Barefoot is better: Negative Shoe Efficacy.
Barefoot is better: Negative Shoe Efficacy.
And the destruction of our natural immunity.
(Updated 24 Jan 2022)
There’s a lot of talk recently about Negative Vaccine Efficacy.
I’ve got a real problem with this term. I know it’s not designed to confuse (or is it?) but its end result is a confusion, or certainly a blurring of what is really going on. It’s also oxymoronic.
Vaccine Efficacy is something positive, so it’s a Negative Positive??
Words matter, so let’s call it what it really is, damaged immunity.
The genetic intervention damaging our body’s natural ability to deal with a virus. Our natural immunity is injured, disabled, broken…pick your word, any one of these words describes the situation more accurately that Negative Vaccine Efficacy.
Imagine a pair of shoes that had Negative Shoe Efficacy, what that would mean is that those shoes made walking harder, more painful, worse. So, people would be far better walking barefoot because putting those Neg SE shoes on actually handicapped and disabled you.
Imagine airbags that had Negative Airbag Efficacy. That would mean that more people were injured or died BECAUSE of the airbags than without them at all. It would mean they made things WORSE, that you would be better off WITHOUT them.
That’s what Negative Vaccine Efficacy means. The “vaccine” is making things WORSE, you would be better off WITHOUT it.
The reason you would be better off without it, is because it’s damaging your natural immune system. Remember those Negative Shoe Efficacy shoes? They were actually damaging your feet, those natural god given tools that assist you with walking. These “dangerous” shoes are actually injuring your feet. I’m not sure how, they might have spikes inside the shoe (pardon the pun).
There’s any number of countries that we could look at, but let’s look at one of the pioneers, Israel.
Please just stare at this chart for a while, what do you see? Pay attention.
The first thing we see is three “humps” in Oct 20, Jan 21 and Sept 21.
What do you notice about these three “hills”. They go up at a particular gradient, about the same rate for all three, they seem to bump into an invisible “ceiling”, plateau and then turn and fall away. The general shape and maths of these “hills” has a name, it’s call a Gompertz Curve (thank you Ivor Cummins).
Ask yourself, why do they turn, why don’t they just keep rising into the heavens? What is it that they are “bumping” into that causes them to fall back down to earth. The answer is Natural Immunity. The societal immunity “grid”, it’s like a glass ceiling, you cannot see it but it’s there and very real.
Now look at the last straight line up into the heavens. What’s different about it? Well, it rises at a much sharper rate, and it does not seem to be bumping into anything anymore, it has passed all previous “high water marks”. What happened to the glass ceiling? The answer is, we broke it. We damaged the immunity grid, it’s not working properly anymore. The grid is a sum of all its parts, and those parts are the natural immunities of each and every citizen. We damaged people’s immune system. I don’t know if the damage is permanent, I hope not.
If you are wondering if this is unique to Israel, how about…
France
Spain
Germany
Denmark
Anyway, you get the picture, I hope.
Let’s have a look at some of the data coming out of different health services to see if we can find evidence of this “injury”.
Paul Alexander wrote today about the numbers coming out of Scotland.
I’ve put the data into an easier to understand table.
Here is the recent 4 week period, looking at cases (per 100,000 people) based on how many doses they’d had.
In every single case, the dosed population faired worse than the unjabbed.
Why is that? Why would EVERYBODY that got the jab be MORE susceptible to getting and “breeding” the virus than those walking around without that “juice” in their body? The reason, as we discussed already is the “juice” has damaged their natural immunity.
I averaged out the numbers in the last row, so we can say for ease of explanation that after one and three doses, people are about 50% more likely to test positive and after two doses they are about 1.5 times more likely to test positive. The jab has made things worse. You are LESS healthy and MORE likely to test positive with that stuff in you.
To add insult to injury, we know that these jabs can reduce symptoms a bit for a short time, so not only are you more likely to test positive, but you are more likely to NOT KNOW that you have the virus (because your natural symptom response has been dulled and is not working properly) so you will walk around thinking you are perfectly fine, when in fact you are spreading the virus. While those that have not been jabbed, get the virus, get symptoms, and stay at home and sleep it off.
