44 French Rats

Did they kill Remy's wife?

I’ve been thinking about French rats recently.

What triggered the thought was the recent UK NIH reversal on their “advice” to pregnant women.

BREAKING NEWS: UK Government website says vaccine not safe for pregnant or breastfeeding women (normanfenton.com)

It went from “strongly recommended” to “sufficient assurance of safe use …cannot be provided”.

This after telling pregnant women of the world to not worry and take it, as it was safe, while at the same time threatening financial violence if they didn’t.

As I’ve said from the start, this is a product defect story, but unlike other product defects, you cannot recall the spike protein.

But governments, AMAs and doctors everywhere said it was safe, so it’s reasonable to ask what was the basis of that safety claim. This is where the rats come into the story.

Thankfully Naomi Wolf and her team of 1,000s of organised volunteers have been studying the forcefully released Pfizer documents that were the basis of the original “approval” that was not an approval but an EUA (emergency use authorisation) that permitted the mass global injection event.

Here is Wolf in late May 2021:

Dear Friends, Sorry to Announce a Genocide

The WarRoom/DailyClout volunteers have confirmed that lipid nanoparticles, the tiny hard fatty casings that contain the MRNA, traverse the amniotic membrane. That means that they enter the fetal environment, of course. (They also traverse the blood-brain barrier, which may help explain the post-MRNA vaccination strokes and cognitive issues we are seeing). The Volunteers have drilled deep into the Pfizer documents’ reports about pregnancy and found that the assurance that the vaccine is “safe and effective” for pregnant women, was based on a study of 44 French rats, followed for 42 days (the scientists who ran the study are shareholders or employees of BioNTech).

The Volunteers found that while pregnant women were excluded from the internal studies, and thus from the EUA on which basis all pregnant women were assured the vaccine was “safe and effective”, nonetheless about 270 women got pregnant during the study. More than 230 of them were lost somehow to history. But of the 36 pregnant women whose outcomes were followed - 28 lost their babies.

The Volunteers found that a baby died after nursing from a vaccinated lactating mother, and was found to have had an inflamed liver. Many babies nursing from vaccinated mothers showed agitation, gastrointestinal distress, and failure to thrive (to grow), and were inconsolable.

The article links to this, so let’s go a bit deeper:

COVID-19 Vaccines & Pregnancy: Risky Business - DailyClout

So we see that their confidence in the safety of the Pfizer vaccine is based solely on animal studies. Given the extreme importance of studying the effects of a new vaccine technology on pregnant women and their offspring; one would expect this study to be conducted by independent researchers using a robust design that answers fundamental questions. Questions like were there any congenital abnormalities or developmental issues in the offspring and were there any long-term effects on fertility? 

After a review of this study, it is astounding to discover that it was performed on a mere 44 rats and for a length of only 42 days!

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163337/

To their credit it turns out that rats are the perfect mammal to do pregnancy studies on because they only need 21 days from conception to delivery. Half of the rodent pregnancies were terminated at day 21 via cesarean section and the fetuses were removed from the mother. All were euthanized and then anatomically studied. The other half were allowed to deliver naturally and then were monitored until they were weened at 21 days of age when the rest were euthanized. This is long before any developmental issues could have been observed in the offspring and precludes any long-term safety or fertility studies of the mothers or their offspring. The effects on fertility in this study were determined by dissection and examination of the ovaries of the mother rats who were fully mature at the time of vaccination.

After this 42-day study on 44 pregnant rats they concluded that there were “no effects on female fertility and prenatal and postnatal offspring development in rats with BNT162b2, mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine.” Thus, supposedly, the prerequisite for a DART study was complete.

Notice the following line in the new NIH announcement:

Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.

Why?

Pretty simple really, the whole body goes into overdrive to produce spike protein, and that gets into the breast milk and into the child.

Spike protein is cytotoxic, that’s fancy talk for “bad”.

