Invisible wrigglies jumping between people to hurt them. So you get some invisible wrigglies that look like the first ones but aren't as hurty. You scratch those nicer ones into arms, then the cell thingies get used to fighting all the invisible wrigglies that look that way, the hurty and the not-so-hurty.
Has a certain naive charm, but so do puppy videos. I can see why credible types like Tronchin were attracted to the idea early on. But those adjuvants? You'd have to be a colossal wanker, an even more colossal wanker than Pasteur. Trouble is, your local family doctor is one of those colossal wankers.
Thanks Unbekoming ... lots of good information here, with the exception of the commonly invoked advice to rely on constitutional amendments as an ostensible defense against medical tyranny.
The scrapping of the perfectly fine Articles of Confederation for the "all new and improved" Constitution was an ingenious Coup d'tat, with a tacked-on "bill of rights" that was a de facto bill of goods concocted to get the populace to swallow the great centralization of power that eventually became the Leviathan monster now threatening the world ... one that cares not a whit about a piece of paper with some quaint, antique words regarding liberty ...
By now it should be obvious that medical freedom will not ever be achieved by petitioning the very system that was built precisely for the purpose of stealing that freedom, while making its subjects pay dearly for the "privilege" of using it. Think Red Riding Hood getting her best beg on, "Mr. Wolf, I respectfully request that you not devour me today."
Rather, State by State Nullification of federal dictates, with outright physical, financial and spiritual Secession from a tyrannical empire are the only options remaining. I would submit that leaving an abusive relationship is a Natural Right that can never be "settled" ... not by Dishonest Abe, not by the transparent sophistry of Texas v. White and certainly not by any other lying government (redundant).
Thanks for making such crucial points about the corrupt-to-the-core pharma-crims, whose wicked heritage is traced to the despicable Pasteur getting the ball rolling a la Indiana Jones.
Best of luck to all, especially those who recognize the sheer folly of trying to vote their way out of a despotic regime of nightmares and crimes against humanity itself.
~~ Doc
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." ~~ Upton Sinclair
Wonderful information, J. Lee. I hope that some day enough people will be informed re your statement: ". . . Articles of Confederation for the "all new and improved" Constitution was an ingenious Coup d'tat, with a tacked-on "bill of rights" that was a de facto bill of goods concocted to get the populace to swallow the great centralization of power . . ." Brilliant of you to point that out. If one has read the Articles it becomes obvious that it would be much harder for psychopaths and their corrupt ilk to infiltrate our government and get away with the corrupt activities of our feckless, bribeable congress and senators since 1776 (with very few exceptions). Is it any wonder that this information isn't taught in the public screwal system at all levels?
I just sent for the book. This is a great book joining Common Law Jurisdictions worldwide with the positive amendments to the American Constitution as defences for all to use. It fully explains the foundation of lies by Pastuer on which germ theory relies and adds in the bacteria source at the same time, produced naturally by our cells to fight off toxins and dispell them from our cells/bodies. Exosomes which were the globular shaped bacteria with tentacle suckers protruding from it were the good guys in fighting covid by swallowing it it and discharging itself out of our bodies naturally, rather than the "covid germ" as they alleged.
Didn’t Pasteur really continue the Napoleonic wars? Napoleon III funded Pasteur possibly to create a silent war whilst nobody was looking?. Makes me think of Dan Browns book inferno. Sanofi Pasteur is huge and controls the vaccine industry imho.
Right about vaccines and harms, wrong about germ theory and disease transmission. In my view this is a psyop intended to make the MAHA movement look like idiots.
If you intentionally eat food that is contaminated with botulism, you are going to get very sick and then anything you have read claiming that germ theory is bogus will no longer be important.
Certainly it has been abused and lies have been created. But because the "boy has cried wolf" doesn't mean that wolves don't exist.
If you have ever made wine or yogurt you know very well that you cannot allow any bacterial contamination.
If you have kids or grandkids you know how they pick up bugs from school - not a bad thing, just strengthens their immune systems.
Our 'good bacteria' or bioflora contain more bacterial cells than all our cells in our bodies. They literally keep us alive, without them we couldn't live.
