"While Pasteur was promoting his germ theory with the backing of Napoleon III’s authoritarian government..." -- This is important to know because this is where the Rothschilds come in and we also get our vaccines as well, as discussed in "Rich People Do Magic": https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/rich-people-do-magic
"...other scientists were discovering something remarkable: the microorganisms associated with disease aren’t invaders at all. They’re shapeshifters, emerging from particles that exist in every living cell, transforming based on the condition of their environment. Antoine Béchamp called them microzymas. Gaston Naessens called them somatids. Wilhelm Reich called them bions.
Working independently across different centuries with different technologies, these researchers kept finding the same phenomenon - tiny, indestructible particles that could evolve into bacteria when the body’s internal terrain became toxic, acidic, or depleted. It’s not invasion; it’s transformation from within.
Your body isn’t sterile - it’s teeming with microscopic life that either supports your health or, when the conditions deteriorate, participates in disease."
This is where our understanding of disease and viruses are flawed -- they arent disease, they're mechanisms as explored in "Why “Disease-Causing Viruses” Are Pseudoscience" Parts 1 and 2:
Funny read, viruses would not exist but microzymas do! Nobody has ever isolated microzymas, nobody has ever demonstrated their supposed pleiomorphism, nobody has ever biochemically characterized microzymas. But countless bacterial genomes have been sequenced, each species having its specific biochemistry and genetics. Likewise, countless viruses have been isolated, characterized and sequenced. There are over 1.5 million scientific papers on viruses and a single one on mycrozymas... Microzymas was a cool story before the advent of molecular biology, but is utterly refuted by it!
Show me who has isolated microzymas, show me who has ever demonstrated their supposed pleiomorphism, show me who has ever biochemically characterized microzymas..., you cannot!
I agree for the most part. I think gut microbiota can become pathogenic depending on the environment they find themselves in. As far as I know, Dr. Cowan is a board member of Weston Price. One of their articles suggests microbes are not external invaders, sickness is due to transformation within the patient. The article gives an example of a 'French study done in 1980, where 94 unvaccinated children recovered from chickenpox and sadly, three passed away, those who had been on steroids.' This example does not support Bechamps theory, which holds that the 94 healthy children should never have developed symptoms in the first place. There is a relationship between the health of the organism and symptom expression. However, I would expect serious symptoms in any healthy person who had been exposed to a high load of Ebola virions. I think Pasteur and Bechamp both had useful and useless insights regarding microbes.
Yes. Pasteur was in full agreement with the importance of the terrain, I don't know a single scientist or physician who disputes the crucial role of the terrain. He did questionable things, the most egregious for me was when after vaccinating a bitten kid multiple times with his rabbit-attenuated rabies vaccine, he inoculated him with wild-type rabies virus to demonstrate the efficacy of his vaccine... The kid lived. Yet whatever reprehensible behavior he has been accused of has logically no connection with the validity of the germ theory (which does take the terrain into account).
Totally wrong! Pasteur only rejected his germ theory on his deathbed while knowing many years before that he was wrong; Pasteur's legacy was the birth of the false paradigm of allopathic medicine and the fraud of vaccines able to cure every ailment imaginable which they never have and never did.
'Multiple sources confirm this is a fabricated story that first appeared in 1922, created by novelist Paul Bourget. The Bulletin of the National Academy of Medicine has explicitly labeled this claim as a "legend to be destroyed....The claim often appears in anti-vaccination and alternative medicine contexts, where discrediting germ theory serves commercial and ideological interests
The story transforms Pasteur's nuanced scientific understanding into an oversimplified narrative.'
That's total nonsense but expected coming from a diehard Pasteurian! In reality and historical correctness, germ theory was promoted by Pasteur and the French state at the time precisely to serve commercial and ideological interests; the very first Pasteur Institute to be set up was financed and promoted by the French rule specifically for vaccine development and future financial gain; it was part of the overall plan to restore the loss of France's prestige and status in the world following its defeat in the Franco-Prussian war; Pasteur was the hero France needed at any cost and the cost was the loss of genuine scientific research and honest medical geniuses and the burying of the pursuit of real science using the scientific method; Pasteur (a mediocre chemist) did not have a "nuanced scientific understanding" but a mastery of charlatanism and plagiarism which he was aided and abetted in to serve France's national interests at the expense of the pursuit of truth in science; the world was bequeathed the abject failures of allopathic medicine and medical treatment for profit which necessitated the vilification and burial of a long line of medical pioneers from Florence Nightingale to Royal Rife; as for Bechamp, his long overdue vindication has only begun as the facts and truth are destined to overcome the lies and deception.
