I’m sure the audience here knows about the fallacies of viruses and all, so I won’t belabor the point. What I do want to bring attention too is who are the individuals who gave us these diseases like smallpox, plagues, etc. it’s here that we must examine history and find that everything we’ve been told mainstream about medicine is a lie: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/rich-people-do-magic
never ending search for and eradication of the bogeyman! They are running after the supposed cause of disease when it's not bogeymen at all that cause disease. I'm reminded of a story about a man walking around underneath a streetlight looking at the ground. Another man comes along and asks him, are you looking for something? The first man answers, yes I'm looking for my car keys. Second man asks, did you lose them here? First man says, no I lost them over there, pointing 20 yards away. Second man says, then why aren't you looking for them over there? First man says because the light is so much better here.
We’re tracking two competing brands in the skin-symptom snappy tees market:
👕 ELASTIC LABELS™
🧵 Business model: wardrobe relabelling
😷 Same rash → 🏷️ new tag → 🚨 new panic
🕳️ The actual garment? Never shown — only “somewhere in the supply chain”
📏 When the fit’s wrong, they don’t redesign… ✂️ they rename
👚 DETOX™
🪡 Business model: fit & function
🚫 The skin isn’t under attack — 🧼 it’s taking something out
🍽️ Change what goes in → 👕 the outfit settles down
📆 No seasonal rebrands
☠️ No toxic fabrics
🌱 Just honest terrain tailoring
📉 Why Elastic Labels™ is bleeding share
👀 Customers notice:
❌ the “virus” was never shown
🔁 the same symptoms keep wearing different names
📣 and the fear marketing never ends
🧲 Once seen, the label stops sticking
📈 Why Detox™ is winning
🧠 It explains variation without invention
🔄 Same body + different inputs = different outputs
✔️ Fits reality
✔️ Fits every season
📉 ANALYST NOTE
Sharp sell-offs expected in Elastic Labels™ stock as premium brands like No Virus™, Terrain™, and Detox™ continue exposing the fake garments — stitched with invisible claims and lined with toxic fibres — still being hawked to the public.
If what this author claims is true, then she should have NO problem lying down in bed with someone with smallpox or leprosy or even having sex with someone with syphilis! After all if all these "diseases" are just the body cleansing itself from environmental factors and not contagious there would be NO danger of transmission, but i highly doubt she would put her money where her mouth is! I would wager the chances of her doing it are less than ZERO! Prove me wrong, ma'am.
I wonder what happened to the Native Americans. Supposedly many of them died off due to smallpox. If not “smallpox”, what was introduced to them to cause this?
I am certain that if you were to go down that rabbit hole you would discover psychological stress on a population removed from its regular dietary and clean water sources, likely some poisoning via “vaccination” from military doctors, environmental pressure such as ivies that cause skin rashes that may not have been prevalent in the areas that the tribes had lived (because for generations they had adapted to avoiding those areas containing those pressures), etc.
Living for generations in the same ways in the same places at the same time of year suddenly disrupted by outside forces creates a cascade of factors that can upset the health of a population.
If the reaction of the body to toxines explains smallpox then the pox would contain toxic material but that doesnt seem to be confirmed does it? This aspect ought to play a key role in the debate. Diseases depopulate the world so that may be one reason for disease:to cut down our numbers. If that is the main real reason then it is less surprising that we fail to find out exactly what it is. When we know more about it we might grow too much in number. I dont mean to sound pessimistic but it is a bit odd that progress in medicine has been so slow. I know greed is one reason: That sick people generate more profits. But is that all? Isnt it surprisng that no scientific establishment has managed to break that spell?
When public‑health agencies evaluate whether an intervention is helpful, they look at very broad indicators such as: how many people are hospitalised, how many people develop complications, how many people die, how often the virus spreads in communities, how quickly outbreaks grow or shrink. The problem is that hospitals routinely make an initial diagnosis based on symptoms and on what is statistically likely in a highly vaccinated community, and this early diagnosis is what gets reported to public health authorities as a suspected case. Once a suspected case enters the surveillance system, it is counted in the official totals and is almost never revised even if later laboratory testing shows that the patient did not have the disease, had a vaccine‑strain detection, or had a different illness entirely. Strain identification happens only in the laboratory through genetic testing, but this information usually stays within the lab and does not flow back into the public‑health reporting layer because it does not change the intervention strategy, which focuses on wild‑type transmission. As a result, clusters of symptomatic cases can be publicly described as part of an outbreak even when later testing shows that some of those cases were not wild‑type infections, and the public never sees the corrected picture because the reporting system does not update the initial numbers. This misreporting later becomes the population level data used in research to communicate supposed clinical efficacy, along with antibody studies which just show a form of incomplete immunity or immune reaction.
