193 Comments
User's avatar
Donna's avatar

I wonder if the higher suicide and depression rates are linked to not only the hormones but “consequent free sex” which leads women feeling used and like a product devoid of intimacy

Expand full comment
Susie's avatar

For many years, TV, movies, and music have promoted females to be sluts, to show off their bodies, and to "feel powerful" if they pose naked in a magazine. Very strong propaganda.............It's only gotten worse - take a look at the young "ladies" out in public or even on all the social media. They don't look attractive anymore. They almost seem to uglify themselves on purpose......Put on a big clunky nose ring to go with their latest face and neck tattoos, then go out shopping.

Expand full comment
Peter Andrew Nolan's avatar

And you women chose to be sluts and whores over the very loud objections of the men in your families. You women have only your selves to blame. The men in your families told you what was good for you. I told you what was good for you. You called us “misogynists” for trying to give you good advice.

Expand full comment
Steven Work's avatar

In my first professional job as a basic medical science researcher I ran into meritless Affirmative Action Quota hired women lab-tech I often wondered if they even had HS science .. I ran into women that absolutely refuse to listen to when a man who loved Science from5th grade slurped up everything he could find, 7th grade a love of math and computer programming, and a HS education far above what I could wish every student got ..

.

.. anyway. A sane rational human that was helped into not making endless mistakes to failure and homelessness and death on our feces cover streets, a sane rational human that was not mind-F-ed by Gender Studies Witches, would listen closely and maybe ask some questions and then sincerely thank him - as I have done when-ever manhood Love like that is offered and given. Mothers raise retarded mind-raped psycho-delusional never mature symbolically breast-nursing 'adults', when fathers raise successful adults

Remember that women helicopter that was warned by Traffic Control and by instructor man in cockpit that an airline was going to land and so fly helicopter way from path .. but she refused to be Mansplained and didn't and so they died and killing commercial airline filled with people .. but the important thing is she refused to be Mansplained.

Well, after a while I understood that our lab-tech would much rather waste a day, waste the solutions and experimental preps, and even the very rarely acquired heart muscle strip saved from a heart-attack victim .. would waste all that and more before she would accept a suggestion from a man that was not the Lab Head.

It took me a while to understand because that is clearly psycho-insane and likely a danger to herself and others .. but Witches raised her from Crib to be so difunctionally retarded.

Anyway. I remember being an older boy listening to men trying to guide daughters or co-working women that refused to accept the help because they were baby-murdering insane psycho-horrors, It seemed and seems.

Expand full comment
Peter Andrew Nolan's avatar

Yes. That is exactly what happens. Not even our wives and daughters will do what we ask them. Then they blame us for not "making" them do what we ask. I will get back to you more later.

Expand full comment
Nicole Percy's avatar

Wow listen to yourself. Slut? You’re really using this term? Do you think we are sleeping with ourselves??? Do you not think women have wanted more from these men that you’re also not calling “whores”??? Many times I have slept with men only for them to decide they’re no longer wanting a relationship, or they didn’t treat me well, or they went back to the wife they swore they’d left, or hell - sometimes they were still married and I hadn’t a clue. You’re going to blame women and use derogatory names like sluts and whores and not blink one fucking eye at the men who deceive women into using their bodies before they’re ready to???

Fuck off with this.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

My catch-all reply to essentially all of the comments here: "That escalated quickly!"

Expand full comment
Steven Work's avatar

In the mid-1960s Satanic directed SCOTUS created a new Right that was earmarked for later use to destroy sanity and feed demons souls, the 'right to privacy' shaped from deep levels of Hell to Haunt most, to drive souls into Hell to Burn for the Pleasures of Demons .. making a gov forced nation-wide religion of disOrdered soul-crippling sterile sex, where men and woman no longer viewed each other and self as a potential Beatified soul made in the Image of God and demanding dignity in Fear and Love of God, Wisdom. Birth-control turned everyone including self into a soulless meat-machine with on leg already in a grave of infinite darkness and death, to use, abuse, dispose-of and redue. .. Like those Talmudic Zionists that view everyone else as soulless wild beasts to use and kill as serves them.

.

.. imagine that, Satan directed SCOTUS shaped a bit of Hell into a new Right, and in so doing caused nearly everyone alive to view themselves and most others as Satanic Zionists view us all .. we have always been Gazans to them, and now SCOTUS helped us each be Gazans to each other - to abuse, murder, enslave, .. whatever those minions want.

So, to women, men became disposable and often disgusting to women that realize they have nothing to take from them except perhaps the fun of watching them suffer, to coordinate with other vile horrors and gaslight a man to suicide, what fun! A kind of mind-raping of helpless men that never saw demons in women skin, pure evil in the shape of Death and Hell .. yea, that could explain many women we suffer today.

But the demonic-possessions were wide spread through womanhood by end of Vietnam and men that were forced to serve them and us and lived but broken returned to a nation of soulless women that were okay with our brothers, fathers, sons, uncles homeless broken on streets, rejected by the human woman form filled with the seed of baby-murdering loveless sicken green poisoned hearts ..

.

.. so, without birth-control it is agued that homelessness would not have been allowed because women would still have a soul of some Beauty in the image of God, and would have fought together for our sons, fathers, uncles, brothers, .. that Served and then need a bit of help, they would have banned together like they would later do to vote as one - to demand baby-murdering rights.