Yes, it’s a pandemic of the vaccinated. The jabs have turned people into super spreaders.
Here is a excellent video visually outlining the week by week UK data and how you are MORE likely to become a Covid case if jabbed rather than unjabbed.
What have they done to our Immune Systems ? - Frightening UK Data
Your last objection might be: OK, maybe more people are testing positive because of the jabs, but surely less are dying, are they not?
Let’s look at the Scottish data again.
The average deaths per 100,000 for the unjabbed over that 4 weeks was 4.3.
As you can see, one dose increased your risk of death by 29% and two doses by 64%.
It looks like the third dose is finally making a difference, but I wouldn’t put too much stock into that. Let’s see what the boosted data looks like in a few months, I don’t think it looks like this. We know that to the extent there is any benefit to the genetic technology, it’s very transient, hence why they keep shortening the dose windows.
I think there is also the likelihood that there is some “dry tinder effect” as people survive more and more doses. Remember you are not only surviving the virus, but you are also surviving the jab, so those that have survived three doses are clearly a stronger group than the average population. If they are less likely to die of Covid after three doses, is that because of the doses or because they are just a tougher group of people?
Anyway, I don’t think the three dose numbers will hold for long and I think we will be back to the standard Negative Vaccine Efficacy experience soon enough. It’s the same liquid after all, there is no new magical ingredient in the third doses, it’s the same toxin.
But let’s assume the three dose data is accurate for a moment. It suggests that the three dose group is dying at an 81% lower rate than the unjabbed group (0.8 vs 4.3). Sounds impressive.
But this is in a world where early treatment protocols have been banned. What we know and have known since around May/June 2020 is that early treatment protocols that include Ivermectin, Zinc, Vit D3, Vit C etc are 85% effective at reducing hospitalisation and death.
Here is Dr. Peter McCullough on Rogan:
I testified in the US Senate, November 19, 2020. I told Americans, under oath, that 50% of the lives at that time could have been saved. We were at about 250,000 deaths, based on what I knew. I then testified on March 10, 2021 in the Texas Senate, sworn testimony, I upped that to 85% of the deaths could have been avoided.
We know that because we carried out studies. We did one with Proctor here in Dallas Fort Worth, where we demonstrated that even the early primordial protocols before the monoclonal antibodies, when we use drugs in combination, we’re associated with 85% reductions in hospitalizations and deaths compared to fair compared to groups. For death, we use the TriCounty area and DFW averages age adjusted and for hospitalization, we use the Cleveland Clinic Calculator, which is a very precise estimate of the risk of hospitalization. Then simultaneously, Durham and Zelenko showed that from our own New York data and then did a real showed it from Marseille, France.
So, before you go arguing that infinite jabs is the right policy, just understand that a few cheap pills given to people early (in the first few days of symptoms) would have been as good, if not a much better result than this evil clown show that we are living.
Here is Steve Kirsch also discussing the injury to your immune system.
In short, we’ve been lied to about the vaccine. It is protecting you less and less over time. While you may get a benefit for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In short, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, but at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else.
Remember the wonderful “tests” that showed 95% efficacy after two doses. Today we know those tests were sophisticated and very well designed lies (but that’s a discussion for some other time), what I want to ask is where are the “tests” for three doses and then four doses and then a fifth?
Where is the phase three trial for a group of people that have had five doses vs a population that has had none? It doesn’t exist.
I want to end with El Gato Malo, this was the first cat to really show me the Neg VE issue in the Danish data.
It’s pretty clear here too isn’t it. Being unjabbed is healthier than being jabbed. I cannot put it any simpler than that.
And then finally there’s this wonderful chart.
Zero doses is the normal “healthy” state. Everything else is injury.
A very clear and easy to read explanation of the horror show that's going on. I'm hoping your blunt and less sciencey speak will get through to people🤞👏👏👏
Look, I'm a big fan of yours and you give insights that are often uniquely illuminating.
But you're wrong here.
The boosters are just fine, all that needs to be done is to hook them up to a 24 hour a day portable iv unit and they will once again offer protection from covid.*
*So long as the vaxxed wear respirators, never leave their homes, and pray to their little gnome god "saint anthony" for forgiveness for their sins.