Interesting. Cancer behaves, for all practical purposes, just like a parasite. Most importantly, antiparasitics like fenbendazole kill parasites and cancer cells using the same mechanisms. My new book, Cancer is a Parasite: Kill it With the Safe, Over-the-Counter Antiparasitic Fenbendazole, published by Skyhorse, explains the nature of cancer, that is, what cancer is. Cancer is a parasite, as demonstrated convincingly, as in beyond a doubt, in the book. Dr. Marik is concerned with what causes cancer, not its nature. Whereas I am concerned with the characteristics of cancer cells not their cause.
I am not convinced that the sugar part of this is completely true in all types of cancer. My husband eats quite a lot of junk food, but yet he is cancer free now just using IVM and Fenbendazole. I’m sure a sugar free diet would be better, but this was all I could get him to do. Glucose is an important energy source—preferred by the body, and maybe some metabolic damage that is not figured in should be. Just a thought. No glucose in the diet results in the liver pathways using stress hormones of cortisol, adrenaline, etc.(gluconeogenisis ) to make it. Has anyone thought of that. I was keto and low carb for too long and I experienced quite a lot of metabolic damage, including thyroid and thin bones, HBP, and a very low metabolism I’m on my third year trying to correct. I guess you have to balance that out with a cancer diagnosis.
Your book, and your interview with Robert Yoho, are fascinating. I’ve shared them often. Unfortunately, as most of us are experiencing, many friends and loved ones are getting (aggressive) cancer. Thank you for all your research.
Years ago I read a book by former Canadian doctor Guyslaine Lanctot, in which she already states that cancer is a metabolic disease. The book was called the Medical Mafia I think.
Recently a Substacker mentioned that ivermectin works probably because 6 out of ten cancer cells he examined turned out to be parasitic infections instead of cancers. I think it was David Nixon
Very interesting relationships between a variety of cancers and parasitic infections. Should always rule out a parasitic infection prior to treating for cancer with liver, lung, bile duct, colorectal, lumphomas, glioblastomas, esophageal and bladder cancers.
Reading Dr. Paul Marik’s interview felt very familiar. Almost two years ago, I was one of the first people interviewed by Unbekoming (https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/heresy), right when the great post-COVID career destroyer started swinging. Like Marik, I saw my path cut short for daring to ask the wrong questions at the wrong time. He lost his university position and his board certification. I was pushed out of my PhD at Laval University. What stands out in both our stories is the same institutional shield. Whether in academia or medicine, the system closes ranks the moment someone steps outside the official narrative. There is no real debate — just quiet censorship, biased evaluations, missing clear criteria, and bureaucratic exclusion. Everyone protects the institution first. This “lockstep” solidarity is exactly what I saw at every stage of my own case: silence, delays, empty procedures, and zero willingness to correct course. Marik experienced it in clinical medicine. I experienced it in academia. Different fields, same pattern: when institutions stop correcting themselves, they become very good at neutralizing dissenting voices without ever having to justify it openly.Thank you to Unbekoming for publishing both testimonies. They show that the problem goes far beyond one country or one discipline.
>Multiple studies show that up to 60% of families with a cancer diagnosis experience significant financial hardship as a result. This is not a marginal issue—it is a central failure of the system.
Actually, the system is working exactly as intended i.e the patient is extorted of, with as much money that he can part with.
Great interview. 4 years ago I got aggressive cancer from the vax. I did all the research myself and pieced a protocol together myself. I'm sure it wasn't ideal compared to what I could do now with guidance from doctors like Dr Marik. (Note I did have help from some naturopathic oncologists but on the whole I found them to be either uneducated or use cookie cutter approaches.)
He's probably trying not to step on toes of the establishment too much by saying this doesn't replace chemo which debulks. What he should have mentioned is how the many tumors can be removed completely and don't need debulking. The lie that they tell about chemo/radiation is that even if you get the whole tumor, the "treatments" will pick up any tiny stray cells. But in reality they don't work on cancer stem cells, and can even make them spread and grow faster. And they cause so much harm that other treatments don't work as well. The only people who should be considering chemo are people who have tumors that cannot be realistically removed. And that is very different from standard of care.
