Yes, we the people reading this here today are not the cause of changing the climate ,but I assure you with ZERO doubt that the military arms of the major countries around the globe are. There has been no natural weather /climate cycles for many decades now and all one has to do is look the F*ck up in the sky on any day and observe with there own eyes how it is being done. Not to take anything away from this presentation but Mother Nature is in total collapse mode and it is observable from the astonishing rate of trees dying here in New England to the noticeable lack of insects in the spring and rare blue skies above. Here is an attempt to wake up pathetic "lawmakers " by Dane Wigington of Geoengineering .org on this crucial matter.
I get so frustrated about how folks do no seem to look up....the jizz is daily here in northern NY...how can they not see it? A few folks , though, do....the skies here are effing sprayed up like crazy. I do have to say, a friend did point it out to me waaaaay back in 1994 or so, and I did not believe it then. It was 2019 before I really started seeing it, back in Portland, OR. Lots of firs dying here as well (ny). I have read it's the National Guards that are doing some of the spraying, which means those local guys are willing to drop poison on their own kids.....sick. I hope we can stop this, but damn...how....
Good for you for trusting your eyes. The schmucks doing this are the same ones playing god with the human genome trying hard to hook us all up to the cloud so we can all be obedient slaves. They hate this world and want to, and are, making it antithetic to what God/Mother Nature created. They are the same Psychopaths involved with Epstein who was working on cloning humans under his Zorro ranch facility. Nothing now is normal or real. I have very little faith anything will get resolved even though my wife and I are part of a Bioethics group here in R.I trying to get legislation passed by numbskull grifting idiots . The fact that Hillary Clinton is able to, to this day along with her P.O.S husband The Bonnie and Clyde of American politics , walk as free people knowing what heinous crimes they have committed and then lie laughingly in front of a feckless bunch of CON gresssmen tells me it is all business as usual. Sad to say.
Yes. Dane Wigington has been pointing out the obvious for over 15 years. This latest video (thank you) condenses the issue to *known* contaminates. The "legislators" depicted in the video have repeatedly signed Department of Defense funding for geoengineering 'experiments'. People keep wondering why the weather has become so unpredictable, why their ears are ringing, why birds, insects, and wildlife are dying, and why human populations are in decline. It ain’t a mystery, folks. >>>
What struck me most in Dr. Edwin Berry’s essay is not only the argument itself, but the discipline behind it.
The index he proposes is modest in appearance, but powerful in function. It does not try to win the debate by force. It asks a prior question: are we even still treating evidence symmetrically? That shift matters. It moves the discussion away from slogans and toward structure.
What also deserves to be said — plainly — is that publishing work like this today takes real courage. Not because it is reckless, but because the ambient environment is quietly punitive. As Norman Fenton has documented elsewhere (https://youtu.be/r7EDU_IktbU), dissent no longer needs to be formally banned to be suppressed. It only needs to be made costly, reputationally or professionally.
In that context, Berry’s essay reads as more than a technical contribution. It is an example of intellectual responsibility: careful, restrained, and willing to follow an argument where it leads, even when the incentives point elsewhere.
Whether one ultimately agrees with his conclusions or not, the method matters. So does the willingness to publish under conditions where silence is often the safer option.
That, to me, is what makes this piece worth engaging seriously — and why spaces like Unbekoming still matter.
This would b much more interesting if CO2 was in any way responsible for warming the climate. This is a similar problem to the 'where did Covid come from' debate. It accepts the big lie, only questioning the detail. Just as a novel coronavirus is a fiction, and there was no pandemic. CO2 is an effect of a warming planet not its cause.
Rising CO2 is a lagging indicator of a warming planet. Primarily through outgassing of the oceans. It’s been seen in the fossil records over and over again.
Hello Dominic Lloyd. The entire CO2 "warming" discussion is intentionally off base. Atmospheric and oceanic heating are definitely eventing, but the causal factors are not simple mathematical solutions - such as presented in CO2 modeling... Technological man is producing/consuming *massive* levels of energy from a variety of energy sources. The 1st and 2nd Laws of thermodynamics are never discussed. Let's just keep fouling the planet with industrial filth until every thing is quite dead...
That's the thing isn't it? We're certainly destroying nature in myriad ways, all of which we should be doing something about. Instead, as with viruses, the 'elites' invented another invisible terror so they can pretend to care while using it's existence to pullall manner of scams.
