🚨Introducing the Revolutionary “Viral Isolation™ Method” 🚨
Because Who Needs the Scientific Method When You Have Consensus™?
Are you a virologist looking to isolate a virus but don’t want to deal with pesky scientific principles? Do you long for a world where assumptions are facts, controls are optional, and results are whatever you need them to be? Well, look no further! With Viral Isolation™, you, too, can bypass every fundamental step of the scientific method and still get published!
🎉 Special Features – Now with ZERO Adherence to the Scientific Method! 🎉
🔬 Step 1: Skip Direct Observation!
Why waste time finding a virus in nature when you can just assume it exists? Don’t worry—no one in ‘virology’ has ever observed a virus as a distinct, independent entity directly from a sick person’s fluids. If they haven’t done it in over a century, why start now?
💡 Bonus: Instead of isolating a virus, just declare symptoms = virus. Got a cough? Must be a virus! Fever? Definitely a virus! Ate bad sushi? Yep - virus!!
📏 Step 2: The Hypothesis-Free Hypothesis™!
Real science requires an Independent Variable (IV) (the thing being tested), but who has time for that? Since we never actually isolate a virus, we’ll just assume it’s there. Science is hard—so let’s just skip the part where we identify our IV!
🧐 Scientific Method Violation:
✅ No purified virus? No problem! Just declare the existence of one and move on.
✅ Symptoms are vague? Who cares? A fever must mean viral infection!
✅ What about controls? HAHAHA, good one.
🧪 Step 3: Experimental Design... Or Lack Thereof!
Time to “prove” viral replication! But instead of isolating and testing a virus, let’s throw patient samples into a blender of monkey kidney cells, toxic antibiotics, fetal bovine serum, and a battery of chemicals! What could go wrong?
🧬 Pro-Tip: When the monkey kidney cells start dying from all the poison you added, just call it a Cytopathic Effect (CPE) and claim the virus did it! (Ignore the fact that control experiments show the same results without a virus—just pretend those don’t exist!)
📸 Step 4: The Electron Microscope Magic Show!
Now, let’s get some ‘proof.’ Instead of isolating and purifying a virus, just snap a picture of the cellular debris from our CPE Toxicity Soup™ and say, “See? That blob right there—totally a virus.”
🔍 Fun Fact: If someone asks why you didn’t purify and separate the virus, just roll your eyes and mutter, “You don’t understand virology.” That’ll shut them up!
📊 Step 5: Data Manipulation & Narrative Control!
Science should be about unbiased analysis... but where’s the fun in that? With Viral Isolation™, you can:
✅ Assemble ‘viral genomes’ on a computer, even if no complete ‘genome’ was found! (Computers never make mistakes.)
✅ Use PCR to ‘detect’ tiny ‘genetic fragments,’ from a ‘virus’ never proven to exist.
✅ Ignore all contradictory evidence, and call anyone who questions your methods a science denier™!
🧠 Step 6: Declare Success No Matter What!
In real science, if an experiment fails, the hypothesis should be rejected. But with Viral Isolation™, failure is never an option!
🚫 Found no actual virus? Publish anyway!
🚫 Control experiments contradict your results? Ignore them!
🚫 No reproducibility? Silence the skeptics!
🌟 SPECIAL BONUS! – Support the Digital Biosecurity State! 🌟
By believing in this groundbreaking Non-Scientific Methodology™, YOU, too, can:
💰 Enable the Biosecurity State™ – The more viruses we ‘find,’ the more lockdowns, mandates, and surveillance we can justify!
📉 Help Crush Small Businesses! – Nothing says ‘progress’ like eliminating those pesky local shops and centralizing power!
🛑 Contribute to The Great Reset™! – Because why have freedom when you can have digital IDs, carbon quotas, and endless health passports?
🚀 ORDER NOW! 🚀
For a limited time, get your Viral Isolation™ Kit for the low price of your critical thinking skills!