I did take most of the supplements he mentioned prior to my surgery, and from the day of surgery I have had no evidence of cancer. (I also did a lot of alternative treatments and repurposed drugs/supplements.) I get circulating tumor DNA testing every few months, and it's negative. Yet they still wanted me to do a total of 4 or 5 chemos/immunotherapies which would have been bad for me given I have an immune deficiency as it is.
I think the ideas in this article make sense but I don't have training in oncology. That said, I have read on other substacks by medically trained doctors that oncology is a scam, like dermatology. However, this article sheds some light in why people both inside and outside the medical community think this way.
While I think this protocol with or without chemo will work for most people (given what I know about cancer), the problem still exists, what about insurance coverage? This protocol is relatively inexpensive and most likely pay-as-you-go (cash, no insurance). People are already financially strapped when dealing with a cancer diagnosis and adding this on makes them more strapped. I think that until we go pay-as-you-go for ALL medical care by any willing provider, cancer will continue to be a genetic disease. People have to get over their fear of cancer, and be more willing to pay out of pocket to bypass insurance before we see any cancer cure breakthroughs. Internet scans exist because some cancers are caused by parasite eggs, but many are not. It is important that those capable of educating people about cancer do so, so the oncology-insurance cartel can be broken.
Years ago, I read somewhere that there are more people making a living LOOKING for a cure for cancer than there are dying of it. Talk about financial incentive eh.
I tremendously appreciate this, all it brings together.
I have been following alternative cancer treatments since as long as I can remember. I watched (and bought) The Truth About Cancer. I read everything I found on Ivermectin. And so on. This puts so much together. It's not a quick jiffy read. EXCELLENT. It looks at how the pieces of the puzzle fit together, and at how one needs all the pieces of the puzzle. For example, Ivermectin on its own, does a little. In combination, it's is extremely powerful in how it integrates everything.
BIGGEST TAKE-AWAYS:
The most successful patients typically end up with:
Oncologist → directs standard therapy
Second physician → supervises metabolic/repurposed approach
The most important advice to patients
Do not try to “win the argument” with your oncologist.
Instead, quietly build a team that allows you to move forward safely.
That means:
Be respectful, not adversarial
Introduce therapies incrementally
Ensure medical supervision at all times
Patients who succeed are not the ones who push hardest.
Isn't it a possibility that the re-purposed pharmaceuticals might have unintended consequences, repercussions that will need further remediating intervention?
Cancer is a fungus, as Dr Simonccini discovered decades ago, and healed 97% of cancer patients with a simple cure. In 1997, I was diagnosed with 4th stage colon cancer ... and given a 2 week death sentence, if it was not removed immediately. This all resulted from a parasite I acquired from an airline ice cube in 1981, followed by a barrage of pharma poisons over 15 years ... I prayed to God to for a remedy, while the surgeon was booking the surgery to remove it entirely immediately. The Dr returned 15 minutes later shaking his head, "The surgery room is booked solid for 3 weeks. It has never been booked more than a day in the history of the hospital." He thought I was going to die. Miracle after miracle followed. Here is my story, which I have shared with 100s who asked for it ... I learned years later that they were ALL healed.
Read, "Breaking the Vicious Cycle" by Elaine Gottschall - gastroenterologist who cured her 8 year old daughter of cancer through diet. We are what we eat and most food today, like ALL pharma is ingested and injected with poisons.
This “Warburg Effect” is an excellent example of how even those skeptical of the DNA dogma are somehow ignorant of fundamental cell biology.
Eukaryotic cells rely primarily on oxygen which is used by mitochondria to enable the “Krebs Cycle” that generates something like thirty molecules of ATP from each molecule of glucose. When eukaryotic cells are starved of oxygen, the Krebs Cycle is brought to a halt, and the cells begin to switch to a secondary “anaerobic” metabolic pathway that doesn’t require oxygen, but is far less efficient. This causes lactic acid accumulation in the hypoxic tissues, which is a by-product of anaerobic cell metabolism. It also causes other metabolic abnormalities, all of which promptly disappear when adequate oxygen is supplied to the cells.