Fraudulent Science Studios, 🎥 in “proud” partnership with Eugenics International, 🧬 and Slave Death Goals™, 💀 proudly presents…
“CLIMATE HOAX” 🌍🔥
From the visionary minds who brought you “Fake Limits to Growth”, 📉 comes the blockbuster event designed to herd humanity into a smaller, poorer, permanently apologetic population.
Starring…
Neo-Malthus the Math Magician, 🎩📊 conjuring population formulas that somehow always equal austerity for you and champagne for them.
Computer Models of Doom, 💻🌩️ where apocalyptic projections rise faster than the mutations of a fake virus… because the inputs are “creative.”
A Terrifying 0.04% of the Atmosphere comprised of CO2, 😱🌫️ the trace gas recast from plant food to planetary villain, spawning carbon taxes, carbon credits, carbon offsets, and an entire marketplace for invisible indulgences.
Leaked “Climategate” Emails, 📧🔥 sparking global academic defensiveness, and a fresh wave of “trust the science” campaigns.
A Swedish Schoolgirl with a Script, 🎤🌎 delivering “How dare you?” to suited delegates who clap politely, and then fly home private ✈️
And a Planet That’s Actually Greener, 🌱🌍 awkwardly thriving while the soundtrack screams apocalypse.
Featuring archival dialogue from a 1990 interview with Maurice Strong in West Magazine:
“What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment.
Will they do it?
The conclusion is ‘no.’ The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change.
So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
And the philosophical twist from The First Global Revolution, published by the Club of Rome:
“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.
In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together.
But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes.
All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome.
The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Cue dramatic orchestral swell, 🎻⚡ and a slow zoom over a snow-capped summit filled with delegates, spreadsheets, and sustainable canapés, 🏔️🥂
Welcome to CLIMATE HOAX, 🌍🔥 the thriller where billionaires gather in alpine resorts to save the planet by reorganizing your thermostat, your transport, your dinner plate, and your destiny.
There is no such thing as "nature"....God is in control...He created all living creatures and the atmosphere we live in....HOWEVER, there are very evil people out there tampering with our weather using sophisticated patented devices that wreak havoc whereever "they" want....all the big countries have this capability...they can create droughts, floods and earthquakes...the ultimate destabilization tool in their toolbox to take over the world
“The IPCC says human CO2 “accumulates” in the atmosphere.”
Why would not the simplest rebuttal package be:
1. “Please explain to the court (commission panel, conference attendees) how you can differentiate between human-caused CO2 molecules and natural-processes-caused CO2?”
.
2. “Please provide the details for how molecules differ between your “two different CO2 versions” that you claim exist; and how they are captured differentially in the planet’s atmosphere, and how they are identified AS different?”
.
3. “As they are the SAME molecules, please provide the basis on which you claim that human-caused and earth-caused CO2 molecules are differentially maintained or recycled IN the natural CO2 processes of the planet (“e.g., longer time spans, more damage”); how do they have differing lengths during which they remain in the atmosphere and are not ‘recycled’ the same way.”
.
.
(Note, the elision of (undifferentiated) “CO2" from human-caused into natural-caused and earth-caused CO2! IF your enemy is using ... shadow words ... to convince others of their validity; it becomes incumbent on our side to do the same! It doesn't damage or undercut the scientific method to use common terminology in non-scientific papers – or in court and conference presentations – so that people without a good grasp of ‘real’ science can hear and hold onto correctly ‘propagandized’ terms. (STOP accepting our enemies’ premises and terminology! Don't argue THEIR b.s. – state the science in terms your audience likely hasn't heard or considered!)
I call this technique “building a mental infrastructure.”
.
Example: I got a new dentist, He was massively sick and on this way to death from some cancer. Being a “Chatty Kathy” I started bubbling to ({wince} AT) him about the science and benefits of fenben and IVM, which are making such huge inroads into seemingly curing or even just modifying/slowing cancer progression. He was dubious but too polite to shut me up. It helped that his receptionist had been trying to get him to listen to this new “non-scientific” info too. I brought in my fenben “handout” – he was out sick that day, but his head nurse was there, and I stressed to her to really try to get him to read it. (She was interested in it too! Huh. Inroads?)
.
Next time I came by, his receptionist joyfully said that he has visited his back doctor a few weeks before and completely out of the blue, this doc (whom the dentist respects) had brought up fenben to him! So, the dentist finally READ my handout (the receptionist said), and ordered some fenben to try. (No I haven’t been back yet; don’t know his status.)
.