From the standpoint of acknowledging medical harm and acknowledging viruses, viruses cannot be isolated the way bacteria are because bacteria are complete living cells that can grow on nutrient plates or in broth, while viruses cannot reproduce unless they enter living cells and use the host’s machinery, so identifying a virus requires letting it multiply in cells, tissues or embryos and then separating the viral particles from the surrounding material for structural or genetic examination. Poxviruses were historically distinguished by the characteristic lesions they produced in laboratory systems such as the chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryos, although similar rashes can be SOMETIMES CONVENIENTLY mistaken for one another in clinical settings. In a laboratory, however, viruses that look alike on the skin can be differentiated by methods such as PCR, or electron microscope. Electron microscopy can also distinguish viruses because poxviruses are large brick‑shaped particles while herpesviruses have a smaller icosahedral structure, so even when clinical appearance is misleading, laboratory analysis can clearly identify the virus involved. What’s disingenuous is identifying by symptoms alone, and also citing cases of measles or such, without clarifying if the case spread from a vaccinated person or occurred naturally. *** Labs can tell vaccine strains and wild‑type viruses apart by looking directly at their genetic sequences, because vaccine strains contain specific mutations that were introduced when the virus was weakened and these mutations act like a fingerprint. Tests such as PCR help with this because PCR looks for a short, known piece of genetic material and makes many copies of it only if that exact piece is already present in the sample. This makes PCR useful and valid because it does not create new sequences and it does not copy unrelated material; it only amplifies what matches the target. When the copied sequence matches the known pattern of a vaccine strain, the result is identified as vaccine‑derived, and when it matches the pattern of a naturally circulating strain, it is identified as wild‑type. Sequencing can read longer stretches of the genome and confirm these differences with even greater detail, so even if two infections look similar on the skin, the underlying genetic signatures allow a laboratory to tell them apart. Requiring these tests would knock the “outbreaks” claims off their aims.
what actually happens is…Strain identification happens only in the laboratory through genetic testing, but that information is not routinely passed on to clinicians, patients, or public health authorities, which means the distinction between vaccine strain and wild‑type strain often remains inside the lab rather than entering the broader reporting system. Hospitals are required to report suspected cases early based on SYMPTOMS alone, and these reports enter surveillance tallies before any laboratory confirmation is available, so they remain in the system even if later testing shows a vaccine strain or a different illness entirely. Public health authorities focus on tracking wild‑type transmission because the mythology says that is the only thing which drives outbreaks and requires intervention, so strain‑level details are not highlighted in public summaries since they do not change the response - which is to tell people to vaccinate more. As a result, clusters of symptomatic cases can be publicly described as part of an outbreak even when some or all of those cases later turn out to involve vaccine‑strain detections, and the public never sees that distinction because the reporting system does not update the initial numbers. (And the claim “vaccine‑strain measles is always mild” is not supported by large datasets. Additionally, severe cases involving vaccine‑strain detection are not discussed publicly.) The limitation in the data is therefore not biological rarity but the fact that strain‑level findings do not flow beyond the laboratory into the clinical or public‑facing layers of the reporting structure because this would dismantle the assumptions which are relied upon to encourage vaccination.
We can stop this by refusing to comply and refusing to listen to 'experts', the gatekeepers of the silos. What we are finding out is that the silos only change color, or are built out of something different than the silo down the street. Inside the silos are the same junk that is called by a different name, each with a chosen, highly credentialed gatekeeper whose only claim to the silo is the invention of a new Latinized long word that nobody can pronounce. Yet when one analyzes the contents of each silo, they contain the same junk: a toxic soup of heavy metals, GMO food, animal waste, and whatever else the real parasites invent to control us.
It is difficult to live without being exposed to all this junk, but it is not that hard to say no to the gatekeepers and let the body do its thing. Once we do that, the silos no longer look different. And the silo whose contents have been exposed, such as the one containing the flu is the same as all the other silos. Your wallet will be a lot happier and your body will start acting like it is supposed to act. How simple life would be.