Yes, pandemics are created to create fear and control populations through non-elected authoritative institutions as we just witnessed with DIVOC. Anything global like 'climate change' is used to globally control populations and to reinforce 'one world order'.
In my view, the whole of the vaccine paradigm is pseudoscience, dangerous and largely responsible for the explosion of autism. It is just a very bad idea to bypass first line defences and stick kids with toxins and allergens that cause general inflammation and inflammation of the brain.
But making the leap that germs such as viruses and bacteria do not exist is to create an equally misleading pseudoscience. It is similar to flat earth theory. The purpose is to make people legitimately questioning science and medical lies and paradigms appear as fools and idiots.
yes I couldn't agree more. Ten years ago my perfectly healthy x husband came home from an overseas trip and started driving his car again, which kept stalling at lights. After a few days he started to have respiratory problems and when he finally got round to taking it into the garage (in the western USA) they found a mouse nest, and called him a) to tell him about the mouse nest and b) to ask if he was sick, which he still was, and it was getting worse. They said that he'd better get to a doctor fast as he could have Hantavirus. Unfortunately that turned out to be the case, and he died. So I just tell this story every time someone tries to tell me that viruses don't exist, because if you think for even a minute that it 'was just his body detoxing' and his death had nothing to do with the infected mice in the car, you're delusional in my opinion.
1918–1919 influenza contagion experiments conducted by the U.S. Navy and the Public Health Service💥 some of the most compelling historical evidence against the germ theory of disease transmission. These experiments were part of attempts to understand the so-called "Spanish Flu" pandemic.👇
During the 1918 flu pandemic, scientists believed a virus or bacteria was responsible and set out to prove how the disease spread. Over 100 volunteers, healthy Navy sailors, were used in deliberate exposure experiments.
Key Experiments
(Source: Public Health Reports, Vol. 34, No. 33, Aug. 1919, Dr. Milton J. Rosenau, et al.)
1. Droplet Spray Experiment
Setup: Sick flu patients had their mouths and noses swabbed.
The collected mucus was sprayed directly into the noses, mouths, and eyes of the healthy volunteers.
Result: None of the volunteers got sick.
2. Coughing/Breathing Experiment
Setup: Sick patients were instructed to cough, breathe, and speak directly into the faces of the healthy volunteers at close range for several minutes.
Result: Again, no sickness resulted.
3. Mucus Swapping Experiment
Setup: Mucus from sick patients’ noses, throats, and lungs was collected and transferred into the noses and throats of healthy men.
Result: Zero infections.
4. Blood and Sputum Transfer
Injected blood or mixed secretions from flu victims into healthy men.
Result: No illness.
5. Environment Transfer
Volunteers were placed in sick wards and exposed for hours to infected individuals.
Result: Still, no disease transmission occurred.
Rosenau’s Conclusion:
“We entered the outbreak with the notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”
These experiments have been largely ignored by mainstream medicine because they challenge the basic assumptions of germ theory, especially regarding viral contagion.
❓️Key Questions to Uproot the Contagion Myth❓️
❓️If "contagious viruses" cause disease, why couldn’t scientists in 1918 infect healthy volunteers, even with direct exposure to fluids from sick patients?
❓️Why has no study ever isolated a virus directly from a sick person, shown it causes disease in a healthy person, and fulfilled Koch’s Postulates—without cell cultures or additives?
❓️Why do "infectious" diseases often appear seasonally, geographically, or in clusters—without clear contact between people?
❓️Why were most historical "outbreaks" tied to environmental toxins, poor sanitation, or nutritional deficiency—not invisible microbes?
❓️Why is virology based on growing “viruses” in toxic cell cultures that themselves cause cell death—then blaming the virus?
❓️Why has no controlled study ever shown people getting sick just from being around sick people, without other stressors involved (toxins, fear, environment, etc.)?
❓️Why are we told asymptomatic people can spread illness—when real-world experiments like those in 1918 showed the exact opposite?
❓️Why is the terrain theory—focused on internal health, environment, and detoxification—ignored, even when it explains symptoms without relying on invisible particles?