Am I an egotist to say that I truly believe the “mental infrastructure” I had ‘built’ in his mind ALLOWED him something to ‘hang’ the back-doc’s unexpected words on? (Any life preserver in a storm?!) When one hears something “obviously fake and totally stupid!” it usually leaks (or get thrown!) out of their mind. So, pick your propagandized terms by NOT using our enemies’ pejoratives, but constantly using some less militant but still entirely correct terms and phrases (“earth-caused CO2") to provide a different way for the person to hear and maybe retain. When they are again exposed to that info, their brain (metaphorically) goes: “Oh! I’ve HEARD of that before!” (TV commercials anyone? 100,000 TIMES repetition, till it sticks?!)
I think you misunderstand what IPCC means with human CO2. It is simply about human civilisations industries and machines and other sources that quantitatively add CO2 compared with how nature would be without any civilisation. One might use the expression technological CO2.
The IOCC lies it butts off, so I don't CARE what they mean by THEIR propaganda term "technological CO2" -- because our enemies spend SO MUCH TIME screaming (and misleading) about how it's HUMANS who are murdering the planet!
"Technological CO2" doesn't NOT counterbalance the hysteria and child-frightening about: "humans are destroying the planet: we're all gonna die!!" Plus, they completely ignore (or cover over!) how very very "high" CO2 levels have been in the PLANET'S history -- not just since the 1970s. We are literally starving the world's plants, upon which ALL LIFE depends, by trying to remove ever-more CO2, which they breath!
(You DO know, don't you, that greenhouses pump in CO2 (at a guess: "technological CO2"?) to HELP the greenhouse plants grown bigger, better, faster, and more nutritious for the mammals that depend upon them?!)
So then, the major underlying question comes back up: HOW can our lying enemies possibly identify "Technological CO2" MOLECULES from natural CO2 molecules? Oh, right -- THEY CAN'T! Yet somehow they know (or is that, they FEEEEEL?) that the 'natural' CO2 is handled nicely BY natural processes -- but (ooooh!) human-caused CO2 is hanging around for YEARS and, no questioning: "We're ALL GONNA DIE!!!"?
Peter, your answer is a very serious scientific-sounding one. I'm guessing then that you've "drunk their koolaid"? Do y'all know that allusion; you've 'bought' what they're selling"? You partake of their belief system? If anything. we should be ENCOURAGING (non-pollution-based) CO2. Old-timey wisdom: if you're trying to solve a problem, FIRST make sure you have CORRECTLY identified the problem!
I would be delighted if 'the powers that be' started REALLY SERIOUSLY working on reducing pollution -- without calling a VITAL molecule necessary to keep ANY life alive on this planet a pollutant and then making billion-bucks on "cures" for a "problem" that's been intentionally misidentified!
(And p.s., human-caused -- hell allegedly-HUMAN-LINKED! -- "global warming" is b.s. from top to bottom AND side to side!!)
I realise that you are pissed off by officialdome. But I dont belong to any authority and it was I who used the term technological CO2 to underline that most of the CO2 the civilisation causes comes from various artifacts burning fuels. Both you and Berry were annoyed by the expression human CO2. And since his argument is wrong I dont blame you for not trusting the official version about climate science. But it is correct: our civilisation produces surplus CO2 compared with an undisturbed nature where no fossil fuels are used. There is no reason to scare children but we are many people and in many nations they want to increase the standard of living. That will most likely cause more CO2 the more the population increases and prospers. So eventually climate will heat. One prediction in a document from IPCC in 2018 predicted that in the year 2300 the temperature would have increased by at least +2.5C and at most +12C. The median was +8C. So that gives you an estimate. What will +8C mean for you on a warm summerday is something you may consider.
Thanks for clearing that up should be required reading for all grade school students. All I have to say is that it really sucks that the government we have especially our military are out to get us. What kind of lunatics run our education government offices, and are dangerous military ? It has just proved again today by joining the worlds, worst hoodlum sociopathic genocidal monsters to get busy with some killing. It’s time to put your heel in the sand. Tell everybody how you feel.
It needs to be said...The Weather is a random evolving series of circumstances...totally devoid of influence by any lifeforms...Basic chemistry and physics, with some minor biology...
Climate change may be a con (well, human caused anyway) but so is Trump, don't you think? Makes you wonder why he's saying what he says. Playing the game, I suppose. All may lead to a lack of trust in democracy and it's replacement with individuals and 'communities' on-line with the global controllers behind the curtain.