When this happens, all the real parasites disappear into the woodwork, like the cockroaches they are. Shedding light on them is the first step to eliminating them. Another well researched essay on how these silos are created and maintained. They need our compliance to survive. Without it, these silos just become another boring site on the road to wellness, not even worth a stop for a photo, no matter how glitzy they appear.
Right on eileen. Belief in "authority" is the most egregious viral infection ever invented, and it seems to be contagious. The only cure is to treat ALL expert dialog as waste products of education. Flush twice...
It just goes to show you how lazy and gullible people are.Taught to believe evil opportunistic freaks in power by their stupid parents and sociopaths and psychopaths who make up 10% of Homo sapiens. All it would take is love and a good program teaching critical thinking and pattern recognition. It would have to be mandatory and supported by the norms in mass. Gone are viruses pedos war slavery ect. It’s not hard to imagine all the people living in the world in harmony.AI must stay clean or we are toast.
I greatly appreciate all your articles and I believe it's beneficial to develop critical thinking skills in the face of the flood of approximations, simplistic theories, and even outright lies that are presented to us as "the one and only absolute truth" (only to hear the exact opposite with the same conviction a few years later).
Here, I find the argument about the contagiousness of chickenpox in children a bit weak. I had chickenpox when I was about 15 years old; my symptoms started a few days after my little sister (10 years old at the time). We had healthy food, sunshine, perfectly adequate living conditions, no environmental pollution, and no stress... and I'm skeptical that "metabolic growth producing waste that must be eliminated through the skin because all the other elimination organs are overloaded" could produce the same symptoms at such different stages of growth as 10 and 15 years old.
In short: Critical thinking should not, in turn, become a religion....
I’m sure the audience here knows about the fallacies of viruses and all, so I won’t belabor the point. What I do want to bring attention too is who are the individuals who gave us these diseases like smallpox, plagues, etc. it’s here that we must examine history and find that everything we’ve been told mainstream about medicine is a lie: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/rich-people-do-magic
“Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts.” - Richard P. Feynman - (May 11, 1918 – February 15, 1988)
more than 30 years ago I read a book from Feynman. A critical thinker, got my respect.
And we are to trust these people with our health?
Strike at the root...
Germ Theory is a fraud, always has been.
never ending search for and eradication of the bogeyman! They are running after the supposed cause of disease when it's not bogeymen at all that cause disease. I'm reminded of a story about a man walking around underneath a streetlight looking at the ground. Another man comes along and asks him, are you looking for something? The first man answers, yes I'm looking for my car keys. Second man asks, did you lose them here? First man says, no I lost them over there, pointing 20 yards away. Second man says, then why aren't you looking for them over there? First man says because the light is so much better here.
📺 And tonight on MARKET FLASH — CORE TAKE
We’re tracking two competing brands in the skin-symptom snappy tees market:
👕 ELASTIC LABELS™
🧵 Business model: wardrobe relabelling
😷 Same rash → 🏷️ new tag → 🚨 new panic
🕳️ The actual garment? Never shown — only “somewhere in the supply chain”
📏 When the fit’s wrong, they don’t redesign… ✂️ they rename
👚 DETOX™
🪡 Business model: fit & function
🚫 The skin isn’t under attack — 🧼 it’s taking something out
🍽️ Change what goes in → 👕 the outfit settles down
📆 No seasonal rebrands
☠️ No toxic fabrics
🌱 Just honest terrain tailoring
📉 Why Elastic Labels™ is bleeding share
👀 Customers notice:
❌ the “virus” was never shown
🔁 the same symptoms keep wearing different names
📣 and the fear marketing never ends
🧲 Once seen, the label stops sticking
📈 Why Detox™ is winning
🧠 It explains variation without invention
🔄 Same body + different inputs = different outputs
✔️ Fits reality
✔️ Fits every season
📉 ANALYST NOTE
Sharp sell-offs expected in Elastic Labels™ stock as premium brands like No Virus™, Terrain™, and Detox™ continue exposing the fake garments — stitched with invisible claims and lined with toxic fibres — still being hawked to the public.
📊 That’s MARKET FLASH.
Tomorrow: Is Fear Still Fashionable? 👔😷📉
Continuing gratitude to you.