I do believe that viruses and bacteria are real and a small percentage cause symptoms even in healthy people. I do believe healthy children do contract measles and chickenpox. You won't change my mind. I think natural immunity is superior, and these infections confer benefits to the developing immune system.
There is no such thing as a"wild -type" rabies 'virus'. When we read in the literature about 'viruses' what's happening is pathogens termed as viruses are either bacteria or parasites or if they are not wild they are created and constructed in laboratories, i.o.w. man-made because a bacteriophage a.k.a. "virus" requires the DNA and/biology of living cells in order to replicate itself.
Where that entity the 'bacteriophage' originates from, that is the age old question?
Many theories, too much buried evidence but, seek and you shall find... Eventually.
There is such a thing as a wild-type rabies virus, it refers to the virus isolated from an individual with rabies and that is genetically distinct from a virus obtained after passaging it in rabbits. Bacteria or parasites, which are unicellular or pluricellular eukaryotic organisms, are not viruses. If you refer to the fact that viruses must be inside a cell in order to replicate, it is true of certain species of bacteria as well, e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
I've never seen the proof that a so called"virus" has ever been isolated? Show me the proof and I may change my stance but until you or anybody else brings forward this irrefutable evidence, I will continue to maintain the view that viruses are dead man made constructs and do not or did not originate from the wild. All of them are introduced.
You don't seem to understand how science works: you cannot prove anything in science, only disprove, refute. The way science works is that you make observations, from which you formulate hypotheses that you test in experiments. When you have sufficient experimental validation (not proof) of your hypothesis, eventually a theory is formulated that accounts for the observation. It is considered valid until experiments that would refute it are produced. In the case of viruses, there are some 1.5+ million publications consistent with the theory of virology. So far, no refutation of virology. If you know of an experiment that refutes virology, please share it. And don't hesitate to read the virology literature, you will discover that countless viruses have been properly isolated, despite the claims of the no-virus crowd.
What "scientific knowledge available today"!? the world was left with 200 years of possible scientific advancement that NEVER HAPPENED because real science was STOPPED along with any genius who actually used the scientific method; there is no motive to pursue genuine science or actually "follow the science" because science was long ago hijacked by those who seek profit and control and the dominant money-making paradigm we are forced to live under demands that we remain sick and/or dying.
This world is not what you believe it to be. Much has existed for thousands of years. There have been several extinction events and the victors always rewrite history to suit their agenda.
Nothing you see in today's world is new. It's all been done before. They just drip feed us the new tech to create the illusion of evolution.
The historical evidence clearly shows that Bechamp did, in fact, prove the existence of microzymas and "biochemically characterized" them by their function as the basic unit of all cellular life; and he did this without the aid of advanced microscopy which still fails to actually show a virus culture completely isolated and identified; neither virology nor molecular biology have advanced the cause of medical science because they repeatedly fail to reveal their unscientific methodologies lacking the scientific method; viruses cultured in labs invariably depend on computer models which are so manipulated as to make any definitive results questionable and invalid.
Completely empty claim, without the slightest evidence to support it, historical or otherwise... Show me a publication... Biochemical characterization is not the same as function, Bechamp or anybody else cannot say what molecules microzymas are made of, nor can they isolate them... Look up Brownian motion, that's what gave the illusion of life under a microscope. There are ~20,000 bacterial genomes sequenced, completely contradicting the concept of microzymas... You are just repeating claims against virology and molecular biology made by others with no understanding of the science behind it, but go ahead, cling to your fantasies if you must...
'viruses' an invented word( invented to strike absolute terror into the hearts of gullible consumers) are merely Exosomes which are merely the expelled dead material from cleansed detoxifying cells.The very same exosomes which Pasteur so wrongly assumed we're 'viruses' the bogey man of dis ease as such.
The term 'virus' is exactly just that, a medical term given to bacteriophages, which without the machinery of the cell cannot replicate. To suggest that people catch things is completely illogical and a scientific fallacy.