This also from the Wolf article (please read the whole thing):

But — four of the lactating vaccinated women in the Pfizer documents reported “blue-green” breast milk. I am not making this up. And the nursing baby who died, with an inflamed liver — the case has been buried; has not made headlines.

So, in order to keep the women of the world safe, we recruited 44 French female rats and studied them for 42 days and determined:

After this 42-day study on 44 pregnant rats they concluded that there were “no effects on female fertility and prenatal and postnatal offspring development.

The issue of risks to women and female reproduction were known from the very early days.

Here from my letter to my kids in June 2021

A letter to my two adult kids: Vaccines and the free Spike Protein

Biodistribution data shows massive accumulation in ovaries of the LNP (Lipid Nano Particle) (which instructs cells in ovaries to sprout toxic spike protein). Whoops. That was never supposed to be leaked out. We obtained it via FOIA request. The CDC never told you about that one, did they? Of course not!

--

Biodistribution of lipid nanoparticles which carry the mRNA show that the ovaries get the highest concentration. This turns the ovaries into a very large manufacturing plant to turn out toxic spike protein. Accumulation in the bone marrow is likely not good either. What are the long term implications of that?

--

Here’s what this means. This vaccine seeks out your daughter’s ovaries and instructs the cells in the ovaries to turn out a very toxic spike protein. It also goes to your child’s brain, heart, and other critical organs. This can cause deafness, blindness, inability to speak, myocarditis, pericarditis, and more at unacceptable rates. It may permanently damage your child’s reproductive system. We just don’t know. Would you like to volunteer your child for a clinical trial so we can find out? Well, if so, and if your child concurs, then get vaccinated and be part of the largest experiment ever done on the human reproductive system.

This was all known in June 2021, long before Pfizer were forced to hand over their documents.

Here is Malone on Rogan talking at length about the impact on ovaries around 1:27:33 for about 5 minutes:

So here’s the thing about this, Joe. That kind of ties this together. I’m in the business. It’s basically the part of what I do is like a detective, figuring out because I’m trained in pathology. Why is this happening? What are the things that connect these things? Okay, so what is it that drives menstruation? The answer is the ovary. The ovary is the controller through hormones and ovulation.

What did we learn early on from the Pfizer data package, which, by the way, when that was disclosed by Byram Bridle from Japan and sent to me, was the first thing that really lit me up and let me know that something here was rotten. And when I got that I picked out as Byram had done, I was given the task of independently evaluating it. And then I took that package, and I gave it to a more senior regulatory professional that I respect. And I said, These are the things I see. This looks really bad. He looked at it and he said, oh, you miss this thing. That the other thing. Okay. These missing things include reproductive toxicology, evaluations of teratogenicity (birth defects), standard stuff that’s always done. Genotoxicity, not done.

What was done was a cobbled together group of data that didn’t even evolve the vaccine and used other mRNAs in non-GLP. That’s fancy talk for not done with rigor studies, not done according to the rules. All cobbled together and sent into the regulatory agencies of the world to justify going ahead and giving jabs to everybody under emergency use authorization. That’s the truth of it. That’s the short version that’s using common language.

One of the studies they did do was administer these lipid RNA complexes to rodents and showed the distribution of the synthetic lipid component. That’s the fats that package the RNA that let it slip into your cells. It’s a synthetic chemical, positively charged molecule. It’s a fat with a charge on the end. It goes to the ovary at a very high rate. It’s like 11% of the lipids. Now, this wasn’t supposed to happen. It was supposed to stay in the arm where it got jabbed, but it doesn’t. It goes all over the body, and it goes to two places that are really kind of anomalous bone marrow and ovaries.

Now the ovarian signal is really clear because it doesn’t happen in testes. So now you got a molecule synthetic molecule going to an organ, the ovary, that controls menstruation in a nonclinical model, rodent. And subsequently, it’s deployed widely in humans. And you have this phenomena of alteration in menstrual cycle.