(Side effects include cognitive dissonance, FOIA-induced panic attacks, and an uncontrollable urge to shout, “Trust the Science!” at anyone who asks for evidence.)
💥 Viral Isolation™ – Where Assumptions Become Facts! ™ 💥
This is the first time I have heard about Mark Gober. Very interesting indeed so thank you for posting this. I have been involving myself for a while with the virus existence topic, or rather the lack of existence of any evidence from the virologists to show that particles attributed with the properties they claim for viruses do exist in nature. According to what I have recently learned, and contrary to the opinion of Mark Gober, it is indeed possible and acknowledged among logicians that you can prove a negative.
Recent Transmission Electron Micrography work done by the Controls Studies Project of Jamie Andrews (see his Substack) has identified in guaranteed virus free cell culture material particles which possess the exact same morphologies (size and shape ) of those claimed by the virologists for SARS-CoV-2, HIV and measles viruses. So I think it is pretty clear that the virologists have a huge problem with their 'science'.
But this is a rather minor point in what is a very impressive body of work on important human biology topics and a great contribution towards a better understanding of what causes disease reflecting what actually takes place in nature and what treatments might be required.
"Since 2020, there has been more widespread questioning around the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Scientists should be welcoming this because the scientific process is inherently one of challenging paradigms. But the next step for vaccine skeptics—among doctors, scientists, citizens, and politicians alike—will be to examine the underlying premise behind vaccines: that microscopic organisms are making people sick."
So much of this has Grand Canyon sized gaps in the evidence cited and questions inspired. It feels like PR for groups seriously qualified to challenge viral theories and mysteriously indifferent to maiming and killing generations of children with exploding numbers of toxic injections for an imaginary risk. Also weird to cite Christine Massey FOIA mountain to municipal offices.. repetition of meaningless replies when isolation evidence would never be part of these groups evidence collections.
No Massey FOIA efforts are directed to laboratory components or scientific divisions of FDA-NIH-NSF etc.. wrong question in wrong places is proof we can be kept on a hamster wheel while NOBODY demands evidence of biological mechanisms to usefully augment immune systems or demonstrate why antibodies are suitable correlate of immunity when any provocation of injected toxins or foreign proteins cause your body to react to violation.
Tragically the more time passes the more we see all the high profile published challengers of the Pharma cartel make bank posing useless question with no clear lies exposed. Everyone named with kudos has some truth but no progress challenging criminal insanity of injections.
Hundreds of years of principled opposition to 'vaccines' hasn’t slowed the flood of jab-induced death and disability — it’s only turned a leaky faucet into a full-blown firehose. And while documenting the carnage is necessary, it’s like trimming back diseased branches on a tree that keeps regrowing from toxic soil. You want lasting change? Start with the root system — the germ theory grift and its bastard offspring, the virus lie. Otherwise, people will go on playing amateur landscape gardeners at the cemeteries of their loved ones.
And as for antibodies — if they’re just generic repair proteins triggered by any bodily violation, not sacred signatures of never-proven-to-exist viral invaders, then the entire 'immunity passport' charade collapses like the pseudoscience it’s built on.
Now, to scoff at Christine Massey’s monumental FOIA project — over 300 health agencies, including the FDA, CDC, Health Canada, Public Health England, and the TGA — all admitting they have zero evidence of a virus isolated directly from the bodily fluids of a sick human or animal and proven to cause disease — is not just logically bankrupt. It’s pathological denial dressed up as intellectual critique.
Your claim that these agencies aren’t the right ones to ask is like saying you shouldn’t question the chef about the ingredients in your food — go talk to the dishwasher. These are the very institutions colluding to mandate policy, push jabs, censor dissent, and claim to “follow the science.” If they can’t produce proof of isolation, contagion, or pathogenicity, the burden of proof doesn’t magically shift to a basement lab in Belgium.
And no, the Massey FOIAs aren’t “municipal trivia.” They include national-level regulators, scientific divisions, public health agencies, and ministries of health across multiple continents. If you think repeated admissions of “no records” from these bodies are meaningless, then your standard of evidence is so selectively high it could moonlight as a drone.