❓️Why did disease rates plummet long before vaccines or antibiotics, following better sanitation, clean water, and nutrition?
❓️Why is asking these questions treated as dangerous or "misinformation"—instead of being welcomed in true scientific discussion?
What we’re dealing with isn’t science, it’s an unproven hypothesis dressed up in lab coats and Latin. The entire contagion model hinges on invisible, unisolated particles called “viruses” that have never been directly shown to cause the diseases they're blamed for. Despite over a century of trying, no experiment has ever demonstrated that these particles behave the way virologists claim...not in transmission, not in infection, and certainly not in isolation. Instead, the theory relies on indirect evidence, toxic cell cultures, computer models, and circular logic. It’s not observable, not repeatable, and not grounded in real-world results...meaning it's not science, but belief masquerading as fact.
The 1918–1919 influenza experiments, notably those conducted by Dr. Milton Rosenau, aimed to demonstrate the contagious nature of the flu. Despite various methods—such as exposing healthy volunteers to infected individuals' breath, mucus, and even direct injections of bodily fluids—none of the healthy participants contracted the illness. These outcomes challenged the prevailing assumptions about disease transmission.
Such findings suggest that the concept of contagion, particularly as it pertains to viruses, may not be as straightforward as traditionally believed. The inability to induce illness under controlled conditions raises questions about the mechanisms of disease spread and the foundational principles of virology.
If you intentionally eat food that is contaminated with botulism, you are going to get very sick and then anything you have read claiming that germ theory is bogus will no longer be important.
Certainly it has been abused and lies have been created. But because the "boy has cried wolf" doesn't mean that wolves don't exist.
If you have ever made wine or yogurt you know very well that you cannot allow any bacterial contamination.
If you have kids or grandkids you know how they pick up bugs from school - not a bad thing, just strengthens their immune systems.
Our 'good bacteria' or bioflora contain more bacterial cells than all our cells in our bodies. They literally keep us alive, without them we couldn't live.
Yes, pandemics are created to create fear and control populations through non-elected authoritative institutions as we just witnessed with DIVOC. Anything global like 'climate change' is used to globally control populations and to reinforce 'one world order'.
In my view, the whole of the vaccine paradigm is pseudoscience, dangerous and largely responsible for the explosion of autism. It is just a very bad idea to bypass first line defences and stick kids with toxins and allergens that cause general inflammation and inflammation of the brain.
But making the leap that germs such as viruses and bacteria do not exist is to create an equally misleading pseudoscience. It is similar to flat earth theory. The purpose is to make people legitimately questioning science and medical lies and paradigms appear as fools and idiots.
Lynn - I am very sorry about your husband. I think you are 100% correct. I also think that what doctors do not understand and therefore can't practice is the bioflora body within our bodies and how crucial it is for health and disease prevention and as well healing from disease! It is no other than medical arrogance - they don't understand the powers that created their monopoly, attempted to destroy an vilify all other much older practises of medicine and certainly don't understand the wickedness of pharmacy that dared use the word Pharmakon (sorcery) as their name - right in our faces and we can't see it!
June 18th 2024 Rachel Maddow on Fauci. The segment on Fauci starts with Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene telling him in a congressional hearing that he is guilty of crimes against humanity and that he belongs in prison. https://rebeccaculshawsmith.substack.com/p/rachel-maddow-on-fauci -- December 1st 2023 A Crime Against Humanity... “This is in my opinion, the worst thing that’s ever happened to our country in my lifetime in the world, and the government’s role cannot be denied,” — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on C-19-Vaxx https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/the-magic-moment/ -- Nuremberg 2.0 International Public Grand Jury vs Covid Measures & Crimes Against Humanity https://nurembergtrials.net
Forgive my lack of understanding, but I have one question: Notwithstanding the toxicity and the various serious adverse consequences of vaccination, I am somewhat puzzled by your comment “The suppression of beneficial childhood diseases through vaccination eliminates natural cancer protection”. Is there some disease suppression by certain vaccinations? If so, which ones? Perhaps not offsetting the harm caused, but if disease is not caused by outside bacteria or viruses and vaccines are toxins creating disease directly or indirectly rather than offering protection against such disease, how is it that vaccines exhibit any suppression of childhood diseases? Is that not inconsistent with your theory, or are some vaccines effective to some degree in suppressing or preventing certain disease?