Now, one of the things that was fascinating. I was asked to testify to the Hasidic Jew Rabbinical Court in New York. A lot of interesting things happen with that. It’s like sitting around with 15 different Gandolphs. It’s one of those bucket list things, I guess, talking to them. It turns out that the rabbis in the Hasidic Jew community carefully monitor. We don’t need to go into how the menstrual cycle of the fertile women in their congregations closely monitor it because there is strict guidance about cleanliness and intercourse. And they had a major problem because these are all 60 plus up to 80 long beards, grey hair, that had exquisite understanding about the menstrual cycle and all the women in their congregations. And they all knew that these menstrual cycles were being disrupted all the time. And for them, this was a major crisis because it meant that if you’re in the Hasidic community, increasing the size of the population of Hasidic Jews is kind of important to you. It’s centrally important to them. And this was a major threat to reproductive health in their communities. Now they took all this testimony. They thought about it, and they came out with a clear statement that children should not be vaccinated. This has the power of law in this community should not be vaccinated in adults. It’s strongly discouraged. And part of the reason is because of these alterations in reproduction.

And again, the point, what’s the common variable is the ovary. This is why I say in my little statement that’s gone all over the world, this little four minute clip that’s kind of gone viral and triggered governments to attack me now, like Israel in Spain and Italy, in the same systematic pattern of trying to demean me and delegitimize me. But that’s why I say in that, think twice about giving these jabs to your kids, among other things. Your girls are born with all the eggs they will ever have. And these lipids are going to the ovaries, and they appear to be affecting menstruation in some way. But menstruation is just one of these adverse events. You picked out some of the other ones, the fatigue, brain fog, all kinds of things. 

The Australian Government still wants you to take it if you are pregnant or breastfeeding.

COVID-19 vaccination – Pregnancy, breastfeeding, and COVID-19 vaccines | Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care

All pregnant and breastfeeding women are recommended to have a booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

You can continue breastfeeding before and after your vaccination.

Toby Rogers wrote a great piece in June 2022 about the failure of the regulatory system to work for us and to protect us:

The end of Covid-19 vaccine safety science in America

The reality is that FDA/VRBPAC and CDC/ACIP with their reckless votes across 8 meetings during the month of June, guaranteed the collapse in our lifetime of these regulatory agencies, allopathic medicine, and the vaccine program.

Think about it: going forward, only about 25% of the population — the hypochondriacs — are going to want these dangerous shots with no clinical safety data. It’s an unnatural experiment. The people who receive the most shots will develop Covid-19 at higher rates and experience side effects including heart attacks, strokes, infertility, and death at higher rates than the population that is not vaccinated. There will also be a dose-response relationship — the more shots, the worse the health outcomes (thereby confirming one of the Bradford Hill criteria). This is already happening, and lots of people are starting to notice.

Well said Toby. Yes, we are witnessing, in not very slow motion “the collapse in our lifetime of these regulatory agencies, allopathic medicine, and the vaccine program.”

In conclusion

So, I’m now talking to you, the pregnant woman that took these shots.

Is your or your baby’s life worth more than a French rats? (You don’t need to answer that, it’s rhetorical).

Would you prefer human trials of the thing you get injected with, or are you happy to go from French rats straight to your and your baby’s bodies?

Do you think that safety testing is important or are you happy to be experimented on?

Would you like something to be tested for more than 42 days before it goes into your baby who will be around, God willing, for 80+ years?

What do you think of the doctors that told you to take it, that it was safe?

Do they get off the hook because “they didn’t know”?

Are they forgiven because “they were doing the best they could”?

Are you angry, or are you scared or are you ambivalent?

Would you be prepared to ask your GP, Obstetrician or Paediatrician about the French rats?

And lastly who is responsible for your babies safety, the government, the doctor or you?

Next time I watch Ratatouille I’m always going to be thinking whether one of those 44 French rats was Remy’s wife.

44 Rats, 42 Days