Dr. Ross Walker is “doing a Kulldorff”
Plus, a note about Prof. Peter Doherty.
We went to see Ross many years ago. He’s a good man.
My wife was “auto recommended” Lipitor (a statin) by a pill pushing GP, for slightly elevated cholesterol and Ross, rightly, told her that was nonsense. He’d long taken a heterodox position against the pharma rigged cholesterol narrative in medicine.
So, he understands pharma corruption.
I’m glad to see that he has stuck his neck out to say something negative about the mRNA jabs, so for that I commend him.
Better late than never and better something than nothing…I guess.
But I’m not going to let him off the hook.
Ross, what took you so long…it’s April 2022 for God’s sake.
Unfortunately, Ross is “doing a Kulldorff”.
I think that Martin wants to keep his place within civil society, he doesn’t want to be relegated to the purgatory of Rumble, Bitchute and god forbid Telegram. He does not want his fate to be that of Yeadon and now Malone.
Ross is also trying to thread the needle between his conscience and remaining in civil society. He is hell bent on not being viewed as an anti-vaxxer, but obviously saying nothing is preventing him from sleeping at night.
“We have better alternatives (than mRNA vaccines) ... Have AstraZeneca. Have Novavax. I think it's been the wrong decision to push the RNA vaccines. It was the wrong decision, I believe, by the Government to stop producing AstraZeneca in Australia. But now we have AstraZeneca and Novavax -- they're the ones I'd be going for, for the fourth shot if people need them,” he said.
What does “better” mean Ross? Do you mean that AZ is less poisonous that Pfizer, based on what?
Both produce trillions of spike protein that cause carnage in the body. What does “better” when viewed and understood that way?
Yes, I will grant you that Novavax is less toxic than the others, but that’s not saying much. It has proven itself to be very dangerous never the less.
Why are you promoting the idea of “the fourth shot if people need them”. Who in the world needs a fourth shot for something that didn’t work the first three times? Just say it Ross, like McCullough has just said it, the jabs are all dangerous, the technology is too dangerous, the technology has failed. Just say it for God’s sake.
In reference to Ollie Wines, and Australian AFL player injured by the jab:
"What they're doing (club doctors) is they're doing ECHOs on people and seeing that the heart is still pumping fine ... I'm not saying that's the case, I'm saying people will get sub-acute Myocarditis where the heart is still pumping well, but when you look for it there is indication of underlying heart damage, but just not bad enough to show the heart pumping poorly," he said.
"I'm sure what happened to Ollie is, they probably did an ultrasound on his heart and it was completely normal, so they then ruled it out and said there's nothing wrong with your heart, but it doesn't have to be to that level, that's very rare, that's four per million to get the full-blown Myocarditis.
"But I'm saying I see a lot of people with cardiac symptoms, chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, dizziness but when you look at their heart there's not much to find, and so I'm just saying this is a presumed diagnosis without having good clinical evidence that it is full-blown Myocarditis, because it isn't."
Fair enough, the point he is making is right.
There is myocarditis as we used to understand it and then there is sub-acute myocarditis as we are witnessing on scale now. What he doesn’t say that I wish he would, is that you can spot “mild” myocarditis and sub-acute hart muscle damage with a Troponin test. Dr. Charles Hoffe made the D-Dimer Test, that spotted micro-clotting, famous. I wish Ross would have talked about the Troponin Test so that more people simply start pushing their doctors into running them.
"I am still seeing them (side effects) in a greater rate in people who have been vaccinated, whether it be Tinnitus or Bells Palsy or just really weird syndromes people are getting, so I think we've got to look at it ... When AstraZenica and Novavax are old technologies that have been repurposed for the Coronavirus, whereas the RNA vaccines are experimental and new technologies that we don't have any good long-term view with this," Dr Walker said.
"All I'm saying is, we've done this, most people have gotten away with it and have had a very good coverage of Pfizer and Moderna but now we have Novavax and we still have AstraZenica, why not go for the more long term ... tried and trusted vaccine?"
False. AZ and Nova are NOT old technologies.
There is nothing old about putting DNA into a chimpanzee virus (acting as delivery parcel) that spreads around your body generating spike protein in cells that will then be attacked by your immune system.
There is nothing old about manufacturing a cytotoxic spike protein in moths, for harvesting, and then injecting that into your body.
Come on Ross, you should know better…much better. You are lulling people into a false sense of security about interventions that have been proven to be dangerous and deadly.