So, demonic SCOTUS waited while an Abortion case was pre-shaped to use with that Hell-formed new created 'right to privacy' and Announce that Satan rules the Gov by ruling to legalize the manifest evil and insane. To force a nationwide Synagogue of Satan Religion of torturing unborn to death as sacrifices to Satan, backed by threat of gun, fines, arrest, courts, prison, and even death by States monopoly of violence. They will kill a father trying to save his unborn child .. and if that seem okay, well you must be another one late for grave.

Here is a good explanation on exactly the Key-Log that transformed a sane, virtue-filled trusting Charitable valuable Christian-based society a man and wife could raise a healthy happy sane rational caring batch of children to adulthood and successful life, or hope too with good chance of success into this insane-evil-accepting mind-raped soul-crippled virtueless evil-blinded mind-broken fatherless twisted from crib with early OD or suicide as a kind of line of Hope to escape this Hell, perhaps only Burning for a few eternities.

We as a world have passed the same line that required the Flood, or burning sulfur destroying Sodom and Gamora to Cleanse the evil, the insane, the demonic, the mass suffering, .., because almost no child can be raised in this Screaming Witch Level of Hell and only by the Grace of God to not Burn in Hell.

Ever wonder why the world grows more insane every generation?

AI generated audio overview of this article;

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/8066f0fc-c4b7-4ab7-a667-75b84c39c8f8/audio

"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2225:, 21st July 2025, The Profound Sickness: An Anti-Abortion Apologetic"

https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2225

---

I've tracked down the information to argue that since 1979 Gov and corp have been silencing and impoverishing regular people. If Synagogue of Satan Zionist and other minions had left well enough alone, you would not believe how much better we all and our nation would have been. Listen for taste, read for truth.

AI generated audio overview of article;

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/9fc1b713-4c44-49bd-9c29-04fc3fe09744/audio

"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2223:, 14th July 2025, State's Organized Planned Disempowerment of the American Citizen"

https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2223

---

Everywhere Abortion is Legal the State should not have a monopoly on violence.

Want a legal reason to refuse State's authority?

AI generated audio overview of this article;

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/0a0572a6-8c54-4bbf-a3eb-829aae5e81e4/audio

"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2222:, 12th July 2025, State's Monopoly on Violence is unLawful by it's own Actions and Laws"

https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2222

---

Feedback welcome.

God Bless., Steve

Expand full comment
Pamela Huffman's avatar

couldn't have said it better myself!

Expand full comment
Cricket's avatar

This 🎯💯👏

Expand full comment
Susanna Mills's avatar

As a positive sidebar to this superb, but very serious essay, I am happy to report that the young ladies and mothers who attend our traditional Free Reformed church, wear beautiful dresses and make themselves look amazing for services every Sunday. The average young family size is 3-5 kids. (There are a lot of young adult people in our church: about 50%). My sister visiting from Canada, remarked on how ‘refreshing’ this was to behold. That means outside of our exceptional little church, in 5 Eyes countries, people dressing down & deliberate ugliness, is the norm- as is a majority of white heads (like me) in the congregations.

The one G-d who made the womb, can heal the womb. If you haven’t already, it’s time to take a turn and find the true source of all life, truth & creation.

Expand full comment
CM Maccioli's avatar

G-d??

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

Some people believe God should never be spelled out. So they say G-d.

Expand full comment
Proton Magic's avatar

Here in Japan, condoms are far the norm and OCs were not really on the market much until about 15 years ago. Condoms doesn't stop lots of sex with the same risk of being "used" on both sides of the gender isle. But it does stop pregnancy. The culture is still largely to marry and make a family, even though more women work into their 30s and marry a bit later than 30 years ago.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

I don’t even know how you process and kick out so much information in such a prolific fashion, but thank you for doing so.

Expand full comment
Susanna Mills's avatar

…and write all of it up…and get it to communicate so succinctly!

Expand full comment
Sue's avatar

I was thinking the same! Quite amazing really and I'm grateful for it.

Expand full comment
Proton Magic's avatar

Mix of AI and editing skills. Some people also have "back office" help.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

Thanks

Expand full comment
Susie's avatar

Back in the 1970s, I took birth control pills while in my 20s. Then got married, went off pill, but couldn't get pregnant for two years. The male doctor put the blame on my "tilted uterus" which made my young 20-something self feel bad and inadequate as a woman.........Why didn't he tell me it was because the pill damaged my system and because my husband was drinking too much alcohol and smoking pot, which damaged his sperm contribution? Years later, I learned all this......I eventually had children...........Nowadays, I won't go near pills, drugs, or my ex-husband. I only go to natural holistic doctors/practitioners.

Expand full comment
Darling Crimson's avatar

...or my ex husband 😄

Here here! 🥰

Expand full comment
SF Med's avatar

The article literally said the pill changed women's selection of a mate. Why do you blame your ex-husband?

Expand full comment
Lesa Spravka's avatar

This was so beautifully done. I feel so seen and I finally feel like I belong because I am one of those people that fell into the indoctrination and I stand here at 62 years of age thinking I made the greatest mistake in not having children. And almost dumbfounded and can't believe I have found myself here. From your beautiful analysis I can see how the agenda was simultaneously an attack on our minds as well as our bodies. So at 62 I will start working on unprogramming myself from that nefarious agenda. And with your article's help I'll start reprogramming myself to a life of beauty and abundance.

Expand full comment
David Rinker's avatar

Why not involve yourself in children's causes as a way of adopting and nurturing children?

Expand full comment
Lesa Spravka's avatar

Your comment makes me think possibly you're riding over the important process of grieving and possibly over-simplifying the ways one could use their creative powers.

