The McDowell Triplets
On Childhood Vaccination
“…we were told it was genetic…” Brenda McDowell (min. 4.45 in video below)
"We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
I recently came across a document titled Vaccine Prospectus that was put together in 2019, while at the same time, a reader, Jessica sent in her child’s vaccination story (below).
As I was browsing through the Vaccine Prospectus (there’s a lot of good stuff in there) I noticed this story on page 31.
Vaccine Safety in the United States (vaccineprospectus.com)
The McDowell Triplets: Three thriving babies lost
This is arguably the single-most unquestionable example of harm by vaccines.
At 9 months old, the triplets went in for their pneumococcal shots, and all three of them immediately regressed into severe autism. The photographic and video evidence of the children before and after the vaccinations is undeniable and heartbreaking.
The only scientific explanation for what happened to them is that an environmental cause triggered their autism. This was the case that made Dr. Rachel Ross from the TV show “The Doctors” start questioning vaccines.
After I watched this clip, I realised I had forgotten this story from Vaxxed 2.
The McDowell Triplets in Michigan - YouTube
Brenda and David McDowell's account of their experience with their triplets (Richie, Robbie, and Claire) who were adversely affected by vaccinations. The triplets were born at 36 weeks, each weighing around five pounds, and were initially healthy and developing normally. They were engaging, happy, and interactive with each other.
The turning point, was on June 25, 2007, when the triplets received the pneumococcal vaccine at nine months of age. Brenda noticed immediate changes in their behavior following the vaccination. Claire, their daughter, became unresponsive as if she were blind and deaf, losing her previously happy demeanor. By that afternoon, Richie also changed, losing his ability to speak and engage. Robbie, similarly, lost his expressive abilities and seemed stunned.
Brenda, an educational audiologist, tested the triplets and found they had lost various reflexes, such as the startle reflex and the Stapedial (Stu PDL) reflex. The children were diagnosed with severe autism spectrum disorder by the time they were due to enter kindergarten. Despite various therapies, including sunrise therapy which brought some happiness back into their lives, significant challenges remained. Richie was mostly nonverbal and in pain, Claire remained nonverbal and not potty-trained, and while Robbie made some progress, he still faced severe OCD.
The McDowells faced further challenges with the healthcare system. They were initially told that the condition was genetic, which they found implausible given the simultaneous onset in all three children. They were also unable to pursue legal action due to the protections in place for vaccine manufacturers and the statute of limitations for vaccine injury claims.
The family discovered years later that the vaccine lot administered to their children had been recalled due to sterilization issues and was linked to the death of a two-year-old. This information was not disclosed to them at the time of vaccination.
The McDowells expressed frustration with the medical community's response to their situation, including being dismissed from their pediatric practice for refusing further vaccinations post-incident. They remain adamant about raising awareness of vaccine injury, sharing their story, and hoping for recovery for their children.
Quite a few thoughts went through my mind watching the McDowell’s testimony again.
One of the fall backs of the system is the “Bad Batch” narrative.
There are a series of cascading chambers used to defend childhood vaccination, not unlike the flooding chambers1 of the Titanic.
Genetics is obviously one of the main flooding chambers that is designed to take in a lot of the water.
But Bad Batches is another. It’s a way of blaming manufacturing and not the product nor the whole institution and enterprise of vaccination, that is unavoidably unsafe.
The “recall” then acts as a continuation of that narrative to show that the system and the authorities, with their checks and balances, are working to keep the public safe.
This is not to say that there are no bad batches or manufacturing problems, off course there are, but it’s to say that the primary utility of that narrative is to act as a Flooding Chamber to make sure that the whole ship doesn’t sink.
I can truly relate, my son almost died from his first DTP vaccine, he went code blue and was flown to Children’s hospital in Ann Arbor, 2 weeks in ICU, 2 years on phenobarbital for seizures. FDA said it was a bad batch. Per his neurologist he can never have it again. - @maraleeoneill9124
The other thought I had connected with the interview I recently did with Vicky Davis:
What risks do you see in the growing trend of genetic research in healthcare?
With the redesign of the American health care system, there is no way to prevent human medical research and no way to oversee it. They’ve turned the American people into a flock of sheep surrounded by wolves who will simply cut a few out of the herd for experimental purposes. Because of the nature of networked systems, research populations can be distributed so there are no pockets of death or injury. If a family was suspicious, it would take serious time and money to investigate – not to mention the barriers to medical records (at least to those outside the health care system). In my opinion, the redesign of the American system of health care is perfectly evil designed for an evil purpose.
