This article is a “renovation” of a chapter in my free eBook The Climate™.
It’s the type of short eBook I would have wanted to read when I was asleep but slightly curious.
Update: 17th October 2022
A reader left a comment correctly reminding me about the tone on which the doco ends, that of an overpopulation message. Let’s get one thing straight, overpopulation is a fast-thinking, Malthusian, genocidal, hope destroying, narrative that seems very hard for most to shake. It is total and utter BS and although I think the doco is absolutely worth watching to show the hypocrisy and corruption of the “green” movement, the “there are too many people” bullshit at the end can be ignored.
There are roughly 8 billion people (7.922 to be precise we are told).
If each one of us stood in 1 square metre, that would be 8b square metres.
Or 8,000 square kilometres (1 sq kilometre is 1m square metres). Which is an area just under 90kms long and 90 kms wide.
So, you could fit every man, women and child, standing within a square metre (holding hands) within an area the size of Sao Paulo (7,947 square kms).
Our little island of Tasmania is 68,401 square kms, if you divide by 8,000 you get 8.5.
That means that you could fit every man, woman and child, standing and holding hands 8.5 times into Tasmania.
The population “threat” has always been WILDLY exaggerated for political and financial gain.
Don’t believe it.
Back to the doco.
I’m no fan of Michael Moore, but credit where it’s due, he helped produce and promote this amazing documentary.
It’s a very important “lego bit” in understanding the global, multi-trillion-dollar racket that is Industrial Climate Change.
Planet of the Humans | By Jeff Gibbs, Executive Producer Michael Moore
If you are like me, and you find it almost impossible to watch any of the new movies produced by Netflix, Amazon, Apple and others, and were wondering what to watch this weekend, then I strongly recommend this documentary.
It will shatter and reframe whatever you think you know about the “environmentally friendly solutions” that The Climate™ is promoting.
You will not find it on YouTube, and it has been savagely attacked by the machine and censored wherever possible.
Which tells us it’s a must watch!
Historically, the claim of consensus is the first refuge of the scoundrel; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had. Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics.
Michael Crichton, PhD, MD, author, screenwriter and academic
I was reminded about this documentary when I saw this recent post by Senator Gerard Rennick:
“According to EU data, almost half of harvested wood biomass in its member countries is now used for generating electricity and heating. It is the most important single renewable energy source.”
Ah yes, burning trees to save the planet. That will do wonders for the environment won’t it.
You remember all those trees that we were meant to plant to “save the planet”, well, we are burning then to generate electricity.
It’s called Biomass.
Don’t believe me, watch the documentary, or read this:
Here are a couple of section from the Introduction of the report:
Europe’s forests have for centuries been cut for household fuel, and more recently for community burners supplying heat to villages and even small towns. But what is under way now is very different. Energy facilities burning biomass require millions of cubic metres of timber a year. So, in place of the occasional wood-chopper or chainsaw, mechanised logging operators are driving new roads deep into mountain ranges and clear-felling whole forests.
--
The threat to the continent’s forests is big and immediate. Expanding demand and generous subsidies are attracting investors to buy forests and fund logging companies. One Luxembourg based investment fund specialising in buying up Europe’s forests estimates that if the EU 2020 renewable energy targets are to be met, Europe will need between seven and 16 million hectares of energy crops. As a result, it says, “easily accessible biomass resources will soon be exhausted.”
As I mentioned here:
Judith Curry’s Senate testimony was my original Climate Change Red-Pill moment. If you are curious about the climate narrative, it’s a wonderful place to start.
I generally don’t like writing a The Climate™ article without including at least one Tony Heller video. Here is a wonderful recent one.
Thank you for reading this Substack.
Please consider a small paid subscription (donation). The money goes to a good cause.
I am always looking for good, personal GMC (pandemic and jab) or childhood vaccination stories. Shared stories help others.
In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.
You can write to me privately: unbekoming@outlook.com
If you are Covid-jab injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment
It's an outstanding documentary, but toward the end, it became clear it's a film about depopulating the planet. It's very dark.
What enrages me is how many people have bought the propaganda thar co2 causes global warming. It couldn't be further from the truth and has been proved to be a lie time and again by scientist 2ho are not paid by grant funding from the govts who are all in for this propo....so you can be slaves again..feudal serfdom