One thing I did not understand about Trump is how he uses the court system to expose hoaxes or frauds. His bull in the China shop technique like appointing RFK, Jr as HHS Secretary doesn't always work. It worked in the HHS case because people reached the precipice with their health and were ready for change. In the climate hoax, people aren't as far along in their 'unlearning' of the climate hoax, so they must be shown. One big difference between before and now is that censorship is much less. A few years ago, an article like this could not be published. Now it can and it is easier to get information out.
Trump knows his picks and if the pick is not in line with his agenda, he picks them to expose them and their fraud in the expectation that some organization will sue. The DoJ will go through the process of Discovery, someone like Judicial Watch will sue for FOIA documents and the get published for people to see. Until the public awakens to the hoax, he does not have the public on his side. He must break through the brainwashing and choosing a deep stater is one of the fastest way to expose the hoax
He 'lost' the tariff case that went to the Supreme Court to expose certain factions in the Republican Party as being globalists. IMO, he wanted this outcome because it advanced his goal of exposing organizations like the US Chamber of Commerce or The Club of Rome.
Also the Epstein files has already affected the WEF and I have reason to believe that the pre-Davos WEF is quite a bit different from the post-Davos WEF. I am waiting and watching to see how many people the Epstein dump takes down.
Also, he is taking down the insurance cartel with his TrumpRX. Alternative health providers want an equal playing field. However, the insurance cartel is the reason the playing field is not equal. So using big pharma to take down the insurance cartel will level the playing field. So with regard to the climate hoax, the exposure of the hoax must happen before he can put in a disruptor like Secretary Kennedy.
My point is that not everything you see with Trump can be taken as literal. The one thing I assume with Trump and so far my instincts have been correct is that he is aware of what's going on and that his picks are not made in ignorance.
The homeopathic indications for potentized CO2 are an interesting sidebar in this discussion. In folks who are mentally susceptible to this gas, it creates a state of profound selfishness and self absorption. Also, an attraction and deep appreciation for trees and other greenery. One could imagine the latter indication for this element as a remedy. The extreme self- centeredness doesn’t bode well for humanity, keeping in mind that CO2 is a natural aspect of our environment while what human consciousness does with its awareness of CO2 is another story.
SO brilliant! (So far, haven't finished it yet... however:)
NOT this: "CEP proof that Assumption (1) is false will prevail in court." The underlying assumptions in that are:
.
1. Courts/judges are honorable, WILLING to understand the evidence, and INTENDING to find the truth.
1a. Judges are NOT paid or otherwise rewarded for finding the truth; they are rewarded AND paid for DOING AS THEY ARE DIRECTED!
.
2. Courts/judges have a greater than a five-year-old-child's grasp of science and the scientific method and the barest bit of comprehension of chemistry, atmospheric and geologic science, and planetary history and prehistory.
2a. Judges are NOT paid or otherwise rewarded for intentionally -- or ignorantly -- refusing to LEARN or accept any actual science, chemistry, and 'historical timing' from e.g., ice cores and/or plant and 'ground' proxies. If they TRY, they are punished.
.
3. Courts/judges take social and emotional refuge and pleasure in their self-perceived "image" as a savior of the planet. Plus cocktail parties in wonderful tourist places around the planet.
3a. Well, "saviors" except for the bankrupted humans and suffocating plants and culled or tortured (fart bags on cows: REALLY?!?) animals being destroyed or killed by "climate control idiocies" that they cannot or will not recognize as both murderous AND idiocies!
3b. Courts/judges are more afraid of negative repercussions -- protests, riots, loss of cocktail parties and 'respect' from their equally horrible "peers."
.
I won't go on. Anyone who READ this wonderful essay is no doubt already of clear-headed consideration.... But spread it around: MAYBE we can reach a few of the misled and unknowing humans. (The cows won't care. Skip them.)
Unbekoming- just thought i should mention - i really like the colors and textures you are using in a lot of your more recent paintings. thanks for your amazing work on so many crucial subjects. i also upvoted you recently on both counts and would like to support you financially as well, but no longer am willing to use the SS auto-renew credit card mode. so if you are open to it, i could send you a check.