Thanks everyone! By spreading my book around you may just save a child from autism or death this week. A worthy cause ! Appreciate this synopsis of my now 26 year old thesis !
What does the author Trebig think about the idea that viruses are a more specialised form of tool for cleansing cellular debris than bacteria?
That is that bacteria and viruses both contribute but that viruses being more selective about what they do particularly well and faster than the bacteria.
In that way of thinking it makes sense that some viruses would be part of the DNA for convenient reference for the organism when commonly occuring forms of debris turn up. That would speed up the cloning and massproduction of such tools when needed.
The official narrative is that such viruses hijacked the organism way back during evolution. But I think the constructive explanation has more appeal.
I suspect both are true: germ theory and terrain theory. The reason I say this is because if you get amoebas far up into your sinuses, they can eat into your body, your brain, and you die. This happened to the brother of a friend of mine. There are also parasites, like the ones that cause Chagas Disease. They infect the cells of the heart and 10, 20, 30 years later, your heart gives out.
But smaller critters like bacteria and viruses, I would agree that it's the terrain that causes the disease. Expose 20 people to the same virus or bacteria and they don't all get sick! In fact, none of them may get sick.
Invisible wrigglies jumping between people to hurt them. So you get some invisible wrigglies that look like the first ones but aren't as hurty. You scratch those nicer ones into arms, then the cell thingies get used to fighting all the invisible wrigglies that look that way, the hurty and the not-so-hurty.
Has a certain naive charm, but so do puppy videos. I can see why credible types like Tronchin were attracted to the idea early on. But those adjuvants? You'd have to be a colossal wanker, an even more colossal wanker than Pasteur. Trouble is, your local family doctor is one of those colossal wankers.
Thanks Unbekoming ... lots of good information here, with the exception of the commonly invoked advice to rely on constitutional amendments as an ostensible defense against medical tyranny.
The scrapping of the perfectly fine Articles of Confederation for the "all new and improved" Constitution was an ingenious Coup d'tat, with a tacked-on "bill of rights" that was a de facto bill of goods concocted to get the populace to swallow the great centralization of power that eventually became the Leviathan monster now threatening the world ... one that cares not a whit about a piece of paper with some quaint, antique words regarding liberty ...
https://open.substack.com/pub/doc115/p/not-your-average-everyday-coup-d?r=18tk5o&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
By now it should be obvious that medical freedom will not ever be achieved by petitioning the very system that was built precisely for the purpose of stealing that freedom, while making its subjects pay dearly for the "privilege" of using it. Think Red Riding Hood getting her best beg on, "Mr. Wolf, I respectfully request that you not devour me today."
Rather, State by State Nullification of federal dictates, with outright physical, financial and spiritual Secession from a tyrannical empire are the only options remaining. I would submit that leaving an abusive relationship is a Natural Right that can never be "settled" ... not by Dishonest Abe, not by the transparent sophistry of Texas v. White and certainly not by any other lying government (redundant).
Thanks for making such crucial points about the corrupt-to-the-core pharma-crims, whose wicked heritage is traced to the despicable Pasteur getting the ball rolling a la Indiana Jones.
Best of luck to all, especially those who recognize the sheer folly of trying to vote their way out of a despotic regime of nightmares and crimes against humanity itself.
~~ Doc
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." ~~ Upton Sinclair
Wonderful information, J. Lee. I hope that some day enough people will be informed re your statement: ". . . Articles of Confederation for the "all new and improved" Constitution was an ingenious Coup d'tat, with a tacked-on "bill of rights" that was a de facto bill of goods concocted to get the populace to swallow the great centralization of power . . ." Brilliant of you to point that out. If one has read the Articles it becomes obvious that it would be much harder for psychopaths and their corrupt ilk to infiltrate our government and get away with the corrupt activities of our feckless, bribeable congress and senators since 1776 (with very few exceptions). Is it any wonder that this information isn't taught in the public screwal system at all levels?