Expand full comment
Peter Andrew Nolan's avatar

Lesa. You women did not “fall into the indoctrination”. You leapt into it and you grasped it with open arms. I am 61. From 12 years old I was telling the girls who were my peers that feminism was communism in drag. By 14 I was telling girls that feminism is poison that will ruin their live. You women called me a misogynist for telling you that. And here you are 50 years later claiming you were “indoctrinated”.

You weren’t.

You were offered a BRIBE and you took it.

Feminism was the BRIBE that if you ally with, vote for, marry, and always support the government then the government will steal money from men and give you “free stuff”.

A bribe is not indoctrination Lesa. You were not indoctrinated and neither was any other woman. You were offered a bribe and you took it with glee. You women never stopped to wonder this:

“If the government is willing to bribe us with free money today by stealing that money from our men based on our support and our vote? What will the government do tomorrow?”

Nope. None of you wondered what a bunch of scum bag criminals you support today might do tomorrow. And what did you get in the bribe? You got alimony. You got child support. You got single mothers benefits. You got unemployment payments. You got “universal health care”.

Basically you women got free money for life by taking the bribe of governments in return for your votes. And you never, ever, bothered to wonder what the government might do next. Like invite millions of foreign men into the country and give them free stuff as a bribe in return for THEIR VOTE AND SUPPORT.

You were NOT brainwashed. You were NOT indoctrinated.

YOU WERE BRIBED AND YOU TOOK THE BRIBE FROM PEOPLE YOU KNEW TO BE CRIMINALS…FOR FIFTY YEARS.

Expand full comment
Lesa Spravka's avatar

Wow. You don’t know my life. And the fact that you think you do shows, I’m guessing, a vast unhealed mother wound. It’s not even logical that you ascribe “glee” in making a deal with the devil to all women. Life is not so simple unfortunately. You would help this world if you had an ounce of compassion for yourself. Then you might be able to have it for others.

Expand full comment
Peter Andrew Nolan's avatar

"You don’t know my life."

Lesa, you are a 62 year old woman. I know you very well.

Expand full comment
Lesa Spravka's avatar

How? Have we met?

Expand full comment
Peter Andrew Nolan's avatar

"Lesa, you are a 62 year old woman. I know you very well."

All you women are exactly the same Lesa. I am 61. It is very likely I know you better than you know your self. I certainly understood my wife better than she understood herself.

You are 62. That means you are a manhater who took the bribe from criminals asking for your vote that if you voted for them they would criminally abuse men and steal from men to give you "free stuff".

All women vote only for criminals who bribe them with "protection and free stuff".

If you claim to not be exactly like all other women? A man hater who holds men in contempt. A man hater who supports the murder by proxy in the divorce courts? You are going to have to prove it. And you are going to have to pay me for my time to read your proof.

For my part? At 61 years of age? I have seen enough to know all women are exactly the same. All women are manhaters who hold men in contempt. And all women are liars and hypocrites.

Lesa, its like this. No real man will ever respect you or ever listen to you ever again because we all know all women are manhaters.

The only "men" who will pretend to respect you and pretend to listen to you are men who want your vote and men who want to have seggs with women by pretending to respect women and by pretending to listen to them. At 62 they won't want seggs with you. But they will pretend to listen to you to try and impress a younger woman into having seggs with them.

These men are the worst of the worst men. Politicians will tell you any lie you want to hear. Make any promise you want to hear. And uphold the criminal abuse of men to steal from them to give you free money. They have no respect for you. They just want your vote.

And the men who are weak pathetic beta brad soybois will also tell you any lie in public to try and persuade women they are "feminist men" who "care about womens rights". Not all male seggsual perverts are "male feminists who support womens rights and support women voting". But all male feminists are seggsual perverts.

You are welcome to your politicians and male feminists Lesa. But the men like me don't want any of you any more for the very reason we know you so well.

Expand full comment
Lesa Spravka's avatar

Peter Andrew Nolan, I really don't know how to respond to you. Believe what you want to believe but you're sounding like a bot to me. And that's a compliment to humanity.

Expand full comment
Carissa Santee Goff's avatar

It worked because women were tired of being controlled, objectified, and abused by men. They were looking for a way out and feminism and birth control was shiny tempting bait. It was a decision made under duress, and men are not without fault, AT ALL. This was a pendulum swing. Women deserved better treatment from men and society as a whole, but as this article points out it was gone about in the wrong way - not by valuing the natural gifts women possess, but by making them think they had to be like men, because men's gifts are what were prized and lauded in society. It is a sad, Satanic path that we have gone down, but let's not pretend women's leaning into this agenda came out of nowhere. It was reactionary. Instead of yelling, and telling, and blaming, love, appreciation, empathy, and reassurance will get you much farther.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

You did not make any mistake in that regard. Don't fall for the reactionary pronatalist propaganda.

Expand full comment
Steven Work's avatar

I wonder how they compare.

Never having children or ..

As a young man in HS, a junior (11th grade) my lover became pregnant and hired a Witch to murder her - I found out years later about her brief unborn life and that she was my unborn daughter, killed by my murdering lover long before I knew she existed and before I could've tried to protect her.) You know it would be a small price to pay to have her alive and we raised her, a small price if every unrepented abortion supporter, murdering mothers and minions world-wide all drop dead .. but not more than 3 billion, perhaps.

