Murder by Injection: The Story of the Medical Conspiracy Against America (1988)
By Eustace Mullins – 50 Q&As – Unbekoming Book Summary
“We must defeat the effort of the man who would make an entire community of well people sick in the fear that a small portion of it may get sick. We must denounce the idea that a healthy person is a menace to anybody. We must see that our children's education is not predicated on the point of the poisoned quill. We must see to it that subcutaneous injection of an absolute poison does not take the place of sanitation and hygiene. We must declare against superstition practiced by the State. We must not surrender the right of personal privilege in the selection of our food, our religion, our politics, or our medicine.”
[“Statement of Mr. Harry B. Bradford, President of the Washington Antivaccination Society,” Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce of the House of Representatives, Part IV, 1910, Washington Government Printing Office, p 350.]
If the hunter is invisible, how can you explain to the hunted that they are indeed being hunted?
If the hunted are blind, how can you describe the hunter to them?
"We accept the reality of the world with which we're presented. It's as simple as that." - Christof, The Truman Show
How would you explain “wet” to a fish?
How would you describe a whale to a krill?
One. Official stories exist to protect officials. Two. We have to overcome our built-in willingness to be duped. – Liam Scheff
With thanks to Eustace Mullins for explaining the whale to the krill.
Murder by Injection: The Story of the Medical Conspiracy Against America: Mullins, Eustace Clarence
Related Posts
Deep Dive Conversation Library (Bonus for Paid Subscribers)
This deep dive is based on the book:
Discussion No.42:
21 Important insights from “Murder by Injection”
Thank you for your support.
Analogy
Imagine you're living in a small town where one powerful family has gradually bought all the restaurants and grocery stores. They then convince the town council to pass laws requiring all food to be purchased only from their establishments. The family closes down the farmers' market, outlaws home gardens, and requires all farmers to use their special (but toxic) fertilizers.
When people get sick from the low-quality food, they must visit the family's medical clinics, which only prescribe medications from the family's pharmaceutical company. Independent doctors who suggest eating healthier food or natural remedies are run out of town or lose their licenses. The local newspaper, also owned by the family, runs constant articles about the dangers of home cooking and the benefits of their processed foods and medications.
The town's bank, also controlled by this family, provides loans to expand this system to neighboring towns. The school system, funded by the family's foundation, teaches that this is the only safe and scientific way to handle food and healthcare. Anyone who questions this system is labeled as backward or dangerous to public health.
This mirrors how the Medical Monopoly operates on a national scale: controlling the sources of health (like food and water quality), creating health problems through that control, providing expensive treatments for the problems they create, and suppressing any alternatives or criticism through financial, legal, and media control. Just as the townspeople end up sicker and poorer while the family grows richer, the American public has experienced declining health while paying ever-increasing costs to the medical establishment that created and maintains this system.
This analogy helps explain how a self-reinforcing system of control can be established through coordinated influence over essential services, regulatory bodies, education, and information channels, all while maintaining the appearance of legitimacy and public service.
12-point summary
Control Through Education: The Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations transformed medical education through the Flexner Report, reducing medical schools from 650 to 50 and establishing a drug-based curriculum while eliminating natural healing approaches.
Financial Control Network: A sophisticated network of banks, foundations, and corporations maintained monopoly control through interlocking directorates, with the Rockefeller and Rothschild interests at the center, operating through institutions like Chase Manhattan Bank and various European financial houses.
Drug Trust Development: The pharmaceutical cartel emerged from patent medicine makers who transitioned to "ethical" drug companies, creating a closed system of drug development, testing, and distribution that eliminated competition while ensuring high profits.
Cancer Industry Creation: The American Cancer Society and Memorial Sloan Kettering became central forces in controlling cancer treatment, promoting only surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy while systematically suppressing alternative treatments and information about prevention.
Government Agency Capture: Key agencies like the FDA and NIH became enforcement arms of the Medical Monopoly through a revolving door system where officials moved between government and industry positions, ensuring regulatory decisions favored monopoly interests.
Research Manipulation: Control of research funding through foundations, government grants, and corporate money ensured that medical research focused on profitable pharmaceutical approaches while suppressing investigation of nutritional, preventive, and alternative treatments.
Chemical Agriculture Impact: The introduction of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and food additives created a cycle of declining food quality and increasing health problems, generating more demand for pharmaceutical treatments.
International Cartel Operations: Companies like I.G. Farben demonstrated how the drug cartel operated internationally, maintaining profit-sharing arrangements even during World War II and reorganizing afterward to maintain monopoly control.
Prison Testing Programs: Pharmaceutical companies used prisoners for dangerous drug testing, paying minimal amounts for experiments that often resulted in severe injuries or death, while gathering data to help avoid future lawsuits.
Water Treatment Programs: Fluoridation and chlorination programs created profitable markets for industrial waste products while establishing mechanisms for population-wide chemical exposure, despite evidence of harmful effects.
Alternative Medicine Suppression: Systematic campaigns eliminated competing medical approaches through legal persecution, loss of licensing, media attacks, and economic pressure, regardless of their effectiveness.
Public Health Decline: Despite enormous healthcare spending, American health statistics have steadily declined relative to other developed nations, demonstrating the Medical Monopoly's success at generating profits while failing to improve public health.
Foreword
The present work, the result of some forty years of investigative research, is a logical progression from my previous books:
The expose of the international control of monetary issue and banking practices in the United States.
A later work revealing the secret network of organizations through which these alien forces wield political power—the secret committees, foundations, and political parties through which their hidden plans are implemented.
And now, to the most vital issue of all, the manner in which these depredations affect the daily lives and health of American citizens.
Despite the great power of the hidden rulers, I found that only one group has the power to issue life or death sentences to any American—our nation's physicians.
I discovered that these physicians, despite their great power, were themselves subjected to very strict controls over every aspect of their professional lives. These controls, surprisingly enough, were not wielded by any state or federal agency, although almost every other aspect of American life is now under the absolute control of the bureaucracy. The physicians have their own autocracy, a private trade association, the American Medical Association. This group, headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, had gradually built up its power until it assumed total control over medical schools and the accreditation of physicians.
The trail of these manipulators led me straight to the same lairs of the international conspirators whom I had exposed in previous books. I knew that they had already looted America, reduced its military power to a dangerously low level, and imposed bureaucratic controls on every American. I now discovered that their conspiracies also directly affected the health of every American.
This conspiracy has resulted in a documented decline in the health of our citizens. We now rank far down the list of civilized nations in infant mortality and other significant medical statistics. I was able to document the shocking record of these cold-blooded tycoons who not only plan and carry out famines, economic depressions, revolutions, and wars, but who also find their greatest profits in their manipulations of our medical care.
The cynicism and malice of these conspirators is something beyond the imagination of most Americans. They deliberately mulct our people of millions of dollars each year through "charitable" organizations and then use these same organizations as key groups to bolster their Medical Monopoly. Fear and intimidation are the basic techniques by which the conspirators maintain their control over all aspects of our health care, as they ruthlessly crush any competitor who challenges their profits.
As in other aspects of their "behavioural control" over the American people, their most constantly used weapon against us is their employment of federal agents and federal agencies to carry out their intrigues. The proof of this operation may be the most disturbing revelation of my work.