Illness or dis ease occurs when the human body system is out of balance and homeostasis has been disrupted.
Like with everything in this modern world, what the establishment and certain elites did when they hijacked the medical industry and the education system is create a psuedoscience. Traditional remedies were usurped and replaced with chemically derived by products from the petrochemical industry and traditional remedies were re-labelled as the alternative when it's in fact completely the other way around. Allopathic medicine is the alternative.
While modern medicine can be very beneficial in terms of surgery or prosthetics for example, all pharmaceutical based medicine is born from lies going back centuries. Lies for profit. It's not about supporting your health but instead it's about creating wealth for the shareholders.
You know, I agree that medicine is largely corrupt and that remedies that work have been sidelined but that does not mean the rest of your prose is correct. All the terms in language are invented... that's how languages evolve, do you think bacteriophage is not an invented word? You are mistaken that viruses would be exosomes: yes, some viruses do look like exosomes but many are very very different, you can take a look here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7161876/pdf/BOC-100-491.pdf
Poxviruses and members of the rabies virus family, for example, have very distinct shapes having nothing to do with exosomes. Adenoviruses don't even have a membrane like exosomes, rather they have an icosahedral protein shell, never found in exosomes. I could go on and on, but simply put, you did not do your homework, you know nothing about viruses but you feel like you can make grand pronouncement about the field: it's the Dunning Kruger trap that you have fallen into. Grow up, do your homework or keep making a fool of yourself.
I think the no-virus phenomenon is indeed a psyop, even if the issue was raised before COVID. I don't think it is terribly useful to give a number for the relative contributions of the terrain and the germ, both aspects deserve understanding, respect and attention. I am saying that even though if I was pressed to give a number I would be close to yours, lol. Having worked with viruses all my life I naturally have no doubt about their reality and their ability to infect, transmit and occasionally cause disease in susceptible individuals.
What an excellent and refreshing article on health and disease. Even if what Nancy Appleton says is only partly correct, it is well worth pondering. I have long since lost faith in the "disease care" system. I avoid prescription medications and most processed foods, prepare for myself from basic ingredients most of what I eat. At 89 I'm doing pretty well. I accept the fact of my own mortality but am determined to do my part in staying healthy as long as I can.
Exactly. That's one of the most prolific reasons for people thinking there is a quick fix or pill to cure long term self abuse, what the medical establishment inevitably did was remove self responsibility.
Like with all things created for our 'convenience ' the truth is, there are no short cuts, there are no quick fixes when it comes to maintaining a healthy terrain.
It's a continual process of tweaking and observing, like dialling through the radio stations on an old analogue radio until you get the correct frequency, takes a little while before you dial out the static to get a clear signal.
One of my greatest moments in life is when I realized the viral delusion. I never had to worry about something attacking me from the outside. The Bible tells us we are fearfully, and wonderfully made. My body, if treated right, will heal itself.
I few of us had asked in the Healing with Food thread about the test she recommends. Still unable to find any test that is available for what she recommends. Any Help?
Thank you and God bless you for exposing Louis Pasteur's Germ theory. It has really helped me. The only thing I could add would be that Pasteur used poison to get innocent people to believe that germs were affecting them. See https://coppervortex.substack.com/p/louis-pasteur-the-fraudster-part
Excellent. Bacteria exist. Viruses aka Germs do not.
Illnesses cannot be caused by something that does not exist.
Pasteur was a quack.
Koch was a quack.
Jenner was an idiot and a quack.
Follow the money, funded and extended of course, by government.
The unholy drug industry, built by governments and quacks since 1800.
Jenner was a freemason:).
"While Pasteur was promoting his germ theory with the backing of Napoleon III’s authoritarian government..." -- This is important to know because this is where the Rothschilds come in and we also get our vaccines as well, as discussed in "Rich People Do Magic": https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/rich-people-do-magic
"...other scientists were discovering something remarkable: the microorganisms associated with disease aren’t invaders at all. They’re shapeshifters, emerging from particles that exist in every living cell, transforming based on the condition of their environment. Antoine Béchamp called them microzymas. Gaston Naessens called them somatids. Wilhelm Reich called them bions.
Working independently across different centuries with different technologies, these researchers kept finding the same phenomenon - tiny, indestructible particles that could evolve into bacteria when the body’s internal terrain became toxic, acidic, or depleted. It’s not invasion; it’s transformation from within.