What are the chances that the McDowell’s were unwittingly part of camouflaged “medical research”?
I don’t know, but at this point in the equation I’m confident it’s not zero.
The problem with the history we’ve been taught is that we’ve come to think of Totalitarianism through either a Nazi or Communist lens. If we don’t see a swastika or gulag in the vicinity, we believe we are living a life safe from Totalitarianism.
But the hallmark of Totalitarianism isn’t a Goose Step or a Comrade, it’s Lies.
A society built on lies is Totalitarian.
It might be “soft” Totalitarianism, but Totalitarian, nevertheless.
It’s Huxley’s vision rather than Orwell’s2.
Western Society socially engineered and managed by Empire has been Totalitarian for quite some time, with an obvious recent change in degree. It’s a society built on foundations of lies that are well hidden under the rubble of “democracy”.
Hannah Arendt, in her seminal work "The Origins of Totalitarianism," explored the mechanisms and characteristics of totalitarian governments.
One of Arendt's key observations about totalitarianism and lying is the concept that totalitarian regimes rely on lies as a crucial tool for controlling and manipulating the populace. Totalitarian leaders use lies to create an alternative reality that serves their political goals. This manipulation of truth is not just about deceiving people, but about undermining their capacity to discern truth from falsehood. In a totalitarian state, facts become irrelevant, and the line between truth and lies blurs, creating a state of confusion and disorientation among the people.
Arendt argued that the constant barrage of propaganda and misinformation in a totalitarian state serves to erode the public's ability to think critically and independently. The incessant stream of falsehoods aims to wear down the individual's capacity to trust their own judgment and experiences. This leads to a situation where people begin to doubt the existence of an objective reality and become more susceptible to the dictates of the regime.
Furthermore, Arendt highlighted the concept of the "big lie" in totalitarian regimes. A big lie is a gross distortion or falsehood so extreme that it becomes a kind of enforced reality, requiring everyone to live as though the lie were true. Totalitarian regimes use such big lies to create a new "reality," one that aligns with their ideologies and objectives.
On the Nature of Totalitarian Lies: The concept about the ideal subject of totalitarian rule being those who can't distinguish between fact and fiction is indeed a theme in Arendt's work. She discusses how totalitarianism thrives when people lose the capacity to think and discern reality.
On the Destruction of Reality: The idea that totalitarianism replaces first-rate talents with less capable but more loyal individuals is consistent with Arendt's views. She explored how totalitarian regimes manipulate truth and reality.
On the Big Lie: The notion of the totalitarian state erasing atrocities from public memory aligns with Arendt's analysis of totalitarianism's manipulation of history and truth.
On Manipulating the Truth: The idea that totalitarian regimes replace truth with lies is a theme Arendt explored. She examined how these regimes use lies as a tool for control and manipulation.
And finally, I leave you with the story sent in by Jessica (thank you!).
From Jessica
My eldest daughter was induced at 37 weeks due to being very small for gestational age which was discovered at 23 weeks’ gestation. They now believe this is due to a rare genetic condition, but I’m not convinced…
She was born at 37 weeks at exactly 2kg. She then had Vitamin K and Hep B immunisations and within the hour was moved to special care because her temperature dropped to 35 degrees and her blood sugar levels were zero!
She then had several apnea episodes (stopped breathing).
Then just before 7 months of age and 2 weeks after she received her 6 month vax including the flu shot she developed nystagmus (eyes flicking side to side rapidly). She also had a high fever and was generally unwell. They did a lumbar puncture and MRI on her brain. They discovered she had a macro-cerebellum (this is supposedly very rare). Neurologists say this is due to her rare genetic condition. I find it strange that I had specialised scans in pregnancy to check her brain and it wasn’t discovered then. I now wonder was this because of all the toxins (aluminium etc.) that passed through the blood brain barrier causing encephalitis?
The MRI also showed she had a smaller then usual pituitary gland and was explained as the reason she was always slow to grow and small in stature. Although endocrinologists have done extensive testing and her growth hormone levels have always come back normal.
Unfortunately, I didn’t wake up to the danger of vaccines until after her 18-month ones, but our following children have ceased the schedule.