Meanwhile, you’re lamenting that high-profile skeptics aren’t asking the "right" questions — as if dismantling the official narrative in real time, under censorship, while putting careers and reputations on the line, somehow doesn’t count. Maybe you’re just upset they didn’t use your preferred font or format? The truth is, many of these challengers have exposed glaring lies, coerced consensus, and forced viral dogma into a public defense it can’t sustain.
So before mocking people risking everything to crack the illusion, ask yourself this: Are you shining light — or just critiquing from the shadows? Because from here, it sounds like you’re not fighting the scam. You’re just auditioning to be its quality control officer.
Very much of what you wrote is correct but none of these folks are risking everything they are making careers of keeping the debate stalled in one place. As for FOIA as a tool Massey's work falls flat because targeted requests to appropriate agencies will yield more than a no we have no patient isolated viral sample.
There is no audition nor any critique from the shadows unless you count two decades of censorship & Twitter ban in 2020 with over 457,000 mostly research links for Rockefeller-Gates Biotech Mafia as being in the shadows. Meanwhile narrative peddlers like Means duo shift a global movement opposing genetically engineered foods to some seed oil mantra & no virus crowd fail at basics.
I do not believe the sequences identified as contagious or viral particles transmit disease. There are sequences that are grown in E.coli aka Gain of Function in pure concentrations that are stuffed into rodents & serve as the basis for bad models purporting to capitulate disease but all that is fraudulent in my estimation. Whatever these are it is not a cause of illness it is a method to justify vaccine development. The mRNA TRANSFECTIONS were never vaccines a separate but key distinction in the discussion.
So, what I think you’re saying is that viroLIEgists have never actually isolated a virus, and the entire field is just a fraudulent front for biotech profiteering. The "sequences" (can you clarify which ones you mean?) are lab-constructed, grown in E. coli, and then injected into animals to mimic disease—creating the illusion of contagion. This staged performance is then used to justify so-called mRNA ‘vaccines,’ which aren’t vaccines at all, but a more invasive form of genetic manipulation.
"So, what I think you’re saying is that viroLIEgists have never actually isolated a virus, and the entire field is just a fraudulent front for biotech profiteering"
The virus vaccine model is a dumb idea from 1800s that predates biotech. If you looked at the GoF review it details the CRISPR clones for flu vaccines w efforts for a coronavirus vaccine. Their synthetic sequences are based on lots of sequences generated by Human Genome Project. In theory they are built of consensus sequences from the wild partial captures but who knows how much of their tools and models reflect any reality.
The mRNA TRANSFECTIONS are the CRISPR clones that are also used for producing biologics but the TRANSFECTIONS skip the purification step which is why all the DNA-SV40 etc contaminants were to be expected.
Mark Gober, "Goober" is a disinformation agent who conflates a flat-earth tier, proven false, absurd theory with several valid and important fields in order to discredit them. The false claim is that viruses do not exist. Work on bacteriophages and phage and adenovirus vectors for genetic engineering as well as endogenous retrovirus sequences in all animal DNA refute this, as well as whole libraries full of converging evidence.
The absurdity of denying the existence of viruses helps to discredit true observations that in many if not most cases the specific viruses claimed to cause specific diseases are not the actual causes or not the sole or primary factors. Denying the existence of viruses also intentionally discredits the other, potentially valid, and certainly fertile areas of thought that Goober maliciously ties to his disinformation, such as the work of most members of the Institute for Noetic Science.
Goober's background, his physiognomy and that of his former associates at Sherpa Technology Group scream "Cabal!", "demonic!", "run!". He and everybody at Sherpa have eyes more than halfway to the top of their heads, microcephalic, "pinheads". Their features are not just ugly, but nearly all deformed, asymmetrical, some with eyes glittering with malice. They are in the IP / patent racket, one of the most corrupt and intel-agency infiltrated rackets, which has not only completely suppressed inventors (including me) from making a living at inventing but suppressed the benefits of innovation for the public and entrenched control by Cabal agencies and corporations.