If what this author claims is true, then she should have NO problem lying down in bed with someone with smallpox or leprosy or even having sex with someone with syphilis! After all if all these "diseases" are just the body cleansing itself from environmental factors and not contagious there would be NO danger of transmission, but i highly doubt she would put her money where her mouth is! I would wager the chances of her doing it are less than ZERO! Prove me wrong, ma'am.
I wonder what happened to the Native Americans. Supposedly many of them died off due to smallpox. If not “smallpox”, what was introduced to them to cause this?
I am certain that if you were to go down that rabbit hole you would discover psychological stress on a population removed from its regular dietary and clean water sources, likely some poisoning via “vaccination” from military doctors, environmental pressure such as ivies that cause skin rashes that may not have been prevalent in the areas that the tribes had lived (because for generations they had adapted to avoiding those areas containing those pressures), etc.
Living for generations in the same ways in the same places at the same time of year suddenly disrupted by outside forces creates a cascade of factors that can upset the health of a population.
Good points. Readily available of alcohol certainly didn’t help either.
Hey now, stop binging up inconvenient facts that ruin her carefully constructed narrative!
If the reaction of the body to toxines explains smallpox then the pox would contain toxic material but that doesnt seem to be confirmed does it? This aspect ought to play a key role in the debate. Diseases depopulate the world so that may be one reason for disease:to cut down our numbers. If that is the main real reason then it is less surprising that we fail to find out exactly what it is. When we know more about it we might grow too much in number. I dont mean to sound pessimistic but it is a bit odd that progress in medicine has been so slow. I know greed is one reason: That sick people generate more profits. But is that all? Isnt it surprisng that no scientific establishment has managed to break that spell?
When public‑health agencies evaluate whether an intervention is helpful, they look at very broad indicators such as: how many people are hospitalised, how many people develop complications, how many people die, how often the virus spreads in communities, how quickly outbreaks grow or shrink. The problem is that hospitals routinely make an initial diagnosis based on symptoms and on what is statistically likely in a highly vaccinated community, and this early diagnosis is what gets reported to public health authorities as a suspected case. Once a suspected case enters the surveillance system, it is counted in the official totals and is almost never revised even if later laboratory testing shows that the patient did not have the disease, had a vaccine‑strain detection, or had a different illness entirely. Strain identification happens only in the laboratory through genetic testing, but this information usually stays within the lab and does not flow back into the public‑health reporting layer because it does not change the intervention strategy, which focuses on wild‑type transmission. As a result, clusters of symptomatic cases can be publicly described as part of an outbreak even when later testing shows that some of those cases were not wild‑type infections, and the public never sees the corrected picture because the reporting system does not update the initial numbers. This misreporting later becomes the population level data used in research to communicate supposed clinical efficacy, along with antibody studies which just show a form of incomplete immunity or immune reaction.
From the standpoint of acknowledging medical harm and acknowledging viruses, viruses cannot be isolated the way bacteria are because bacteria are complete living cells that can grow on nutrient plates or in broth, while viruses cannot reproduce unless they enter living cells and use the host’s machinery, so identifying a virus requires letting it multiply in cells, tissues or embryos and then separating the viral particles from the surrounding material for structural or genetic examination. Poxviruses were historically distinguished by the characteristic lesions they produced in laboratory systems such as the chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryos, although similar rashes can be SOMETIMES CONVENIENTLY mistaken for one another in clinical settings. In a laboratory, however, viruses that look alike on the skin can be differentiated by methods such as PCR, or electron microscope. Electron microscopy can also distinguish viruses because poxviruses are large brick‑shaped particles while herpesviruses have a smaller icosahedral structure, so even when clinical appearance is misleading, laboratory analysis can clearly identify the virus involved. What’s disingenuous is identifying by symptoms alone, and also citing cases of measles or such, without clarifying if the case spread from a vaccinated person or occurred naturally. *** Labs can tell vaccine strains and wild‑type viruses apart by looking directly at their genetic sequences, because vaccine strains contain specific mutations that were introduced when the virus was weakened and these mutations act like a fingerprint. Tests such as PCR help with this because PCR looks for a short, known piece of genetic material and makes many copies of it only if that exact piece is already present in the sample. This makes PCR useful and valid because it does not create new sequences and it does not copy unrelated material; it only amplifies what matches the target. When the copied sequence matches the known pattern of a vaccine strain, the result is identified as vaccine‑derived, and when it matches the pattern of a naturally circulating strain, it is identified as wild‑type. Sequencing can read longer stretches of the genome and confirm these differences with even greater detail, so even if two infections look similar on the skin, the underlying genetic signatures allow a laboratory to tell them apart. Requiring these tests would knock the “outbreaks” claims off their aims.