In malignant tumor tissues, the extreme malignant metabolic hyperactivity of the energy-demanding cells undergoing rapid mitosis (eukaryotic cell division) causes the “malignant” cells to outstrip angiogenesis needed to supply oxygen and nutrients to the hyperactive cells. This readily explains the lactic acidosis and other metabolic derangements observed during malignancy. Painful “lactic acidosis” also occurs routinely during intense athletic activity in athletes with inadequate “athletic training.” Athletic training induces beneficial angiogenesis (capillary proliferation) secondary to persistent CO2 accumulation in the hyperactive, inadequately perfused muscle cells; this reduces microvascular flow resistance. This explains why trained athletes exhibit abnormally low blood pressure when they are at rest, and normal blood pressure during intense athletic activity. Essential hypertension is caused by toxic environmental stresses that accelerate capillary senescence, which is a normal part of the aging process. It explains why old people exhibit declining exercise tolerance and disease resistance.
The Warburg effect fails to explain “Trousseau’s Syndrome” (hypercoagulability of blood caused by the malignant state). Hyperactivity of the mammalian stress mechanism readily explains both effects. www.stressmechanism.com
This is a very comprehensive interview that every cancer patient should read. It clearly exposes the gaps in both conventional and integrative care—but also why strategy matters. Repurposed drugs and nutraceuticals aren’t harmless add-ons. Used without direction, they can drive the wrong kind of pressure.
What about artificial sweeteners? They are becoming more and more prevalent as folks try to avoid sugar. And then there are the differences between refined sugars, highly refined sugars and natural sweeteners.
Interesting. Cancer behaves, for all practical purposes, just like a parasite. Most importantly, antiparasitics like fenbendazole kill parasites and cancer cells using the same mechanisms. My new book, Cancer is a Parasite: Kill it With the Safe, Over-the-Counter Antiparasitic Fenbendazole, published by Skyhorse, explains the nature of cancer, that is, what cancer is. Cancer is a parasite, as demonstrated convincingly, as in beyond a doubt, in the book. Dr. Marik is concerned with what causes cancer, not its nature. Whereas I am concerned with the characteristics of cancer cells not their cause.
I am not convinced that the sugar part of this is completely true in all types of cancer. My husband eats quite a lot of junk food, but yet he is cancer free now just using IVM and Fenbendazole. I’m sure a sugar free diet would be better, but this was all I could get him to do. Glucose is an important energy source—preferred by the body, and maybe some metabolic damage that is not figured in should be. Just a thought. No glucose in the diet results in the liver pathways using stress hormones of cortisol, adrenaline, etc.(gluconeogenisis ) to make it. Has anyone thought of that. I was keto and low carb for too long and I experienced quite a lot of metabolic damage, including thyroid and thin bones, HBP, and a very low metabolism I’m on my third year trying to correct. I guess you have to balance that out with a cancer diagnosis.
And some cancers are more glucose driven than others. I had triple negative breast cancer and it uses fat and even protein if you don't give it sugar.
Yes. Not all. But I saw studies—wish I had saved them that showed the opposite in some.
Your book, and your interview with Robert Yoho, are fascinating. I’ve shared them often. Unfortunately, as most of us are experiencing, many friends and loved ones are getting (aggressive) cancer. Thank you for all your research.
Today's turbo cancer is the result of the bioweapon, as are the majority of today's diseases and deaths.
I have gifted your amazing book to several people...thank you for all you have done to educate us, Dr. Supple. I hope your book is widely read.
Nice to see you here Bill. ♥️
Years ago I read a book by former Canadian doctor Guyslaine Lanctot, in which she already states that cancer is a metabolic disease. The book was called the Medical Mafia I think.
Recently a Substacker mentioned that ivermectin works probably because 6 out of ten cancer cells he examined turned out to be parasitic infections instead of cancers. I think it was David Nixon
Very interesting relationships between a variety of cancers and parasitic infections. Should always rule out a parasitic infection prior to treating for cancer with liver, lung, bile duct, colorectal, lumphomas, glioblastomas, esophageal and bladder cancers.
Yes, it's hard to find but I too read the book just prior to getting pregnant.