Yes, we the people reading this here today are not the cause of changing the climate ,but I assure you with ZERO doubt that the military arms of the major countries around the globe are. There has been no natural weather /climate cycles for many decades now and all one has to do is look the F*ck up in the sky on any day and observe with there own eyes how it is being done. Not to take anything away from this presentation but Mother Nature is in total collapse mode and it is observable from the astonishing rate of trees dying here in New England to the noticeable lack of insects in the spring and rare blue skies above. Here is an attempt to wake up pathetic "lawmakers " by Dane Wigington of Geoengineering .org on this crucial matter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlXIga6IC_A
I get so frustrated about how folks do no seem to look up....the jizz is daily here in northern NY...how can they not see it? A few folks , though, do....the skies here are effing sprayed up like crazy. I do have to say, a friend did point it out to me waaaaay back in 1994 or so, and I did not believe it then. It was 2019 before I really started seeing it, back in Portland, OR. Lots of firs dying here as well (ny). I have read it's the National Guards that are doing some of the spraying, which means those local guys are willing to drop poison on their own kids.....sick. I hope we can stop this, but damn...how....
Good for you for trusting your eyes. The schmucks doing this are the same ones playing god with the human genome trying hard to hook us all up to the cloud so we can all be obedient slaves. They hate this world and want to, and are, making it antithetic to what God/Mother Nature created. They are the same Psychopaths involved with Epstein who was working on cloning humans under his Zorro ranch facility. Nothing now is normal or real. I have very little faith anything will get resolved even though my wife and I are part of a Bioethics group here in R.I trying to get legislation passed by numbskull grifting idiots . The fact that Hillary Clinton is able to, to this day along with her P.O.S husband The Bonnie and Clyde of American politics , walk as free people knowing what heinous crimes they have committed and then lie laughingly in front of a feckless bunch of CON gresssmen tells me it is all business as usual. Sad to say.
Yes. Dane Wigington has been pointing out the obvious for over 15 years. This latest video (thank you) condenses the issue to *known* contaminates. The "legislators" depicted in the video have repeatedly signed Department of Defense funding for geoengineering 'experiments'. People keep wondering why the weather has become so unpredictable, why their ears are ringing, why birds, insects, and wildlife are dying, and why human populations are in decline. It ain’t a mystery, folks. >>>
H.R. 5371 Includes Funding for Military Research, NATO, Federal Agencies >>> November 25, 2025 >>> https://zerogeoengineering.com/2025/h-r-5371-includes-funding-for-military-research-nato-federal-agencies/
Thanks Ron.C
What struck me most in Dr. Edwin Berry’s essay is not only the argument itself, but the discipline behind it.
The index he proposes is modest in appearance, but powerful in function. It does not try to win the debate by force. It asks a prior question: are we even still treating evidence symmetrically? That shift matters. It moves the discussion away from slogans and toward structure.
What also deserves to be said — plainly — is that publishing work like this today takes real courage. Not because it is reckless, but because the ambient environment is quietly punitive. As Norman Fenton has documented elsewhere (https://youtu.be/r7EDU_IktbU), dissent no longer needs to be formally banned to be suppressed. It only needs to be made costly, reputationally or professionally.
In that context, Berry’s essay reads as more than a technical contribution. It is an example of intellectual responsibility: careful, restrained, and willing to follow an argument where it leads, even when the incentives point elsewhere.
Whether one ultimately agrees with his conclusions or not, the method matters. So does the willingness to publish under conditions where silence is often the safer option.
That, to me, is what makes this piece worth engaging seriously — and why spaces like Unbekoming still matter.
This would b much more interesting if CO2 was in any way responsible for warming the climate. This is a similar problem to the 'where did Covid come from' debate. It accepts the big lie, only questioning the detail. Just as a novel coronavirus is a fiction, and there was no pandemic. CO2 is an effect of a warming planet not its cause.
💯
Rising CO2 is a lagging indicator of a warming planet. Primarily through outgassing of the oceans. It’s been seen in the fossil records over and over again.
Hello Dominic Lloyd. The entire CO2 "warming" discussion is intentionally off base. Atmospheric and oceanic heating are definitely eventing, but the causal factors are not simple mathematical solutions - such as presented in CO2 modeling... Technological man is producing/consuming *massive* levels of energy from a variety of energy sources. The 1st and 2nd Laws of thermodynamics are never discussed. Let's just keep fouling the planet with industrial filth until every thing is quite dead...
That's the thing isn't it? We're certainly destroying nature in myriad ways, all of which we should be doing something about. Instead, as with viruses, the 'elites' invented another invisible terror so they can pretend to care while using it's existence to pullall manner of scams.
Fraudulent Science Studios, 🎥 in “proud” partnership with Eugenics International, 🧬 and Slave Death Goals™, 💀 proudly presents…
“CLIMATE HOAX” 🌍🔥
From the visionary minds who brought you “Fake Limits to Growth”, 📉 comes the blockbuster event designed to herd humanity into a smaller, poorer, permanently apologetic population.