Eustace Mullins
February 22, 1988
50 Questions & Answers
1. How did Morris Fishbein and Doc Simmons establish initial control over the American Medical Association?
Morris Fishbein and Doc Simmons gained control through strategic manipulation of the AMA's organizational structure and publication policies. Simmons, who operated as a fraudulent medical practitioner under various names, became editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association despite having no verifiable medical credentials. He established himself as secretary and general manager of the AMA, creating a power structure where all funds and operations fell under his direct control.
Fishbein, who joined as Simmons' assistant, continued this system of control after becoming editor. He never practiced medicine a day in his life but wielded enormous power through control of the AMA's publications and its lucrative "Seal of Acceptance" program for drugs and products. This seal became essential for pharmaceutical companies' success, requiring substantial payments to the AMA and creating a system of financial leverage over the entire medical industry.
2. What role did the Flexner Report play in transforming American medical education?
The Flexner Report, funded by the Rockefeller interests through the Carnegie Foundation, fundamentally restructured American medical education by establishing rigid requirements that forced most medical schools to close. Abraham Flexner, whose brother headed the Rockefeller Institute, conducted a survey of medical schools that led to reducing their number from 650 to 50 schools between 1910 and World War I.
The report imposed expensive requirements for laboratories and equipment while extending medical education to four years of college plus four years of medical school. This system made medical education prohibitively expensive for most students, creating an elite profession controlled by the Rockefeller interests. The number of annual graduates dropped from 7,500 to 2,500, ensuring a limited supply of doctors who would operate under the established system.
3. How did John D. Rockefeller's early business practices lead to control of the medical industry?
Rockefeller began his domination of medicine through the same monopolistic techniques he used in the oil industry. Working with the National City Bank of Cleveland and accepting guidance from Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb Company, Rockefeller implemented a strategy of crushing competition through predatory practices. His approach included buying out competitors, undercutting prices, and using violence when necessary.
These business practices were then applied to the medical field through the creation of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and strategic control of medical education. Through the General Education Board and other foundations, Rockefeller money was used to gain control of medical schools, research institutions, and eventually the entire medical establishment, creating a system that promoted pharmaceutical-based medicine while suppressing alternative approaches.
The Rothschilds
The book discusses the Rothschilds' influence on various aspects of American and global power structures, often in connection with the Rockefeller family and other powerful entities. Here's a breakdown of key points:
Financial Control: The Rothschilds are presented as a major force in global finance, having reached a point of world control by 1885. They are described as the power behind the scenes, with their representatives and agents wielding influence in various sectors. The Rothschilds' financial power is said to be centered in the Bank of England.
Relationship with the Rockefellers: The book suggests that the Rockefellers were initially financed by Rothschild money through the National City Bank of Cleveland. Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., is described as the principal Rothschild representative in the U.S., guiding Rockefeller's expansion.
Monopolies and Cartels: The Rothschilds are said to have financed John D. Rockefeller's oil monopoly. The Rothschilds are also identified as the guiding force behind I.G. Farben, the German chemical cartel. This cartel had a significant influence on drug companies and chemical production, and had close ties with Standard Oil.
Banking Connections: Several banks are identified as being within the Rothschild orbit, including the National City Bank of Cleveland, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Montreal. The Rothschilds are also said to have controlled 95% of all railroad mileage in the U.S. through J. P. Morgan and Kuhn Loeb.
Political Influence: The book alleges that the Rothschilds exert political influence through various means, including funding political parties and influencing international policies. The Rothschilds are also connected to individuals in government and intelligence, such as George Humphrey, who was Eisenhower's Secretary of the Treasury, and John Foster Dulles, who was Secretary of State under Eisenhower.
World Order and Colonial Government: The Rothschilds are portrayed as the real power behind a "re-established colonial government in the United States". This colonial government is said to function primarily through the Council on Foreign Relations and the Rockefeller Foundation. The book also posits that the world is run by a "Rockefeller-Rothschild conglomerate," with money and power as its gods.
Communism: The book claims the Rothschilds were behind the origins of communism. They are said to have had a hand in funding the 1905 Russian revolution. Mullins contends that although communism originated with Marx's association with the Rothschilds, John D. Rockefeller supported it because he saw it as the ultimate monopoly.
World War II: The book alleges that the Rothschilds and their associates maintained business relationships with Nazi Germany through the I.G. Farben cartel, with the Standard Oil company also working with them.
Modern Connections: The book suggests that the Rothschilds' influence continues through various organizations and individuals, including the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderbergers.
The book emphasizes that the Rothschilds are a hidden power, and their influence is often masked by focusing on the Rockefellers. Mullins also makes it clear that it is his belief that the Rothschilds' operations are part of a deliberate effort to establish a new world order.
4. What were the key mechanisms used to establish the Drug Trust in America?
The Drug Trust was established through a combination of financial control, educational dominance, and regulatory capture. The Rockefeller interests, working with major pharmaceutical companies, created a system where drug manufacturing became concentrated in the hands of a few major companies. These companies controlled patents, research funding, and drug distribution channels through their connections with banking interests.
Control was maintained through ownership of medical journals, influence over the FDA, and domination of medical education. The AMA's Seal of Acceptance became a crucial tool, as drugs could not succeed commercially without it. Additionally, the establishment of prescription drug laws ensured that medications could only be dispensed through approved channels, creating a closed system that enriched the Drug Trust while eliminating competition.
5. How did I.G. Farben develop and what was its relationship to American industry?
I.G. Farben emerged in 1925 as a merger of major German chemical companies, with backing from the Rothschild interests through their German banker, Max Warburg. The company became a massive chemical and pharmaceutical cartel, working closely with American companies, particularly Standard Oil, through various patent and market-sharing agreements. These relationships continued even during World War II.
The company established American I.G., which worked closely with Standard Oil and other American firms. After World War II, I.G. Farben was officially broken up into three companies - Bayer, BASF, and Hoechst - but each became larger than the original I.G. Farben. The company's American connections remained strong through various banking and corporate relationships, maintaining the international drug and chemical cartel.
6. What role did the American Cancer Society play in controlling cancer treatment?
The American Cancer Society, reorganized by Albert Lasker and Elmer Bobst in 1944, became a powerful force in controlling cancer treatment approaches. Through its immense fundraising capabilities and political connections, the ACS effectively determined which cancer treatments would receive research funding and public support. The organization consistently promoted orthodox treatments while labeling alternative approaches as "quackery."
The ACS worked closely with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and other established institutions to maintain control over cancer research and treatment protocols. It raised vast sums of money from the public while spending relatively little on actual research, using its influence to support pharmaceutical approaches and suppress information about alternative treatments or prevention strategies.
Vaccination
Vaccination as a "Holy Water" Vaccination is presented as one of the "Four Holy Waters" of the "Church of Modern Medicine" by Mullins. It is portrayed as a central tenet of modern medical practice, with the medical establishment claiming that only vaccination can protect against infection by injecting a foreign body that confers immunity. This is in contrast to holistic medicine, which emphasizes the body's natural defenses. The author suggests that questioning vaccination is considered a form of heresy within the medical community.
Questionable Safety of Vaccines The safety of vaccines is heavily questioned in the text, with Dr. Henry R. Bybee quoted as saying that vaccines cause more disease and suffering than anything else, including conditions like cancer and syphilis. This casts serious doubt on the conventional view of vaccines as a safe and effective preventative measure and challenges the notion that they are a universally beneficial practice.
Personal Experience with Vaccination The author shares his personal experience of being compelled to get vaccinated as a child, which he describes as a ritualistic sacrifice. This personal anecdote is used to highlight the perceived lack of freedom and the forceful nature of mandatory vaccination programs, and also frames the act of vaccination as a form of submission to a powerful authority.