About 170,000 results. Restricting to marine bacteriophages, the most common organisms on the planet by orders of magnitude, still gives 333 results. Denying the existence of any viruses is absurd and beyond foolish or insane. Don't collaborate in the psy-op.
Lol, that is what one does when they cannot cite a specific study... just point to a database and claim that there are thousands of studies. Cite one that is valid and scientific, showing the existence of the claimed particle and that it does what a virus is claimed to do. Should be easy-peasy for you if there are hundreds or thousands of valid studies. What is passed off as "isolation" in virology is the opposite of what that word means in everyday life.
There are electrical pathways in body e.g., brain, heart. Thus, I can see how we are "bioelectromagnetic beings". Grounding (barefoot on the grass), is perhaps a healthy electrical discharge, just like a battery - "Discharging a battery, while often associated with usage, also offers specific benefits for maintaining and optimizing battery performance and safety".
Anybody that races RC cars can relate to the importance of discharging batteries for life and performance of the battery, lol.
If someone is sick and believes in energy healing, the act alone helps their psyche and body to heal.
No need for bio fields.
Anyway, I've yet to see any of these studies address the placebo effect. I'm not saying that energy healing doesn't work... It does, but his own section on the psychic connection to the body is the answer to why it works.
Fascinating - thank you Mark for challenging the "status quo" and the dogma that can only lead to the dark ages for all those who willingly accept it. Critical thinking.
🚨Introducing the Revolutionary “Viral Isolation™ Method” 🚨
Because Who Needs the Scientific Method When You Have Consensus™?
Are you a virologist looking to isolate a virus but don’t want to deal with pesky scientific principles? Do you long for a world where assumptions are facts, controls are optional, and results are whatever you need them to be? Well, look no further! With Viral Isolation™, you, too, can bypass every fundamental step of the scientific method and still get published!
🎉 Special Features – Now with ZERO Adherence to the Scientific Method! 🎉
🔬 Step 1: Skip Direct Observation!
Why waste time finding a virus in nature when you can just assume it exists? Don’t worry—no one in ‘virology’ has ever observed a virus as a distinct, independent entity directly from a sick person’s fluids. If they haven’t done it in over a century, why start now?
💡 Bonus: Instead of isolating a virus, just declare symptoms = virus. Got a cough? Must be a virus! Fever? Definitely a virus! Ate bad sushi? Yep - virus!!
📏 Step 2: The Hypothesis-Free Hypothesis™!
Real science requires an Independent Variable (IV) (the thing being tested), but who has time for that? Since we never actually isolate a virus, we’ll just assume it’s there. Science is hard—so let’s just skip the part where we identify our IV!
🧐 Scientific Method Violation:
✅ No purified virus? No problem! Just declare the existence of one and move on.
✅ Symptoms are vague? Who cares? A fever must mean viral infection!
✅ What about controls? HAHAHA, good one.
🧪 Step 3: Experimental Design... Or Lack Thereof!
Time to “prove” viral replication! But instead of isolating and testing a virus, let’s throw patient samples into a blender of monkey kidney cells, toxic antibiotics, fetal bovine serum, and a battery of chemicals! What could go wrong?
🧬 Pro-Tip: When the monkey kidney cells start dying from all the poison you added, just call it a Cytopathic Effect (CPE) and claim the virus did it! (Ignore the fact that control experiments show the same results without a virus—just pretend those don’t exist!)
📸 Step 4: The Electron Microscope Magic Show!
Now, let’s get some ‘proof.’ Instead of isolating and purifying a virus, just snap a picture of the cellular debris from our CPE Toxicity Soup™ and say, “See? That blob right there—totally a virus.”
🔍 Fun Fact: If someone asks why you didn’t purify and separate the virus, just roll your eyes and mutter, “You don’t understand virology.” That’ll shut them up!