"I think it's a conversation that we need to have, because we're hearing far too many stories about people who are suffering ailments of some sort ... It's almost like you're too scared to raise it for fear of being an anti-vaxxer and just because you want to query something it doesn't mean you're an anti-vaxxer does it?," he said.
Ross, don’t worry about being tarred with that smear.
You are most likely independently wealthy by now. You might even have “fuck you money”. Just tell the truth, the whole truth and let the chips fall where they fall. I assume you know the whole truth, don’t you?
None of your other cardiologist mates are saying a word so if not you, then who?
Before we move on from the subject of mRNA, here is a recent story right up your alley.
Lead researcher Professor Mauro Giacca said: 'We are all born with a set number of muscle cells in our heart and they are exactly the same ones we will die with. The heart has no capacity to repair itself after a heart attack. Our goal has been to find a treatment that can convince surviving cells to proliferate.
'Regenerating a damaged human heart has been a dream until a few years ago, but can now become a reality.
I’d love to hear your thoughts on this Ross. As you know, mother nature had good reason for making sure that heart muscles DO NOT regenerate.
What do you think the odds are Ross of “heart cancer” emerging from this new tech?
As you can see, I’m very frustrated with Australian doctors. They have failed this country and as a group, as an establishment, are a total and utter disgrace.
Chief among them is the disgrace that is Prof. Peter Doherty.
When I first heard of him in 2020, the old, naïve version of me felt optimistic that one of our own, a Nobel Prize winner no less, would be a source of calm and common sense that would make it hard for politicians to ignore.
Doherty's research focuses on the immune system and his Nobel work described how the body's immune cells protect against viruses. He and Rolf Zinkernagel, the co-recipient of the 1996 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, discovered how T cells recognise their target antigens in combination with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins.
And so, I wrote to him in July 2020, hoping he might help me make sense of a few things:
Dear Peter
In trying to make sense of the recent Covid related policy responses, I became aware of you and your work. I would really appreciate to hear your thoughts on a few Covid related questions.
It's arguably the most significant event of our lifetimes, and will impact the lives of our children and grandchildren. I don't think that's an exaggeration.
The questions that I would love to hear your views on are:
Are lock-downs a proportional response to covid?
Why has a death from covid been valued above all other deaths?
Is it strategically right to aim for virus elimination?
What level of death from a new virus is acceptable?
Is not knowing the long term consequences of covid, an adequate foundational principle for lockdowns?
It seems like we are behaving within an "infinite resource" paradigm. But public health policy is always constrained by finite resources. What has changed?
Brendan Murphy testified that he thought 14,000 lives had been saved by the governments response. Taking into account $260b of new printed money so far, that equates to $18.5m per life saved (average age 80). The Northern Beaches hospital in Sydney (488 beds) was built for $840m. In other words the resource used to save 45 covid lives could have been used to build a new hospital, that would save countless more lives. What am I missing?
There are many (most) that are on the "this is the right thing to do to get rid of the virus" side of the argument. But I would love to know if that is your position too, and if so why.
Whatever your position, I know you will have good reasons for it.
I am not a journalist, I have no agenda besides trying to think clearly about what is going on.
Regards
F
He didn’t reply.
I discovered him on Twitter shortly after that and realised that he was either a sell-out or crazy or both. A fear monger he most certainly was and is.
And then 3 weeks later 40,000 deaths became 14,000.
Peter Doherty, and his Doherty Institute, are and continue to be, two of the most destructive forces in Australian political, social and medical history.
Re Dr Walker
Not exactly. He is merely against the mRNA, not the covid faccination per se.
Re Prof D0herty
I remember in late 2020 he was not up to an unexpected debate with Prof Michael Levitt of Stanford during an interview. Worse, he was not game to upload that clip onto this twitter account.
Apparently natural immunity was news to him... Enough said about him!
My intense disappointment, disgust, rage and utter sorrow at the Australian Medical practitioners, governing bodies and academia, since May 2020 until now 2022, knows no bounds. Ever.
They have actively and cowardly, whether through horrific incompetence/ignorance/cowardice or outright willful negligence, personally killed or allowed governmental policy through their silence, to kill, maim and destroy Australian lives, before their time.
And worse, not just one generation but multiple.
FIRST DO NO HARM.
Silence when you should speak for your patient-is harm.
Silence when your governing bodies provide inaccurate or incomplete information- is harm.
LYING BY OMISSION (or Incompetence) IS STILL LYING!
I am ashamed of you [Australian medical professionals] and worse, I'm ashamed FOR you.
Your legacy of failure is momentous and will never be forgotten. Especially by those you failed families.