Your body isn’t sterile - it’s teeming with microscopic life that either supports your health or, when the conditions deteriorate, participates in disease."
This is where our understanding of disease and viruses are flawed -- they arent disease, they're mechanisms as explored in "Why “Disease-Causing Viruses” Are Pseudoscience" Parts 1 and 2:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-disease-causing-viruses-are-pseudoscience
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-disease-causing-viruses-are-pseudoscience-93c
Funny read, viruses would not exist but microzymas do! Nobody has ever isolated microzymas, nobody has ever demonstrated their supposed pleiomorphism, nobody has ever biochemically characterized microzymas. But countless bacterial genomes have been sequenced, each species having its specific biochemistry and genetics. Likewise, countless viruses have been isolated, characterized and sequenced. There are over 1.5 million scientific papers on viruses and a single one on mycrozymas... Microzymas was a cool story before the advent of molecular biology, but is utterly refuted by it!
Show me who has isolated microzymas, show me who has ever demonstrated their supposed pleiomorphism, show me who has ever biochemically characterized microzymas..., you cannot!
I agree for the most part. I think gut microbiota can become pathogenic depending on the environment they find themselves in. As far as I know, Dr. Cowan is a board member of Weston Price. One of their articles suggests microbes are not external invaders, sickness is due to transformation within the patient. The article gives an example of a 'French study done in 1980, where 94 unvaccinated children recovered from chickenpox and sadly, three passed away, those who had been on steroids.' This example does not support Bechamps theory, which holds that the 94 healthy children should never have developed symptoms in the first place. There is a relationship between the health of the organism and symptom expression. However, I would expect serious symptoms in any healthy person who had been exposed to a high load of Ebola virions. I think Pasteur and Bechamp both had useful and useless insights regarding microbes.
Yes. Pasteur was in full agreement with the importance of the terrain, I don't know a single scientist or physician who disputes the crucial role of the terrain. He did questionable things, the most egregious for me was when after vaccinating a bitten kid multiple times with his rabbit-attenuated rabies vaccine, he inoculated him with wild-type rabies virus to demonstrate the efficacy of his vaccine... The kid lived. Yet whatever reprehensible behavior he has been accused of has logically no connection with the validity of the germ theory (which does take the terrain into account).
Totally wrong! Pasteur only rejected his germ theory on his deathbed while knowing many years before that he was wrong; Pasteur's legacy was the birth of the false paradigm of allopathic medicine and the fraud of vaccines able to cure every ailment imaginable which they never have and never did.
'Multiple sources confirm this is a fabricated story that first appeared in 1922, created by novelist Paul Bourget. The Bulletin of the National Academy of Medicine has explicitly labeled this claim as a "legend to be destroyed....The claim often appears in anti-vaccination and alternative medicine contexts, where discrediting germ theory serves commercial and ideological interests
The story transforms Pasteur's nuanced scientific understanding into an oversimplified narrative.'
That's total nonsense but expected coming from a diehard Pasteurian! In reality and historical correctness, germ theory was promoted by Pasteur and the French state at the time precisely to serve commercial and ideological interests; the very first Pasteur Institute to be set up was financed and promoted by the French rule specifically for vaccine development and future financial gain; it was part of the overall plan to restore the loss of France's prestige and status in the world following its defeat in the Franco-Prussian war; Pasteur was the hero France needed at any cost and the cost was the loss of genuine scientific research and honest medical geniuses and the burying of the pursuit of real science using the scientific method; Pasteur (a mediocre chemist) did not have a "nuanced scientific understanding" but a mastery of charlatanism and plagiarism which he was aided and abetted in to serve France's national interests at the expense of the pursuit of truth in science; the world was bequeathed the abject failures of allopathic medicine and medical treatment for profit which necessitated the vilification and burial of a long line of medical pioneers from Florence Nightingale to Royal Rife; as for Bechamp, his long overdue vindication has only begun as the facts and truth are destined to overcome the lies and deception.
I do believe that viruses and bacteria are real and a small percentage cause symptoms even in healthy people. I do believe healthy children do contract measles and chickenpox. You won't change my mind. I think natural immunity is superior, and these infections confer benefits to the developing immune system.
