Dear Unbecoming, You had better check your brakes. Many a person was made to suffer in the early 20th century for daring to discuss pleomorphism.
In 1917, someone at the NY Times published that Edward Rosenow had cured polio (it has to do with the morphing of bacilli and virus). Oops not supposed to reveal that. So back we went to the belief that polio is just a virus.
Great article, thank you. Combined with Dr Hamer's German New Medicine we would get close to a "theory of everything". See www.learninggnm.com: understanding disease, free of fear and panic.
Health care is so desperate to be relevant that they weaponized the clean up crew and the rubbish collector that picks up your weekly trash. The harder they try the less relevant they become. How about if we all said "I will not comply" and ate food that are close to the soil. Not necessarily being a vegan, but if we choose to eat animals, then eat animals raised according to their nature: free roaming and eating what grows naturally if left unfallowed. (Plants we call 'weeds'). By disconnecting we avoid the fear porn, vax pushers or paid off government bureaucrats telling us how to think. It's wealth transfer pure and simple.
Fascinating article, unbekoming. Love the clear overview of what being sick really means & how our brilliant bodies adapt to disease..
I'll never forget watching Dr Kaufman's 2020 video slide show/ discussion of exosomes as clean-up crews (& later related terrain theory) during the con-vid years. Those early explanations of how our body is trying to heal itself made so much more sense than the allopathic medical system's explanations/treatments - a system I've observed as damaging health & injuring/even killing so many friends & family members throughout my life.
Later on, I watched "The Viral Delusion" doc-series & also began to read widely on the topic of terrain theory vs the current drug & suppress medical system I'd always been suspicious of before.
Absolutely love your brief review here & clear outline of the mistaken analysis/focus of the ongoing allopathic - "traditional" - so-called modern medical system. As you say:
“Louis Pasteur won and Antoine Béchamp lost. Germ theory became [modern] medicine’s foundation. The organism became the enemy. The terrain became irrelevant.”
“This wasn’t a scientific conclusion reached through rigorous comparison of the two frameworks. It was a choice - arguably a political and commercial choice - that closed off entire avenues of inquiry.”
Hoping that lots of new eyes will read & share this article & follow all your excellent included links, re: the competing historical disease claims aka "Pasteur vs Bechamp" camps as to why a body gets sick/develops inflammation, illness & disease, So much solid info here for those w/a real medical curiosity as to why the med system/corps/farma-makers have become so powerful & relatively untouchable over the past 100+ years. It's an enforced monopolistic system with a lack of any real competitive medical analysis & buffered by the forced AMA rules conscription of its "practitioners".
fyi -Important book on the history of US medicine (original scan but save it to a safer document):
"Rockefeller Medicine Men - Medicine and Capitalism in America" (1979, reprint 2013) a book by E. Richard Brown - Link here: http://www.whale.to/b/brown_b.html - Also online in other pdfs/to buy.
From the book's Preface:
"When Rockefeller Medicine Men was first published in1979, it proved to be a controversial work. In reviewing histories of medicine from 1962 to 1982, Ronald L. Numbers called it "the most controversial medical history of the past decade."' This reprinting of the book provides an opportunity to respond to some of the book's critics as part of a continuing dialogue about the issues it raises."
"Part of the controversy generated by the book comes from its social-historical approach to medicine. The growing body of social histories of health care challenges the "great physician" perspective that for so long has dominated the history of medicine.2 Some are dismayed by this new approach to health care, particularly when it involves a critical examination of the broader social, economic, and political contexts of medicine and health-related developments.3 Indeed, 'heroic physicians and medical milestones,"4 whether innovative teachers of clinical practice or breakthrough discoveries by brilliant researchers, do have a profound effect on the development of medicine's technical knowledge and practice."
... "But the history of medicine, like the history of any other social phenomenon, is more than an intellectual history. The actions of men and women, including leaders and the masses of people who follow and participate in professions and social movements, are shaped by economic, political, and social forces as well as by ideas. Ideas themselves develop in a broader context, which they shape but which also shape them."
Gonna take a many Millions Man March, so to speak, to turn this Rockefeller medical ship around.
When on my Android Samsung cellphone I keyed "Pleomorphism" into the Substack search field, this article did not appear. Some other account which I ignored did appear.
Is Substack is censoring this vitally important work?
Please inform us of another way to donate and to encounter this material.
I am going to be leaving Substack to follow those I find valuable.
I am confused about the organisms as friends concept.
I don't doubt it, it sounds reasonable, I accept it. There have been several articles regarding this.
But there are times when we know or think bacteria is bad. Just a day or two ago we read about the IUD where the string wicked bacteria into places it shouldn't. That was bad bacteria, at least I think the article focused on bacteria.
We have things such as Pneumonia. We typically think of this as a bacterial infection and it's treated with a variety of anti-bacterials. This seems like a case of bad bacteria, or is this also a situation where the bacteria is a diagnostic and not the problem?
I'm an IT guy by trade, I know machines not people. I like the articles here but am scratching my head about this.
Is there bad bacteria? How do we know when it is? I hope this makes sense.
What if one 'thing' - a somatid or protit is the fundamental thing that morphs into what you call good and bad organisms? Is the fundamental thing good or bad itself or is it merely doing what it must or rather is requested do?
Dear Unbecoming, You had better check your brakes. Many a person was made to suffer in the early 20th century for daring to discuss pleomorphism.
In 1917, someone at the NY Times published that Edward Rosenow had cured polio (it has to do with the morphing of bacilli and virus). Oops not supposed to reveal that. So back we went to the belief that polio is just a virus.