Thankfully today she is a healthy 4-year-old but is still small in stature. She’s developing normally cognitively which is wonderful!
I have now taken her to see a naturopath and homeopath and done lots of work to detox her and work on her general health. She’s barely been unwell in 2 years but is still very small for her age. I will always wonder if these issues are linked to vaccines and will probably never know the answer to that question. Hope this helps and open to anything you have to contribute or if you have heard of any similar experiences with others.
Thanks for being here.
Please consider a paid subscription.
You will get nothing more for your support, as everything is made freely available. The money simply goes towards recovering some of the cost of this work.
I am always looking for good, personal GMC, covid and childhood vaccination stories. You can write to me privately: unbekoming@outlook.com
If you are Covid vaccine injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment
If you want to understand and “see” what baseline human health looks like, watch (and share) this 21 minutes
If you want to help someone, give them a book. Official Stories by Liam Scheff. Point them to a “safe” chapter (here and here), and they will find their way to vaccination.
Here are all eBooks and Summaries produced so far:
FREE Book Summary: The HPV Vaccine on Trial by Holland et al.
FREE Book Summary: Bitten by Kris Newby (Lyme Disease)
FREE Book Summary: The Great Cholesterol Con by Dr Malcolm Kendrick
FREE Book Summary: Propaganda by Edward Bernays
FREE Book Summary: Toxic Legacy by Stephanie Seneff (Glyphosate)
FREE Book Summary: The Measles Book by CHD
FREE Book Summary: The Deep Hot Biosphere by Thomas Gold (Abiogenic Oil)
FREE Book Summary: The Peanut Allergy Epidemic by Heather Fraser
FREE eBook: What is a woman? - “We don’t know yet.”
FREE eBook: A letter to my two adult kids - Vaccines and the free spike protein
Flooding Chambers
The Titanic was designed with a total of 16 watertight compartments, often referred to as "flooding chambers". These compartments were a key feature of the ship's design, intended to make it "unsinkable". The design of the Titanic was such that it could stay afloat if any two of these compartments or the first four became flooded.
Aldous Huxley's and George Orwell's visions of totalitarianism, as depicted in their respective novels "Brave New World" and "1984," present two distinct dystopian futures, each with its unique approach to societal control and individual freedom.
In Orwell's "1984," the totalitarian regime is overtly oppressive and coercive. The government, led by Big Brother, maintains control through constant surveillance, manipulation of language (Newspeak), and psychological torture. The society Orwell depicts is grim and bleak, where any form of dissent is ruthlessly suppressed, and individuality is crushed. The protagonist, Winston Smith, represents the struggle of the individual against this oppressive state.
On the other hand, Huxley's "Brave New World" presents a seemingly utopian society where control is maintained not through oppression but through the manipulation of pleasure. The World State in Huxley’s novel uses genetic engineering, conditioning, and the drug soma to ensure that citizens are kept happy and docile. This society is characterized by technological advancements and a caste system where people are bred for specific roles, leaving no room for individuality or emotional connections. John the Savage, the protagonist, represents the human values that are at odds with this controlled, pleasure-seeking society.
Neil Postman, in his work "Amusing Ourselves to Death," summarizes the differences between these two visions. He suggests that Orwell feared a culture where books are banned and information is controlled, while Huxley feared a society where people would be overwhelmed with so much trivial content that they would become passive and egotistical. In essence, Orwell feared the concealment of truth leading to a captive culture, whereas Huxley feared that truth would be drowned in irrelevance, leading to a trivial culture focused on entertainment and pleasure.
Today I caught up with friends I haven't seen since before covid. They told me their son ended up in hospital with myocarditis after the second jab. Not to worry though, they said, because they've since discovered that he can take Novavax next time because it doesn't have that particular side effect. To make matters worse, this is a boy "on the spectrum". So if those parents didn't wake up after the childhood vax likely damaged their son's brain, and they didn't wake up after the covid vax damaged his heart, what hope is there?
Many parents are still seduced by the Medical Industrial Complex. The price is too high folks we have been lied to, there are no safe vaccines. SAY NO in front of the mirror, practice taking control of your life and that of your children every day. Vax required to attend school if enough parents refused to vax schools would no longer be able to discriminate in this manner. Why do parents not sue boards of education, school is a right and there should be no means tests. Fight Back!