Thanks friend, you're too kind ... it was Albert Jay Nock who said it best ...
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/08/albert-jay-nock/the-founding-fathers-coup-detat/
~~ j ~~
I just sent for the book. This is a great book joining Common Law Jurisdictions worldwide with the positive amendments to the American Constitution as defences for all to use. It fully explains the foundation of lies by Pastuer on which germ theory relies and adds in the bacteria source at the same time, produced naturally by our cells to fight off toxins and dispell them from our cells/bodies. Exosomes which were the globular shaped bacteria with tentacle suckers protruding from it were the good guys in fighting covid by swallowing it it and discharging itself out of our bodies naturally, rather than the "covid germ" as they alleged.
Didn’t Pasteur really continue the Napoleonic wars? Napoleon III funded Pasteur possibly to create a silent war whilst nobody was looking?. Makes me think of Dan Browns book inferno. Sanofi Pasteur is huge and controls the vaccine industry imho.
The Napoleonic Wars ended in 1815 and Pasteur was born in 1822.
Meant continued hence edit it napoleons nephew who funded Pasteur
Absolutely facilitated and bangs the Big pharma to face a truth that they do not like to face !this article is priceles
Right about vaccines and harms, wrong about germ theory and disease transmission. In my view this is a psyop intended to make the MAHA movement look like idiots.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=debunking+germ+theroy have a look at some of these videos you just may change your mind
If you intentionally eat food that is contaminated with botulism, you are going to get very sick and then anything you have read claiming that germ theory is bogus will no longer be important.
Certainly it has been abused and lies have been created. But because the "boy has cried wolf" doesn't mean that wolves don't exist.
If you have ever made wine or yogurt you know very well that you cannot allow any bacterial contamination.
If you have kids or grandkids you know how they pick up bugs from school - not a bad thing, just strengthens their immune systems.
Our 'good bacteria' or bioflora contain more bacterial cells than all our cells in our bodies. They literally keep us alive, without them we couldn't live.
Yes, pandemics are created to create fear and control populations through non-elected authoritative institutions as we just witnessed with DIVOC. Anything global like 'climate change' is used to globally control populations and to reinforce 'one world order'.
In my view, the whole of the vaccine paradigm is pseudoscience, dangerous and largely responsible for the explosion of autism. It is just a very bad idea to bypass first line defences and stick kids with toxins and allergens that cause general inflammation and inflammation of the brain.
But making the leap that germs such as viruses and bacteria do not exist is to create an equally misleading pseudoscience. It is similar to flat earth theory. The purpose is to make people legitimately questioning science and medical lies and paradigms appear as fools and idiots.
yes I couldn't agree more. Ten years ago my perfectly healthy x husband came home from an overseas trip and started driving his car again, which kept stalling at lights. After a few days he started to have respiratory problems and when he finally got round to taking it into the garage (in the western USA) they found a mouse nest, and called him a) to tell him about the mouse nest and b) to ask if he was sick, which he still was, and it was getting worse. They said that he'd better get to a doctor fast as he could have Hantavirus. Unfortunately that turned out to be the case, and he died. So I just tell this story every time someone tries to tell me that viruses don't exist, because if you think for even a minute that it 'was just his body detoxing' and his death had nothing to do with the infected mice in the car, you're delusional in my opinion.
Great videos, Susan. Thanks.
Thanks Susan I will take a look at this.
A T, suggest you read/watch the following. I hope it helps in broadening your understanding:
https://viroliegy.com/2024/01/19/the-infectious-myth-busted-part-6-the-germ-duel?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3077333165906959&ref=sharing
1918–1919 influenza contagion experiments conducted by the U.S. Navy and the Public Health Service💥 some of the most compelling historical evidence against the germ theory of disease transmission. These experiments were part of attempts to understand the so-called "Spanish Flu" pandemic.👇
During the 1918 flu pandemic, scientists believed a virus or bacteria was responsible and set out to prove how the disease spread. Over 100 volunteers, healthy Navy sailors, were used in deliberate exposure experiments.