Yes. Also, science is not frozen in the Pasteur era, it keeps evolving.
There is no such thing as a"wild -type" rabies 'virus'. When we read in the literature about 'viruses' what's happening is pathogens termed as viruses are either bacteria or parasites or if they are not wild they are created and constructed in laboratories, i.o.w. man-made because a bacteriophage a.k.a. "virus" requires the DNA and/biology of living cells in order to replicate itself.
Where that entity the 'bacteriophage' originates from, that is the age old question?
Many theories, too much buried evidence but, seek and you shall find... Eventually.
There is such a thing as a wild-type rabies virus, it refers to the virus isolated from an individual with rabies and that is genetically distinct from a virus obtained after passaging it in rabbits. Bacteria or parasites, which are unicellular or pluricellular eukaryotic organisms, are not viruses. If you refer to the fact that viruses must be inside a cell in order to replicate, it is true of certain species of bacteria as well, e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
I've never seen the proof that a so called"virus" has ever been isolated? Show me the proof and I may change my stance but until you or anybody else brings forward this irrefutable evidence, I will continue to maintain the view that viruses are dead man made constructs and do not or did not originate from the wild. All of them are introduced.
You don't seem to understand how science works: you cannot prove anything in science, only disprove, refute. The way science works is that you make observations, from which you formulate hypotheses that you test in experiments. When you have sufficient experimental validation (not proof) of your hypothesis, eventually a theory is formulated that accounts for the observation. It is considered valid until experiments that would refute it are produced. In the case of viruses, there are some 1.5+ million publications consistent with the theory of virology. So far, no refutation of virology. If you know of an experiment that refutes virology, please share it. And don't hesitate to read the virology literature, you will discover that countless viruses have been properly isolated, despite the claims of the no-virus crowd.
You fail to grasp the true genius of Bechamp and Pasteur's utter failure to understand the human body.
Bechamp contributed to science greatly, yet he didn't have the advantages of the scientific knowledge available today, genius or not.
What "scientific knowledge available today"!? the world was left with 200 years of possible scientific advancement that NEVER HAPPENED because real science was STOPPED along with any genius who actually used the scientific method; there is no motive to pursue genuine science or actually "follow the science" because science was long ago hijacked by those who seek profit and control and the dominant money-making paradigm we are forced to live under demands that we remain sick and/or dying.
What makes you think science does not continue to evolve, what we know today about genetics and epigenetics was not known fifty years ago.
This world is not what you believe it to be. Much has existed for thousands of years. There have been several extinction events and the victors always rewrite history to suit their agenda.
Nothing you see in today's world is new. It's all been done before. They just drip feed us the new tech to create the illusion of evolution.
A response to this comment would be far more constructive than the never-ending "no one's ever proved viruses exist" posts.
Lol, you can expect crickets...
The historical evidence clearly shows that Bechamp did, in fact, prove the existence of microzymas and "biochemically characterized" them by their function as the basic unit of all cellular life; and he did this without the aid of advanced microscopy which still fails to actually show a virus culture completely isolated and identified; neither virology nor molecular biology have advanced the cause of medical science because they repeatedly fail to reveal their unscientific methodologies lacking the scientific method; viruses cultured in labs invariably depend on computer models which are so manipulated as to make any definitive results questionable and invalid.
Completely empty claim, without the slightest evidence to support it, historical or otherwise... Show me a publication... Biochemical characterization is not the same as function, Bechamp or anybody else cannot say what molecules microzymas are made of, nor can they isolate them... Look up Brownian motion, that's what gave the illusion of life under a microscope. There are ~20,000 bacterial genomes sequenced, completely contradicting the concept of microzymas... You are just repeating claims against virology and molecular biology made by others with no understanding of the science behind it, but go ahead, cling to your fantasies if you must...
🤣🤣🤣
'viruses' an invented word( invented to strike absolute terror into the hearts of gullible consumers) are merely Exosomes which are merely the expelled dead material from cleansed detoxifying cells.The very same exosomes which Pasteur so wrongly assumed we're 'viruses' the bogey man of dis ease as such.
The term 'virus' is exactly just that, a medical term given to bacteriophages, which without the machinery of the cell cannot replicate. To suggest that people catch things is completely illogical and a scientific fallacy.