Starring…
Neo-Malthus the Math Magician, 🎩📊 conjuring population formulas that somehow always equal austerity for you and champagne for them.
Computer Models of Doom, 💻🌩️ where apocalyptic projections rise faster than the mutations of a fake virus… because the inputs are “creative.”
A Terrifying 0.04% of the Atmosphere comprised of CO2, 😱🌫️ the trace gas recast from plant food to planetary villain, spawning carbon taxes, carbon credits, carbon offsets, and an entire marketplace for invisible indulgences.
Leaked “Climategate” Emails, 📧🔥 sparking global academic defensiveness, and a fresh wave of “trust the science” campaigns.
A Swedish Schoolgirl with a Script, 🎤🌎 delivering “How dare you?” to suited delegates who clap politely, and then fly home private ✈️
And a Planet That’s Actually Greener, 🌱🌍 awkwardly thriving while the soundtrack screams apocalypse.
Featuring archival dialogue from a 1990 interview with Maurice Strong in West Magazine:
“What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment.
Will they do it?
The conclusion is ‘no.’ The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change.
So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
And the philosophical twist from The First Global Revolution, published by the Club of Rome:
“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.
In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together.
But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes.
All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome.
The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Cue dramatic orchestral swell, 🎻⚡ and a slow zoom over a snow-capped summit filled with delegates, spreadsheets, and sustainable canapés, 🏔️🥂
Welcome to CLIMATE HOAX, 🌍🔥 the thriller where billionaires gather in alpine resorts to save the planet by reorganizing your thermostat, your transport, your dinner plate, and your destiny.
Coming soon to SCREEMs near you! 🌍🎬🔥
Very Good!
HUGE THANKS 👍👍
There is no such thing as "nature"....God is in control...He created all living creatures and the atmosphere we live in....HOWEVER, there are very evil people out there tampering with our weather using sophisticated patented devices that wreak havoc whereever "they" want....all the big countries have this capability...they can create droughts, floods and earthquakes...the ultimate destabilization tool in their toolbox to take over the world
Climate change is just another freemasonic Rockefeller psyop.
As always--$$ & control.
Total C02 is O,O36% of air More co2 more plants, animals
“The IPCC says human CO2 “accumulates” in the atmosphere.”
Why would not the simplest rebuttal package be:
1. “Please explain to the court (commission panel, conference attendees) how you can differentiate between human-caused CO2 molecules and natural-processes-caused CO2?”
.
2. “Please provide the details for how molecules differ between your “two different CO2 versions” that you claim exist; and how they are captured differentially in the planet’s atmosphere, and how they are identified AS different?”
.
3. “As they are the SAME molecules, please provide the basis on which you claim that human-caused and earth-caused CO2 molecules are differentially maintained or recycled IN the natural CO2 processes of the planet (“e.g., longer time spans, more damage”); how do they have differing lengths during which they remain in the atmosphere and are not ‘recycled’ the same way.”
.
.
(Note, the elision of (undifferentiated) “CO2" from human-caused into natural-caused and earth-caused CO2! IF your enemy is using ... shadow words ... to convince others of their validity; it becomes incumbent on our side to do the same! It doesn't damage or undercut the scientific method to use common terminology in non-scientific papers – or in court and conference presentations – so that people without a good grasp of ‘real’ science can hear and hold onto correctly ‘propagandized’ terms. (STOP accepting our enemies’ premises and terminology! Don't argue THEIR b.s. – state the science in terms your audience likely hasn't heard or considered!)
I call this technique “building a mental infrastructure.”
.
Example: I got a new dentist, He was massively sick and on this way to death from some cancer. Being a “Chatty Kathy” I started bubbling to ({wince} AT) him about the science and benefits of fenben and IVM, which are making such huge inroads into seemingly curing or even just modifying/slowing cancer progression. He was dubious but too polite to shut me up. It helped that his receptionist had been trying to get him to listen to this new “non-scientific” info too. I brought in my fenben “handout” – he was out sick that day, but his head nurse was there, and I stressed to her to really try to get him to read it. (She was interested in it too! Huh. Inroads?)
.
Next time I came by, his receptionist joyfully said that he has visited his back doctor a few weeks before and completely out of the blue, this doc (whom the dentist respects) had brought up fenben to him! So, the dentist finally READ my handout (the receptionist said), and ordered some fenben to try. (No I haven’t been back yet; don’t know his status.)