Vaccination and Sudden Deaths Dr. Herbert Snow, a senior surgeon, is cited as claiming that 80% of sudden deaths are caused by vaccinations, which cause grave and permanent heart damage. Coroners are said to cover these deaths up by attributing them to "natural causes". This suggests a deliberate concealment of the negative consequences of vaccination by the medical establishment.
Cancer and Unvaccinated Individuals Dr. W.B. Clarke is quoted as stating he had never seen a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person. This observation is presented as a significant lead that should be explored, implying a direct link between vaccination and cancer, while also questioning why this has not been a topic of research by the American Cancer Society.
Compulsory Vaccination as an Outrage The text argues that compulsory vaccination is an outrage against the personal liberties of American citizens and an example of the "Cult of Baal". It states that compulsory vaccination does not protect against modern diseases such as cancer and AIDS. This challenges the justification for mandatory vaccination as a public health measure and calls into question its role in protecting against illness.
"Brute-Extracted Lymph" Dr. J.M. Peebles is quoted as referring to the practice of vaccination as "poisoning the crimson currents of the human system with brute-extracted lymph". This strongly worded criticism raises concern about the substances used in vaccines, suggesting that they are harmful and unnatural, and also implying a connection between the injection of this "brute-extracted lymph" and the rise of cancer of the lymph glands.
Vaccine-Induced Brain Damage A court case is cited where Wyeth Laboratories was ordered to pay $15 million in damages to a child who suffered permanent brain damage after receiving a vaccine. This provides evidence of the potential dangers and harmful side effects of vaccines, specifically brain damage, which suggests that there are inherent risks associated with vaccination.
Lowered Vaccination Age The text notes that the age for children to receive flu vaccine has been lowered from 24 months to 18 months by the American Academy of Pediatricians, promoting a new flu vaccine tested in Finland. This detail serves to highlight the push by medical authorities to administer vaccines to children at increasingly younger ages, suggesting a pattern of over-vaccination.
Government and Drug Company Ties The text suggests that government agencies such as the Center for Disease Control, HEW, USPHS, FDA, AMA, and WHO, actively promote vaccines because of a conflict of interest with the big drug firms. This points to a potential corruption of the system, with governmental agencies working to benefit drug companies instead of protecting public health. The author notes how government employees later take jobs at the drug firms they were regulating during their government service.
1918 Flu Epidemic The 1918 flu epidemic is presented as a consequence of the compulsory vaccination of soldiers during World War I. This claim suggests a direct link between widespread vaccination and a deadly pandemic, and also implies that the historical narrative about the flu is misleading.
Swine Flu Campaign The "swine flu" campaign is portrayed as a scheme by drug companies to generate profits. It is alleged that the vaccine was developed and promoted without any cases of swine flu in the U.S. to justify it, and that public figures were used to encourage the public to get vaccinated. This underscores a lack of concern for public health and the motivation of the Medical Monopoly for profit, and how the media were complicit.
Polio Cases Caused by Vaccine The text claims that all cases of polio in the United States since 1979 were caused by the polio vaccine. This is a strong indictment of the vaccine's efficacy and safety, implying that the very vaccine intended to prevent polio has become its primary cause. The author also points out that logic suggests that this would be a reason to discontinue the vaccine, yet the Medical Monopoly continues the practice.
Vaccines as "Time Bombs" Vaccines are described as "time bombs" that can remain latent in the body for years, only to become virulent later. This highlights the long-term potential risks and dangers of vaccines, and questions the concept of lifelong immunity. The author suggests that they can cause heart attacks and other diseases years after being administered.
Ongoing Lawsuits The text mentions that there are 150 lawsuits pending against DPT vaccine manufacturers seeking $1.5 billion in damages. This fact suggests widespread dissatisfaction with vaccines and further indicates the existence of significant health problems caused by them.
7. How did the fluoridation of water supplies begin and who promoted it?
Water fluoridation began as a solution to dispose of industrial waste from aluminum manufacturing and atomic bomb production. Oscar Ewing, who received a $750,000 fee to leave his Wall Street practice, became head of the Federal Security Agency and spearheaded the national fluoridation campaign. The program was promoted despite evidence of fluoride's toxicity and its origins as an industrial waste product.
The U.S. Public Health Service, under Ewing's direction, actively promoted fluoridation while suppressing evidence of its dangers. Cities that fluoridated their water supplies early on, like Washington D.C., saw their officials receiving special deliveries of unfluoridated water for their own use. The program represented a convergence of industrial waste disposal needs and the medical establishment's desire for increased control over public health measures.
8. What methods were used to control medical research funding?
Medical research funding was controlled through a complex system of foundation grants, government funding, and pharmaceutical company influence. The Rockefeller Foundation and other major foundations directed research toward drug-based approaches while systematically defunding alternative research directions. Government agencies, particularly the National Institutes of Health, coordinated their funding with foundation priorities.
Research institutions became dependent on this funding system, creating a self-perpetuating cycle where only orthodox research approaches received support. Scientists who questioned established approaches or investigated alternative theories found their funding cut off and their careers jeopardized. This system effectively channeled all major medical research toward pharmaceutical solutions while suppressing investigation of nutritional or preventive approaches.
9. How were alternative cancer treatments suppressed by the medical establishment?
Alternative cancer treatments were suppressed through a coordinated campaign involving the AMA, FDA, and American Cancer Society. Practitioners who developed successful alternative treatments faced legal harassment, loss of medical licenses, and public discrediting campaigns. The FDA and other agencies would raid clinics, seize records, and force successful alternative practitioners out of business.
The medical establishment used its control of medical journals and media to ensure that positive results from alternative treatments were never published in mainstream sources. Practitioners like Dr. William Koch, who developed successful alternative treatments, were forced out of the country. The cancer establishment maintained its monopoly by ensuring that only approved chemical and radiation treatments could be used, despite their poor success rates.
The Four Holy Waters
The "Four Holy Waters" is a term used by Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn to describe what he considers to be the four central, yet questionable, practices of modern medicine. These practices are portrayed as being blindly accepted and promoted by the medical establishment, despite concerns about their safety and efficacy. The author suggests that questioning these practices is seen as a form of heresy within the medical community. Mullins highlights that these practices are promoted by the Rockefeller interests, who have fought to make them compulsory, despite all warnings about their dangers.
Here's a more detailed look at each of the "Four Holy Waters":
Vaccination is described as the most deeply entrenched and consistently profitable operation of the "Medical Monopoly". It is presented as a practice that goes against the body's natural immune defense. The "Church of Modern Medicine" claims that only vaccination can protect against infection by injecting a foreign body that confers lifelong immunity. However, this claim is disputed by Mullins, who questions the safety of vaccines and suggests they may cause more harm than good. He notes that many physicians have publicly stated that vaccines are the cause of diseases such as cancer and syphilis.
Fluoridated water is presented as another practice considered beneficial by the medical establishment, particularly for children's dental health. However, Mullins argues that it has "questionable value". He suggests that, despite claims of benefits, fluoridation may actually cause harm, and that the practice is enthusiastically supported by dentists, even though it could be expected to put them out of business. The principal source of the fluoride is a poisonous chemical called sodium fluoride, which is also a main ingredient in rat poison. The author questions whether the addition of this compound to drinking water is also a part of a rat control program. He also asserts that the U.S. Public Health Service has never tested public drinking water for the effects of fluoridation, and that the figure of one part per million was selected arbitrarily.