In my mid-30s I married and after about a decade we decided to have a child. 4 or 5 years later after she has a car accident with head injury that changed her, over a year or 3 the woman I married and could make laugh died while I watched helplessly, died in a kind of 'Pet Seminary' way - the woman that remained grew ever hostel towards me, everything my fault, angry for no reason she would share, stopped talking to me unless I asked a direct question, moved to different bedroom, ... She divorced raped me, took my farm, may son, and herself .. well, I was forced to leave, but she interfered with even the Demonic-court allowed Sat afternoon visits, phone calls, later I wrote letters to him I sure he never saw ..

She took some of Web Journal writing out of context and went to court to force supervised visitations that was last straw, the Satanic Vile family court system was so unJust the entire Western family court and child protection department and everyone connected could all die screaming with all adults in their Bloodline and still that would not be Justice .. I don't even know if he is alive, I sent letter on birthdays, Christmas, and never an answer. When he turn 18 I was hoping we could restart our relationship without the better screaming burning dying State or dead-soul mother not interfering .. nope.

So, better to have no children or a daughter tortured to death unborn and a young son stolen from my life. Funny is it not .. I okay with 3 billions dead from nukes, okay if the survivors may hang to death judges, abortionists, teachers, law-makers, false-witnessers, .. that do 1/10 of the vile demon-filled evils that most do today.

With only the local gov that we create, so we can kill every person that actively tries to unite into a State Gov, burn all the building, and drag to death behind horses every Satanic reShapers of Gov or organizations that are large enough to pressure us - dragged screaming chained to their mothers and aunts and .. in public scrapped into small gobs of flesh that rodents would eat ..

yea, funny is it not? So, childless or my experience - which would you choose?

Expand full comment
Lesa Spravka's avatar

Thank you for sharing your experience. It allows me to see the good in my decision. And I can also hold the negative of that decision too.

Expand full comment
Fide et Veritate's avatar

There are many young families who need a grand parent figure in their lives, either they don't have living parents or their parents are "hands off", try and identify some families in your circle and "adopt" them. Speak to your pastor as a good start to identifying them

Expand full comment
Lesa Spravka's avatar

I've been open to this idea for a long time. But I don't want to be in a grandparent role in a family who doesn't share my values. Which is why I would want the family to believe in "Radical Unschooling" philosophy by Dayna Martin. And I don't believe in having a pastor or anyone else between me and my relationship with my concept of god.

Expand full comment
currer's avatar

A little balance. As a woman born in the mid 1950s, I can remember what women's lives were like before birth control. Women were not celebrated for their femininity, but looked down on as they would grow up inevitably to marry and just be baby makers. Educational opportunities for women were reduced, especially in sciences, and the assumption was that there was no point in educating women because they would be housewives and never use their education.

It was tacitly accepted that women were second rate citizens.

It has only been birth control that has allowed women to penetrate into the privileged male sphere. Before that, girls lives were kept apart from boys and men because of the danger of unplanned pregnancy.

If a woman needs effective birth control there are other methods. I have never thought hormonal contraception a safe option, it is bound to mess up one's hormonal balance. The other methods may not be promoted as much because they do not result in an income stream for pharma. A coil or dutch cap are one off purchases for the medical provider. It is up to the woman to think, research, and decide what is best for her.

Expand full comment
Jake's avatar

2nd class citizens? Oh come on. Who would consider their mother a second class citizen. Who considered women a second class citizen? If it is the corporate entity and its owners, who cares. We are all considered to be nothing but worthless beings by them anyway. You are conflating 2 things the birth control pill and a women’s ability to procure the job she desires. Those 2 aren’t synonymous.

Expand full comment
currer's avatar

Yes they were perceived as second class, this was a reality.

Only birth control and its social acceptance allowed women to operate as full independent sexually mature adults.

Obviously there were women who worked and lived full lives before the sixties, but they would either have been married, or living very "liberated" lives using the early methods of birth control, which would have been highly unusual, limited to the more privileged classes, and not socially approved.

Sexually inexperienced women were either perceived as waiting to get married and on the lookout for a husband, or old maid types.

In both cases their sexual standing far outweighed any other characteristic or ability they possessed. Plus there was a horrible sexual double standard that applied only to women's behaviour.

If you do not believe me read some of the women's literature from the late 19th century up to the early sixties. The change in women's social status is inescapably linked to her control over her biology.

Try "the Pumpkin Eater" a depressing book, but notable in that it was written in 1962, just before attituded changed. Not everyone led such pointless lives as the female protagonist, but many of the attitudes of the times to women are accurately noted.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/400361.The_Pumpkin_Eater

Of course the widespread access to birth control led men to hope for free sex and no consequences. But this is a later challenge we need to take up now, to educate men in responsibility in this new and unprecedented circumstance, not retreat into a false picture of the past.

You do not believe me about the second class status. I am afraid it was true, however smoothed over at the time with lip service to family piety and sentiment. Women could not leave abusive or unhappy marriages as they could not earn enough to live independently (before the equal pay act), or get a mortgage as a single woman without a male sponsor.

All men knew they were privileged simply because of their sex. You could sense this. Because of when I was born, right on the turn from these attitudes, if I went out with a man older than me he would have all the old attitudes unmodified, whereas men about ten years younger had none of the old assumptions about women.

Expand full comment
Susie AH's avatar

Currer, I was born in 1959 and what you say fits my memory. It is probably hard for younger people to believe that women were believed to be worth less than men but many people older than me and even of my generation, especially women themselves, believe that women are less than men, they are misogynists because they were brought up to be, I was brought up to be so. It took me decades to recognise it.

Expand full comment
currer's avatar

Yes. My mother, (born 1920s) said she had problems relating to other women as friends, because they were not educated either to think or value themselves.