This is discussed in my 2013 book, "Consider the Lilies". Here is the PDF: https://gumshoenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/lillies_book_20Jan2014_highres368.pdf
PS Are the illustrations on your Substack painted by you? Wow.
Thank you Mary. Could you please email me as I would like to promote the book. unbekoming@outlook.com
I'm reading your book now Mary. So happy unbekoming will highlight it! Thank you for sharing the link
Downloaded - thank you!
Great article, thank you. Combined with Dr Hamer's German New Medicine we would get close to a "theory of everything". See www.learninggnm.com: understanding disease, free of fear and panic.
Health care is so desperate to be relevant that they weaponized the clean up crew and the rubbish collector that picks up your weekly trash. The harder they try the less relevant they become. How about if we all said "I will not comply" and ate food that are close to the soil. Not necessarily being a vegan, but if we choose to eat animals, then eat animals raised according to their nature: free roaming and eating what grows naturally if left unfallowed. (Plants we call 'weeds'). By disconnecting we avoid the fear porn, vax pushers or paid off government bureaucrats telling us how to think. It's wealth transfer pure and simple.
Fascinating article, unbekoming. Love the clear overview of what being sick really means & how our brilliant bodies adapt to disease..
I'll never forget watching Dr Kaufman's 2020 video slide show/ discussion of exosomes as clean-up crews (& later related terrain theory) during the con-vid years. Those early explanations of how our body is trying to heal itself made so much more sense than the allopathic medical system's explanations/treatments - a system I've observed as damaging health & injuring/even killing so many friends & family members throughout my life.
Later on, I watched "The Viral Delusion" doc-series & also began to read widely on the topic of terrain theory vs the current drug & suppress medical system I'd always been suspicious of before.
Absolutely love your brief review here & clear outline of the mistaken analysis/focus of the ongoing allopathic - "traditional" - so-called modern medical system. As you say:
“Louis Pasteur won and Antoine Béchamp lost. Germ theory became [modern] medicine’s foundation. The organism became the enemy. The terrain became irrelevant.”
“This wasn’t a scientific conclusion reached through rigorous comparison of the two frameworks. It was a choice - arguably a political and commercial choice - that closed off entire avenues of inquiry.”
Hoping that lots of new eyes will read & share this article & follow all your excellent included links, re: the competing historical disease claims aka "Pasteur vs Bechamp" camps as to why a body gets sick/develops inflammation, illness & disease, So much solid info here for those w/a real medical curiosity as to why the med system/corps/farma-makers have become so powerful & relatively untouchable over the past 100+ years. It's an enforced monopolistic system with a lack of any real competitive medical analysis & buffered by the forced AMA rules conscription of its "practitioners".
fyi -Important book on the history of US medicine (original scan but save it to a safer document):
"Rockefeller Medicine Men - Medicine and Capitalism in America" (1979, reprint 2013) a book by E. Richard Brown - Link here: http://www.whale.to/b/brown_b.html - Also online in other pdfs/to buy.
From the book's Preface:
"When Rockefeller Medicine Men was first published in1979, it proved to be a controversial work. In reviewing histories of medicine from 1962 to 1982, Ronald L. Numbers called it "the most controversial medical history of the past decade."' This reprinting of the book provides an opportunity to respond to some of the book's critics as part of a continuing dialogue about the issues it raises."
"Part of the controversy generated by the book comes from its social-historical approach to medicine. The growing body of social histories of health care challenges the "great physician" perspective that for so long has dominated the history of medicine.2 Some are dismayed by this new approach to health care, particularly when it involves a critical examination of the broader social, economic, and political contexts of medicine and health-related developments.3 Indeed, 'heroic physicians and medical milestones,"4 whether innovative teachers of clinical practice or breakthrough discoveries by brilliant researchers, do have a profound effect on the development of medicine's technical knowledge and practice."
... "But the history of medicine, like the history of any other social phenomenon, is more than an intellectual history. The actions of men and women, including leaders and the masses of people who follow and participate in professions and social movements, are shaped by economic, political, and social forces as well as by ideas. Ideas themselves develop in a broader context, which they shape but which also shape them."
Gonna take a many Millions Man March, so to speak, to turn this Rockefeller medical ship around.
Excellent!
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
Thank you for reminding and educating me on the correct term. My memory had morphed pleo- into poly-.
Something seems wrong at Substack.
When on my Android Samsung cellphone I keyed "Pleomorphism" into the Substack search field, this article did not appear. Some other account which I ignored did appear.
Is Substack is censoring this vitally important work?
Please inform us of another way to donate and to encounter this material.
I am going to be leaving Substack to follow those I find valuable.
I am confused about the organisms as friends concept.
I don't doubt it, it sounds reasonable, I accept it. There have been several articles regarding this.
But there are times when we know or think bacteria is bad. Just a day or two ago we read about the IUD where the string wicked bacteria into places it shouldn't. That was bad bacteria, at least I think the article focused on bacteria.
We have things such as Pneumonia. We typically think of this as a bacterial infection and it's treated with a variety of anti-bacterials. This seems like a case of bad bacteria, or is this also a situation where the bacteria is a diagnostic and not the problem?
I'm an IT guy by trade, I know machines not people. I like the articles here but am scratching my head about this.
Is there bad bacteria? How do we know when it is? I hope this makes sense.
What if one 'thing' - a somatid or protit is the fundamental thing that morphs into what you call good and bad organisms? Is the fundamental thing good or bad itself or is it merely doing what it must or rather is requested do?
So many hypotheses; now onto the science that proves these hypotheses.
also interesting : Oliver Brünner.