what actually happens is…Strain identification happens only in the laboratory through genetic testing, but that information is not routinely passed on to clinicians, patients, or public health authorities, which means the distinction between vaccine strain and wild‑type strain often remains inside the lab rather than entering the broader reporting system. Hospitals are required to report suspected cases early based on SYMPTOMS alone, and these reports enter surveillance tallies before any laboratory confirmation is available, so they remain in the system even if later testing shows a vaccine strain or a different illness entirely. Public health authorities focus on tracking wild‑type transmission because the mythology says that is the only thing which drives outbreaks and requires intervention, so strain‑level details are not highlighted in public summaries since they do not change the response - which is to tell people to vaccinate more. As a result, clusters of symptomatic cases can be publicly described as part of an outbreak even when some or all of those cases later turn out to involve vaccine‑strain detections, and the public never sees that distinction because the reporting system does not update the initial numbers. (And the claim “vaccine‑strain measles is always mild” is not supported by large datasets. Additionally, severe cases involving vaccine‑strain detection are not discussed publicly.) The limitation in the data is therefore not biological rarity but the fact that strain‑level findings do not flow beyond the laboratory into the clinical or public‑facing layers of the reporting structure because this would dismantle the assumptions which are relied upon to encourage vaccination.
So the claim that NO virus has EVER been isolated/identified is total bs?
We can stop this by refusing to comply and refusing to listen to 'experts', the gatekeepers of the silos. What we are finding out is that the silos only change color, or are built out of something different than the silo down the street. Inside the silos are the same junk that is called by a different name, each with a chosen, highly credentialed gatekeeper whose only claim to the silo is the invention of a new Latinized long word that nobody can pronounce. Yet when one analyzes the contents of each silo, they contain the same junk: a toxic soup of heavy metals, GMO food, animal waste, and whatever else the real parasites invent to control us.
It is difficult to live without being exposed to all this junk, but it is not that hard to say no to the gatekeepers and let the body do its thing. Once we do that, the silos no longer look different. And the silo whose contents have been exposed, such as the one containing the flu is the same as all the other silos. Your wallet will be a lot happier and your body will start acting like it is supposed to act. How simple life would be.
When this happens, all the real parasites disappear into the woodwork, like the cockroaches they are. Shedding light on them is the first step to eliminating them. Another well researched essay on how these silos are created and maintained. They need our compliance to survive. Without it, these silos just become another boring site on the road to wellness, not even worth a stop for a photo, no matter how glitzy they appear.
Right on eileen. Belief in "authority" is the most egregious viral infection ever invented, and it seems to be contagious. The only cure is to treat ALL expert dialog as waste products of education. Flush twice...
Outstanding.
It just goes to show you how lazy and gullible people are.Taught to believe evil opportunistic freaks in power by their stupid parents and sociopaths and psychopaths who make up 10% of Homo sapiens. All it would take is love and a good program teaching critical thinking and pattern recognition. It would have to be mandatory and supported by the norms in mass. Gone are viruses pedos war slavery ect. It’s not hard to imagine all the people living in the world in harmony.AI must stay clean or we are toast.
I greatly appreciate all your articles and I believe it's beneficial to develop critical thinking skills in the face of the flood of approximations, simplistic theories, and even outright lies that are presented to us as "the one and only absolute truth" (only to hear the exact opposite with the same conviction a few years later).
Here, I find the argument about the contagiousness of chickenpox in children a bit weak. I had chickenpox when I was about 15 years old; my symptoms started a few days after my little sister (10 years old at the time). We had healthy food, sunshine, perfectly adequate living conditions, no environmental pollution, and no stress... and I'm skeptical that "metabolic growth producing waste that must be eliminated through the skin because all the other elimination organs are overloaded" could produce the same symptoms at such different stages of growth as 10 and 15 years old.
In short: Critical thinking should not, in turn, become a religion....