Playback speed
Share post
Share post at current time

Ivermectin: The Truth

A Short Documentary


“Two thirds of the world’s non-commercial biological research is funded by just three bodies.

  • The Wellcome Trust in the UK

  • The NIH (specifically the NIAID under Tony Fauci)

  • The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation”

-Dr. Mike Yeadon (quote from Ivermectin: The Truth)

How many different ways can you say that Ivermectin was purposefully blocked and sabotaged and that millions have suffered and died as a consequence?

This is an absolutely excellent short documentary (just 13 minutes) on Ivermectin and what THEY did to keep it from you and me. Please forward it to anyone that has ever mentioned “horse” in the same sentence as Ivermectin.

We knew that it worked as far back as May-June 2020.

I remember recommending the Zelenko protocol (that didn’t include Ivermectin) to someone during the Australian Omicron wave in January 2022, but the sheet that had the basic protocol also included a secondary protocol with Ivermectin (if you had it). Once she saw that Ivermectin was mentioned she discarded the whole thing, it was a “credibility killing” feature of anything that Zelenko might say. “They use this for horses!!” she said.

It was the response of someone experiencing a psychosis, and as Mark McDonald said:

When a number of associated delusions organize themselves into an irrational belief system, a state of psychosis can develop. When the man who believes the world is out to get him also insists that his restaurant food is poisoned, that his wife is having a lesbian affair with the neighbor’s daughter, and that his boss is somehow involved in both—he is psychotic.

That psychotic state was manufactured. The mechanics of that manufacture are succinctly explained in the short doco. It forms part of a suite of great docos on the subject that include Dr. Tess Lawrie’s historical takedown of Andrew Hill, the man that fired the final kill shot on Ivermectin.

Lies are Unbekoming
The assassination of Ivermectin and the death of millions
Watch now (19 min) | Plenty has been said about Ivermectin. Those of us that are awake (except for Alex Berenson) know that it works, has been withheld from use and also have a general understanding of why they did it. But I didn’t understand the details of how they blocked Ivermectin until I read Kennedy Jr.’s…
Read more

It’s hard for people to understand the WHY.

WHY would THEY do that?

To which I fall back on my analogy from June 2021:

Lies are Unbekoming
A letter to my two adult kids: Vaccines and the free Spike Protein
20 June 2021 To family and friends I wrote this to our 23 year old daughter and 22 year old son. I apologise for the length of this, it started out as an email, and then I just kept going and here we are. As many of you know, our son studied para-medicine and is in the early days of his career, so I expect the question of vaccination will be put to him soon…
Read more

Imagine that someone has a heart attack on an aeroplane, and there are 5 doctors on the flight, all of them as it turns out are heart specialists. They start running towards the patient to help, but get crash tackled by air hostesses and onboard airline security, even the co-pilot jumps in to punch the doctors.

Anyway, the patient dies and several of the doctors lose their license for trying to help.

Turns out the reason is that the airline has also invested in a new heart treatment and that is the only treatment it will allow its passengers. The treatment involves heavy machinery that is at the airport, so the patient must wait until landing.

Do you think that the airline, its employees and hired help are involved in a Criminal Obstruction? I do.

If you need any evidence at all that there is structural, centralised malfeasance at play, look no further than Ivermectin and this subject generally.

Ivermectin was blocked, “crash tackled”, so that the Covid “jabs” could be legally authorised under an Emergency Use Authorization. It’s really as simple as that.

Covid-19: Ivermectin ban in place for doctors | — Australia’s leading news site

If you look at the timeline, it will make sense, as doctors on the ground discovered that Ivermectin worked in May-June 2020, but THEY were working on “vaccines” at exactly that time. Remember they “formulated” the mRNA “code” for the jabs after TWO days in Feb (or was in Jan) 2020, if my memory is right. So, their “solution” was already in the pipeline and under Operation Warp Speed was going to be released around the US election in November 2020.

So, from discovering that it worked in May-June 2020 until THEIR solution, the jabs, was made available in October-November 2020, all they had to do was crash-tackle the solution and the doctors for about 6-months.

Which is exactly what happened, that allowed the EUA to be granted for a rushed and improperly tested genetic experimental “treatment”, it’s NOT a vaccine because it doesn’t stop infection or transmission, it’s only claim is that it MIGHT reduce severe symptoms, in the very old, which makes it a treatment at best.

There is a great section of the doco that discusses Merck (remember these are the Vioxx and Gardasil people). The Mexican cartels have nothing on these guys.

Their patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996, until then they were happy to promote the wonders and the safety of THEIR drug. But in 2021 they were happy to imply it wasn’t safe and didn’t work against Covid, seeing that they had no patent rights at that time, and they were developing their own, newly minted, scam of a product Molnupiravir.

