Stewart ridiculed Eric Clapton when Clapton openly talked about his v. injury. He owes Clapton an apology. - Comment from Bengie31eu
Jon Stewart is the kind of guy that publicly comes out against slavery a decade after it’s been abolished. - Comment from UnfinishedWorkz
Once upon I time, I liked Jon Stewart, a lot.
Actually, I liked a lot of people once upon a time.
I used to find Jon funny, I thought he was sticking it to the man, and even with today’s lens I still think he was at times. I loved how he stood up for New York’s first responders, for example.
But I was also asleep back then and didn’t understand many things. I didn’t understand what all the words meant, progressive, conservative, liberal, Marxist, Fascist, Globalist, Empire etc.
I thought I understood them, but I now know that I didn’t.
What I really didn’t understand was that besides the left right axis that everyone argued about, and lived on, there was another axis, an invisible one, that of the tendency to go authoritarian when the pressure is on, when they dial up the fear. I didn’t know that axis existed, and I certainly never expected that most of the people I liked and looked up to, would part with me on that axis.
That they would drift from me and get swallowed up into the lizard brain of the collective.
I haven’t been able to watch or listen to Jon Stewart for over three years, so when I saw that Jimmy Dore had done a segment just for him, back in January 23, I thought it was time to listen to the man, under Jimmy’s cover. I’m catching up on my Jimmy.
The video in the masthead has been condensed a bit from the original as I’ve cut out most of Kirsch’s contribution, I love Steve, but he can waffle at times.
I wanted to do this post, just to have another bookmark, or a tombstone, to a man I used to really like.
Jimmy Dore’s anger is real. I can feel it. I love him for showing it and going to town on an establishment coward.
I hadn’t come across Gregory Poland before (Director of Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group). Listening to him is painful. Pure establishment. Pure bouigecrat.
Dr. Poland's research has been continuously funded by the National Institutes of Health since 1991.
No point dissecting each of his sentences. But listening to him reminded me of Trofim Lysenko.
Trofim Denisovich Lysenko was a Soviet agronomist and biologist. He was born on September 29, 1898, and died on November 20, 1976. Lysenko rejected Mendelian genetics in favor of the hybridization theories of Russian horticulturist Ivan Vladimirovich Michurin, believing in the inheritance of acquired characteristics (Lamarckism).
Lysenko served as the director of the Soviet Union's Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences. He was a strong proponent of soft inheritance and rejected Mendelian genetics in favor of pseudo-scientific ideas termed "Lysenkoism". His unorthodox experimental research in improved crop yields earned the support of Soviet leader Joseph Stalin, especially following the famine and loss of productivity resulting from forced collectivization in several regions of the Soviet Union in the early 1930s.
In 1940, he became the director of the Institute of Genetics within the USSR's Academy of Sciences, and Lysenko's anti-Mendelian doctrines were further secured in Soviet science and education by the exercise of political influence and power. Scientists who refused to renounce genetics found themselves at severe risk. Many lost their positions, some were imprisoned, and a few were executed.
Lysenko's influence declined in the late 1950s and early 1960s and his doctrines were officially discredited in the Soviet Union in 1964. Despite the end of Lysenko's political power, the damage to Soviet biology and genetics and its consequences for Soviet society and agriculture had been profound and long-lasting.
I would call Lysenko a “political scientist”, in the true sense of the word (not as that term is usually used), which is an oxymoron, but there you have it.
Politics is ideological, and small “s” science is questioning. Which is why Political Scientists need capital “S” Science, or as we have fondly come to call it, The Science.
Gregory Pollard is a Political Scientist™.
James Lindsay did this great short on Lysenko and Lysenkoism.
The video "Lysenkoism" by New Discourses, hosted by James Lindsay, discusses the concept of Lysenkoism, named after Soviet biologist Trofim Lysenko. Lysenko's incorrect theories, influenced by Marxist Socialist and Soviet Theory, led to massive crop failures and starvation in the Soviet Union and Communist China. The video argues that we're currently facing a similar situation due to Woke Marxism and the "Sustainability" agenda.
Lindsay identifies several modern forms of Lysenkoism:
1. Environmental Lysenkoism: The sustainability movement and the push for green energy are based on incorrect science, leading to potential failures.
2. Medical Lysenkoism: Medical science is being passed through an ideological filter, resulting in harmful practices such as gender affirming care for gender dysphoria.
3. Gender Lysenkoism: The application of queer theory to biology and child developmental psychology is causing psychological harm to children.
4. Educational Lysenkoism: The application of social emotional learning in education is causing psychological harm to students and leading to worse educational outcomes.
Lindsay argues that these forms of Lysenkoism are causing harm and will lead to deaths, just like the original Lysenkoism did. He calls for a return to true science that is not distorted by ideological lenses.
What was Communism’s “The Science”?
Lysenko believed that by changing the environment in which plants were grown, one could alter the traits of the plants, and that these altered traits could then be inherited by the next generation. For example, he thought that by exposing wheat plants to cold, they could be "trained" to germinate at lower temperatures, and that this trait would be passed on to their offspring.
Lysenko's theories were not based on rigorous scientific research or empirical evidence, but rather on ideology and political expediency. His ideas were appealing to the Soviet leadership, including Joseph Stalin, because they aligned with the Marxist doctrine of the malleability of nature and the rejection of "bourgeois" science.
Lysenko's influence led to the widespread implementation of agricultural practices based on his theories, which contributed to severe crop failures and famine in the Soviet Union
The State needs its stories and doctrines.
The Soviet’s needed Lysenkoism.
US Empire, being much bigger, needs Viruses, Climate, Gender, and Race.
Thanks for being here.
Please consider a small paid subscription (donation). The money goes to help covid vaccine injured Australians.
I am always looking for good, personal GMC, covid and childhood vaccination stories. You can write to me privately: unbekoming@outlook.com
If you are Covid vaccine injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment
If you want to understand and “see” what baseline human health looks like, watch (and share) this 21 minutes
If you want to help someone, give them a book. Official Stories by Liam Scheff. Point them to a safe chapter (here and here), and they will find their way to vaccination.
Here are three eBooks I have produced so far:
FREE eBook: A letter to my two adult kids - Vaccines and the free spike protein
Share this post