.
Am I an egotist to say that I truly believe the “mental infrastructure” I had ‘built’ in his mind ALLOWED him something to ‘hang’ the back-doc’s unexpected words on? (Any life preserver in a storm?!) When one hears something “obviously fake and totally stupid!” it usually leaks (or get thrown!) out of their mind. So, pick your propagandized terms by NOT using our enemies’ pejoratives, but constantly using some less militant but still entirely correct terms and phrases (“earth-caused CO2") to provide a different way for the person to hear and maybe retain. When they are again exposed to that info, their brain (metaphorically) goes: “Oh! I’ve HEARD of that before!” (TV commercials anyone? 100,000 TIMES repetition, till it sticks?!)
AMAZED is what I am.
I think you misunderstand what IPCC means with human CO2. It is simply about human civilisations industries and machines and other sources that quantitatively add CO2 compared with how nature would be without any civilisation. One might use the expression technological CO2.
The IOCC lies it butts off, so I don't CARE what they mean by THEIR propaganda term "technological CO2" -- because our enemies spend SO MUCH TIME screaming (and misleading) about how it's HUMANS who are murdering the planet!
"Technological CO2" doesn't NOT counterbalance the hysteria and child-frightening about: "humans are destroying the planet: we're all gonna die!!" Plus, they completely ignore (or cover over!) how very very "high" CO2 levels have been in the PLANET'S history -- not just since the 1970s. We are literally starving the world's plants, upon which ALL LIFE depends, by trying to remove ever-more CO2, which they breath!
(You DO know, don't you, that greenhouses pump in CO2 (at a guess: "technological CO2"?) to HELP the greenhouse plants grown bigger, better, faster, and more nutritious for the mammals that depend upon them?!)
So then, the major underlying question comes back up: HOW can our lying enemies possibly identify "Technological CO2" MOLECULES from natural CO2 molecules? Oh, right -- THEY CAN'T! Yet somehow they know (or is that, they FEEEEEL?) that the 'natural' CO2 is handled nicely BY natural processes -- but (ooooh!) human-caused CO2 is hanging around for YEARS and, no questioning: "We're ALL GONNA DIE!!!"?
Peter, your answer is a very serious scientific-sounding one. I'm guessing then that you've "drunk their koolaid"? Do y'all know that allusion; you've 'bought' what they're selling"? You partake of their belief system? If anything. we should be ENCOURAGING (non-pollution-based) CO2. Old-timey wisdom: if you're trying to solve a problem, FIRST make sure you have CORRECTLY identified the problem!
I would be delighted if 'the powers that be' started REALLY SERIOUSLY working on reducing pollution -- without calling a VITAL molecule necessary to keep ANY life alive on this planet a pollutant and then making billion-bucks on "cures" for a "problem" that's been intentionally misidentified!
(And p.s., human-caused -- hell allegedly-HUMAN-LINKED! -- "global warming" is b.s. from top to bottom AND side to side!!)
I realise that you are pissed off by officialdome. But I dont belong to any authority and it was I who used the term technological CO2 to underline that most of the CO2 the civilisation causes comes from various artifacts burning fuels. Both you and Berry were annoyed by the expression human CO2. And since his argument is wrong I dont blame you for not trusting the official version about climate science. But it is correct: our civilisation produces surplus CO2 compared with an undisturbed nature where no fossil fuels are used. There is no reason to scare children but we are many people and in many nations they want to increase the standard of living. That will most likely cause more CO2 the more the population increases and prospers. So eventually climate will heat. One prediction in a document from IPCC in 2018 predicted that in the year 2300 the temperature would have increased by at least +2.5C and at most +12C. The median was +8C. So that gives you an estimate. What will +8C mean for you on a warm summerday is something you may consider.
Thanks for clearing that up should be required reading for all grade school students. All I have to say is that it really sucks that the government we have especially our military are out to get us. What kind of lunatics run our education government offices, and are dangerous military ? It has just proved again today by joining the worlds, worst hoodlum sociopathic genocidal monsters to get busy with some killing. It’s time to put your heel in the sand. Tell everybody how you feel.
It needs to be said...The Weather is a random evolving series of circumstances...totally devoid of influence by any lifeforms...Basic chemistry and physics, with some minor biology...
Climate change may be a con (well, human caused anyway) but so is Trump, don't you think? Makes you wonder why he's saying what he says. Playing the game, I suppose. All may lead to a lack of trust in democracy and it's replacement with individuals and 'communities' on-line with the global controllers behind the curtain.
