Novak, Thickening, Girardot and Seatbelts (again)
The Unbekoming Express - Edition 5 - Reading Time 11 minutes
Novak and Sovereignty
I had a client many years ago who was an electrician, his surname was Circuitt. What are the odds?
What are the odds, that one of the greatest athletes of all time would stand up and say No to the jab and his name would be No-vak. The odds would have to be in the trillions. It looks like it was meant to be.
Two years in there’s little that surprises me anymore but watching him during this BBC interview really blew me away. This is a historically important moment.
Clips of his BBC interview on Twitter are getting harder to find. I don’t expect this clip to be there for long.
In case that gets scrubbed, here is a longer segment on YouTube (although they are also scrubbing it).
There are so many ways this story could have gone.
Do you really think that there aren’t professional athletes out there, who know what Novak knows and who have access to a wide variety of doctors who would sign off on a fake jab certificate? It’s not only a victimless crime, but you couldn’t prove and prosecute it. Honestly, think about it. There are tens of thousands (probably a few hundred thousand) of professional athletes in soccer, tennis, basketball, volleyball, rugby etc. Conservatively I think there’s strong resistance to these jabs from at least 30% of the public. Those that will never get it or those that were very reluctantly forced to get it against their free will. Why wouldn’t that percentage map over professional sports, probably higher as they are hearing stories every single day about people in their sports either dying of suffering heart conditions.
I’m confident faked, bought, jab certificates are happening on scale within professional sports.
He chose to not go down that path. It would have been so easy.
I love the sequence of the BBC reporter asking him about his status as the GOAT, Wimbledon, The French Open and his short and firm answers as he looks him straight in the eye.
He has chosen to publicly stand for a principle that virtually no other high-level athlete is doing and injuring his sporting legacy in a manner that is frankly hard to fathom.
But in so doing he has transcended sport.
Nadal, who threw Novak under the bus, will be remembered as the man who said that you just need to follow the rules. The man who stood with The State against the sovereign individual.
I wrote about Aguero who not only took the jab, but promoted it to millions of kids, developed heart damage that ended his career, and still said nothing publicly about what happened to him. A disgraceful and cowardly way to end an amazing soccer career.
Novak has not made his stand about jab safety. Instead, his primary argument has been that he, and he alone will choose what goes into his body. You can look at this as a health-based position (which it is) but I think it’s primarily a personal sovereignty principle that he is making.
This principle was one of the key arguments I made here:
In Feb 2020 there was a border, a fairly large circle that you stood in the centre of. Everything within that circle was your domain, your freedoms, and your sovereignty.
Now, reflect on your life today, but more importantly reflect on the size of that circle. It obviously is much, much smaller today. The border between you and the State has been Reset.
Within that circle is a second circle that is much smaller, and it surrounds you almost like a second skin. Within this second circle, you have what is your “bodily sovereignty”. What is within your body is YOURS and not the State’s.
If you have acquiesced to the State’s injection, you have surrendered your bodily autonomy to the State. There is no border anymore between you and the State. It’s a depressing conclusion but true.
For those of you that have lost a job, or worse a career, I hope you find some solace in this. You are not a fool, you are not selfish, you are not weak…you are sovereign.
For those of you that have doubts of even regrets about your decision to take it, I hope this helps and gives you the will and courage to unsurrender and reclaim your sovereignty. It is never too late.
Here is the full interview on Rumble.
Novak Djokovic, full BBC interview, uncut (rumble.com)
The plot, and the blood, thickens.
I recently came across these three clips that a brave Dutch blood researcher by the name of Eunice Lieveld posted.
I can explain the problems with the jabs until I’m blue in the face (and I have) but watching a video and SEEING the problem has a way of actually getting through.
If you are unjabbed and you watch these, you can have some well-earned validation for why you have said no to these genetics.
If you have taken a couple of doses, and can bring yourself to watch these clips, I hope you find the motivation and courage to say, “no more, that’s it!”. I hope you can get off this toxic and deadly merry go round. Ever dose is another sprint through the minefield.
Show these to your friends that are showing a bit of hesitancy. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then a video is surely worth a million.
Twitter wouldn’t let me embed the third vid. I doubt they will be up for much longer.
Here is a link to the Twitter upload.
If you are on Twitter and you want to save clips, you can use: @this_vid
Here are saved links of the three clips if, or when, Twitter gets rid of them:
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1494006811866939392/pu/vid/1206x720/kLRGkkHg8tdittVo.mp4?tag=12
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1494007169838198784/pu/vid/1206x720/GcSsomk932zs7pC1.mp4?tag=12
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1494008408986603523/pu/vid/1206x720/_j4B3-ox7M_wlMdD.mp4?tag=12
Marc Girardot
Marc is a great new addition to the Substack community and specifically to what I call the “resistance writers”.
He is part of the PANDA team put together by Nick Hudson that called BS on the whole charade very early on.
His new Substack is worth subscribing to.