Intravenous fluids are listed as one of the four "holy waters", implying that they are used frequently in modern medical practice. The author includes them in his list of questionable practices that are seen as central to modern medicine.
Silver nitrate is also listed as one of the four "holy waters," further suggesting that it is a common practice in the "Church of Modern Medicine".
10. What was the relationship between German and American pharmaceutical companies before and during World War II?
German and American pharmaceutical companies maintained close relationships through patent agreements, shared ownership, and cartel arrangements, even during World War II. Standard Oil and I.G. Farben had extensive agreements regarding markets and patents, while American I.G. operated as a subsidiary of the German company with American corporate leaders on its board. These relationships continued throughout the war, with American companies maintaining their patent agreements with German firms.
Companies like Standard Oil continued to collect royalties from Germany during the war, while German subsidiaries in America operated with minimal interference. After the war, many of these relationships were reconstructed under new corporate names, but the basic cartel arrangements remained intact. The international pharmaceutical industry demonstrated that corporate relationships transcended national boundaries and continued despite political conflicts.
11. How did the vaccination program develop as a control mechanism?
Vaccination programs emerged as a powerful control mechanism through mandatory enforcement and pharmaceutical industry influence. Beginning with Edward Jenner's cowpox vaccine in 1796, vaccination evolved from a voluntary medical procedure into a compulsory program enforced by government agencies. Despite evidence that vaccinated populations often experienced higher disease rates than unvaccinated groups, mandatory vaccination programs expanded throughout the 20th century.
The pharmaceutical industry gained unprecedented control through vaccination requirements in schools, military service, and public health programs. The Great Swine Flu campaign of 1976 exemplified this control, where President Ford was enlisted to promote a vaccine that pharmaceutical companies couldn't sell to pig farmers due to its dangers. The campaign resulted in numerous deaths and paralysis cases, yet demonstrated how government authority could be used to create massive vaccine markets regardless of safety concerns.
12. What role did the Rockefeller Foundation play in medical education?
The Rockefeller Foundation transformed medical education by establishing a standardized, pharmaceutical-oriented curriculum across American medical schools. Through strategic funding and the implementation of the Flexner Report recommendations, the Foundation effectively eliminated schools teaching homeopathy, natural medicine, and other alternative approaches. This standardization ensured that future physicians would be trained primarily in drug-based treatments while receiving minimal education in nutrition or preventive care.
The Foundation's influence extended beyond curriculum control to the physical structure of medical education. It provided funding for buildings, laboratories, and research facilities, but always with strings attached that required adherence to specified educational approaches. This created a self-perpetuating system where medical schools became dependent on Foundation support and therefore compliant with its pharmaceutical-oriented agenda.
Vaccination as a Weapon
Mullins strongly implies that vaccination is used as a weapon to create a sick, dependent, and profitable population for the "Medical Monopoly". Here's how he builds that argument:
Profit Motive: Mullins repeatedly emphasizes that the "Medical Monopoly," which he ties to the Rockefeller interests, is primarily driven by profit. He argues that vaccination is one of the most consistently profitable operations of this monopoly. This suggests that the widespread promotion of vaccines is not about public health, but about generating revenue for the pharmaceutical industry and related entities.
Compulsory Vaccination: The author highlights the fact that vaccination is often made compulsory. This removes individual choice and ensures a steady stream of "clients" for the medical establishment. By making vaccination a condition for school attendance and other activities, the Medical Monopoly guarantees a consistent flow of revenue, regardless of the actual health benefits of the vaccines.
Creation of "Future Patients": Mullins cites a physician, Dr. Henry R. Bybee, who states that vaccines are the cause of diseases such as cancer, syphilis, and cold sores. He notes that by compelling children to submit to vaccination, the medical profession makes "splendid and prospective patients for the future". This suggests a cynical view that the medical establishment is creating a continuous cycle of illness and treatment.
Undermining Natural Immunity: Mullins argues that vaccination goes against the body's natural immune defenses. By injecting foreign bodies, the author asserts that vaccines disrupt the body’s natural ability to fight off disease, making people more susceptible to illness.
Suppression of Alternatives: The text describes how the "Medical Monopoly" actively suppresses alternative health practices and treatments, such as chiropractic and laetrile. This suppression ensures that the public remains dependent on the dominant allopathic medical system and its products, including vaccines.
"Four Holy Waters": Mullins refers to vaccination as one of the "Four Holy Waters" of the "Church of Modern Medicine," implying a blind faith in the practice despite evidence of its dangers. He notes that the Rockefeller interests fought to make these practices compulsory, ignoring warnings about their danger. This shows that these practices are not based on sound science but rather dogmatic belief and financial incentive.
Government Complicity: The author details how government agencies like the FDA, CDC, and U.S. Public Health Service are complicit in promoting vaccination. He suggests that these agencies are often influenced or controlled by the "Medical Monopoly" and that there is a "revolving door" between government agencies and the drug firms whose products they promote. This further implies a deliberate effort to create a system of dependence on the medical establishment.
Vaccine Damage: Mullins cites examples of vaccines causing serious health problems, including brain damage, paralysis, and death. This suggests that the risks of vaccination are often ignored or downplayed by the medical establishment. The author notes that some of the side effects may take years to appear.
The "Cult of Baal": Mullins refers to the practice of compulsory vaccination as a modern version of child sacrifice to the "Cult of Baal". This is a strong metaphor suggesting that children are being offered up for ritualistic harm by a malevolent system, where the financial tribute is paid to the masters of the Medical Monopoly.
In summary, Mullins implies that vaccination is not a benevolent practice aimed at improving public health. Instead, he argues that it is a tool used by the "Medical Monopoly" to create a perpetually sick and dependent population, which is highly profitable for the pharmaceutical industry, the medical establishment, and the financial interests behind them. He suggests that vaccination undermines the body's natural immunity, creates new diseases, and generates a never-ending demand for medical care. He believes this system is maintained through compulsory programs, suppression of alternatives, government complicity and outright lies, creating a state of dependence on the "Medical Monopoly".
13. How did patent medicines evolve into the modern pharmaceutical industry?
Patent medicines, often criticized as questionable cure-alls in the 19th century, transformed into the "ethical" pharmaceutical industry through a careful rebranding process orchestrated by the AMA and drug manufacturers. The key shift occurred when patent medicine makers began marketing exclusively to physicians rather than the public, creating the prescription drug system. This change allowed the same basic marketing techniques to continue under the guise of professional medical authority.
The transition was facilitated by the AMA's Seal of Acceptance program, which gave legitimacy to drugs that paid for approval while condemning similar compounds sold directly to the public. The modern pharmaceutical industry maintained many patent medicine marketing techniques but channeled them through medical journals and physician education programs, creating an appearance of scientific legitimacy while preserving profitable monopoly control.
14. What was the connection between the chemical industry and agriculture?
The chemical industry's entry into agriculture began largely after World War II, when military chemical manufacturers needed new markets for their products. Nitrogen compounds previously used for explosives were remarketed as fertilizers, while other war chemicals became pesticides and herbicides. This transformation occurred despite early warnings about the dangers of chemical agriculture to soil health and human nutrition.