Reading it saved my child from vaccines.
https://www.amazon.com/Medical-Mafia-Lanctot-Ghislaine-Staff/dp/2980746525
at the time I ordered it it was only available in French, so I worked my way through it LOL
Reading Dr. Paul Marik’s interview felt very familiar. Almost two years ago, I was one of the first people interviewed by Unbekoming (https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/heresy), right when the great post-COVID career destroyer started swinging. Like Marik, I saw my path cut short for daring to ask the wrong questions at the wrong time. He lost his university position and his board certification. I was pushed out of my PhD at Laval University. What stands out in both our stories is the same institutional shield. Whether in academia or medicine, the system closes ranks the moment someone steps outside the official narrative. There is no real debate — just quiet censorship, biased evaluations, missing clear criteria, and bureaucratic exclusion. Everyone protects the institution first. This “lockstep” solidarity is exactly what I saw at every stage of my own case: silence, delays, empty procedures, and zero willingness to correct course. Marik experienced it in clinical medicine. I experienced it in academia. Different fields, same pattern: when institutions stop correcting themselves, they become very good at neutralizing dissenting voices without ever having to justify it openly.Thank you to Unbekoming for publishing both testimonies. They show that the problem goes far beyond one country or one discipline.
Hi Luc. I heard about you early in the pandemonium. Thanks for your work and for weighing in.
>Multiple studies show that up to 60% of families with a cancer diagnosis experience significant financial hardship as a result. This is not a marginal issue—it is a central failure of the system.
Actually, the system is working exactly as intended i.e the patient is extorted of, with as much money that he can part with.
Great interview. 4 years ago I got aggressive cancer from the vax. I did all the research myself and pieced a protocol together myself. I'm sure it wasn't ideal compared to what I could do now with guidance from doctors like Dr Marik. (Note I did have help from some naturopathic oncologists but on the whole I found them to be either uneducated or use cookie cutter approaches.)
He's probably trying not to step on toes of the establishment too much by saying this doesn't replace chemo which debulks. What he should have mentioned is how the many tumors can be removed completely and don't need debulking. The lie that they tell about chemo/radiation is that even if you get the whole tumor, the "treatments" will pick up any tiny stray cells. But in reality they don't work on cancer stem cells, and can even make them spread and grow faster. And they cause so much harm that other treatments don't work as well. The only people who should be considering chemo are people who have tumors that cannot be realistically removed. And that is very different from standard of care.
I did take most of the supplements he mentioned prior to my surgery, and from the day of surgery I have had no evidence of cancer. (I also did a lot of alternative treatments and repurposed drugs/supplements.) I get circulating tumor DNA testing every few months, and it's negative. Yet they still wanted me to do a total of 4 or 5 chemos/immunotherapies which would have been bad for me given I have an immune deficiency as it is.
I think the ideas in this article make sense but I don't have training in oncology. That said, I have read on other substacks by medically trained doctors that oncology is a scam, like dermatology. However, this article sheds some light in why people both inside and outside the medical community think this way.
While I think this protocol with or without chemo will work for most people (given what I know about cancer), the problem still exists, what about insurance coverage? This protocol is relatively inexpensive and most likely pay-as-you-go (cash, no insurance). People are already financially strapped when dealing with a cancer diagnosis and adding this on makes them more strapped. I think that until we go pay-as-you-go for ALL medical care by any willing provider, cancer will continue to be a genetic disease. People have to get over their fear of cancer, and be more willing to pay out of pocket to bypass insurance before we see any cancer cure breakthroughs. Internet scans exist because some cancers are caused by parasite eggs, but many are not. It is important that those capable of educating people about cancer do so, so the oncology-insurance cartel can be broken.
Years ago, I read somewhere that there are more people making a living LOOKING for a cure for cancer than there are dying of it. Talk about financial incentive eh.
I tremendously appreciate this, all it brings together.
I have been following alternative cancer treatments since as long as I can remember. I watched (and bought) The Truth About Cancer. I read everything I found on Ivermectin. And so on. This puts so much together. It's not a quick jiffy read. EXCELLENT. It looks at how the pieces of the puzzle fit together, and at how one needs all the pieces of the puzzle. For example, Ivermectin on its own, does a little. In combination, it's is extremely powerful in how it integrates everything.
BIGGEST TAKE-AWAYS:
The most successful patients typically end up with:
Oncologist → directs standard therapy
Second physician → supervises metabolic/repurposed approach
The most important advice to patients
Do not try to “win the argument” with your oncologist.
Instead, quietly build a team that allows you to move forward safely.
That means:
Be respectful, not adversarial
Introduce therapies incrementally
Ensure medical supervision at all times
Patients who succeed are not the ones who push hardest.