Substack Alexander COVID News evidence-based medicine
MERCK's Molnupiravir & Pfizer's Paxlovid have MAJOR rebound problems, causing COVID illness; Wang et al. pre-print; "COVID-19 rebound after Paxlovid and Molnupiravir during January-June 2022"
These two drugs were garbage to begin with, both rushed through with only one study, very sub-optimal garbage junk questionable research methods, terrible data, yet were given FDA’s corrupted EUAs. Remember, CDC recently put out a Health Alert Network Health Advisory to update us on the potential for COVID-19 rebound after Paxlovid treatments. Now we se…
Read more

A wonderful sub-thread to the Ivermectin story is this:

Do Your Own Research
Did Use Of Ivermectin In Latin America Sabotage Clinical Trials and Confuse The World Of Medicine?
In late 2020, a curious article from Nature Magazine made the rounds: Its chief concern? That people in Latin America were taking ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment, and therefore local studies were very hard to execute: Some early studies in cells and humans hinted that the drug has antiviral properties, but since then, clinical trials in Latin America h…
Read more

Still, researchers might never have sufficient data to justify ivermectin’s use if its widespread administration continues in Latin America. The drug’s popularity “practically cancels” the possibility of carrying out phase III clinical trials, which require thousands of participants — some of whom would be part of a control group and therefore couldn’t receive the drug — to firmly establish safety and efficacy, says Krolewiecki.

As unchecked use of ivermectin grows, he says, “the more difficult it will be to collect the evidence that regulatory agencies need, that we would like to have, and that will get us closer to identifying the real role of this drug.”

So, said in simple English. They couldn’t find enough people who were NOT using it, so that they could PROVE it worked. Why do you think it was WIDELY used in South America already? Do you think millions of South Americans used it because it DIDN’T work?

It’s worth reminding everybody that what is incredible about Ivermectin is that it has so many different mechanisms of action. At least 20 that we know of. This from my article back in January 2022.

Lies are Unbekoming
Quercetin and The War on Zinc
Thanks for reading Lies are Unbekoming! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. I’m going to frame the last 2 years a little bit differently. I want to talk about The War on Zinc, a war that you haven’t heard of. Have you ever wondered why all the early treatment protocols and combinations always include Zinc…
Read more

I hadn’t realised until listening to Robert Kennedy Jr’s book (The Real Anthony Fauci) that IVM has SO MANY different mechanisms of action. 20 that we know of. One of them is acting as a Zinc mineral mule, but there are 19 other actions.

Here are all 20 mechanisms of action:

A. Direct action on SARS-CoV-2

Level 1: Action on SARS-CoV-2 cell entry

Level 2: Action on importin (IMP) superfamily

Level 3: Action as an ionophore

B. Action on host targets for viral replication

Level 4: Action as an antiviral

Level 5: Action on viral replication and assembly

Level 6: Action on posttranslational processing of viral polyproteins

Level 7: Action on karyopherin (KPNA/KPNB) receptors

C. Action on host targets for inflammation

Level 8: Action on interferon (INF) levels

Level 9: Action on Toll- like receptors (TLRs)

Level 10: Action on nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway

Level 11: Action on the JAK-STAT pathway, PAI-1 and COVID-19 sequalae

Level 12: Action on P21 activated kinase 1 (PAK1)

Level 13: Action on Interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels

Level 14: Action on allosteric modulation of P2X4 receptor

Level 15: Action on high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1)

Level 16: Action as an immunomodulator on lung tissue and olfaction

Level 17: Action as an anti-inflammatory

D. Action on other host targets

Level 18: Action on plasmin and annexin A2

Level 19: Action on CD147 on the RBC

Level 20: Action on mitochondrial ATP under hypoxia on cardiac function

Also, if you are jab injured in any way, Ivermectin is a backbone of the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment Protocol.

I-RECOVER: Post-Vaccine Treatment - FLCCC | Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (

Ivermectin: 0.2–0.3 mg/kg, daily for up to 4–6 weeks. Ivermectin has potent anti-inflammatory properties. It also binds to the spike protein, aiding in the elimination by the host. It is likely that ivermectin and intermittent fasting act synergistically to rid the body of the spike protein. Ivermectin is best taken with or just following a meal for greater absorption. A trial of ivermectin should be considered as first line therapy. It appears that patients can be grouped into two categories: i) ivermectin responders and ii) ivermectin non-responders. This distinction is important, as the latter are more difficult to treat and require more aggressive therapy. Due to the possible drug interaction between quercetin and ivermectin, these drugs should not be taken simultaneously (i.e., should be staggered morning and night).

I’m pretty sure this will not be the last time I write about Ivermectin.

Thank you for reading this Substack.

Please consider a small paid subscription (donation). The money goes to a good cause.

I am always looking for good, personal GMC or childhood vaccination stories. Shared stories help others.

In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.

You can write to me privately:

If you are Covid-jab injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment

Lies are Unbekoming is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Leave a comment

Anne Can't Stand It!
Mocking the Mockingbird
Read more
Lies are Unbekoming
Lies are Unbekoming