The Rockefeller interests, controlling both chemical and pharmaceutical companies, promoted chemical-intensive farming methods through their agricultural programs worldwide. This created a cycle where chemical farming reduced food nutrition, leading to increased health problems, which then required more pharmaceutical treatments. The "Green Revolution" became a mechanism for expanding chemical company control over global agriculture while degrading food quality.
15. How did prison drug testing programs operate?
Prison drug testing programs provided pharmaceutical companies with human subjects for dangerous experimental drugs, operating with minimal oversight or ethical constraints. Prisoners were paid minimal amounts - often just one dollar per day - to participate in tests that frequently resulted in severe injuries or death. These programs were particularly active from the 1940s through the 1970s, with major drug companies competing for access to prison populations.
The testing programs were justified as allowing prisoners to "repay their debt to society," but actually served as a means for drug companies to conduct hazardous experiments without liability. Prison officials welcomed these programs for the additional revenue they provided, while pharmaceutical companies used them to gather data on drug toxicity levels that would help them avoid lawsuits when marketing the drugs to the general public.
The Cult of Baal
Mullins uses the concept of the "Cult of Baal" as a symbolic framework to critique what he sees as a historical pattern of exploitation and control, rather than describing a literal, organized cult in the modern world. He argues that this ancient cult represents a long history of "child sacrifice" and exploitation that continues to manifest in modern institutions. He contends that the practices and principles of this ancient cult are still present in the modern medical establishment and financial systems controlled by powerful families, such as the Rothschilds, whom he suggests are the modern representation of the cult's underlying principles of power and control. The "Cult of Baal," in Mullins’ view, symbolizes a ruthless pursuit of power and profit at the expense of human health and freedom, and its rituals are echoed in modern practices that prioritize monetary gain over well-being.
Mullins connects the "Cult of Baal" to modern medicine, specifically through the practice of compulsory vaccination, which he characterizes as a modern form of child sacrifice to the "Cult of Baal". He argues that the medical establishment, driven by profit motives, forces children to undergo vaccinations that undermine their natural immune defenses and create a cycle of illness and dependence. In his view, this compulsory practice is akin to sacrificing children on the altar of a malevolent system, where the financial tribute is paid to the masters of the Medical Monopoly. Mullins also suggests that the "Age of Enlightenment," rather than representing progress, was merely the latest program of the "Cult of Baal" and its rituals of child sacrifice, implying that modern advancements have been co-opted to serve the same exploitative ends. He believes that this system is maintained through compulsory programs, suppression of alternatives, government complicity, and outright lies.
16. What role did tax-exempt foundations play in controlling medical policy?
Tax-exempt foundations served as key mechanisms for implementing and maintaining medical monopoly control while avoiding both taxation and public oversight. The Rockefeller Foundation, Carnegie Foundation, and similar organizations used their charitable status to influence medical education, research priorities, and public health policies while simultaneously protecting family fortunes from taxation. These foundations effectively functioned as tax-free operating bases for controlling medical institutions.
The foundations worked in coordination, creating a network of influence through strategic grant-making and institutional control. They funded medical schools, research programs, and public health initiatives, but always with specific requirements that advanced their agenda of pharmaceutical-based medicine. This system allowed wealthy families to maintain control over medical policy while appearing to engage in charitable giving.
17. How did the FDA develop as a regulatory agency?
The Food and Drug Administration evolved from a consumer protection agency into an enforcement arm of the pharmaceutical cartel. While originally established to prevent the sale of dangerous patent medicines, the FDA increasingly focused on protecting drug company profits by suppressing alternative treatments and natural remedies. The agency developed a revolving door relationship with pharmaceutical companies, with officials moving between industry and regulatory positions.
The FDA's regulatory power was systematically used to remove competitive products from the market while expediting approval for new pharmaceutical drugs, despite their dangers. Natural remedies with long histories of safe use were classified as "unsafe" until proven safe through expensive testing procedures, while new chemical compounds were routinely approved despite known hazards. This created a system where only large pharmaceutical companies could afford to bring new products to market.
18. What was the relationship between banking interests and drug companies?
Banking interests, particularly the Rockefeller and Rothschild networks, maintained controlling interests in major pharmaceutical companies through complex financial arrangements and interlocking directorates. The same banking figures appeared repeatedly on the boards of drug companies, chemical manufacturers, and medical research institutions. This financial control ensured that drug company operations aligned with banking interests' broader economic objectives.
The banking-pharmaceutical connection operated internationally through institutions like the Bank of England, Chase Manhattan Bank, and various European financial houses. This network allowed for the coordination of pharmaceutical operations across national boundaries and the maintenance of drug cartels even during wartime. The banks provided not just financing but strategic direction, ensuring that pharmaceutical companies operated as part of a larger financial control system.
19. How did hospital standardization create monopoly control?
Hospital standardization, implemented through the American College of Surgeons and various accrediting bodies, created a system where hospitals had to conform to specific requirements or lose their accreditation. These standards, while presented as quality measures, effectively required hospitals to use pharmaceutical products, surgical approaches, and equipment from approved monopoly suppliers. Hospitals that attempted to offer alternative treatments risked losing their accreditation and insurance contracts.
The standardization process extended to hospital construction, equipment purchasing, and treatment protocols, all of which had to meet specifications that favored established monopoly suppliers. This system turned hospitals into reliable customers for pharmaceutical products and medical equipment while eliminating their ability to adopt alternative approaches or natural treatments, regardless of their effectiveness.
20. What methods were used to control medical journals and research publications?
Medical journals were controlled through advertising revenues from pharmaceutical companies and editorial policies that suppressed research challenging drug-based medicine. The AMA's journal became particularly powerful under Morris Fishbein's leadership, using its influence to determine which medical approaches would be considered legitimate. Research that questioned established treatments or supported alternative approaches was systematically rejected by major journals.
The peer review system was used to ensure that only research supporting pharmaceutical approaches would be published in prestigious journals. Scientists who produced results questioning drug treatments or supporting natural approaches found their work rejected regardless of its quality. This publication control system effectively prevented new treatment approaches from gaining scientific legitimacy while maintaining the appearance of objective scientific discourse.
21. How did the Rockefellers use international banking networks to expand control?
The Rockefeller family utilized an intricate web of international banking connections to extend their medical and chemical monopolies globally. Working through Chase Manhattan Bank and various European financial institutions, they developed a system where major banks coordinated pharmaceutical operations across national boundaries. This network was particularly effective because it operated above the level of national governments, allowing monopoly control to continue even during periods of international conflict.
The banking system allowed the Rockefellers to maintain control of drug companies throughout Europe and Asia while appearing to operate through local ownership. For example, the Rockefeller interests could control European pharmaceutical companies through intermediary banks like the Schroder Bank, while maintaining similar control over American companies through Chase Manhattan. This international financial structure enabled them to coordinate drug pricing, research directions, and market allocation on a global scale.
22. What role did Albert Lasker play in medical advertising?
Albert Lasker revolutionized medical advertising by bringing sophisticated marketing techniques to the pharmaceutical industry. As the "father of modern advertising," he transformed drug marketing through memorable slogans and constant repetition, particularly in his work with the American Cancer Society. Lasker's greatest achievement was breaking the taboo against women smoking in public, effectively creating a new market for tobacco companies through calculated media manipulation and Hollywood influence.
Lasker's influence extended beyond direct advertising into the reshaping of medical institutions. Working with Elmer Bobst, he transformed the American Cancer Society from a minor organization into a powerful force for controlling cancer treatment approaches. His techniques combined emotional appeals with scientific-sounding language, creating a model for pharmaceutical advertising that continues to dominate medical marketing.