📊 Step 5: Data Manipulation & Narrative Control!
Science should be about unbiased analysis... but where’s the fun in that? With Viral Isolation™, you can:
✅ Assemble ‘viral genomes’ on a computer, even if no complete ‘genome’ was found! (Computers never make mistakes.)
✅ Use PCR to ‘detect’ tiny ‘genetic fragments,’ from a ‘virus’ never proven to exist.
✅ Ignore all contradictory evidence, and call anyone who questions your methods a science denier™!
🧠 Step 6: Declare Success No Matter What!
In real science, if an experiment fails, the hypothesis should be rejected. But with Viral Isolation™, failure is never an option!
🚫 Found no actual virus? Publish anyway!
🚫 Control experiments contradict your results? Ignore them!
🚫 No reproducibility? Silence the skeptics!
🌟 SPECIAL BONUS! – Support the Digital Biosecurity State! 🌟
By believing in this groundbreaking Non-Scientific Methodology™, YOU, too, can:
💰 Enable the Biosecurity State™ – The more viruses we ‘find,’ the more lockdowns, mandates, and surveillance we can justify!
📉 Help Crush Small Businesses! – Nothing says ‘progress’ like eliminating those pesky local shops and centralizing power!
🛑 Contribute to The Great Reset™! – Because why have freedom when you can have digital IDs, carbon quotas, and endless health passports?
🚀 ORDER NOW! 🚀
For a limited time, get your Viral Isolation™ Kit for the low price of your critical thinking skills!
(Side effects include cognitive dissonance, FOIA-induced panic attacks, and an uncontrollable urge to shout, “Trust the Science!” at anyone who asks for evidence.)
💥 Viral Isolation™ – Where Assumptions Become Facts! ™ 💥
This is the first time I have heard about Mark Gober. Very interesting indeed so thank you for posting this. I have been involving myself for a while with the virus existence topic, or rather the lack of existence of any evidence from the virologists to show that particles attributed with the properties they claim for viruses do exist in nature. According to what I have recently learned, and contrary to the opinion of Mark Gober, it is indeed possible and acknowledged among logicians that you can prove a negative.
Recent Transmission Electron Micrography work done by the Controls Studies Project of Jamie Andrews (see his Substack) has identified in guaranteed virus free cell culture material particles which possess the exact same morphologies (size and shape ) of those claimed by the virologists for SARS-CoV-2, HIV and measles viruses. So I think it is pretty clear that the virologists have a huge problem with their 'science'.
But this is a rather minor point in what is a very impressive body of work on important human biology topics and a great contribution towards a better understanding of what causes disease reflecting what actually takes place in nature and what treatments might be required.
"Since 2020, there has been more widespread questioning around the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Scientists should be welcoming this because the scientific process is inherently one of challenging paradigms. But the next step for vaccine skeptics—among doctors, scientists, citizens, and politicians alike—will be to examine the underlying premise behind vaccines: that microscopic organisms are making people sick."
So much of this has Grand Canyon sized gaps in the evidence cited and questions inspired. It feels like PR for groups seriously qualified to challenge viral theories and mysteriously indifferent to maiming and killing generations of children with exploding numbers of toxic injections for an imaginary risk. Also weird to cite Christine Massey FOIA mountain to municipal offices.. repetition of meaningless replies when isolation evidence would never be part of these groups evidence collections.
No Massey FOIA efforts are directed to laboratory components or scientific divisions of FDA-NIH-NSF etc.. wrong question in wrong places is proof we can be kept on a hamster wheel while NOBODY demands evidence of biological mechanisms to usefully augment immune systems or demonstrate why antibodies are suitable correlate of immunity when any provocation of injected toxins or foreign proteins cause your body to react to violation.
Tragically the more time passes the more we see all the high profile published challengers of the Pharma cartel make bank posing useless question with no clear lies exposed. Everyone named with kudos has some truth but no progress challenging criminal insanity of injections.
