Australian’s love getting tested.
They will line up for hours for the "gold standard" PCR Test.
This love affair with testing goes a long way to explaining our current hockey stick.
Today we have PCRs and RATs (Rapid Antigen Tests) as the main two testing tools. But I've been wondering recently about what we used to do before testing became a thing?
In the distant past, you know the world before March 2020, how did we used to know whether we were diseased or not? When you frame the question that way, the answer seems pretty obvious, symptoms.
So, that started me thinking about symptoms and I realised that symptoms are mother nature's built-in test (seeing we like acronyms, let’s call it a BIT). We each walk around with a most sophisticated built-in disease signaling test, fine-tuned by evolution. Our BIT also produces a positive and a negative result. The positive result comes in the form of symptoms and the negative test result comes in the form of no symptoms, in the new parlance that is asymptomatic, otherwise known as healthy.
Our BIT is always on, highly reliable and responsive and most of all, free.
BIT+
Having a positive BIT means we have symptoms.
Symptoms serve two opposing functions. One is to help the virus spread, and the other is to signal our status, to ourselves and others, that we are indeed ill and need to take virus counter measures to ensure our health and restrict the virus's ambitions.
BIT-
Having a negative BIT means we have no symptoms, or asymptotic, or as we used to say fine as a fiddle and healthy.
More importantly, having no symptoms means you are not a threat to others.
Even Fauci was happy to admit this in January 2020 before they ramped up the lying to 11.
“The one thing historically people need to realise, that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission in all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there’s a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.” Here is the clip.
We always knew that people without symptoms were not a threat, but for me the meta-analysis published in JAMA in December 2020 is one of those data points that I am happy to anchor many positions to.
Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
In simple English, this was a study of studies, 54 studies in fact with 77,758 total participants. It studied households with at least one member of the family having the virus, and looked at how many other people in that family they infected. In other words, “secondary transmission”.
Buried in the bowels of this study is this innocent looking partial sentence:
Household secondary attack rates…from asymptomatic index cases (0.7%; 95% CI, 0%-4.9%)
0.7%!
That means, for every 100 people that have the virus without symptoms (otherwise known as healthy people), living with their families, kissing, hugging, arguing, shouting, sexing, and sleeping together without masks, distancing, or vaccines, LESS THAN ONE other person caught the virus from them. POINT SEVEN to be precise.
Please pause and reflect on this.
This is how hard it is to catch the virus from someone without symptoms (healthy), while LIVING with them. Let alone passing them in the shopping centre, or at the park or simply walking down the street.
So, back to our Built-In Test (BIT) and a question:
Is a negative BIT (BIT-) a reliable signal of no disease and a reliable signal of potential risk to others?
According to Fauci in January 2020; YES.
According to JAMA in December 2020; YES.
This is a profoundly important point. If you accept that you have a BIT, and you accept that your BIT is a highly accurate and reliable signal, then you are now ready to think about PCR Tests and Rapid Antigen Tests in a deeper manner.
You need to see all of these tests for what they are, State sanctioned and State sponsored signals of disease.
I am going to say that again, a PCR Test, or Rapid Antigen Test, or any other test The State is promoting are simply:
State sanctioned and State sponsored SIGNALS OF DISEASE.
And they are designed to replace your own God given, finely tuned, built-in signal of disease. Your symptoms.
At the heart of this matter is a very ugly truth. The State has taken over the signaling role of disease and in so doing have created a new “reality” different from our old reality.
In this new “reality” we don’t know whether we are ill and diseased or not until the State TELLS US.
Hopkins talks about the New “Reality” better than anyone else:
Manufacturing (New Normal) “Reality” - CJ Hopkins
There is nothing subtle about this process. Decommissioning one “reality” and replacing it with another is a brutal business. Societies grow accustomed to their “realities.” We do not surrender them willingly or easily. Normally, what’s required to get us to do so is a crisis, a war, a state of emergency, or … you know, a deadly global pandemic.
During the changeover from the old “reality” to the new “reality,” the society is torn apart. The old “reality” is being disassembled and the new one has not yet taken its place. It feels like madness, and, in a way, it is. For a time, the society is split in two, as the two “realities” battle it out for dominance. “Reality” being what it is (i.e., monolithic), this is a fight to the death. In the end, only one “reality” can prevail.
Reflect on the reality you want to stand in.
Do you want to exist in a reality where your body tells you when you are ill and when you are not ill, or do you want to exist in a “reality” where the State tells you?
Do you want to stand in reality or “reality”.
Please remember This Is A War by “reality” on reality.