Covid Myth Buster Series | Marc Girardot | Substack
And his recent article on nano particles does a wonderful job of explaining what is happening in our bodies. We need more “gateway writers” like Marc that can bridge the gap between the curious common man and the otherwise dense, complex, and impenetrable science.
What happens to those billions of NanoParticles you've become host to? (substack.com)
A crazy number of LNPs. An even crazier number of spike proteins.
The number of nanoparticles (NP) injected in a dose of these anti-COVID vaccines is utterly flabbergasting: up to 50 billion viral vectors for AstraZeneca, 40 billion LNPs for Moderna, and likely 10 for Pfizer. It’s not very clear how many intact messenger RNA are in each LNP , but even if we agree to only 1, and that each one produces 1000 spike protein, we are talking your body having to deal with a minimum 30 trillion pathogenic spike proteins in a few months’ time…
Those are numbers way beyond very severe SARS-COV-2 infections: typically at infection peak between 1 and 100 billion virions, are present in the body.
What the medical and public health community hasn’t realised is that all the healthy cells that will be “infected”3 by these nanoparticles will eventually be destroyed by the immune system. When you take the Pfizer vaccine 3 times, you accept sacrificing up to 45 billion of your healthy cells… with AstraZeneca it’s 150 billion!
You need to read this article and the above passage in particular with a view to Eunice Lieveld’s clips above.
The point of all of this is simple. Stop injecting yourself with these dangerous and toxic genetics.
This is a wonderful passage from Malone’s interview with Rogan on safety and toxicity.
Then there is this fundamental logic flaw in clinical development and nonclinical development and safety and pharmacology, I like to say the French judicial system applies. What that is, is, you’re guilty until proven innocent. It’s the job of the pharmaceutical companies to prove that their engineered spike is safe. They never did that. And so, all of this pressure that comes back from folks like me saying, hey, this isn’t right, okay? And it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck. It’s probably toxic because it’s the common variable. I get criticized because, oh, well, prove that it’s not safe. I’m sorry.
That’s not the way it works. It’s pharma’s job to prove that it is safe. Not my job to prove that it’s not safe.
I’m observing the safety signal. The safety signal is there. It is associated with vectors that express spike, whether it’s the vaccine, the virus, or the adenovirus, you know, the mRNA, the virus itself or the adenoviral vector spike, those toxicities are there. And the common variable is the spike protein. And the comment, “well, it’s not a toxin”.
I’m kind of in the forest Gump school of toxicity. If it causes toxicity, it is right, it is a toxin. By definition, toxin is as a toxin does.
We can argue about the meaning of toxin. Just like so much of the rest of our language has been perverted during this. But a simple explanation. The simple definition is, does it cause toxicity in people? I think the answer is pretty clear now it does. The question that we’re arguing about is how often and how bad this is the question.
We knew that the lipid nano particles had a special affinity with ovaries as far back as mid last year. I wrote about it hear in my letter to my kids in June 2021.
Biodistribution data shows massive accumulation in ovaries of the LNP (Lipid Nano Particle) (which instructs cells in ovaries to sprout toxic spike protein). Whoops. That was never supposed to be leaked out. We obtained it via FOIA request. The CDC never told you about that one, did they? Of course not!
-
The biodistribution study obtained by Bridle showed lipid nanoparticles from the vaccine did not stay in the deltoid muscle where they were injected as the vaccine’s developers claimed would happen, but circulated throughout the body and accumulated in large concentrations in organs and tissues, including the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and — in “quite high concentrations” — in the ovaries.
-
Biodistribution of lipid nanoparticles which carry the mRNA show that the ovaries get the highest concentration. This turns the ovaries into a very large manufacturing plant to turn out toxic spike protein. Accumulation in the bone marrow is likely not good either. What are the long-term implications of that?
-
Here’s what this means. This vaccine seeks out your daughter’s ovaries and instructs the cells in the ovaries to turn out a very toxic spike protein. It also goes to your child’s brain, heart, and other critical organs. This can cause deafness, blindness, inability to speak, myocarditis, pericarditis, and more at unacceptable rates. It may permanently damage your child’s reproductive system. We just don’t know. Would you like to volunteer your child for a clinical trial so we can find out? Well, if so, and if your child concurs, then get vaccinated and be part of the largest experiment ever done on the human reproductive system.
I am very happy to see more being written about lipid nano-particles. It’s not just the spike protein that causes harm.
Seatbelts
And lastly let’s talk about seatbelts, again.
In December 2021 I had a shot at Peter Singer for abusing, misunderstanding and misrepresenting the seatbelt analogy.
I came across this recently and I thought it a wonderful final few nails in the seatbelt analogy coffin.
Till next time.
and seat belts do not CAUSE ACCIDENTS. thank you very much
I wonder if there is an island somewhere that we can seek asylum from this circus? Because it's becoming very clear that Trudeau was right, that we are a 'small, fringe minority'. The bulk of humanity could care less.