Hundreds of years of principled opposition to 'vaccines' hasn’t slowed the flood of jab-induced death and disability — it’s only turned a leaky faucet into a full-blown firehose. And while documenting the carnage is necessary, it’s like trimming back diseased branches on a tree that keeps regrowing from toxic soil. You want lasting change? Start with the root system — the germ theory grift and its bastard offspring, the virus lie. Otherwise, people will go on playing amateur landscape gardeners at the cemeteries of their loved ones.
And as for antibodies — if they’re just generic repair proteins triggered by any bodily violation, not sacred signatures of never-proven-to-exist viral invaders, then the entire 'immunity passport' charade collapses like the pseudoscience it’s built on.
Now, to scoff at Christine Massey’s monumental FOIA project — over 300 health agencies, including the FDA, CDC, Health Canada, Public Health England, and the TGA — all admitting they have zero evidence of a virus isolated directly from the bodily fluids of a sick human or animal and proven to cause disease — is not just logically bankrupt. It’s pathological denial dressed up as intellectual critique.
Your claim that these agencies aren’t the right ones to ask is like saying you shouldn’t question the chef about the ingredients in your food — go talk to the dishwasher. These are the very institutions colluding to mandate policy, push jabs, censor dissent, and claim to “follow the science.” If they can’t produce proof of isolation, contagion, or pathogenicity, the burden of proof doesn’t magically shift to a basement lab in Belgium.
And no, the Massey FOIAs aren’t “municipal trivia.” They include national-level regulators, scientific divisions, public health agencies, and ministries of health across multiple continents. If you think repeated admissions of “no records” from these bodies are meaningless, then your standard of evidence is so selectively high it could moonlight as a drone.
Meanwhile, you’re lamenting that high-profile skeptics aren’t asking the "right" questions — as if dismantling the official narrative in real time, under censorship, while putting careers and reputations on the line, somehow doesn’t count. Maybe you’re just upset they didn’t use your preferred font or format? The truth is, many of these challengers have exposed glaring lies, coerced consensus, and forced viral dogma into a public defense it can’t sustain.
So before mocking people risking everything to crack the illusion, ask yourself this: Are you shining light — or just critiquing from the shadows? Because from here, it sounds like you’re not fighting the scam. You’re just auditioning to be its quality control officer.
Very much of what you wrote is correct but none of these folks are risking everything they are making careers of keeping the debate stalled in one place. As for FOIA as a tool Massey's work falls flat because targeted requests to appropriate agencies will yield more than a no we have no patient isolated viral sample.
There is no audition nor any critique from the shadows unless you count two decades of censorship & Twitter ban in 2020 with over 457,000 mostly research links for Rockefeller-Gates Biotech Mafia as being in the shadows. Meanwhile narrative peddlers like Means duo shift a global movement opposing genetically engineered foods to some seed oil mantra & no virus crowd fail at basics.
Hang on a second—before I address the rest of your claims, are you saying ’viruses’ have actually been proven to exist?
I do not believe the sequences identified as contagious or viral particles transmit disease. There are sequences that are grown in E.coli aka Gain of Function in pure concentrations that are stuffed into rodents & serve as the basis for bad models purporting to capitulate disease but all that is fraudulent in my estimation. Whatever these are it is not a cause of illness it is a method to justify vaccine development. The mRNA TRANSFECTIONS were never vaccines a separate but key distinction in the discussion.
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
So, what I think you’re saying is that viroLIEgists have never actually isolated a virus, and the entire field is just a fraudulent front for biotech profiteering. The "sequences" (can you clarify which ones you mean?) are lab-constructed, grown in E. coli, and then injected into animals to mimic disease—creating the illusion of contagion. This staged performance is then used to justify so-called mRNA ‘vaccines,’ which aren’t vaccines at all, but a more invasive form of genetic manipulation.