This was not a misogynist statement of hers but a true one, most women of the working classes lived very restricted mental lives and had a low self image and little confidence in their abilities.

(You lived in a world where you were told that women were automatically not as good as men at almost everything. It was very belittling.)

It was hard to live a fulfilled, confident, and enterprising life if you were an ordinary woman, though I have no doubt that some upper class women were able to extend their lives and mental world..

Women's consciousness was very limited prior to the present time, when it is taken for granted that women are free to do whatever they want in life and are not arbitrarily excluded from education, careers, experience, status, and challenges.

Some women were trapped in very petty and limited circumstances and it took outright revolt on their part to escape. Not many had the courage to do this.

I am astonished that so quickly the memory has been lost of these historical realities. The world women live in now is unprecedented in our entire biological history. It is no surprise that men are having a hard time understanding and adjusting to their changed role too.

Expand full comment
Maureen Hanf's avatar

Born in ‘64 and heard most of this from all my elders. This was very true, along with other attitudes, such a drinking all the time was the norm for many, certainly in my family. As with many other areas in life, changes were needed. However, today, I cannot say that all of the changes have lived up to promises or that things have improved dramatically for the better of all concerned. I have noticed throughout my life that, in any given area of human endeavor, there will inevitably be many parts of it that do need to be changed. So, eventually, changes start to occur. But then. Change, once started, sometimes seems hard to stop. This keep changing past what I view as an optimal point. And somehow seem to veer off to the worse more often than not.

I recall in middle school, being, I’m sure, part of the earlier groups that had the shock and awe sex education classes. Me, and most of my classmates felt this went above and beyond what we were comfortable with. Additionally, this teacher had personality issues and was antagonistic more often than not. Finally, one of the classmates up front secretly recorded one of her lectures. This took some doing compared to today, but they were able to do it with a micro-cassette recorder. This they promptly took after class to the principal, and after a lot more drama, the teacher was moved to a different school district and had a new teacher who was more focused on text books and a few educational movies.

Where the changes will stop, I don’t know. I do know that things will keep changing, as change is one of the few constants in life.

I am aware of women not being educated to value or think for themselves as compared to today. Always felt my mother was caught in the middle of the uneducated ones and the more sophisticated and educated ones. She herself grew up poor in a very toxic family in the depression and had many aspirations beyond her opportunities or abilities. Consequently, she was not acceptable by her family of origin, who considered her an oddball. Nor was she acceptable to her in-laws, who ran in university set, were considered the educated leaders and changers of their communities, and had a depth of intellect that was beyond her.

This brewed an intense dissatisfaction throughout her life; one that she took out on me and my dad, since she had no idea how to change any of her circumstances or abilities.

What I have taken from it, is a hunt for a middle path somewhere, somehow. So far, over the years, I have looked more and more to one of her aunts, her mother’s youngest sister. This was a lady who got the flapper bob when it first came out and kept it till she passed in the early ‘90’s. But what I have found inspiring is that she was supportive of me going to college, although she never felt a need for it. She ran a larger ranch successfully for decades. On her own terms, regardless of the many incidents she had both with neighbors and local officials. Despite that, she succeeded for many years. She had a turn of fortune at the end of her days, but overall, she had carved out the life she wanted and still serves as an inspiration for me to do the same.

Expand full comment
currer's avatar

I had a grandmother of exactly the same age - born 1900 and a flapper too, and very modern and liberated. That generation - we underestimate how revolutionary they were.

Expand full comment
Lisa's avatar

“However, today, I cannot say that all of the changes have lived up to promises or that things have improved dramatically for the better of all concerned.”

“I have noticed throughout my life that, in any given area of human endeavor, there will inevitably be many parts of it that do need to be changed. So, eventually, changes start to occur. But then. Change, once started, sometimes seems hard to stop. This keep changing past what I view as an optimal point. And somehow seem to veer off to the worse more often than not.”

Very well said. And true. Thank you, Maureen.

Expand full comment
Asa's avatar
Jul 28Edited

well it was all set up that way. women were treated that way on purpose so they would welcome the new "freedom". they've been at the family destroying agenda for much longer than the boomers can remember. problem reaction solution. you would have to go back more than a few generations to get to a situation where they weren't running some psychological operation and people were just left alone to be normal natural humans

Expand full comment
Bridget's avatar

Astute comment, Asa. How wonderful for the corporations and those in power to promote careerism and persuade people to devalue having and raising their own families.

If you can get females to postpone or reject motherhood and take that creative energy instead into the workplace, you’ve hit two targets at once: More profit for the powerful and obedient depopulation at the very same time.

The 1969 Day Tapes explain this sinister agenda very clearly. And, oh yes, Planned Patenthood was right smack dab in the center of all this. What a scheme: Get people to dehumanize and kill their own sons and daughters in the name of “freedom” and then double dip by selling the suddenly human baby body parts.

Then there’s this:

https://open.substack.com/pub/chemtrails/p/secret-population-control-operations?r=f9vg3&utm_medium=ios

Expand full comment
Bridget's avatar

“Newly-released undercover footage, which Planned Parenthood sought to block for eight years, shows the organization’s Houston, TX branch describing delivering late-term fetuses intact and alive and mutilating the bodies afterwards to cover up violations of the federal partial-birth abortion law, in conversations about selling fetal body parts.”

Expand full comment
Susie's avatar

Bridget - Yes, the undercover videos of planned parenthood employees talking casually about the price they get for certain aborted baby body parts is shocking - little baby hearts, brains, livers, spleens, etc.