Illness or dis ease occurs when the human body system is out of balance and homeostasis has been disrupted.
Like with everything in this modern world, what the establishment and certain elites did when they hijacked the medical industry and the education system is create a psuedoscience. Traditional remedies were usurped and replaced with chemically derived by products from the petrochemical industry and traditional remedies were re-labelled as the alternative when it's in fact completely the other way around. Allopathic medicine is the alternative.
While modern medicine can be very beneficial in terms of surgery or prosthetics for example, all pharmaceutical based medicine is born from lies going back centuries. Lies for profit. It's not about supporting your health but instead it's about creating wealth for the shareholders.
You know, I agree that medicine is largely corrupt and that remedies that work have been sidelined but that does not mean the rest of your prose is correct. All the terms in language are invented... that's how languages evolve, do you think bacteriophage is not an invented word? You are mistaken that viruses would be exosomes: yes, some viruses do look like exosomes but many are very very different, you can take a look here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7161876/pdf/BOC-100-491.pdf
Poxviruses and members of the rabies virus family, for example, have very distinct shapes having nothing to do with exosomes. Adenoviruses don't even have a membrane like exosomes, rather they have an icosahedral protein shell, never found in exosomes. I could go on and on, but simply put, you did not do your homework, you know nothing about viruses but you feel like you can make grand pronouncement about the field: it's the Dunning Kruger trap that you have fallen into. Grow up, do your homework or keep making a fool of yourself.
I think the no-virus phenomenon is indeed a psyop, even if the issue was raised before COVID. I don't think it is terribly useful to give a number for the relative contributions of the terrain and the germ, both aspects deserve understanding, respect and attention. I am saying that even though if I was pressed to give a number I would be close to yours, lol. Having worked with viruses all my life I naturally have no doubt about their reality and their ability to infect, transmit and occasionally cause disease in susceptible individuals.
What an excellent and refreshing article on health and disease. Even if what Nancy Appleton says is only partly correct, it is well worth pondering. I have long since lost faith in the "disease care" system. I avoid prescription medications and most processed foods, prepare for myself from basic ingredients most of what I eat. At 89 I'm doing pretty well. I accept the fact of my own mortality but am determined to do my part in staying healthy as long as I can.
Exactly. That's one of the most prolific reasons for people thinking there is a quick fix or pill to cure long term self abuse, what the medical establishment inevitably did was remove self responsibility.
Like with all things created for our 'convenience ' the truth is, there are no short cuts, there are no quick fixes when it comes to maintaining a healthy terrain.
It's a continual process of tweaking and observing, like dialling through the radio stations on an old analogue radio until you get the correct frequency, takes a little while before you dial out the static to get a clear signal.
The analogy here is intentionally ironic.
Succinctly put, and accords with my personal experience. Our modern gods are carnival barkers.
One of my greatest moments in life is when I realized the viral delusion. I never had to worry about something attacking me from the outside. The Bible tells us we are fearfully, and wonderfully made. My body, if treated right, will heal itself.
Beautifully and succinctly stated!
All I know from experience is that when one of my kids gets sick, the rest of us get sick as well. I'm trying to reconcile that with Terrain Theory.
Could be any number of things, most basically, a common environmental toxin or exposure.
Resonant frequency my friend.
Explains how women living together in close proximity begin to have their cycles synchronised.
... And when one yawns, the rest (for the most part) yawn too.
We need to study this phenomenon to open the door wider on so called "contagion"
Not the first time I've heard Pasteur impugned...He was a pioneer...
Very succinct and on point. Encouraging to see more and more people are coming to this conclusion through logical and actual scientific debate.
👏
In the meantime
Anytime someone tells you
That they are Vaccinated
Ask Them:
“If you can have their stuff.”
Start There.
I few of us had asked in the Healing with Food thread about the test she recommends. Still unable to find any test that is available for what she recommends. Any Help?
Thank you and God bless you for exposing Louis Pasteur's Germ theory. It has really helped me. The only thing I could add would be that Pasteur used poison to get innocent people to believe that germs were affecting them. See https://coppervortex.substack.com/p/louis-pasteur-the-fraudster-part
Very interesting article--thanks for publishing it. Sol Deo gloria!!!!!!!
It would be nice if evil creatures were restricted to the screen in horror movies, but in reality they infest our world.
I like this