"So, what I think you’re saying is that viroLIEgists have never actually isolated a virus, and the entire field is just a fraudulent front for biotech profiteering"
The virus vaccine model is a dumb idea from 1800s that predates biotech. If you looked at the GoF review it details the CRISPR clones for flu vaccines w efforts for a coronavirus vaccine. Their synthetic sequences are based on lots of sequences generated by Human Genome Project. In theory they are built of consensus sequences from the wild partial captures but who knows how much of their tools and models reflect any reality.
The mRNA TRANSFECTIONS are the CRISPR clones that are also used for producing biologics but the TRANSFECTIONS skip the purification step which is why all the DNA-SV40 etc contaminants were to be expected.
Spare a thought for UK freedom of expression
R.I.P. freedom of expression:).
Mark Gober, "Goober" is a disinformation agent who conflates a flat-earth tier, proven false, absurd theory with several valid and important fields in order to discredit them. The false claim is that viruses do not exist. Work on bacteriophages and phage and adenovirus vectors for genetic engineering as well as endogenous retrovirus sequences in all animal DNA refute this, as well as whole libraries full of converging evidence.
The absurdity of denying the existence of viruses helps to discredit true observations that in many if not most cases the specific viruses claimed to cause specific diseases are not the actual causes or not the sole or primary factors. Denying the existence of viruses also intentionally discredits the other, potentially valid, and certainly fertile areas of thought that Goober maliciously ties to his disinformation, such as the work of most members of the Institute for Noetic Science.
Goober's background, his physiognomy and that of his former associates at Sherpa Technology Group scream "Cabal!", "demonic!", "run!". He and everybody at Sherpa have eyes more than halfway to the top of their heads, microcephalic, "pinheads". Their features are not just ugly, but nearly all deformed, asymmetrical, some with eyes glittering with malice. They are in the IP / patent racket, one of the most corrupt and intel-agency infiltrated rackets, which has not only completely suppressed inventors (including me) from making a living at inventing but suppressed the benefits of innovation for the public and entrenched control by Cabal agencies and corporations.
I challenge you to cite a valid study showing the existence of any alleged virus.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22Viruses%2Fisolation+and+purification%22%5BMeSH%5D&sort=date&sort_order=desc
About 170,000 results. Restricting to marine bacteriophages, the most common organisms on the planet by orders of magnitude, still gives 333 results. Denying the existence of any viruses is absurd and beyond foolish or insane. Don't collaborate in the psy-op.
Lol, that is what one does when they cannot cite a specific study... just point to a database and claim that there are thousands of studies. Cite one that is valid and scientific, showing the existence of the claimed particle and that it does what a virus is claimed to do. Should be easy-peasy for you if there are hundreds or thousands of valid studies. What is passed off as "isolation" in virology is the opposite of what that word means in everyday life.
Interesting and thanks!
There are electrical pathways in body e.g., brain, heart. Thus, I can see how we are "bioelectromagnetic beings". Grounding (barefoot on the grass), is perhaps a healthy electrical discharge, just like a battery - "Discharging a battery, while often associated with usage, also offers specific benefits for maintaining and optimizing battery performance and safety".
Anybody that races RC cars can relate to the importance of discharging batteries for life and performance of the battery, lol.
Thank you.
If someone is sick and believes in energy healing, the act alone helps their psyche and body to heal.
No need for bio fields.
Anyway, I've yet to see any of these studies address the placebo effect. I'm not saying that energy healing doesn't work... It does, but his own section on the psychic connection to the body is the answer to why it works.
Are Vaccines Big Money-Makers for Pediatricians? RFK Jr.'s Comment During an Interview With Tucker Carlson Sparks a New Debate.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccine-incentives-pediatrician-profits-rfk-jr-tucker-carlson/
..................
Are Vaccines Big Money-Makers for Pediatricians? RFK Jr.'s Comment During an Interview With Tucker Carlson Sparks a New Debate.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccine-incentives-pediatrician-profits-rfk-jr-tucker-carlson/
Fascinating - thank you Mark for challenging the "status quo" and the dogma that can only lead to the dark ages for all those who willingly accept it. Critical thinking.
Thank you for posting this interview.