Expand full comment
Steven Work's avatar

I'm not surprised.

They torture our unborn babies to death ripping apart limbs and gutting the still living silently screaming - Witches torturing them to death as sacrifices to whatever Power-Demon they desire something from .. glimpse the future? Murder a 4 month old, Direct Demonic attacks on someone? Torture to death a 7 month old unborn. Become a decade younger? Murder a delivered baby. Different Demons for each 'specialty.

Now, examine the Satanic Baby-murdering Democratic 'Abortion Rights Bill' voted on and rejected .. notice how Partial Birth Murder is possible with the 'loop-hole'?

How many of us men or any of our son's were drawn into a short sexual relationship and dropped when she became pregnant with our child or our son's child and she runs to Planned Parenthood or other baby-murdering mills to offer our dead unborn corpses for sale, and when does she need to schedule the Satanic Sacrifice to sell our child's or grand-child's murdered parts?

Don't think that happens? Perhaps you don't believe that daily hospitals fake brain-death with paralyzing drugs to then cut-away organs from least needed until only heart and lungs and eyes left - while he is still awake but paralyzed, they raffle for who gets to cut-away each eye-ball while laughing at the tortured near to death victim that suffered endlessly while the team laughs and taunts the victim - tasering each organ to squeeze out the last of the blood for shipping but "Opsie! We tasered the organs while the nerve-bundle was still connected. So sorry - HaHaha"

If Witches and minions are so ready to torture to dead our unborn babies - why do you not think Organ Tortured to death trafficking Synagogue of Satan's minions would be any harder?

You know that the best single reason to end insane evil unborn baby-murder on mother whimsy and Witches Calls to Hell for Power .. the best reason does not even need an unborn to argue .. the best reason is that after two generation of gov forced acceptance of the insane practice, most of us are no longer human - twisted from fatherless crib and shaped by Witches most of us can no longer see evil or insanity, we Blind to those Demonically soul-eating shapes from Hell that walk among-us.

We as a world have passed the same line that required the Flood, or burning sulfur destroying Sodom and Gamora to Cleanse the evil, the insane, the demonic, the mass suffering, .., because almost no child can be raised in this Screaming Witch Level of Hell and only by the Grace of God to not Burn in Hell.

Ever wonder why the world grows more insane every generation?

AI generated audio overview of this article;

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/8066f0fc-c4b7-4ab7-a667-75b84c39c8f8/audio

"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2225:, 21st July 2025, The Profound Sickness: An Anti-Abortion Apologetic"

https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2225

Feedback welcome.

God Bless., Steve

Expand full comment
Dachaii's avatar

Corporates also benefit from cheap labour - which can be found in India and China - over populated countries. There's too many people applying for the same job, it is an employers market all the time. If you restrict immigration, and there's lesser people in the applicant, people actually get paid more - which is what happened in the USA, but now with off shoring they have cheap labor available. Obediency from a population is also achievable by overpopulation, resources are scarce and everyone wants to feed their families - you have an extremely obedient work force because there are no un-employement benefits like in the first world, so your option is starve to death or work - that pretty much ensures you are obedient to your job even in countries with large families, pro family culture, and conservative attitudes.

Expand full comment
Bridget's avatar

You raise excellent points. This life sure isn’t easy for most of us regardless of our geographical placement.

Expand full comment
Darling Crimson's avatar

I wasn't here back then, so I'll take her word on it yet I agree with you that most people/children/adult children would never think their mother a second class citizen.

In today's world mothers are glorified even if they should not be (some mothers are evil) even while the system poisons them and their babies. It always been an evil system putting humanity in a vice grip with constant gas lighting!

Expand full comment
currer's avatar

Hmmm....I did not say that children perceived their mothers as second class citizens, This was the other commenter.

I said that women did not have equal status in society, which led to them being perceived as of less value. In my childhood there were laws to permit paying a woman worker less than a man for doing the same job.

Expand full comment
Darling Crimson's avatar

Hmm, I don't think I meant to reply to you but somehow it was posted that way. Sorry about that 🙂

I remember those laws too!

Expand full comment
Judith's avatar

Second class (non-)citizens, by design, yes. Like my mother who had no vote until 1971 (CH). And she didn‘t like it.

This is part of the „feminist paradox“

Expand full comment
Toni's avatar

Men who have never walked in a woman's shoes, experienced the road blocks we have, encountered the sexist bias, can't argue against experiences of others he's never lived through.

Expand full comment
John W Burns's avatar

Women who have never walked in a man's shoes, experienced going into combat or working up 25 floors, encountered the endless harsh demands on men, can't argue against experiences of others she's never lived through.

Expand full comment
Toni's avatar

Well I agree with you, men and women have different experiences, but that's completely unrelated to the article about birth control as it relates to women.

Expand full comment
John W Burns's avatar

It's a female's experience to bear. Stop complaining about your lot in life. You aren't that special, no matter what you try to tell yourself.

Men put their lives on the line for women. Female solipsism knows no bounds.

Expand full comment
Toni's avatar

I'm perfectly aware of the importance of men's role in my life and the world. Quit trying to silence the voices you don't want to hear or acknowledge. Women are I've that bullshit oppression tactic. Sit down and shut the fuck up.

Expand full comment
Arrow's avatar

I'm sorry that is the programing that you received. It certainly was not that way in my family, I being born in 1953. Our mothers were honored and respected and from what I saw, very creative in all that they did. Our fathers dedicated to them and the families that they created together.