23. How did Elmer Bobst influence pharmaceutical marketing?
Elmer Bobst emerged as a key figure in pharmaceutical marketing through his leadership at Hoffman LaRoche and Warner-Lambert, where he developed sophisticated strategies for promoting prescription drugs to physicians. His most significant innovation was establishing the "detail man" system, where pharmaceutical representatives would personally visit doctors to promote their products. This system created a direct marketing channel between drug companies and prescribing physicians, bypassing traditional advertising restrictions.
Bobst's political connections, particularly his relationship with Richard Nixon, allowed him to influence drug regulation and marketing policies at the federal level. His position at Warner-Lambert, combined with his role in reorganizing the American Cancer Society, gave him unprecedented control over both drug promotion and cancer treatment protocols. This dual influence allowed him to shape both the marketing and medical acceptance of pharmaceutical products.
24. What methods were used to suppress nutrition science?
Nutrition science was systematically suppressed through control of medical education, research funding, and publication channels. Medical schools, following Rockefeller Foundation guidelines, reduced or eliminated nutrition education from their curricula, focusing instead on drug-based treatments. Research funding for nutritional approaches to disease prevention was consistently denied, while studies supporting pharmaceutical interventions received generous support.
The suppression extended to the persecution of doctors who promoted nutritional treatments. The FDA and AMA regularly prosecuted physicians who prescribed nutritional therapies, while medical journals refused to publish research demonstrating the effectiveness of dietary approaches to disease treatment. This systematic suppression ensured that doctors would remain ignorant of nutrition's role in health while focusing exclusively on drug-based treatments.
25. How did chemical fertilizers impact agriculture and health?
Chemical fertilizers, introduced widely after World War II, fundamentally altered agricultural practices and food nutrition. These fertilizers, often derived from wartime chemical production, increased crop yields but simultaneously reduced the nutritional content of foods. The shift to chemical farming methods resulted in soil degradation and the steady decline of mineral content in foods, leading to widespread nutritional deficiencies in the population.
The impact on health was compounded by the fact that chemically fertilized crops required increasing amounts of pesticides and herbicides, adding toxic residues to the food supply. The chemical agriculture system created a self-reinforcing cycle where depleted soil led to weaker plants, requiring more chemicals, while producing less nutritious food. This system benefited chemical manufacturers while contributing to a steady decline in public health.
26. What role did Memorial Sloan Kettering play in cancer treatment?
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center emerged as the temple of orthodox cancer treatment, setting protocols that would be followed nationwide. Under Rockefeller control, it promoted exclusively chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery while systematically suppressing information about alternative treatments. The center's researchers, notably Dr. Suiguira, found positive results with alternative treatments like Laetrile, but these findings were suppressed and researchers who attempted to publicize them were dismissed.
The center's influence extended far beyond its own facilities through its role in establishing national cancer treatment protocols. Its directors, interlocked with pharmaceutical companies and banking interests, ensured that cancer treatment would remain focused on expensive drug therapies regardless of their effectiveness. The center effectively functioned as a control point for determining which cancer treatments would be considered legitimate by the medical establishment.
27. How did drug pricing mechanisms develop?
Drug pricing mechanisms evolved through a system of patent protection, marketing control, and insurance reimbursement that allowed pharmaceutical companies to charge excessive prices without market resistance. The prescription drug system, created through the efforts of the AMA and drug manufacturers, eliminated price competition by preventing direct consumer purchasing. This system was reinforced by insurance coverage that masked actual costs from both doctors and patients.
The pricing structure was maintained through control of drug distribution channels and the suppression of competing products. Companies could charge whatever the market would bear for patented drugs, while using their influence to prevent the importation of lower-priced alternatives. This system was particularly effective with cancer drugs, where prices could be set at extraordinary levels without regard to actual production costs.
28. What was the relationship between political figures and the Medical Monopoly?
Political figures served as crucial enablers of the Medical Monopoly through legislation, regulatory decisions, and public promotions of monopoly interests. Many politicians received substantial campaign contributions from drug companies and medical organizations, creating a system of obligation that ensured favorable treatment. The revolving door between government agencies and pharmaceutical companies ensured that regulation would protect monopoly interests rather than public health.
The relationship was exemplified by cases like Oscar Ewing's promotion of water fluoridation and various congressional figures' support for drug industry priorities. Politicians who cooperated with the Medical Monopoly often found themselves rewarded with lucrative positions in pharmaceutical companies or medical organizations after leaving office. This system created a reliable political support structure for maintaining monopoly control.
29. How did medical insurance systems reinforce monopoly control?
Medical insurance systems strengthened monopoly control by creating a payment mechanism that isolated consumers from actual healthcare costs while ensuring high prices for monopoly products and services. The insurance system, promoted by medical organizations and pharmaceutical companies, created a third-party payment structure that removed normal market constraints on pricing. This allowed hospitals and drug companies to steadily increase prices without direct consumer resistance.
The system particularly benefited pharmaceutical companies by making expensive drug treatments appear affordable to patients through insurance coverage, while generating massive profits through inflated pricing. Insurance companies, interlocked with pharmaceutical interests through common banking connections, willingly participated in this system, as they could simply raise premiums to cover increasing costs while maintaining their own profit margins.
30. What role did medical equipment suppliers play in the monopoly?
Medical equipment suppliers functioned as an integral part of the Medical Monopoly by controlling hospital purchasing through standardization requirements and exclusive contracts. Major equipment manufacturers, often connected to the same banking interests that controlled pharmaceutical companies, established specifications that hospitals had to meet for accreditation. This created a closed market where hospitals were required to purchase expensive equipment from approved manufacturers.
The equipment monopoly extended to ongoing maintenance and supply contracts, creating a perpetual income stream from hospitals. The system was reinforced through medical education, where doctors were trained on specific types of equipment and became reluctant to consider alternatives. This created a self-perpetuating cycle where hospitals became increasingly dependent on particular equipment suppliers while losing the ability to consider more cost-effective alternatives.
31. How did food additives and preservatives impact public health?
The introduction of chemical food additives and preservatives created widespread health impacts that complemented the Medical Monopoly's control system. Beginning in the post-World War II period, food manufacturers began introducing thousands of new chemical compounds into the food supply with minimal testing. By 1988, only two percent of these additives had been adequately tested for toxicity, while 30% were "generally recognized as safe" without evidence, and the remainder had never been properly evaluated at all.
The health consequences manifested in rising rates of allergies, with the National Academy of Sciences estimating that 15% of Americans developed allergies to chemical products. These additives worked synergistically with other monopoly control mechanisms - as people became sicker from chemical-laden food, they required more medical treatments and pharmaceutical drugs, creating a profitable cycle of illness and treatment that benefited the Medical Monopoly's bottom line.
32. What methods were used to control medical licensing?
Medical licensing became a powerful tool for monopoly control through the systematic elimination of competing medical practices. The process began with the 1511 law in England requiring official approval to practice medicine, but reached its full power through the AMA's control of state medical boards. These boards could determine who could practice medicine and what treatments they could use, effectively eliminating practitioners who didn't follow orthodox pharmaceutical-based approaches.
The licensing system worked in conjunction with medical education control to ensure that only doctors trained in AMA-approved schools could receive licenses. Alternative practitioners, regardless of their success rates with patients, faced prosecution for practicing without a license. This created a closed system where medical practice was restricted to those who followed monopoly-approved treatments while alternative approaches were criminalized.
