome' IS consistent with the effects of a nuclear bomb being detonated at an altitude of some sixhundred meters above ground. For that surviving building was located at ground zero. The place vertically direct under the place of detonation. Which means the shockwaves only could effect the roof of this building but not the walls. As the walls where standing at an angle of zero degree to the direction of the incoming shock wave. Resulting in (almost) zero destructive force.
For getting a much more authentic story I do recommend Keiji Nakazawa's autobiographic manga novel "Barefoot Gen" (barfuß durch Hiroshima). It is truely horrifying - and it is not fictional. Containing lots of details being consistent with a nuclear detonation.
These "narratives" of historical events end up telling the truth when they may not have intended too. The Olympian Jesse Owens, on his death bed, told the truth of his time in Nazi Germany. It was his deathbed revelation that made me realize that everything we've been told about the Holocaust is wrong: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-holocaust-examined
Mutually assured deception.
Yep, the fear factor, keep the populace scared Sh-less that vaporisation can happen at any instant by the press of a big red button. Duck and cover, duck and cover.....
Where’s the information from a Geiger counter? That seems to be a very relevant
There's a brilliant 19-part series of essays on Miles Mathis' site by an English guy called "Lestrade" about how pretty much the entire "Pacific Theater" war between the United States and Japan was mostly fake. This guy rose even further in my esteem when he mentioned he was the same guy who has the Unpopular Opinion Bitchute channel with the excellent 7 part series of videos Fake Atomics exposing the nukes hoax.
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/srZwpEndebWN/
Brilliant forensic work here. The striped kimono detail is haunting becuase it suggests fabric-mediated chemical burns rather than thermal flash. I remember simialr burn patterns from clinical work where agents penetrated clothing. If close-range survival in wooden structures contradicts radiation dosage models, maybe we gotta rethink the whole mechanism.
Really Unbekoming, you had to interview Parker when you just had to ask me? I told you there were no nuclear weapons ages ago. Oppenheimer was full of shit. Nonetheless, glad you caught up, very interesting article. Now look at the ramifications of that truth today. All leaders, generals, military, scientists, news medias singing from the same hymn book, scaring all of humanity about who will use nuclear weapons first. Dag, they're good, aren't they?
Hiroshima Fake Atomics: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OKFVKmFxIVo1
Hiroshima A-bombing date: 6 August 1945
6+8+1+9+4+5 = 33
On 15 August 1945 Emperor Hirohito made his famous radio broadcast to the Japanese people announcing Japan's surrender.
1+5+8+1+9+4+5 = 33
Nice masonic timing:)
It wasn’t nuclear; it was atomic bombs according to what I was told by the graduate student who led the review for the final exam at UCLA for the American history class that I enrolled in back in 1984. See http://www.truedemocracy.net/w01/10.html by scrolling down until you see Did You Know?
I'm not denying the fires, just don't think that nuclear was used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I have also become aware that those two cities were predominantly where Christians lived.
That w01 means that it was my first edition of top secret history that I learned over a 10 year timespan, and edition that only exists because of the biggest cover up of the 20th century which betrayed every decent human being around the world, and enabled me to understand the mentality of those who deceive people. I highly recommend that you read it.
God bless,
Arlene Johnson
Publisher/Author
http://www.truedemocracy.net
You can click on the Table of Contents at the top of the aforementioned link to access the entire contents of that edition.
Hi Arlene - I've looked into this, and maybe also come across Palmer's work, but I put "nukes" in the same category as "viruses" -- we're told that these things exist, but when we examine them, they serve more as a scare tactic than something plausible. I know you mentioned it was atomic bombs vs nuclear weapons, but I'd like to present some of my articles that show that the reason for Nagasaki/Hiroshima is more of a fear tactic than reality:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/lies-not-discussed-within-the-truth
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/false-fire-5-reasons-to-doubt-the
nuclear means either nuclear fission (the atomic bomb) or nuclear fusion (the H-bomb). If it was an atomic bomb, then it was nuclear!
The offical photographies taken from airplanes 'failed'. I believe the US wanted to escape culpability for having used nuclear weapons and didnt want leave evidence of a mushroom cloud. US authorities censored info about radioactivity from Cs 137 and Sr90 and proof of Neutron activation causing nails and steel to be temporarily radioactive
During the occupation of Japan, photographs, medical reports, and samples showing radiation damage were confiscated. The US authorities formed the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC) to study the victims, but at the same time forbade them from providing medical care, as this was considered an admission of guilt for an "illegal" weapon.
I first came across this concept when I read The Bomber Mafia by Malcom Gladwell.
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Australia.
That story cannot be confirmed. To pick up one detail " - ‘Atomic Bomb Dome’—is presented in both accounts as notable rather than anomalous. Palmer argues such survival is inexplicable under the nuclear narrative but consistent with firebombing." No, that is not true.
The survival of the 'Atomic Bomb Dome' IS consistent with the effects of a nuclear bomb being detonated at an altitude of some sixhundred meters above ground. For that surviving building was located at ground zero. The place vertically direct under the place of detonation. Which means the shockwaves only could effect the roof of this building but not the walls. As the walls where standing at an angle of zero degree to the direction of the incoming shock wave. Resulting in (almost) zero destructive force.
For getting a much more authentic story I do recommend Keiji Nakazawa's autobiographic manga novel "Barefoot Gen" (barfuß durch Hiroshima). It is truely horrifying - and it is not fictional. Containing lots of details being consistent with a nuclear detonation.
Well why not given recent revelations
Whoa. Stunner.
Thank you!!