Expand full comment
currer's avatar

I can see from your spelling that you are from the US where working class women had a higher status than in the UK. My family were pretty enlightened. I am writing about general social change in attitudes.

What people from the US do not realise is that the UK working class are more equivalent to black communities in the US. We never had slavery in England because there was ample impoverished white labour to exploit, and they were horribly exploited. The UK exports a fake rose coloured version of its history

Expand full comment
Arrow's avatar

I really don't know how the status of my mother and grandmothers was measured. I don't think anyone was putting a yard stick up to them. It is a level of consciousness... and yes, there are plenty of people that want to put everyone into a measured box as defined by educational institutions and social engineers of various movements. Maybe because my family, who originated from England and Ireland decided that they had had enough. The words are not spoken, but lived in life by example... the only teaching my mother gave me was that I could do anything I wanted, and I believed her... even though her life was dedicated to home. They were all very religious and believed in mythic Mother Mary... using her as an example of divine intelligence, and they built themselves from there with no man and no governmental institution telling them what to do.... my great grandmothers status came from being a midwife serving rural Vermont, teaching hygiene and child care as well.. no degree needed, just determination and acquired skill from some other midwife as well as the raising of her own children. My grandmother's unsung status came from raising 20 foster children over the years, both women knowing intuitively, not from a school or social worker, that service brings meaning to life and that giving from the heart with one's time is the true gift worth giving, .... I think you are seriously mistaken to think that there was not abundant white labor to exploit in the USA. Poverty was real and still is. ... if working class women did or do have higher status it is because they given it to themselves, without a women's movement. Without fancy education, without a birth control pill. We can clearly see now that such engineered status ends up falling flat on its face over time because it lacks organic roots of spiritual evolution handed from mother to daughter, even to sons who stand as witness and will come to provide home and shelter. ... hence we now have a full fledged growing conservative movement in the USA to stand up to failing engineered cultural revolutions.

Expand full comment
Art Hutchinson's avatar

If the 1950s (or '60s, or any other time) are our norm, we miss the grand norm from which all true hope springs and from which we have massively strayed--the place to which we cannot return with mere human reforms, e.g., of laws or medicine: Christ and His bride.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

Indeed, the OP and 99% of the commenters need to be VERY, VERY careful what they wish for! Rolling back birth control, Women's Liberation, and (yes, quiet part out loud) the sexual revolution in the hopes of restoring some sort of bygone golden age is a mirage.

Expand full comment
John W Burns's avatar

Did you read the article? Sounds like you had your mind made up beforehand.

Expand full comment
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

Excellent summary. May I add that apparently many “vaccines” (with the one for the invented threat, HPV, taking the lead, although some batches for convid also seem strong contenders) also decrease or eliminate fertility?

Although the commoner has no power over politics, knowledge in this case can enable the person to make the right decision.

Expand full comment
Immaculata's avatar

Thank you for this article !

Out of 10 nurses as a sample:

8 had unexplained infertility

BCP coupled with toxins = no fertility

Antidepressants for sterile mom to be.

Then: IVF becomes the next cash cow

Afterwhich: cancer

Throw in some other toxic additions: early demise

Expand full comment
Maureen Hanf's avatar

60, and when it was strongly suggested for me years ago, came off of it after a month due to my already high blood pressure soaring to stroke levels. Even then, it was a thing that were reluctant to do, but necessary. I wonder today how far some drs might push that; such as ‘here, have more blood pressure pills to go with it.’

Expand full comment
Webe1's avatar

The nefarious promote promiscuity while poisoning the human simultaneously.

Expand full comment
CD's avatar

So glad to have left the False Religion that is the Allopathic Industrial Medical Complex, complete with its priests in white robes and nuns in scrubs. 🥼⚖️👩🏻‍⚕️👨🏽‍⚕️⚕️🏥💀⚰️

Expand full comment
Darling Crimson's avatar

Great Emoji story! Facts! 🥰🎯

Expand full comment
CD's avatar

Thanks! 😆

Expand full comment
Darling Crimson's avatar

😄

Expand full comment
Phyllis B's avatar

I regret taking birth control because my lack of hormones resulted in 4 miscarriages. Doctors never tell you about side effects. I did manage to carry a baby to term but she had a birth defect. Primarily my fault; she is the light of our lives.

Expand full comment
CD's avatar

A good attitude to have. 🌞🌻

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

Was a cause and effect link between the two ever actually proven though? If not, no need to blame yourself at all.

Expand full comment
Phyllis B's avatar

No, I didn’t pursue it until it was too late

Expand full comment
Robert Townshend's avatar

Great article.

Take something as fundamental as the fertility of a nubile woman...and neutralise it chemically, day after day, often for years. The sane human will ask what can NOT go wrong.

Before his Washington years, Kissinger was the ultra-quotable new guru for the sixties, Jordan Peterson with a geopolitical slant. You give a perfect example of his superficiality. Fertility in the developing world was a barrier to getting resources, thus reduced fertility in the developing world must be a way to access those resources. If one spent just a moment thinking about such tripe one would reject it. The trick is to impress and bewilder with so much pseudo-science and assumed authority that the one moment of actual thinking does not take place.

Expand full comment
jim's avatar

He also completely failed to reduce fertility in the developing world. Instead, it cratered fertility rates in the west. Meanwhile India and Africa continued with their unsustainable birth rates. Kissinger should have been hung as a war criminal in any event on account of the bombing of Laos and Cambodia.

Expand full comment
CD's avatar

"unsustainable".