33. How did the AMA suppress competing medical practices?
The AMA's suppression of competing medical practices operated through a sophisticated system of legal, economic, and professional persecution. Through its Committee on Quackery, the AMA targeted specific competing practices, particularly homeopathy and chiropractic medicine, using coordinated campaigns involving legal challenges, negative publicity, and economic pressure. The organization worked with government agencies to harass practitioners while using its control of hospitals and insurance systems to deny them access to standard medical facilities.
The suppression extended to control of research funding and publication channels, ensuring that evidence supporting alternative treatments could not reach the public through respected medical journals. The AMA's influence over medical education meant that new doctors remained ignorant of alternative approaches while being indoctrinated in pharmaceutical treatments. This comprehensive system effectively marginalized any medical practice that threatened monopoly control.
34. What role did the media play in promoting medical orthodoxy?
The media's role in promoting medical orthodoxy was secured through advertising revenues from pharmaceutical companies and strategic control of medical reporting. Medical journals, dependent on drug company advertising, served as the primary source for health news, ensuring that mainstream media coverage would reflect monopoly interests. Journalists who attempted to investigate alternative treatments or expose problems with orthodox medicine found their stories suppressed or discredited.
The control system extended to television and radio, where pharmaceutical advertising revenues created a powerful incentive to avoid negative coverage of drug treatments or positive coverage of alternatives. Medical news became increasingly dominated by press releases from drug companies and medical organizations, while investigative reporting on health issues virtually disappeared from major media outlets. This created a public information system that consistently reinforced monopoly control.
35. How did research grant systems control scientific inquiry?
Research grant systems functioned as a sophisticated mechanism for directing medical research toward profitable pharmaceutical approaches while suppressing investigation of alternative treatments. Major funding sources, including government agencies, foundations, and drug companies, coordinated their grant-making to ensure that research followed approved directions. Scientists who investigated alternative approaches or questioned orthodox treatments found their funding cut off and their careers jeopardized.
The system was particularly effective because it operated through seemingly objective peer review processes that were actually controlled by monopoly interests. Research proposals had to be approved by committees dominated by orthodox medical viewpoints, ensuring that grants would only be awarded to projects that supported pharmaceutical approaches. This created a self-reinforcing system where career advancement depended on conducting research that confirmed existing monopoly practices.
36. What was the connection between the Drug Trust and international trade?
The Drug Trust maintained international control through a complex network of patent agreements, market allocation arrangements, and coordinated pricing systems that transcended national boundaries. This network, operating through major pharmaceutical companies and their banking connections, enabled the Trust to maintain monopoly control even during periods of international conflict. The system was exemplified by the continued operation of drug cartels during World War II, when American and German pharmaceutical companies maintained their profit-sharing arrangements despite being technically at war.
The international trade system was reinforced through control of drug testing and approval processes in various countries, ensuring that only monopoly-approved drugs could enter major markets. Patent agreements were used to divide markets among cartel members while maintaining artificially high prices worldwide. This system effectively prevented any country from developing an independent pharmaceutical industry that might challenge monopoly control.
37. How did hospital accreditation systems develop?
Hospital accreditation systems emerged as a powerful tool for enforcing monopoly control over medical facilities and treatment protocols. The American College of Surgeons, working with other monopoly-controlled organizations, established accreditation requirements that forced hospitals to follow specified procedures and use approved equipment and drugs. Hospitals that attempted to offer alternative treatments or natural healing approaches risked losing their accreditation and insurance contracts.
The accreditation system was particularly effective because it operated through seemingly voluntary professional organizations rather than direct government control. This allowed the monopoly to maintain tight control over hospital practices while avoiding the appearance of overt regulation. The system required hospitals to purchase expensive equipment, use specified pharmaceutical products, and follow standardized treatment protocols, effectively eliminating their ability to adopt more natural or cost-effective approaches.
38. What role did World War II play in expanding chemical companies?
World War II provided chemical companies with unprecedented opportunities for expansion while creating new markets for their products in the post-war period. Companies like I.G. Farben developed dual-use technologies that could be used both for warfare and civilian applications, particularly in the pharmaceutical and agricultural sectors. The war effort created massive production capabilities that needed new markets after the conflict ended.
This wartime expansion was transformed into peacetime chemical and pharmaceutical dominance through strategic conversion of military production facilities. Chemical weapons facilities were converted to produce pesticides, while explosive manufacturing plants began producing fertilizers. This conversion was facilitated by government support and the suppression of evidence regarding the health hazards of these chemicals, creating massive new civilian markets for formerly military chemical producers.
39. How did prescription drug laws reinforce monopoly control?
Prescription drug laws created a controlled distribution system that eliminated price competition while ensuring pharmaceutical company profits. These laws, promoted as consumer protection measures, actually served to prevent direct consumer access to medications while creating a captive market that had to pay whatever prices drug companies demanded. The system was reinforced through control of physician prescribing practices and insurance coverage requirements.
The prescription system effectively eliminated traditional medicine makers and herbalists who had previously provided remedies directly to the public. By requiring physician prescriptions for an ever-increasing number of medications, the laws created a distribution bottleneck that pharmaceutical companies could control through their influence over medical education and physician prescribing habits. This system remains one of the most effective monopoly control mechanisms.
40. What methods were used to control medical school accreditation?
Medical school accreditation became a primary tool for controlling physician training and ensuring compliance with monopoly practices. Following the Flexner Report, the AMA and Rockefeller interests established rigid requirements for medical school certification that eliminated schools teaching alternative approaches while standardizing education around pharmaceutical treatments. Schools that attempted to include substantial training in nutrition or natural healing methods found their accreditation threatened.
The accreditation system worked through detailed requirements for facilities, equipment, and curriculum that made medical education extremely expensive while ensuring that all physicians would be trained in drug-based treatments. This system effectively eliminated the possibility of new medical schools developing alternative approaches, as they could not receive accreditation without following monopoly-approved educational methods.
41. How did the Mental Health Industry develop under monopoly control?
The mental health industry emerged as an extension of pharmaceutical control through the promotion of drug-based treatments for psychological conditions. After World War II, pharmaceutical companies began aggressively marketing psychoactive drugs while simultaneously working to redefine normal human emotions and behaviors as medical conditions requiring chemical treatment. This medicalization of everyday life created vast new markets for psychiatric drugs while suppressing non-drug therapeutic approaches.
The transformation was accomplished through control of psychiatric education and research, with drug companies funding studies that supported their products while suppressing research into non-drug treatments. Psychiatric institutions, originally focused on various forms of therapy, were gradually converted into drug distribution centers. The system was reinforced through insurance reimbursement policies that favored drug treatments over talking therapies, creating economic pressures that pushed the entire mental health field toward pharmaceutical solutions.
42. What role did the World Health Organization play?
The World Health Organization became an instrument for extending Medical Monopoly control internationally, particularly in developing countries. Working closely with major pharmaceutical companies and their banking connections, WHO established health protocols that required member nations to adopt monopoly-approved medical practices while discouraging traditional healing methods. This created new markets for pharmaceutical products while undermining local medical traditions that might have offered effective alternative treatments.
WHO's vaccination programs and disease control protocols served as vehicles for introducing pharmaceutical products into developing nations while establishing dependence on monopoly medicine. The organization's influence was particularly effective because it operated under the authority of the United Nations, giving its pharmaceutical-oriented recommendations the appearance of international scientific consensus rather than commercial promotion.