Key Experiments
(Source: Public Health Reports, Vol. 34, No. 33, Aug. 1919, Dr. Milton J. Rosenau, et al.)
1. Droplet Spray Experiment
Setup: Sick flu patients had their mouths and noses swabbed.
The collected mucus was sprayed directly into the noses, mouths, and eyes of the healthy volunteers.
Result: None of the volunteers got sick.
2. Coughing/Breathing Experiment
Setup: Sick patients were instructed to cough, breathe, and speak directly into the faces of the healthy volunteers at close range for several minutes.
Result: Again, no sickness resulted.
3. Mucus Swapping Experiment
Setup: Mucus from sick patients’ noses, throats, and lungs was collected and transferred into the noses and throats of healthy men.
Result: Zero infections.
4. Blood and Sputum Transfer
Injected blood or mixed secretions from flu victims into healthy men.
Result: No illness.
5. Environment Transfer
Volunteers were placed in sick wards and exposed for hours to infected individuals.
Result: Still, no disease transmission occurred.
Rosenau’s Conclusion:
“We entered the outbreak with the notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”
These experiments have been largely ignored by mainstream medicine because they challenge the basic assumptions of germ theory, especially regarding viral contagion.
❓️Key Questions to Uproot the Contagion Myth❓️
❓️If "contagious viruses" cause disease, why couldn’t scientists in 1918 infect healthy volunteers, even with direct exposure to fluids from sick patients?
❓️Why has no study ever isolated a virus directly from a sick person, shown it causes disease in a healthy person, and fulfilled Koch’s Postulates—without cell cultures or additives?
❓️Why do "infectious" diseases often appear seasonally, geographically, or in clusters—without clear contact between people?
❓️Why were most historical "outbreaks" tied to environmental toxins, poor sanitation, or nutritional deficiency—not invisible microbes?
❓️Why is virology based on growing “viruses” in toxic cell cultures that themselves cause cell death—then blaming the virus?
❓️Why has no controlled study ever shown people getting sick just from being around sick people, without other stressors involved (toxins, fear, environment, etc.)?
❓️Why are we told asymptomatic people can spread illness—when real-world experiments like those in 1918 showed the exact opposite?
❓️Why is the terrain theory—focused on internal health, environment, and detoxification—ignored, even when it explains symptoms without relying on invisible particles?
❓️Why did disease rates plummet long before vaccines or antibiotics, following better sanitation, clean water, and nutrition?
❓️Why is asking these questions treated as dangerous or "misinformation"—instead of being welcomed in true scientific discussion?
What we’re dealing with isn’t science, it’s an unproven hypothesis dressed up in lab coats and Latin. The entire contagion model hinges on invisible, unisolated particles called “viruses” that have never been directly shown to cause the diseases they're blamed for. Despite over a century of trying, no experiment has ever demonstrated that these particles behave the way virologists claim...not in transmission, not in infection, and certainly not in isolation. Instead, the theory relies on indirect evidence, toxic cell cultures, computer models, and circular logic. It’s not observable, not repeatable, and not grounded in real-world results...meaning it's not science, but belief masquerading as fact.
The 1918–1919 influenza experiments, notably those conducted by Dr. Milton Rosenau, aimed to demonstrate the contagious nature of the flu. Despite various methods—such as exposing healthy volunteers to infected individuals' breath, mucus, and even direct injections of bodily fluids—none of the healthy participants contracted the illness. These outcomes challenged the prevailing assumptions about disease transmission.
Such findings suggest that the concept of contagion, particularly as it pertains to viruses, may not be as straightforward as traditionally believed. The inability to induce illness under controlled conditions raises questions about the mechanisms of disease spread and the foundational principles of virology.
I thank you for all of this and I will study it.
If you intentionally eat food that is contaminated with botulism, you are going to get very sick and then anything you have read claiming that germ theory is bogus will no longer be important.
Certainly it has been abused and lies have been created. But because the "boy has cried wolf" doesn't mean that wolves don't exist.
If you have ever made wine or yogurt you know very well that you cannot allow any bacterial contamination.
