Playback speed
Share post
Share post at current time


But not really. Rancouey™.

My life was destroyed by my government and they expect me to forget.... I will never forgive them and I will never forget what they did. I will forever be cautious of and be discriminatory towards the ignorant for the rest of my life. There is nothing they can say to change how disgusted I am at everyone who participated in the charade. – C D – YouTube comment


I’m going through a Jimmy Dore phase.

I’ve never really paid attention to him, and only recently discovered his covid comedy, and I like what he is doing. Especially because he openly says, “I was wrong”.

The video above is recent, but referring to Ioannidis’s work, and Senger’s article from Oct 2022.

Dr. Ioannidis has been studying Covid’s IFR since early 2020, when he published his prescient article in Stat News titled “A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data.”

Ioannidis previously led the publication of a peer-reviewed WHO bulletin in late 2020 estimating Covid’s overall IFR to be about 0.23% globally, and another peer-reviewed study soon after in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation revising that estimate downward to an IFR of about 0.15% globally.

For most of you, there is nothing new here.

In Oct 2022 Ioannidis ran the numbers again and came up with 0.1%.

Honestly, whether it’s 0.23% or 0.15% or 0.1%.

Do any of these numbers warrant doing what they did?

How many different ways can you say “scam”?

But by now, in my mind, the much more important question to ask: Is there a number at which point it would have been justified?

Think before you answer…

If you say yes, at so and so number, it was justified, then you are an authoritarian at heart, it’s just a matter of when you’ll come out of the dark.

Listen to Bill Maher at 1.07 saying “I can see draconian measures for a short period of time”. Fool.

If you, like me, believe that there is NO number at which point the State can steamroll you, even for “only 14 days”, then you are not an authoritarian…so, good for you, and for all of us, as there is one less Good [insert country name] in the world. We don’t need to pick on the German’s anymore, as there are plenty of Good Australians etc. to go around…

Listen to Bill [Gates], talk about…

“we didn’t really understand the fatality rate”

Lie. Diamond Princess.

What’s interesting here isn’t that he is lying, it’s that he can lie with such impunity and people will believe him. I can just hear people all around the world, especially the bouigecrats, nodding while thinking “fair enough, he has a point”.

“a fairly low fatality rate”

Why is his left hand high up in the air while he tells us about the “fairly low” fatality rate?

What’s behind the words is interesting. He is basically saying that at a high enough number, obviously everything we did was warranted and justified, but considering the number was “fairly low” then we went a bit to hard this time…we, the anointed, are not perfect after all.

“that it’s a disease mainly of the elderly”

Why the hell is he making that point. He is basically acknowledging Focused Protection.

“kinda like the flu, although a bit different”

If you accept the Rancourt thesis, that there was no virus, certainly not the way they sold it to us, let alone a deadly one, then even as Bill is retreating, he is retreating into another lie, one that would maintain the need for pandemic preparedness.

But if I just take Bill at face value, he is basically saying “oops”, we shut down your business, killed your grandma, damaged your son’s heart, lost you your job and marriage for this thing that is “kinda like the flu”.

How many ways can you say “scam”?

But I want to focus on a different number from the Ioannidis paper:

“At a global level, pre-vaccination IFR may have been as low as 0.03% and 0.07% for 0-59 and 0-69 year old people, respectively.”

0.07% for under 70.

Let’s dwell on this for a moment.

What John is saying here is that if, in 2020(!!), we had found 10,000 random sub-70 year olds from around the world, and infected them all with the “virus”, 7 would have died from Covid, while 9,993 would have survived.

But…there is still something quite wrong with this picture.

Even before we mention co-morbidities (which frankly is an annoying way of saying very, very sick and unwell), we have to contend with:

If you factor all of these different “doctor deaths”, how are we to think about the 7 deaths above from John’s paper?

I’m going to contend, that once you factor all of that in that there were NO Covid deaths in that group of 10,000.

And if that is true, then there was no “virus” the way they said there was.

I’m a supporter of Couey’s work and continue to think that he is likely right about the infectious clone theory which to my mind ties in with Rancourt’s theory.

My working model of what happened is a Rancouey Model™.

Lies are Unbekoming is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Thanks for being here.

Please consider a small paid subscription (donation). The money goes to help covid vaccine injured Australians.

I am always looking for good, personal GMC, covid and childhood vaccination stories. You can write to me privately:

If you are Covid vaccine injured, consider the FLCCC Post-Vaccine Treatment

If you want to understand and “see” what baseline human health looks like, watch (and share) this 21 minutes

If you want to help someone, give them a book. Official Stories by Liam Scheff. Point them to a safe chapter (here and here), and they will find their way to vaccination.

Here are three eBooks I have produced so far:

FREE eBook: A letter to my two adult kids - Vaccines and the free spike protein

FREE eBook: The Climate™

FREE eBook: What is a woman? - “We don’t know yet.”

Lies are Unbekoming
Lies are Unbekoming