IMC or GMC
Hundreds of doctors from 34 countries have declared an IMC: International Medical Crisis.
Frankly, I would have preferred they went with GMC: Global Medical Crisis. I think it has a better ring to it and is within the slipstream of our GFC verbal muscle memory.
Anyway, I’m not going to quibble with them, I’ll take IMC if it helps to spread the word that there’s in fact a “medical crisis” and it is everywhere.
Here is the short declaration in full, with my commentary:
DECLARATION OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CRISIS DUE TO THE DISEASES AND DEATHS CO-RELATED TO THE “COVID-19 VACCINES”
We, the medical doctors and scientists from all over the world, declare that there is an international medical crisis due to the diseases and deaths co-related to the administration of products known as “COVID-19 vaccines”.
As far as I am concerned, there was a GMC (yes, I’m sticking with it!) the moment a global pandemic was declared for a bug that had had an IFR of 0.23%.
For those who say that we didn’t know from the start, you need to read up on the Diamond Princess.
It is framed as a crisis now because of excess mortality and morbidity all over the world from the jabs. So “medical” is being used as a euphemism for “health”, that there is a “health crisis” because of an injection. If this kindergarten framing is what it takes to wake up a few more people, I’ll take it.
But my use of the world “medical” is in reference to the “institution”, there is a global institutional medical crisis. That institution has been wholly captured and corrupted, and in so doing it has produced, approved and pushed, under the threat of state violence, a dangerously defective cocktail that ultimately has led to death and disease. So, MY “medical” is at the source of the river, and THEIR “medical” at the bottom.
It was an “institutional” Medical Crisis when they legitimised, with The Science™:
PCR Cases as Disease
Asymptomatic spread
Masks
Social distancing
House arrest
And the small matter of Civilizational Lockdown
Whatever, I’ll take the “disease and death” approach, better than nothing for now.
We are currently witnessing an excess in mortality in those countries where the majority of the population has received the so called “COVID-19 vaccines”. To date, this excess mortality has neither been sufficiently investigated nor studied by national and international health institutions.
The large number of sudden deaths in previously healthy young people who were inoculated with these “vaccines”, is particularly worrying, as is the high incidence of miscarriages and perinatal deaths which have not been investigated.
A large number of adverse side effects, including hospitalisations, permanent disabilities and deaths related to the so-called “COVID-19 vaccines”, have been reported officially.
The registered number has no precedent in world vaccination history.
Examining the reports on CDC’s VAERS, the UK’s Yellow Card System, the Australian Adverse Event Monitoring System, Europe’s EudraVigilance System and the WHO’s VigiAccess Database, to date there have been more than 11 million reports of adverse effects and more than 70,000 deaths co-related to the inoculation of the products known as “covid vaccines”.
We know that these numbers just about represent between 1% and 10% of all real events.
Therefore, we consider that we are facing a serious international medical crisis, which must be accepted and treated as critical by all states, health institutions and medical personnel worldwide.
Therefore, the following measures must be undertaken on an urgent basis:
1. A worldwide ‘stop’ to the national inoculation campaigns with the products known as “COVID-19 vaccines”.
2. Investigation of all sudden deaths of people who were healthy previous to the inoculation.
3. Implementation of early detection programmes of cardiovascular events which could lead to sudden deaths with analysis such as D-dimer and Troponin, in all those that were inoculated with the products known as “COVID-19 vaccines”, as well as the early detection of serious tumours.
In July 2021, Dr. Charles Hoffe was the first to talk about micro-clotting and the D-dimer test. It was true then, it remains true now, and I’m glad they included this very specific point in the declaration.
Dr. Peter McCullough, more than most has talked about the nuances of myocarditis and the importance of Troponin tests. Again, well done for them to include a mention here.
4. Implementation of research and treatment programmes for victims of adverse effects after receiving the so called “COVID-19 vaccine”.
5. Undertaking analyses of the composition of vials of Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, Sinovac, Sputnik V and any other product known as “COVID-19 vaccines”,
by independent research groups with no affiliation to pharmaceutical companies, nor any conflict of interest.6. Studies to be conducted on the interactions between the different components of the so called “COVID-19 vaccines” and their molecular, cellular and biological effects.
7. Implementation of psychological help and compensation programmes for any person that has developed a disease or disability as a consequence of the so called “COVID-19 vaccines”.
8. Implementation and promotion of psychological help and compensation programmes for the family members of any person who died as a result of having been inoculated with the product known as “Covid-19 vaccines”.
Consequently we declare that we find ourselves in an unprecedented international medical crisis in the history of medicine, due to the large number of diseases and deaths associated with the “vaccines against Covid-19”. Therefore, we demand that the regulatory agencies that oversee drug safety as well as the health institutions in all countries, together with the international institutions such as the WHO, PHO, EMA, FDA, UK-MHRA and NIH respond to this declaration and act in accordance with the eight measures demanded in this manifesto.
Well done to all the doctors who put their head above the parapet and will definitely take fire because of it.
But next time, please let’s go with GMC, seeing that:
The captured and corrupt agency is the FDA rather than Standard & Poors
The rubber-stamped product is a vaccine and not a mortgage-backed security
The target destination of the defective product is our body rather than a pension fund’s portfolio
The stakes are death or disease instead of -15% on your portfolio
“International” recognizes national boundaries and autonomies. “Global” runs roughshod over them and demands for the idea/reality of overrule by one entity.
I’m all for Deglobalization.