If you have kids or grandkids you know how they pick up bugs from school - not a bad thing, just strengthens their immune systems.
Our 'good bacteria' or bioflora contain more bacterial cells than all our cells in our bodies. They literally keep us alive, without them we couldn't live.
Yes, pandemics are created to create fear and control populations through non-elected authoritative institutions as we just witnessed with DIVOC. Anything global like 'climate change' is used to globally control populations and to reinforce 'one world order'.
In my view, the whole of the vaccine paradigm is pseudoscience, dangerous and largely responsible for the explosion of autism. It is just a very bad idea to bypass first line defences and stick kids with toxins and allergens that cause general inflammation and inflammation of the brain.
But making the leap that germs such as viruses and bacteria do not exist is to create an equally misleading pseudoscience. It is similar to flat earth theory. The purpose is to make people legitimately questioning science and medical lies and paradigms appear as fools and idiots.
Lynn - I am very sorry about your husband. I think you are 100% correct. I also think that what doctors do not understand and therefore can't practice is the bioflora body within our bodies and how crucial it is for health and disease prevention and as well healing from disease! It is no other than medical arrogance - they don't understand the powers that created their monopoly, attempted to destroy an vilify all other much older practises of medicine and certainly don't understand the wickedness of pharmacy that dared use the word Pharmakon (sorcery) as their name - right in our faces and we can't see it!
June 18th 2024 Rachel Maddow on Fauci. The segment on Fauci starts with Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene telling him in a congressional hearing that he is guilty of crimes against humanity and that he belongs in prison. https://rebeccaculshawsmith.substack.com/p/rachel-maddow-on-fauci -- December 1st 2023 A Crime Against Humanity... “This is in my opinion, the worst thing that’s ever happened to our country in my lifetime in the world, and the government’s role cannot be denied,” — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on C-19-Vaxx https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/the-magic-moment/ -- Nuremberg 2.0 International Public Grand Jury vs Covid Measures & Crimes Against Humanity https://nurembergtrials.net
Fake food is coming your way… get ready and resist:
https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/3d-printed-fake-food
Forgive my lack of understanding, but I have one question: Notwithstanding the toxicity and the various serious adverse consequences of vaccination, I am somewhat puzzled by your comment “The suppression of beneficial childhood diseases through vaccination eliminates natural cancer protection”. Is there some disease suppression by certain vaccinations? If so, which ones? Perhaps not offsetting the harm caused, but if disease is not caused by outside bacteria or viruses and vaccines are toxins creating disease directly or indirectly rather than offering protection against such disease, how is it that vaccines exhibit any suppression of childhood diseases? Is that not inconsistent with your theory, or are some vaccines effective to some degree in suppressing or preventing certain disease?
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Aus.
Thanks everyone! By spreading my book around you may just save a child from autism or death this week. A worthy cause ! Appreciate this synopsis of my now 26 year old thesis !
Dr. William Trebing
What does the author Trebig think about the idea that viruses are a more specialised form of tool for cleansing cellular debris than bacteria?
That is that bacteria and viruses both contribute but that viruses being more selective about what they do particularly well and faster than the bacteria.
In that way of thinking it makes sense that some viruses would be part of the DNA for convenient reference for the organism when commonly occuring forms of debris turn up. That would speed up the cloning and massproduction of such tools when needed.
The official narrative is that such viruses hijacked the organism way back during evolution. But I think the constructive explanation has more appeal.
Excellent article. I have been looking for more information on this topic. Thank you
good buy GAVI
I suspect both are true: germ theory and terrain theory. The reason I say this is because if you get amoebas far up into your sinuses, they can eat into your body, your brain, and you die. This happened to the brother of a friend of mine. There are also parasites, like the ones that cause Chagas Disease. They infect the cells of the heart and 10, 20, 30 years later, your heart gives out.
But smaller critters like bacteria and viruses, I would agree that it's the terrain that causes the disease. Expose 20 people to the same virus or bacteria and they don't all get sick! In fact, none of them may get sick.
SV40 VIRUS? I urge you to check out all 3 parts https://www.bitchute.com/video/5EAWnkwUuJWJ