If those countries were not under involuntary servitude (like all countries), having their natural resources plundered, would "unsustainable" even be a thing?

Expand full comment
CD's avatar

Well-stated.

Expand full comment
Drew Skonberg,DC's avatar

I witnessed a healthy female insist on starting the pill and a short time later thyroid issues began. Two different thyroid MD specialists prescribed completely different drug/hormone protocols neither of which healed the problem and a lifetime of a drug “managed” disease ensued.

Expand full comment
Susie AH's avatar

I went on the pill at 18 and 6 weeks later I was a type 1 diabetic and have been so for 48 years. At the time, my GP said I had brought it all on myself - I think he was suggesting I was a slut.

Expand full comment
Drew Skonberg,DC's avatar

Gaslighting SOB to deflect that the pill caused the DM.

Expand full comment
CD's avatar

Yikes! While that GP might be a lost cause, turning your health around isn't. Have you tried seeing a Homeopath or Functional Medicine Practitioner?

Expand full comment
Susie AH's avatar

Yes of course all of that and more but I didn’t start really improving my health by leaving the allopathic medical route until 25 years ago and I’ve managed to halt the descent but moving back to full health may not be possible but I can develop my spiritual life.

Expand full comment
CD's avatar

Indeed. According to the industrial medical model. ⚕️💊💉💀⚰️

Expand full comment
ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

EXCELLENT! BUT DON'T ASK A DOCTOR, THEY LIE.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

ALL of them do?

Expand full comment
John W Burns's avatar

Pretty much. Hang on their every utterance if that works for you. Others see it differently.

Expand full comment
Nurse4truth's avatar

I personally can attest to this subject... I was forced by my mother to take the pill as soon as I became sexually active. I was on it for 17 years! Luckily, after 3 months of discontinuing it... I was able to bear two children 21 months apart. After I was finished breastfeeding my last child... I was convinced to have the marena IUD. It was pushed hard on me by my gynecologist. Shortly after having it placed I noticed my husband was withdrawn from having sex. When I asked him why... he told me he was having visible symptoms after intercourse on his penis!! After researching, I found that many couples experienced this... the hormones leaked onto the male and caused drastic irritation to the head of the penis!! When I explained this to my gynecologist... they made me feel crazy, and told me that could not happen. It was a big ordeal for me to have it removed. Once it was removed and I was clear of any synthetic hormones... my libido increased drastically. My body was functioning the way it should! Everything you detailed in this article I find to be true!! More women need the truth! Thank you for writing this!!

Expand full comment
Abby's avatar

The strings of your IUD were probably too long and your husband was touching them during sex.

Expand full comment
Nurse4truth's avatar

I thought so too, but my gynecologist examined them and said they were short enough not to cause irritation... 🤷‍♀️

Expand full comment
Pamela Rapoza's avatar

Obviously contraceptives and/or sex education has done nothing. Girls today are having sex with no regard for the consequences. By the time they turn 20 a lot of them already have 2-3 kids from different men or they have had several abortions! Promiscuity has been a disaster.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

If anything, both birth rates AND abortion rates for teens are at record lows, and having far less sex than previous generations as well, so that could not be further from the truth.

Expand full comment
Pamela Rapoza's avatar

Maybe where you live but in small town PA the young girls are having babies earlier and earlier. I will guarantee you that in my generation the rate of promiscuity compared to today was minuscule! Growing up in the 50’s and 60’s the girls weren’t having sex with every boy they met.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

With all due respect, the plural of "anecdote" is NOT "data". I will stick with the statistics.

Expand full comment
Pamela Rapoza's avatar

Anecdotally? I lived in the 60’s and believe me the girls weren’t having sex and babies with multiple partners. Data? No but I lived it. I graduated in a class of 262 kids and how many of them had babies or were pregnant at graduation? ZERO. And they weren’t out there having abortions either.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

This is a good article, but I take issue with this statement: “…natural male sexuality is pathologized while consequence-free female sexuality is celebrated. The birth control pill created a world where sex is everywhere but intimacy is increasingly rare.”

I’m not sure that ‘consequence-free female sexuality’ is all it’s cracked up to be.

With the pill it’s presumed women are available for penile/vaginal penetration whenever, and they will have to deal with unwanted pregnancies, disposal via the morning after pill or abortion. Not exactly ‘consequence free’…

Our saturated with sex culture, is this really a winner? At the cost of loyal and loving relationships which foster a beneficient atmosphere to raise a family.

Expand full comment
Jeff Cook-Coyle's avatar

It encourages irresponsibility and inhumanity in boys and men. If there are no consequences, then why not, and who cares who it is with?

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Exactly…it’s not good.

Expand full comment
Steven Work's avatar

Jeff, it is interesting that what you prescribe for men is more true for women, the GateKeepers. The insane-accepting baby-murdering power-lust-control-manipulating parental-frauding "can't keep their F-ing legs closed" because unborn killing is celebrated by the mind-raped fatherless divorce-raping family-fatherhood-childhood-self destroyers, and the supporting Witches.

Ever wonder why the world grows more insane every generation? If so, listen and-or read on!

AI generated audio overview of this article;

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/8066f0fc-c4b7-4ab7-a667-75b84c39c8f8/audio

"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2225:, 21st July 2025, The Profound Sickness: An Anti-Abortion Apologetic"

https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2225

Feedback welcome.

God Bless., Steve

Expand full comment
David Rinker's avatar

"Consequence-free sex does not exist for either sex. There may be no physical consequences, but one's psychology is forever affected.

Expand full comment