They are the ones who:
Understand the system
Work around its constraints
Stay medically supervised
And move forward methodically
Wow great interview. 👌
Thank you
Cancer ~ metabolic illness which can operate on several pathways
The late, great Andy Cutler, PhD, told me, "mitochondrial disorder is mercury."
Isn't it a possibility that the re-purposed pharmaceuticals might have unintended consequences, repercussions that will need further remediating intervention?
Thank you Paul,
Cancer is a fungus, as Dr Simonccini discovered decades ago, and healed 97% of cancer patients with a simple cure. In 1997, I was diagnosed with 4th stage colon cancer ... and given a 2 week death sentence, if it was not removed immediately. This all resulted from a parasite I acquired from an airline ice cube in 1981, followed by a barrage of pharma poisons over 15 years ... I prayed to God to for a remedy, while the surgeon was booking the surgery to remove it entirely immediately. The Dr returned 15 minutes later shaking his head, "The surgery room is booked solid for 3 weeks. It has never been booked more than a day in the history of the hospital." He thought I was going to die. Miracle after miracle followed. Here is my story, which I have shared with 100s who asked for it ... I learned years later that they were ALL healed.
Here is my story - Love Heals All - https://sterry448.substack.com/p/love-heals-all?r=pvup8
Read, "Breaking the Vicious Cycle" by Elaine Gottschall - gastroenterologist who cured her 8 year old daughter of cancer through diet. We are what we eat and most food today, like ALL pharma is ingested and injected with poisons.
Where do we go in the states to find an integrative Dr that helps customize and prescribe a metabolic protocol?
Top Integrative Oncology Clinics:
https://cfnmedicine.com/conditions/cancer-prevention-treatment-irvine/ ((California)
https://riordanclinic.org/what-we-do/integrative-oncology-at-riordan-clinic/ (Kansas)
https://www.thekarlfeldtcenter.com/integrative-oncology/ (Idaho)
This “Warburg Effect” is an excellent example of how even those skeptical of the DNA dogma are somehow ignorant of fundamental cell biology.
Eukaryotic cells rely primarily on oxygen which is used by mitochondria to enable the “Krebs Cycle” that generates something like thirty molecules of ATP from each molecule of glucose. When eukaryotic cells are starved of oxygen, the Krebs Cycle is brought to a halt, and the cells begin to switch to a secondary “anaerobic” metabolic pathway that doesn’t require oxygen, but is far less efficient. This causes lactic acid accumulation in the hypoxic tissues, which is a by-product of anaerobic cell metabolism. It also causes other metabolic abnormalities, all of which promptly disappear when adequate oxygen is supplied to the cells.
In malignant tumor tissues, the extreme malignant metabolic hyperactivity of the energy-demanding cells undergoing rapid mitosis (eukaryotic cell division) causes the “malignant” cells to outstrip angiogenesis needed to supply oxygen and nutrients to the hyperactive cells. This readily explains the lactic acidosis and other metabolic derangements observed during malignancy. Painful “lactic acidosis” also occurs routinely during intense athletic activity in athletes with inadequate “athletic training.” Athletic training induces beneficial angiogenesis (capillary proliferation) secondary to persistent CO2 accumulation in the hyperactive, inadequately perfused muscle cells; this reduces microvascular flow resistance. This explains why trained athletes exhibit abnormally low blood pressure when they are at rest, and normal blood pressure during intense athletic activity. Essential hypertension is caused by toxic environmental stresses that accelerate capillary senescence, which is a normal part of the aging process. It explains why old people exhibit declining exercise tolerance and disease resistance.
The Warburg effect fails to explain “Trousseau’s Syndrome” (hypercoagulability of blood caused by the malignant state). Hyperactivity of the mammalian stress mechanism readily explains both effects. www.stressmechanism.com
This is a very comprehensive interview that every cancer patient should read. It clearly exposes the gaps in both conventional and integrative care—but also why strategy matters. Repurposed drugs and nutraceuticals aren’t harmless add-ons. Used without direction, they can drive the wrong kind of pressure.
What about artificial sweeteners? They are becoming more and more prevalent as folks try to avoid sugar. And then there are the differences between refined sugars, highly refined sugars and natural sweeteners.