43. How were medical statistics manipulated to support monopoly practices?
Medical statistics underwent systematic manipulation to support monopoly practices while discrediting alternative approaches. Studies supporting drug treatments were designed to show favorable results through careful patient selection, strategic timing of measurements, and selective reporting of outcomes. Meanwhile, successful results from alternative treatments were either ignored or subjected to impossibly rigid statistical standards that mainstream drug studies never had to meet.
The manipulation extended to the suppression of negative data about approved treatments, particularly regarding drug side effects and treatment failures. Government agencies and medical journals cooperated in this statistical manipulation by accepting drug company data without independent verification while requiring extensive proof for any alternative treatment claims. This created an artificial appearance of scientific support for monopoly practices while discrediting competing approaches.
44. What methods were used to control state medical boards?
State medical boards were controlled through a combination of professional pressure, financial influence, and strategic placement of monopoly-friendly physicians in key positions. The AMA worked with pharmaceutical interests to ensure that state boards would enforce monopoly practices while suppressing alternative treatments. Board members who showed independence or questioned orthodox treatments found themselves isolated and eventually replaced.
The control system operated through standardized procedures that state boards were required to follow, ostensibly to maintain professional standards but actually serving to enforce monopoly practices. These procedures made it virtually impossible for physicians using alternative treatments to defend their practices, regardless of patient outcomes. The boards became enforcement arms of the Medical Monopoly, using their legal authority to eliminate competition while protecting orthodox practitioners.
45. How did pharmaceutical testing regulations develop?
Pharmaceutical testing regulations evolved as a mechanism for protecting drug company profits while creating barriers to competition. The system required expensive testing procedures that only large pharmaceutical companies could afford, effectively preventing smaller companies or natural remedy producers from entering the market. Meanwhile, the actual testing requirements were often superficial, allowing dangerous drugs to reach the market while safe natural alternatives were blocked.
The regulatory system was particularly effective because it appeared to protect public safety while actually serving monopoly interests. Drug companies could navigate the complex approval process through their financial resources and political connections, while potential competitors were eliminated by the cost and complexity of the requirements. This created an appearance of consumer protection while actually protecting monopoly profits.
46. What role did chemical companies play in water treatment?
Chemical companies extended their influence through water treatment systems, particularly through the promotion of chlorination and fluoridation. These programs created profitable markets for industrial waste products while establishing new mechanisms for population-wide chemical exposure. The fluoridation program, particularly, emerged as a solution for disposing of industrial waste products while creating a permanent market for the aluminum industry's fluoride byproducts.
The implementation of these water treatment programs demonstrated the monopoly's ability to transform industrial waste disposal problems into profitable public health measures. Despite evidence of harmful effects, these programs were promoted through coordinated campaigns involving government agencies, medical organizations, and media outlets controlled by monopoly interests. The system remains one of the most successful examples of converting industrial waste into profitable "treatment" programs.
47. How did medical equipment standardization create monopoly control?
Medical equipment standardization established another layer of monopoly control through requirements that forced hospitals and medical practices to purchase specific types of expensive equipment. The standardization process, implemented through accreditation requirements and insurance regulations, created a closed market where only approved manufacturers could sell medical equipment. This system eliminated competition while ensuring high prices and ongoing maintenance contracts.
The equipment standardization extended beyond initial purchases to create perpetual revenue streams through required maintenance, upgrades, and replacement schedules. Hospitals became locked into relationships with specific equipment manufacturers, unable to consider alternatives without risking their accreditation or insurance contracts. This created another self-perpetuating monopoly control system that continues to drive up medical costs.
48. What methods were used to suppress homeopathic medicine?
Homeopathic medicine faced systematic suppression through coordinated attacks on its practitioners, educational institutions, and legal status. The AMA, working with pharmaceutical interests, conducted sustained campaigns to discredit homeopathy despite its documented success rates. Medical schools teaching homeopathic methods were either forced to convert to orthodox medicine or lose their accreditation, effectively eliminating professional training in homeopathic practices.
The suppression included legal harassment of practitioners, exclusion from insurance coverage, and systematic propaganda campaigns portraying homeopathy as unscientific. This occurred despite homeopathy's historical success in treating various diseases, including epidemics where it often achieved better results than orthodox treatments. The campaign against homeopathy became a model for suppressing other alternative medical approaches.
49. How did the cancer treatment industry expand?
The cancer treatment industry expanded through a coordinated system that promoted expensive, ineffective treatments while suppressing information about prevention and alternative therapies. The American Cancer Society, Memorial Sloan Kettering, and other cancer organizations worked together to ensure that research and treatment remained focused on profitable chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, despite their poor success rates. This created a multi-billion dollar industry that offered little hope of cure while generating enormous profits.
The expansion was facilitated through control of research funding, treatment protocols, and public information about cancer. Organizations like the American Cancer Society raised vast sums from the public while spending relatively little on actual research, instead using their resources to promote orthodox treatments and suppress alternatives. The cancer industry became one of the most profitable sectors of monopoly medicine while consistently failing to reduce cancer death rates.
50. What was the overall impact of the Medical Monopoly on public health?
The Medical Monopoly's impact on public health has been profound and largely negative, creating a system that generates enormous profits while failing to improve public health outcomes. The monopoly's focus on pharmaceutical treatments while suppressing nutritional and preventive approaches has led to a population increasingly dependent on drugs while suffering from preventable chronic diseases. Despite massive spending on healthcare, American health statistics have steadily declined relative to other developed nations.
The system's emphasis on treating symptoms with drugs rather than addressing underlying causes has created a self-perpetuating cycle of chronic illness and expensive treatments. The suppression of alternative treatments, nutritional approaches, and preventive medicine has deprived the public of potentially effective solutions while forcing them to rely on expensive and often dangerous drug treatments. The result has been a healthcare system that excels at generating profits while failing at its ostensible purpose of protecting and improving public health.
I appreciate you being here.
If you've found the content interesting, useful and maybe even helpful, please consider supporting it through a small paid subscription. While everything here is free, your paid subscription is important as it helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent research and journalism work. It also helps keep it free for those that cannot afford to pay.
Please make full use of the Free Libraries.
Unbekoming Interview Library: Great interviews across a spectrum of important topics.
Unbekoming Book Summary Library: Concise summaries of important books.
Stories
I'm always in search of good stories, people with valuable expertise and helpful books. Please don't hesitate to get in touch at unbekoming@outlook.com
For COVID vaccine injury
Consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment as a resource.
Baseline Human Health
Watch and share this profound 21-minute video to understand and appreciate what health looks like without vaccination.
No one goes against the medical cartel. And most people don't even know it exists. They think doctors and hospitals and drugs and clinics and pharmacies is healthcare. The cost is mostly socialized through taxes. Drugs are generally synthetic coal tar derivatives - Rockefeller had plenty of waste coal tar available from his business operations. Monopoly is not just a game to these guys - they play for real:).
Well, ya done good Unbekoming. Can't add anything to this man that opened up my eyes in 2004. The best of Ezra Pound's proteges was definitively Eustace Mullins. He unearthed empirical evidence to the corruption in the world like no other. Notable exception being David Irving, another giant. In todays world, David Martin, Whitney Webb and James Corbett come close, yet continue to skate past mentioning the ones you cannot mention. Mullins and Irving went for the jugular. Fearless, intrepid and truthful.