One thing I did not understand about Trump is how he uses the court system to expose hoaxes or frauds. His bull in the China shop technique like appointing RFK, Jr as HHS Secretary doesn't always work. It worked in the HHS case because people reached the precipice with their health and were ready for change. In the climate hoax, people aren't as far along in their 'unlearning' of the climate hoax, so they must be shown. One big difference between before and now is that censorship is much less. A few years ago, an article like this could not be published. Now it can and it is easier to get information out.
Trump knows his picks and if the pick is not in line with his agenda, he picks them to expose them and their fraud in the expectation that some organization will sue. The DoJ will go through the process of Discovery, someone like Judicial Watch will sue for FOIA documents and the get published for people to see. Until the public awakens to the hoax, he does not have the public on his side. He must break through the brainwashing and choosing a deep stater is one of the fastest way to expose the hoax
He 'lost' the tariff case that went to the Supreme Court to expose certain factions in the Republican Party as being globalists. IMO, he wanted this outcome because it advanced his goal of exposing organizations like the US Chamber of Commerce or The Club of Rome.
Also the Epstein files has already affected the WEF and I have reason to believe that the pre-Davos WEF is quite a bit different from the post-Davos WEF. I am waiting and watching to see how many people the Epstein dump takes down.
Also, he is taking down the insurance cartel with his TrumpRX. Alternative health providers want an equal playing field. However, the insurance cartel is the reason the playing field is not equal. So using big pharma to take down the insurance cartel will level the playing field. So with regard to the climate hoax, the exposure of the hoax must happen before he can put in a disruptor like Secretary Kennedy.
My point is that not everything you see with Trump can be taken as literal. The one thing I assume with Trump and so far my instincts have been correct is that he is aware of what's going on and that his picks are not made in ignorance.
Smart cookie!
The homeopathic indications for potentized CO2 are an interesting sidebar in this discussion. In folks who are mentally susceptible to this gas, it creates a state of profound selfishness and self absorption. Also, an attraction and deep appreciation for trees and other greenery. One could imagine the latter indication for this element as a remedy. The extreme self- centeredness doesn’t bode well for humanity, keeping in mind that CO2 is a natural aspect of our environment while what human consciousness does with its awareness of CO2 is another story.
https://lawyerlisa.substack.com/p/new-world-order-animals-bird-flu
In 2020 scientists put the SRY gene which encodes maleness onto the X gene.
They published the study right before the pandemic.
Do you understand what the consequences are an why you would need to have a bird flu to collect all non new world order animals?
Subscribed. Thank You.
SO brilliant! (So far, haven't finished it yet... however:)
NOT this: "CEP proof that Assumption (1) is false will prevail in court." The underlying assumptions in that are:
.
1. Courts/judges are honorable, WILLING to understand the evidence, and INTENDING to find the truth.
1a. Judges are NOT paid or otherwise rewarded for finding the truth; they are rewarded AND paid for DOING AS THEY ARE DIRECTED!
.
2. Courts/judges have a greater than a five-year-old-child's grasp of science and the scientific method and the barest bit of comprehension of chemistry, atmospheric and geologic science, and planetary history and prehistory.
2a. Judges are NOT paid or otherwise rewarded for intentionally -- or ignorantly -- refusing to LEARN or accept any actual science, chemistry, and 'historical timing' from e.g., ice cores and/or plant and 'ground' proxies. If they TRY, they are punished.
.
3. Courts/judges take social and emotional refuge and pleasure in their self-perceived "image" as a savior of the planet. Plus cocktail parties in wonderful tourist places around the planet.
3a. Well, "saviors" except for the bankrupted humans and suffocating plants and culled or tortured (fart bags on cows: REALLY?!?) animals being destroyed or killed by "climate control idiocies" that they cannot or will not recognize as both murderous AND idiocies!
3b. Courts/judges are more afraid of negative repercussions -- protests, riots, loss of cocktail parties and 'respect' from their equally horrible "peers."
.
I won't go on. Anyone who READ this wonderful essay is no doubt already of clear-headed consideration.... But spread it around: MAYBE we can reach a few of the misled and unknowing humans. (The cows won't care. Skip them.)
Unbekoming- just thought i should mention - i really like the colors and textures you are using in a lot of your more recent paintings. thanks for your amazing work on so many crucial subjects. i also upvoted you recently on both counts and would like to support you financially as well, but no longer am willing to use the SS auto-renew credit card mode. so if you are open to it, i could send you a check.